The idea seems good, but there had to be a minimum of local participation to qualify for this consulation prize.
Because there are some local tabs with many entries and others with just one or two.

Based on the success of this year's event, I guess it would be too much to ask from the organizers to handle everything. It's quite a job to organize and compile results; it's not a one-person job as we saw. So I think it's the local board's responsibility to conduct internal competitions if they want. For example, we are already organizing a small reward of $50 for our participants to choose the  Best Pakistani Pizza Participant - Appreciation Award

Congratulations to the winners!

+1
In our region (board:LE) there were only two pizza makers guys, but regardless of whether they are awarded or not, I believe that each board can organize its "award" whether in cash or just in honor, hence, I think that buying the organization rights should not be so expensive,then, you (us) just need to know how much the franchise for local events costs: Bitcoin Pizza Day on Bitcointalk

OP: rate, fee... how much...?
 

It reminds me the time when I was in uni first year and I was asked to solve some if-else conditions. I took two long days [without sleeping two nights in a row] to automate for any possible variable for the program and I still can feel the satisfaction I felt after completing it. It's been over 20 years.

Yes, it's also true. These two participants, it's not their fault that more members of their local board didn't participate.

But, then, at least there had to be two participants.

Because I wouldn't have trusted whatever answer it gave me.

Each time I've played around with ChatGPT (and other LLM-based stuff), I've been disappointed by the correctness-level of its responses compared to the confidence-level with which it speaks. So, I would've had to "check" its work anyway, effectively by repeating it independently; may as well then just do the work myself and not rely on its "assistance" in the first place. Especially with technical stuff, it falls apart quickly. I suppose, if you don't care whether the answers you get from it are actually right or not, then ChatGPT must seem like this incredible tool from the future, but to me, it's so often wrong that I've stopped wasting my time even experimenting with it.

---

I mean, you kid, but it's occurred to me more than once that it would be nice to be able to leave "latent" merit on a post. (That is, if you can't merit a post because of a lack of sMerit or because you've hit the limit for that user, then it would be nice if you could still leave what amounts to a "merit promise" that will get automatically fulfilled when possible. There'd still have to be some kind of limit, so that people don't create unrealistically deep backlogs, and I think unresolved merit transactions probably shouldn't be visible to anyone but the sender, otherwise you risk creating an incentive for people to sometimes send merit only because they're trying to "unlock" the latent merit that they've been sent. But, those two niggles aside, I think it would be a handy feature.)

that was very cringe and lame...
I have been tolerating nonsense coming from you for some time, but it's enough....so welcome to my Ignore list.
Fun fact, another stupid spammer accused me before that I am also another alt account of icopress  

Now back on topic with Bitcoin Pizza Day 2025 plans.