Craig Wright Satoshi Claim Case Update

[franky1]

Thank you for the information. It's really deceptive move though, average reader would wrongfully assume it's written by Calvin himself.

his game is distancing himself..
his next stance would be that his tweets over many years were done by his employee's and not him, whereby he allowed them access to his account and nothing ever said were his words from his human self.. he just allowed them because there was no "proof" either way
(in courts its called plausible deniability/reasonable doubt)
so he can escape any criminal acts of promotin a scammer/fraudster by making suggestions his tweets were never his and he this year completely separated from the account once courts found out his tweets about CSW were lies

[Wind_FURY]

they are again now claiming BSV is bitcoin made by satoshi so pretending the judges freeze of CSW assets is proof of satoshi

they keep forgetting that bsv came into existence in 2018 not 2009

That sort of gaslighting will not work anymore. How stupid do they actually believe the community currently is after Craig Wright was condemned by the very people who have revolted, in some way, against Bitcoin. I have come to respect Vitalik Buterin, Marc Andresen, and Roger Ver for saying that Craig is NOT Satoshi. That shows that their hearts are in the right place, although opinions, beliefs, and understanding of things in Bitcoin Land differ.

you need to learn alot more about EVERYTHING

From who? You? Hahaha! Laughable.

gavin andressen wanted to retire from bitcoin.. he said in like 2010-11 that he would only spend 5 more years invovled in bitcoin.... so knowing 2015-16 was his retirement plan he took whatever golden handshake he could find and leave.. knowing his reputation didnt matter
so he took the money to say bullcrap. thinking it would not lead to anything big, and thought the drama would die out in months. so no harm no foul
yes later when he was out of contract he come clean..

R.Ver is a business man and with the troubled of bitinstant debacle he needed to pivot. he didnt intend to create BCH, BCH was created for him via the mandated rejection of old versionbit blocks(via the core sponsores(nya) bait and switch). and so he took that opportunity. and then done a deal with CSW a year later to help break BCH to BSV and was bought into promoting CSW. again for a payday..
even calvin ayres and nguyen and others sponsoring BSV dont truly believe in CSW they are just looking for riches from promoting his schemes with empty promises of huge returns

Is that the truth, or are you gaslighting/making things up again, frankandbeans? Because by saying that through a written post, and making everyone believe that to be true, could be considered libel.

its obvious no one believed in CSW and then wised up..  but instead they were guided by payouts thinking they can get rich and then CSW drama would kill itself instantly thus not cause long term issues, thus didnt care to promote a nonsense story for a while

even your mentor is not guided by information or proof, nor care for things that actually benefit bitcoiners. he is guided by empty promises of his own possible future riches if he promotes stupid stuff like recruiting people to move to other networks.. as for your motives to ignore actual block data, actual code, actual history, actual things that can benefit bitcoin.. to instead just idolise and trust idiots because they show friendliness(or make promises to you).. well thats your own story to tell one day

Is this 4D Chess? You're making false statements against your mentors for me to defend them? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[franky1]

i have no mentors but your mindset of you needing one makes you beleive other people need one too
cult members always think the rest of the world belongs in other religions..

im independent and atheist and i laugh at the foolish games of idiots in their silly groups using beleif and trust to fool each other into scamming each other using nothing but faith and idolisations

as for research DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH
look at the data and code.. learn from actual sources
research from quotes of the people you talk about from years ago.. actually learn stuff
not your mentor

stop relying on being spoonfed then you wont need to cry like a baby when you get spoonfed
try for once to be independent

99% of your posts are not independant posts with unique thoughts of your own mind. they are simply reciting words told to you by your mentor.. you cant even think of your own insult for me, you even became so enslaved that you use your mentors insults
the reason i call you an idiot, because that is how you chose to act. by choosing to act like the shadow/echo of your mentor
try to escape acting like an idiot if you dont want to be assumed/accused of being one. learn about bitcoin and actual real facts away from the echo chamber you trapped yourself in.. your current path is not making yourself any better then the drones/zombies/idiots of BSV

i have never asked you or told you to beleive me i have always told you and others to do your own research.. so for once try it
and no research is not to ask your mentors what to think, instead try to have your own mind for once an look at the source material.. and just stop asking your mentor to spoon feed you sauces.. your mentors sauces are not sources

here is other examples:
when you learn that gavin took a payday from the NYA group via their sponsorship of BLOQ you will see all the bait and switch stuff too
you can google it and learn stuff independently away from your mentor

[Wind_FURY]

i have no mentors but your mindset of you needing one makes you beleive other people need one too
cult members always think the rest of the world belongs in other religions..

