👑🏆👑BITZ.io Cryptocasino| 5 BTC Daily withdrawal | $1.5kk lvl up reward 👑🏆👑

[Zanab247]

Please let's talk about Bitz.io, if not only, at least mainly about Bitz.io in Bitz.io's announcement thread. Discussing about other casinos here is possible but if we don't stop it, the discussion will be derailed too much to freebitco.in and it will turn to very off-topic.

Everyone is conscious that we are in Bitz.io thread, so if there's any case about Bitz we will discuss it. To the best of my knowledge, Bitz is doing absolutely well.

Also the discussion was not about freebitco. If you have followed the conversation you will understand that it was about casino reputation and how fast they can lose it. Freebitco was mentioned just like BC.game was also mentioned as instances of casinos that are/were reputable and at some times started losing credibility. So, the discussion wasn't about freebitco. Cheers!

I agree with you that Bitz.io team is doing well in the aspect of releasing players that won rewards, because there is no case against them, they don't find solution to it. They believe in evidence before they can take action to investigate how it happened and what make it happen for the players not to get his rewards, which are some of the things players use to confirm reliable teams behind any casino.

I know how some players feel when there is injustice in their matter, because they have spent time and money to some of the games they played to win but anything that makes you break the rules of the games you will surely going to face some delay in receiving your reward.

[God Of Thunder]

Hey guys,

Feel free to join 🎯 Bitz.io - Guess The Goal - 💰 $50 Prize Pool

✦ How does it work?

- You will have to predict the minute of the first goal of the selected match.
- The total number of goals will be used for the tiebreaker.
- You must have had at least $10 deposit in the last 30 days.
- Place a $5 bet on any games over 1.5x odds and submit your prediction.
- You cannot edit your entry.
- In case of a draw, the prize will be shared.
- The reward will be credited to your Bitz.io account.

Selected match of the week

 ✦ Prize Pool

- Two closest predictions will win $25 each, for a total of $50. The prize has 1x wagering requirements.

[SuperBitMan]

Please let's talk about Bitz.io, if not only, at least mainly about Bitz.io in Bitz.io's announcement thread. Discussing about other casinos here is possible but if we don't stop it, the discussion will be derailed too much to freebitco.in and it will turn to very off-topic.

Everyone is conscious that we are in Bitz.io thread, so if there's any case about Bitz we will discuss it. To the best of my knowledge, Bitz is doing absolutely well.

Also the discussion was not about freebitco. If you have followed the conversation you will understand that it was about casino reputation and how fast they can lose it. Freebitco was mentioned just like BC.game was also mentioned as instances of casinos that are/were reputable and at some times started losing credibility. So, the discussion wasn't about freebitco. Cheers!

People should understand that here is a discussion ground and were people are discussing a lot of things will be talked about and so discussion about Freebitco is something that came out because of the discussion people were having here and when we don’t limit our discussion here it will bring in more engagement in this thread but when we limit discussion, engagement will also be limited, I don’t see anything bad if discussion about Freebitco comes out here as long as people are still talking about BITZ then it’s fine.
Zoomic You did well with your explanation to him.
BITZ Are still doing very well and they should continue and not get themselves involved in scam activity.

[Itz-prisigold]

Please let's talk about Bitz.io, if not only, at least mainly about Bitz.io in Bitz.io's announcement thread. Discussing about other casinos here is possible but if we don't stop it, the discussion will be derailed too much to freebitco.in and it will turn to very off-topic.

That is a very good point you actually made. When people start to compare experiences, it is very common that conversations always shift to other platforms. And for the fact that this is Bitz.io announcement thread, it will make more sense if the discussion here focus only on Bitz.io, so that the readers that actually come here just for updates and feedback can get the information they want.

Yeah sure, comparing casinos can sometimes provide more context, but if the discussion moves too far from our main topic which is Bitz.io, it cause some kind of confusion and make it difficult to follow and in most cases it can also be off topic. So I think keeping our discussion centered around Bitz.io, it will be very easier for the community and the team to respond to questions, feedback, and concerns relevant to the platform.

[Bitz_Casino]

🔥 Friends, for your convenience we have created a Rewards Center that includes all the widgets of our website:

https://bitz.io/rewards

 A big request: if you experience any problems using the rewards center or notice any lags — please describe the issue to any of our support agents in the BitzTalk (https://t.me/BitzTalkEn) chat or in Discord (http://discord.gg/bitzio).

