How high is the probability of accusations vs. casinos in BitcoinTalk are true?

[rodskee]

Rationing those what I have seen from the past towards casinos , there are at least 2/10 legit to false/accusations.

there is one thing that can prove here either the casino or accusing and that is to provide proofs , because each cases needs
to be proven with documents more than just a words against words.

While casino are not bringing  proofs directly here yet they are accepting 3rd party prominent member to hold their proofs
saying that the accusation is just crocks .


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0 we can just check this section and look at the sentiments and the
stand of each gamblers here in bitcointalk.

If you are a victim , then make sure that you can stand with it having proofs

[EarnOnVictor]

Most of the time the player turns out to be wrong and is using the forum to strong arm a casino. I still always start off taking the player's side until the book proves him guilty.

Bravo! But in the sincerity of my experience, this must be in rare cases unless you are not referring to this forum. It happens both ways as there are some casinos that will be easily sided and exonerated but there are even more complainers that win the casinos. Some cases were resolved, while others were never resolved even as most casinos were unable to prove their guiltlessness.

Owning to this, contrary to your claim, since I started reading cases between casinos and the customers, I give it 10%/90% won cases in the format of casino/complainers. Regardless, I advise everyone to start or continue their casino's journey with a casino with a good track record. This is the only way to avoid issues like this.

[Kavelj22]

Most of the time the player turns out to be wrong and is using the forum to strong arm a casino. I still always start off taking the player's side until the book proves him guilty.

Bravo! But in the sincerity of my experience, this must be in rare cases unless you are not referring to this forum. It happens both ways as there are some casinos that will be easily sided and exonerated but there are even more complainers that win the casinos. Some cases were resolved, while others were never resolved even as most casinos were unable to prove their guiltlessness.

According to my relatively long experience here on the forum, more than 90% of the accusation topics that are published, whether in the accusations section or in the gambling section or even in comment posts, the user is not right and the casino can find arguments to support its position. Of course, here I mean the accusations that target casinos known for their integrity.

And often, the accusation topics for one casino follow one another in a very short period. This often happens with casinos that operate outside the forum and do not have representation here.

This does not mean that all casinos are always honest because some of them have turned into scams over time, but in general it can be said that casino projects that have representation on the forum and have active interaction with the community here, are always careful in implementing their policies because they realize that any mistake, no matter how small, could lead to ruining their reputation. This confirms the possibility of considering the forum as a relative guarantee of the integrity of some projects that build part of their reputation using it.

[Mahanton]

Can't we say that it is malicious that some people are making accusations because they want to harm the casino? It is no less evil if someone does it because of some dissatisfaction after losing money in the casino. There are people with real issues and ones with invalid complaints, but I just wish to remind you about the third group of "paid trolls & people who can't accept when they lose".

Does it mean that every negative review or complaint ever made is malicious or evil? I do not think so, yet all of these affect the product, experience, or business negatively. The purpose of these actions is not to hurt but to share an experience, rant, validate their feelings, or - especially in the case of online gambling - to get someone to look at their issues and resolve them.

I quoted the important part, a negative review or complaint can't be malicious if it's honest, and honest reviews come from fair players. Everything else is malicious and evil, with one purpose to harm the reputation. You can create groups and subgroups if you wish to dig that deep, but I have tried to provide a simple explanation that anyone can understand.

It makes no sense to me what many forum members believe — that the vast majority of complaining new users are part of this group: trolls whose purpose is to hurt the casino. They have the resources to either buy or "grow" credible accounts and use those for accusations and complaints. Why would they go with fresh, low effort, totally uncredible accounts?

Maybe you have to spend many years here reading various complaints, or you need to grow older and understand how the world works and how people think, I guess that's experience. At first, you may believe everyone, but after a while, the words themselves don't make much sense if they aren't backed up by "something", "anything". The bottom line, many forum members have been in crypto for years/decade, experienced people who tried a lot of things (I am sure that many can write a book about all the things they experienced), and they will not trust anything without checking it, double checking it, taking a look from all possible angles. Just words don't mean much (I already said that) if they are not backed up by some proof! I believe many will agree with me about this, we don't care if account is new/fresh and why they are doing something, we try to be objective and based on our experience we will decide should we trust someone or not... and to repeat once again, many will not trust just words.

I think that a player who has been gambling for a long time can be said to intuitively understand when the claims of an offended player to a casino are really justified and make sense to find out the motives for such unlawful (from the point of view of the offended player) actions of the casino itself. 
Also, an experienced player will most likely recognize custom posts on forums or individual articles about gaming stories by some of the authors of such articles, which are clearly aimed at creating a negative or positive branding of this particular casino. 
It’s just that sometimes you read such an article and you just get struck by how stupid and naive the author of such an article is in presenting arguments that either damage or unnecessarily praise the casino. 
Probably, of course, novice players can take such custom articles and reviews seriously, but experienced players, of course, only laugh at the stupidity of the authors of such articles.  And sometimes even experienced players can admire what utter nonsense the author comes up with, and even seriously tells it to his readers.