You have no mentors, but merely propagating the lies and the disinformation of people that have an Anti-Bitcoin agenda. OK.

There should be no mentors, we merely should know which group of people we should learn from. They're not always right, they're human, but I have full confidence that they're not nefarious. There are also big blockers that I respect, like Deadalnix. The direction he wants for Bitcoin's development may be different, but he isn't a liar. He's not like you.

Plus who should the newbies of BitcoinTalk learn from? You? Or the those people who gave you the red color in your trust-rating?

[Maus0728]

his game is distancing himself..
his next stance would be that his tweets over many years were done by his employee's and not him, whereby he allowed them access to his account and nothing ever said were his words from his human self.. he just allowed them because there was no "proof" either way
(in courts its called plausible deniability/reasonable doubt)
so he can escape any criminal acts of promotin a scammer/fraudster by making suggestions his tweets were never his and he this year completely separated from the account once courts found out his tweets about CSW were lies

Distancing is probably a sound advice coming from his lawyer. But the tweets aren't going to absolve him very much because there's the lies to those people that he talked to and those aren't going to be easily dismissed that his employees did it when he's the one that's been seen. The argument about the tweets are probably just some kind of hail Mary to at least try to make the sentence a bit more shorter or at the least make it more or less that he's not guilty of all that he's been accused of, such a determination from this man to be able to do this and keep on lying when he's been debunked time and time again.

[franky1]

i have no mentors but your mindset of you needing one makes you beleive other people need one too
cult members always think the rest of the world belongs in other religions..

You have no mentors, but merely propagating the lies and the disinformation of people that have an Anti-Bitcoin agenda. OK.

There should be no mentors, we merely should know which group of people we should learn from. They're not always right, they're human, but I have full confidence that they're not nefarious. There are also big blockers that I respect, like Deadalnix. The direction he wants for Bitcoin's development may be different, but he isn't a liar. He's not like you.

Plus who should the newbies of BitcoinTalk learn from? You? Or the those people who gave you the red color in your trust-rating?

you keep mentioning the trust rating.. its meaningless because your group of idiots caused it

people should learn from actual blockdata, code and understanding of bitcoin.. not some idiot group of social drama queens like your silly cult and their agenda. i dont want suck-ups either im not looking to form a fanbase of people trusting me either, people should do their own research and learn the facts..

as for the trust rating:
the debates 8+ years ago that heightened over the years into discourse, is that i kept informing people that segwit will/did/has triggered an exploit that allows JUNK DATA
and guess what.. years later ordinals proved my case

also the promises of segwit being the solution to allow more transactions on the bitcoin network were fake/broken/empty promises
because many devs even back in 2010 said that bitcoin can handle over 4000tx... and yet in 2024 we are still not going way above 4k tx average. even when blocks are 4x of the satoshi days.. meaning we should be averaging or expecting 16k but nope still at 4k average(and less)

now go do your research and realise the biggest idiot you idolise(doomad) was the biggest cry baby wanting me moderated and banned from this forum because i kept correcting him.

even your rhetoric of "big blocker" is not even a thought of your own its the implications made by doomad that you blindly recite that those calling out on CORES short comings must be some "big blocker" group. where there is an attempt of social drama to pidgeon hole anyone not religiously following core like god/idols must be some altcoin group
you shamefully do not even think that me and thousands of people are discussing bitcoin scaling. which is not the rhetoric you blindly think it is.
so go learn what real bitcoin scaling is and stop just reciting silly rhetoric from a group of idiots that have been debunked many times via data and code(real source information). bitcoin scaling is not "big blocker" exaggerations..
bitcoin scaling is not "idolise core as central government or f**k off to another network"
learn what bitcoin scaling actually is

i dare you to try and find some REAL mis information i gave and show me hard data, code that proves your case
realise something upfront though
all your belligerent posts of using insults you cant even come up with yourself but using doomads words and references, are just copies of doomads silliness and i have already debunked his mindset of how he thinks of things like consensus and segwit.. so actually do some proper research before you post because if you just want to recite doomad rhetoric, you will instantly loose

try to learn for once to not trust people blindly/unchecked.. and instead use data and code as your source of bitcoin information. trusting a mentor like you had admitted even in your post.. shows you are not ready to learn bitcoin and instead just want to play social games of trusting cult players
and just reciting silly stories that earn you the title of also being called an idiot by showing your repeated idiocy

so take some time to actually do some research away from doomads rhetoric. and please dont just reply acting like a victim refusing to learn or pretending you have learned things from idiots or crying that i call them idiots.. actually be prepared to learn or stop playing your cultish games. dont cry about it

your cultish games and social drama's are as bad as CSW's games.. stop being a copycat.. and no dont pretend your copycat tactics are actually your own independent idea's... as it really would be you doing a CSW

[Wind_FURY]

i have no mentors but your mindset of you needing one makes you beleive other people need one too
cult members always think the rest of the world belongs in other religions..