  Thank you!

[Mrbluntzy]

A big request: if you experience any problems using the rewards center or notice any lags — please describe the issue to any of our support agents in the BitzTalk (https://t.me/BitzTalkEn) chat or in Discord (http://discord.gg/bitzio).

It is very impressive to see how you and your team have arranged this reward centre to contain all the necessary elements of your casino, I took a look and I was impressed because this reward centre will further enhance customers experience since it is providing various specific functions in one place. It's good to see that your casino is always attentive, listening and implementing what customers want most and you make sure they are satisfied, that's what a good company does. If I experience any problem, I will always contact any of the support agent, than you.

✦ How does it work?

- You will have to predict the minute of the first goal of the selected match.
- The total number of goals will be used for the tiebreaker.
- You must have had at least $10 deposit in the last 30 days.
- Place a $5 bet on any games over 1.5x odds and submit your prediction.
- You cannot edit your entry.
- In case of a draw, the prize will be shared.
- The reward will be credited to your Bitz.io account.

Selected match of the week

 ✦ Prize Pool

- Two closest predictions will win $25 each, for a total of $50. The prize has 1x wagering requirements.

I have a question about this contest, does it have a deadline? I couldn't find such information on the thread, that's why I'm asking.

[macson]

-.-
I have even seen people who say that they wanted to be blocked, got their account deleted, and then opened a new one after a while and then lost all their money again and blamed the casino for not IP banning them. This is why it's clear that we should not be considering how any of this as a good way forward and for that reason we need to be considering staying away for the time being.

I remember there was someone like that in this thread, and their case has now been closed after Bitz compensated them. It's quite amusing to see these people blaming the casino for something they did intentionally. They seem to be trying to get the casino to compensate them for their losses, but if they win, I don't think they'll bother. This just goes to show how problematic they are, and thankfully, Bitz is professional in dealing with these people.

[iv4n]

...
I have even seen people who say that they wanted to be blocked, got their account deleted, and then opened a new one after a while and then lost all their money again and blamed the casino for not IP banning them. This is why it's clear that we should not be considering how any of this as a good way forward and for that reason we need to be considering staying away for the time being.

I am sure some people are doing that with the intention to cheat... They are looking for holes in new casinos, and new crypto casinos are especially good targets for them. But since we never know the full background, it's hard to draw any conclusions when it comes to individual cases. Crypto gambling space is still the wild west, as someone said a long time ago...

Self-exclusion: Protection or a Pointless Feature? - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5569405.msg66211618#msg66211618

[khaled0111]

...

If a gambler asks to be self-excluded and then opens a new account for whatever reason (whether due to gambling addiction issues or because he is attempting to exploit a loophole), then the casino is within its rights, according to responsible gambling policies, to close the new account and confiscate any winnings.
However, I don’t think it’s appropriate to seize the user’s initial deposit. It would be better to allow the user to withdraw his original deposit then permanently block the new account and any future accounts he may create.

[whiteblue]

-.-
I have even seen people who say that they wanted to be blocked, got their account deleted, and then opened a new one after a while and then lost all their money again and blamed the casino for not IP banning them. This is why it's clear that we should not be considering how any of this as a good way forward and for that reason we need to be considering staying away for the time being.

I remember there was someone like that in this thread, and their case has now been closed after Bitz compensated them. It's quite amusing to see these people blaming the casino for something they did intentionally. They seem to be trying to get the casino to compensate them for their losses, but if they win, I don't think they'll bother. This just goes to show how problematic they are, and thankfully, Bitz is professional in dealing with these people.

Are there any cases like that here? I think it is a very silly thing to happen on the forum, and Bitz should not have to compensate people like that, it is clearly his own stupidity and behavior that does not need to be tolerated, even when he has blocked his IP maybe he can use a VPN to access the casino and it is all useless, and you are right people like this if they win they will not say anything and withdraw their winnings.
I think Bitz.io is too kind to customers.

[bhadz]

I remember there was someone like that in this thread, and their case has now been closed after Bitz compensated them. It's quite amusing to see these people blaming the casino for something they did intentionally. They seem to be trying to get the casino to compensate them for their losses, but if they win, I don't think they'll bother. This just goes to show how problematic they are, and thankfully, Bitz is professional in dealing with these people.