You have no mentors, but merely propagating the lies and the disinformation of people that have an Anti-Bitcoin agenda. OK.

There should be no mentors, we merely should know which group of people we should learn from. They're not always right, they're human, but I have full confidence that they're not nefarious. There are also big blockers that I respect, like Deadalnix. The direction he wants for Bitcoin's development may be different, but he isn't a liar. He's not like you.

Plus who should the newbies of BitcoinTalk learn from? You? Or the those people who gave you the red color in your trust-rating?

you keep mentioning the trust rating.. its meaningless because your group of idiots caused it

"Group of idiots" in your opinion are the Core Developers, which in my opinion are the rightful stewards of the network/the smartest people in crypto? Who would you like/suggest to be the developers of Bitcoin, frankandbeans?

---Snip---

I'm not reading all that. But I'm happy for you, or I'm sorry that happened.

[Rabbitqt]

I laughed when he was found to have used ChatGPT and altered PDFs. He has degrees in computer science but doesn't understand metadata.

[franky1]

"Group of idiots"

is yourself, oeleo blackhatcoiner, doomad and the other couple people in the echo chamber group of idiots that treat themselves like a cult club repeating the same mantra hosted by doomad as lead idiot(playing the same games as CSW)

your idiot group even keep trying to define lightning network as being the bitcoin network

you are not a core dev, nor is your mentor or his acolytes.. you lot are just a silly fanclub.. learn the difference.. you dont even understand nor want to learn code, so how can you claim that "group of idiots" refers to core devs, when its clear that when i call you a group of idiots and you know who im talking about, you pretend im talking about another group

i know you want to pretend you are in the same league as core devs because, but your not. so stop trying to associate yourself

the group of idiots is clearly you and your mentor.. yep blackhatcoiner, doomad and the other idiots are not core devs.. they are just a cultish fanbase of certain core devs(that desire a full migration of bitcoin users to move to their favoured lightning network) you lot formed a religion around this philosophy, chanting it

learn the difference
you are playing the same games as CSW. and your not even smart enough to realise it
its time you start having thoughts of your own, and stop blindly idolising and copying what some cult leader says, before you become as poisonous in social drama as CSW crowd

[Wind_FURY]

"Group of idiots"

is yourself, oeleo blackhatcoiner, doomad and the other couple people in the echo chamber group of idiots that treat themselves like a cult club repeating the same mantra hosted by doomad as lead idiot(playing the same games as CSW)

We're idiots because we listen to those two people, Gregory Maxwell and A. Chow both Bitcoin Core Developers, that have given you those two negative trust-ratings? But you're not because you listen to your mentor Roger Ver? You also try to bring Craig Wright in the conversation, but the only person that spreads lies, disinformation, and gaslights like him is you ser.

[franky1]

i mention CSW because its THIS TOPIC

also your gang of idiots form your own lies and echo chamber it and then approach moderators to then get moderators involved by telling moderators that you dont like what others say, then you use the moderators that hug you as your claim..

sucking up and ass kissing like a cult does not form fact.. the cult games are not fact creators. they are echo chambers of lies. same as CSW
creatng a narrative,recruiting idiots to repeat a narrative, popularise a narrative .. doesnot then make that narrative fact.. instead it just circle jerks stupidity and becomes confirmation bias of a lie.. digging your own hole until you cant escape your own grave

now go learn from the block data and code. not from some cult group of social drama and ass kissing idols circle jerking each other

i have no mentor, you are stuck in the cult games that you think everyone not in your cult must be in another
try a new mindset.. escape the cults and have an independent opinion without idols

i dont want ass kissers i am not an ass kisser.. there is a good reason i have said many times and even have it in my footnote
DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH

there have been people over the years that then try to copy my words, word for word without independent thought, and i have called them idiots too.. yep when i highlight flaws in core dev policy and altcoiners and other people then use that 'word for word' for their own attack. i do call them out for not even doing their own research and instead sounding like a sheep repeating something
i am not looking to form a group. i have not been or want to be part of a group.. and just because others say something i said does not mean im pigeon holed into a group

just do your own research and stop playing the cult games or you will become just as stupid as CSW with his games
and by research, i mean actual research using real code and data sources.. NOT repetition of someone you idolise that has their own agenda
... stop playing the games of trust of idols. it wont help you.. as shown by the last few years of your posts

[Wind_FURY]

i mention CSW because its THIS TOPIC

No, frankandbeans. In the context of that post of yours, you mentioned Craig Wright because you're trying to tell everyone that some users in BitcoinTalk and myself are "playing the same games as CSW". But who has the negative trust-rating given by BOTH Core Developers? Should everyone believe you or them?

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[DooMAD]

i mention CSW because its THIS TOPIC

No, frankandbeans. In the context of that post of yours, you mentioned Craig Wright because you're trying to tell everyone that some users in BitcoinTalk and myself are "playing the same games as CSW". But who has the negative trust-rating given by BOTH Core Developers? Should everyone believe you or them?

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Craig Scammer Wanker is franky1's greatest inspiration.  He's basically sucking the guy's cock.  He is #1 member of the Faketoshi cult in terms of how they both perceive Bitcoin:

The deception that has been allowed to creep into Bitcoin (or that pseudo-Bitcoin called BTC) is that non-mining nodes help in any way. They do not. The concept lowers your own personal security, and limits the usefulness of Bitcoin.

also those few people that have slow internet because they are home users actually bottleneck the propogation. and thus they are not helping the network. so just being a full node for the sake of thinking they are helping, is actually doing the opposite.

Soft forks and all of the changes make something that is not Bitcoin. You are not validating Bitcoin, you are validating the fork of the week, when you allow soft forks and the UASF model.

look at cores tactics
1. go soft, avoid node decision of consensus vote
2. go soft to give only pools the vote
3. if pools say no, UASF bomb the pools.
4. if the community say no to UASF then do a mandatory activation with a trigger for late 2018 no matter how many pools or nodes vote or veto

All of the real changes to BTC have been about subverting the key controls in Bitcoin. They have all been about making Bitcoin something that cannot scale, that cannot function.

BUT the usefulness and function of btc has stalled.

LN is not a BTC saviour. dont scream it can never die. instead scream it can comatose and then dmand th devs actually do something to prevent it stagnating.
again LN is not the saviour.. devs are already planning o letting other coins use LN while keping btc stalled in a effort that people lock up their BTC move it into LN and then not want to ever sttle back to btc due to all th things the devs have done to stall btc onchain innovation

to all those that think just screaming btc is utopia and gonna take over the world. should look back to 2011-2013 where the same was said.. and then the devs started to show their weakness by calling it a beta experiment and btc cant scale.

Looks like you two have got a great deal in common.  Like two peas in a pod bits of corn in a turd.

He says people are following my cult, but clearly no one in their right mind would be following his.    

[DaveF]

He says people are following my cult, but clearly no one in their right mind would be following his.    

Is your cult one of the fun ones with lots of orgies and free love? Or one of the boring ones that we sit around chanting for inner calm?

Looking for something to do this summer since it looks like my motorcycle is going to be in for warranty work for the foreseeable future and a free love orgy cult sounds like fun.

Anyway, I don't know all the ins and outs of the courts on the other side of the Atlantic, but here in the US there really is no way to go back and say you didn't say something in a civil trial. You said it, it's on you, and people suing you can use it against you with just about 0% possibility of you being able to dispute it.

-Dave

[franky1]

CSW is my inspiration???

sorry but my opinion exists BEFORE CSW because i have been in bitcoin and pointing out cores faults before CSW was even a name in the cryptosphere

i dont want him or anyone just echo chambering my words..
read my footnote.. its clear people should do their own research

CSW takes other peoples work and claims it as his own.. as we all know.. and no one wants him to do that, including me
i dont want nor need a cult. i am not part of a cult. and scammer CSW is not proof of me being in a cult. he is just an idiot

however windfury is a acolyte/disciple/mentee of doomad... much as ayres was a disciple fo CSW

i have called out many people that try to copy my words verbatim but then show they lack actual independent research to actually understand it

the difference is
doomad adores windfury, blackhat and oeleo copying doomads stupidity.. CSW adores ayres reciting CSW

there is the difference

if a twit thinks that someone that scrutinises or points out core issues must be in some CSW cult. then the twit that thinks that, is an idiot

people need to do research review and scrutinise core devs. doomad doesnt want people scrutinising core devs and will do anything to try to stop anyone from reviewing, scrutinising or pointing things out. including trying to pidgeon hole them into some lame group as his way to try to quieten the scrutiny
but in the end it makes doomad and his ilk look more like the scammer group of cultish games he tries to pideon hole associate people in