There are many cases from different casinos like that. It seems part of the plan they've thought of before gambling. They resort to that when they've lost their money and try to extort the casino by making accusations to ask for compensations. But to those who successfully able to get their cases answered and they're refunded, there's a basis on it. Although many of them really just want to suck as much money as they can with false and baseless accusations against the casino that they're gambling with.

[Zoomic]

Zoomic You did well with your explanation to him.
BITZ Are still doing very well and they should continue and not get themselves involved in scam activity.

Thumbs up.
Discussing the punishment of others is a reminder for the good guys to remain good.

I remember there was someone like that in this thread, and their case has now been closed after Bitz compensated them. It's quite amusing to see these people blaming the casino for something they did intentionally. They seem to be trying to get the casino to compensate them for their losses, but if they win, I don't think they'll bother. This just goes to show how problematic they are, and thankfully, Bitz is professional in dealing with these people.

There are many cases from different casinos like that. It seems part of the plan they've thought of before gambling. They resort to that when they've lost their money and try to extort the casino by making accusations to ask for compensations. But to those who successfully able to get their cases answered and they're refunded, there's a basis on it. Although many of them really just want to suck as much money as they can with false and baseless accusations against the casino that they're gambling with.

But, is there a known rule that whenever a player asked to be self excluded, the casino should ban that particular ip from registering in their platform?

I thought it ends in banning that particular account, either by username or email. If a player who is self-excluding opens a fresh account, they know what they are doing and shouldn't be compensated. Besides, they will be breaking the multi-account rule.

[khaled0111]

But, is there a known rule that whenever a player asked to be self excluded, the casino should ban that particular ip from registering in their platform?

If a user requests to be self-excluded then the casino needs to ensure that he can not create a new account. Any new accounts the casino spot should be immediately blocked. The user’s IP can be used to identify such accounts, but it́s certainly not the only method they rely on.
Whether they will block any attempt to create an account from the self-excluded user’s IP or allow it to be created and then block it after gathering enough information to link both accounts, depends on how their security system is designed.

[Oasisman]

But, is there a known rule that whenever a player asked to be self excluded, the casino should ban that particular ip from registering in their platform?

If a user requests to be self-excluded then the casino needs to ensure that he can not create a new account. Any new accounts the casino spot should be immediately blocked. The user’s IP can be used to identify such accounts, but it́s certainly not the only method they rely on.
Whether they will block any attempt to create an account from the self-excluded user’s IP or allow it to be created and then block it after gathering enough information to link both accounts, depends on how their security system is designed.

I think KYC verification is the only viable solution to block a person who opts to self-exclude himself from a casino and then opens a new account eventually.
I've heard it before that blocking an IP is an impractical solution, because a lot of things could go wrong if a casino is constantly doing it to red-flagged accounts or to people who self-exclude themselves. It could unintentionally block other people from using the casino just because a certain individual's IP address was blocked. Most residential internet users have dynamic IP addresses that change periodically, or if that person was using a public WiFi from a certain establishment, and of course, the VPN.
The casino does not want to lose any potential customers/players because they have been blocking a lot of IP addresses.

[viljy]

🔥 Friends, for your convenience we have created a Rewards Center that includes all the widgets of our website:

https://bitz.io/rewards

 A big request: if you experience any problems using the rewards center or notice any lags — please describe the issue to any of our support agents in the BitzTalk (https://t.me/BitzTalkEn) chat or in Discord (http://discord.gg/bitzio).

  Thank you!

This is a useful feature! I often skip days in the Bitcoin calendar because I forget. And in the bitcoin faucet, I never reached the end of the cycle at all, also because of forgetfulness. That's what a customer-oriented service means.

[dwyane36]

🔥 Friends, for your convenience we have created a Rewards Center that includes all the widgets of our website:

It looks good, and it’s really convenient that everything is displayed on a single page.
Maybe I’m missing something, but I don’t see a link to the Rewards Center on the website in the left-hand menu. Is it only available via the direct link you provided in your post, or is it accessible somewhere else as well?