[Wind_FURY]

i mention CSW because its THIS TOPIC

No, frankandbeans. In the context of that post of yours, you mentioned Craig Wright because you're trying to tell everyone that some users in BitcoinTalk and myself are "playing the same games as CSW". But who has the negative trust-rating given by BOTH Core Developers? Should everyone believe you or them?

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Craig Scammer Wanker is franky1's greatest inspiration.  He's basically sucking the guy's cock.  He is #1 member of the Faketoshi cult in terms of how they both perceive Bitcoin:

I believe not. He has been playing 4D Chess with Jonald Fyookball in the forum BEFORE the existence of Craig Wright was known. The proof in his trust-rating.

He also admitted it.

CSW is my inspiration???

sorry but my opinion exists BEFORE CSW because i have been in bitcoin and pointing out cores faults before CSW was even a name in the cryptosphere

In fact, he also told me that it was Nick Szabo who introduced Craig Wright as the "real Satoshi" during one of the conferences. That was enough 4D Chess for me. Plus I'm wearning my tin-foil hat every time is see frankandbeans.

[peter0425]

I laughed when he was found to have used ChatGPT and altered PDFs. He has degrees in computer science but doesn't understand metadata.

You would not believe how many degrees this man has. He has bachelor’s degree, master’s degree and even theology’s degree. Which is crazy. But I wouldn’t be surprised if those degrees turn out to be fake lol.

But if it is indeed true then imagine studying all those years and gaining recognition just for you to mess everything in your life by pretending to be someone you’re not. To top of it all off, he did all these lies by presenting badly made evidences. As a graduate of multiple degrees in different fields, he should have known better.

[franky1]

i mention CSW because its THIS TOPIC

No, frankandbeans. In the context of that post of yours, you mentioned Craig Wright because you're trying to tell everyone that some users in BitcoinTalk and myself are "playing the same games as CSW". But who has the negative trust-rating given by BOTH Core Developers? Should everyone believe you or them?

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Craig Scammer Wanker is franky1's greatest inspiration.  He's basically sucking the guy's cock.  He is #1 member of the Faketoshi cult in terms of how they both perceive Bitcoin:

I believe not. He has been playing 4D Chess with Jonald Fyookball in the forum BEFORE the existence of Craig Wright was known. The proof in his trust-rating.

He also admitted it.

CSW is my inspiration???

sorry but my opinion exists BEFORE CSW because i have been in bitcoin and pointing out cores faults before CSW was even a name in the cryptosphere

In fact, he also told me that it was Nick Szabo who introduced Craig Wright as the "real Satoshi" during one of the conferences. That was enough 4D Chess for me. Plus I'm wearning my tin-foil hat every time is see frankandbeans.

i had my opinions on core being a central point of failure BEFORE CSW and jonald ..
thats not an admission of being part of some altnetwork group.. thats called independent research and scrutiny
when idiots like CSW and jonald then copied what i said i called them out on it.. yep they are idiots too..

im not looking to form a group. im not part of a group. i dont like nor tolerate nor want ass-kissers.. i dont want mindless zombies copying stuff without understanding it.. people should do their own research and not sound like zombie copy/paste reciting idiots
im not interested in other networks nor promote people should move to other networks(unlike the doomad/windfury group, that sound more like CSW games)

as for windfurys failing to understand logic reason, research, data, fact and history
if he did do his research he will see CSW first appearance publicly in the cryptosphere was not the signing session with gavin.. not the self doxing and running away to the UK. it was months earlier in 2015 at a conference nick szabo was at.
(CSW was skype called live-streamed in on a big screen)
most peoples interest in that conference was due to nick szabo being there, he was the lead guest of interest. CSW was an unknown entity but then treated as secondary lead guest.
the host bitcoinbabe made an article later about her regrets of hosting that conference with CSW in it.. where she says CSW had been previously introducing himself to the big players of crypto and the big names like nick szabo and trying to mingle and get associated with and recognition via trying to get close to the big names(during 2015),
which she then thought he was a big player worthy of being in the conference panel due to the association he wiggled his way into of certain others like nick szabo
if it wasnt for CSW name dropping nickszabo as a contact he would not have been on the panel with nick szabo