[Zoomic]

I think KYC verification is the only viable solution to block a person who opts to self-exclude himself from a casino and then opens a new account eventually.
I've heard it before that blocking an IP is an impractical solution, because a lot of things could go wrong if a casino is constantly doing it to red-flagged accounts or to people who self-exclude themselves. It could unintentionally block other people from using the casino just because a certain individual's IP address was blocked. Most residential internet users have dynamic IP addresses that change periodically, or if that person was using a public WiFi from a certain establishment, and of course, the VPN.
The casino does not want to lose any potential customers/players because they have been blocking a lot of IP addresses.

This is a great explanation and I tend to agree with this. But the setback here is that No KYC casinos cannot successfully exclude a player, because they will have little or no information to act on.
For the shared ip argument, you are very correct because some household share same ip.

🔥 Friends, for your convenience we have created a Rewards Center that includes all the widgets of our website:

It looks good, and it’s really convenient that everything is displayed on a single page.
Maybe I’m missing something, but I don’t see a link to the Rewards Center on the website in the left-hand menu. Is it only available via the direct link you provided in your post, or is it accessible somewhere else as well?

Very good UX design.
At a glance, you could be remembered of everything

[lodocus]

If you bet today that all four favorites will advance in the Champions League, you’ll get odds of @1.738.

The favorites are: PSG, Arsenal, Real Madrid, and Bodo/Glimt.




I believe all four favorites will advance to the next round and that we won’t see any surprises tonight. The odds of around 1.73 for such a bet are good, because if the probability of the bet coming through is higher than ~57%, it makes for a reasonable bet. This is one of my perspectives on a betting slip. If you think the probability of all four teams advancing tonight is over ~57%, it will be a logical bet for you as well.

[JeromeTash]

If you bet today that all four favorites will advance in the Champions League, you’ll get odds of @1.738.

The favorites are: PSG, Arsenal, Real Madrid, and Bodo/Glimt.

https://i.ibb.co/7tK6b70w/image.png
https://i.ibb.co/PzYGp8zP/image.png

I believe all four favorites will advance to the next round and that we won’t see any surprises tonight. The odds of around 1.73 for such a bet are good, because if the probability of the bet coming through is higher than ~57%, it makes for a reasonable bet. This is one of my perspectives on a betting slip. If you think the probability of all four teams advancing tonight is over ~57%, it will be a logical bet for you as well.

An interesting perspective. Let's see how it goes. Good luck to you 

The stubborn me wouldn't want to have a betting slip with so many low odds on it. I would ideally just pick up one bet with odds of 1.7 or 1.8, but I guess your approach is less risky, though I still think that the Manchester City vs Real Madrid game still has a lot of drama in it. Arsenal shouldn't get too comfortable either; Bayer Leverkusen can still shock them.

[Zoomic]

If you bet today that all four favorites will advance in the Champions League, you’ll get odds of @1.738.

The favorites are: PSG, Arsenal, Real Madrid, and Bodo/Glimt.

https://i.ibb.co/7tK6b70w/image.png
https://i.ibb.co/PzYGp8zP/image.png

I believe all four favorites will advance to the next round and that we won’t see any surprises tonight. The odds of around 1.73 for such a bet are good, because if the probability of the bet coming through is higher than ~57%, it makes for a reasonable bet. This is one of my perspectives on a betting slip. If you think the probability of all four teams advancing tonight is over ~57%, it will be a logical bet for you as well.

An interesting perspective. Let's see how it goes. Good luck to you 

The stubborn me wouldn't want to have a betting slip with so many low odds on it. I would ideally just pick up one bet with odds of 1.7 or 1.8, but I guess your approach is less risky, though I still think that the Manchester City vs Real Madrid game still has a lot of drama in it. Arsenal shouldn't get too comfortable either; Bayer Leverkusen can still shock them.

I also do no longer fancy accumulator bet. It has done more harm than good to me. Meanwhile, a single game can still give you a good odds.

Talking about the selections, Manchester city has no chance against Real Madrid. I already predicted Manchester City to win Madrid home and away when the fixtures was made, but Pep Guardiola instead gambled with his first leg and now I think it is over. There is no how he is going to come back from 3 goals down against Real Madrid. Assuming the score line was 1:0, 2:0 or 3:1, there would be a mild hope.

Don't mind as Pep is granting interview and saying it is not over. He is just playing mind games and nothing is coming out from it.
The area I have a little doubt is Bodo and sporting, the spark of Bodo might have expired unaware to them.