i call this crap out because this crap needs to be called out as a way showing history of events.. now go do your research
yep CSW was trying to mingle and wedge his way into bitcoin ecosphere/recognition before he doxxed himself and moved to the UK
CSW first bitcoin purchase was 2013 and first appearance was oct 2015 before the self doxing to media in december 2015
the public had no opinion of CSW before oct 2015
CSW had no bitcoin association, relevance, participation, recognition earlier then this

so i did not form my opinions around stuff CSW said nor had personal contact with CSW.. so windfury trying to pretend im associated with CSWthe scammer are where windfury gets its all wrong

when CSW done the signing thing and published it. i even was trying to tell people the signature was a fake, where it was pulled from publicly available blockdata and not a real newly signed thing soon after CSW published it. i was calling out CSW as fake early on

windfury just hates having his gas enlightened and hates getting burned so then wants to pretend people that burn him with enlightened facts must be part of some alternate group
windfury wants to confuse things and re arrange history purely because doomad does, and its their gameplan to be like CSW and promote some other network(LN) as bitcoin that they think people should move over to it if peoples dont like cores business plan
they are the ones that sound like CSW and emulate him

[Wind_FURY]

i mention CSW because its THIS TOPIC

No, frankandbeans. In the context of that post of yours, you mentioned Craig Wright because you're trying to tell everyone that some users in BitcoinTalk and myself are "playing the same games as CSW". But who has the negative trust-rating given by BOTH Core Developers? Should everyone believe you or them?

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Craig Scammer Wanker is franky1's greatest inspiration.  He's basically sucking the guy's cock.  He is #1 member of the Faketoshi cult in terms of how they both perceive Bitcoin:

I believe not. He has been playing 4D Chess with Jonald Fyookball in the forum BEFORE the existence of Craig Wright was known. The proof in his trust-rating.

He also admitted it.

CSW is my inspiration???

sorry but my opinion exists BEFORE CSW because i have been in bitcoin and pointing out cores faults before CSW was even a name in the cryptosphere

In fact, he also told me that it was Nick Szabo who introduced Craig Wright as the "real Satoshi" during one of the conferences. That was enough 4D Chess for me. Plus I'm wearning my tin-foil hat every time is see frankandbeans.

i had my opinions on core being a central point of failure BEFORE CSW and jonald ..
thats not an admission of being part of some altnetwork group.. thats called independent research and scrutiny
when idiots like CSW and jonald then copied what i said i called them out on it.. yep they are idiots too..

 

"Independent".

You can have your opinions, but I also have mine and in my opinion your opinions are not "independent".

as for windfurys failing to understand logic reason, research, data, fact and history
if he did do his research he will see CSW first appearance publicly in the cryptosphere was not the signing session with gavin.. not the self doxing and running away to the UK. it was months earlier in 2015 at a conference nick szabo was at.

Gaslighting again, and without addressing the fact that frankandbeans claimed that it was Nick Szabo that "introduced" Craig Wright to the public, and making it look that it was Nick Szabo's fault that this "CSW is Satoshi" nonesense started. Everyone should take screenshots of your posts frankandbeans, you change your claims.

---Snip---

Hahaha! The post continues of what was said to him about Nick Szabo and that conference.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[Kakmakr]

I laughed when he was found to have used ChatGPT and altered PDFs. He has degrees in computer science but doesn't understand metadata.

You would not believe how many degrees this man has. He has bachelor’s degree, master’s degree and even theology’s degree. Which is crazy. But I wouldn’t be surprised if those degrees turn out to be fake lol.

But if it is indeed true then imagine studying all those years and gaining recognition just for you to mess everything in your life by pretending to be someone you’re not. To top of it all off, he did all these lies by presenting badly made evidences. As a graduate of multiple degrees in different fields, he should have known better.

Highly educated people can still be emotionally unstable or they simply think they are better than other people. (They call that an inflated ego or just arrogance)

We have a few highly educated family members in my broader family and some of them do not mix with the rest of the family, because they think that they are in a different class and that their shit does not stink. A lot of their social lives are in a mess, but they keep up a fake front to protect their own inflated ego.

CW thought he was the smartest guy in Crypto currency, but he was proven wrong by people that were smarter than him. He did fool Gavin and some fanboys, but the truth and facts exposed him.