As long it would really be that proven on which no matter how old or reputable a site is in the past, it would really be all gone or vanish in an instant on the time that things been proven out. This is why it would really be that recommended that you should really be that making yourself that updated on the time that you would really be dealing or playing on certain sites or specially into the place on where you do make yourself hanging out. We do know that reputation could really be that instantly be broken or would be totally be replaced by being shady if ever they would really be doing things on which arent supposed to be done by a legit platform.
This is why it would really be that much recommended that be make yourself that wary so that you wont really be ending up on getting victimized or your funds would really be held or locked just because you had missed out the community feedback and real time recent comments about a certain platforms. Speaking about % of success rate whether about being legit or not, there are instances that old sites becomes shit just like on what happened on Betnomi on which this one wasnt that expected. We can be able to make up some direct conclusions basing up with real time feedbacks of the community.It would really be that too impossible that you wont really be that making yourself that making up some conclusion basing up on what you have observed.

Most of the time on which accusations is really that made out by newbie accounts. Somehow we cant really be able to tell whether those newbies are really that new people into this
forum or to those people who are really that wary about this forum and just simply making new accounts and doesnt want to get involved with their main accounts and thats why they would really be that deciding on making up some new account to avoid some possible conflicts or problems on the time that accusation wasnt really that true or simply they are really just that trolling. We can really be able to read up
on what are those information been shared up and it would be that impossible that you cant be able to drawn out your decisions whether you would really be dealing with it or not.
There are really just that those people who are really that blindly dealing up sites according into their preference and liking despite of the issues.

[Wind_FURY]

Most of the time the player turns out to be wrong and is using the forum to strong arm a casino. I still always start off taking the player's side until the book proves him guilty.

Bravo! But in the sincerity of my experience, this must be in rare cases unless you are not referring to this forum. It happens both ways as there are some casinos that will be easily sided and exonerated but there are even more complainers that win the casinos. Some cases were resolved, while others were never resolved even as most casinos were unable to prove their guiltlessness.

According to my relatively long experience here on the forum, more than 90% of the accusation topics that are published, whether in the accusations section or in the gambling section or even in comment posts, the user is not right and the casino can find arguments to support its position. Of course, here I mean the accusations that target casinos known for their integrity.

And often, the accusation topics for one casino follow one another in a very short period. This often happens with casinos that operate outside the forum and do not have representation here.

I believe those scam accusations against those casinos that operate outside of the forum, and those that don't have any representation among the trusted campaign of the community, are useless accusations. It will probably be good to be included in a list of which services to avoid. But if a brand new account makes an accusation vs. an unknown casino, what good could that do for us in BitcoinTalk?

This does not mean that all casinos are always honest because some of them have turned into scams over time, but in general it can be said that casino projects that have representation on the forum and have active interaction with the community here, are always careful in implementing their policies because they realize that any mistake, no matter how small, could lead to ruining their reputation. This confirms the possibility of considering the forum as a relative guarantee of the integrity of some projects that build part of their reputation using it.

If the casino has a current signature campaign that's managed by a trustworthy manager, then there's a higher probability that that casino is not a scam. Managers usually stop representing them when they start becoming scams.

[Odusko]

Most of the time the player turns out to be wrong and is using the forum to strong arm a casino. I still always start off taking the player's side until the book proves him guilty.

Bravo! But in the sincerity of my experience, this must be in rare cases unless you are not referring to this forum. It happens both ways as there are some casinos that will be easily sided and exonerated but there are even more complainers that win the casinos. Some cases were resolved, while others were never resolved even as most casinos were unable to prove their guiltlessness.

Owning to this, contrary to your claim, since I started reading cases between casinos and the customers, I give it 10%/90% won cases in the format of casino/complainers. Regardless, I advise everyone to start or continue their casino's journey with a casino with a good track record. This is the only way to avoid issues like this.

It's simple let say a newbie created a thread accusing a casino of fraudulent service with no evidence just a wall of text, it won't work no one will support such accusations, so in such a case, you will see forum members taking the side of the casino if the ops is unable to prove anything such an accusation is termed baseless and out of point, but in a situation where the ops include every necessary evidence, that will solidify his claims and every other person here will support the accusations and warn everyone to stay away from such a casino, so the case is truly bothside and only the evidences from both the casino and the accusers will stand anything other than that will be revoked.

This is a bitcoin forum and since tracing cryptocurrency transactions without any form of evidence and details to follow, it will be impossible to point out any fact since cryptocurrency is decentralised have have no identity attached to it transactions, this is why at any point one need to raise such a point against any individual or company, they should do so with all evidences to support the claims

[EarnOnVictor]

If the casino has a current signature campaign that's managed by a trustworthy manager, then there's a higher probability that that casino is not a scam. Managers usually stop representing them when they start becoming scams.

Well, being an active casino campaigning on Bitcointalk is a very good layer of trust, nevertheless, with my sincere experience so far, it still does not save anyone entirely. Mind you, this is not a matter of those casinos being a scam, they are often running a legitimate business, but in the cause of running such a legitimate business, there could be some cheating and excesses, this is what we are talking about.

And Bitcointalk or not, there are accusations that have been resolved and there are some that have not been resolved, and will never be resolved. What should we call that? I hope casinos are fair/sincere with their customers and have valid proof if at all they restrict or sanction their customers for any reason whatsoever.

[joniboini]

And Bitcointlak or not, there are accusations that have been resolved and there are some that have not been resolved, and will never be resolved. What should we call that? I hope casinos are fair/sincere with their customers and have valid proof if at all they restrict or sanction their customers for any reason whatsoever.

I mean there's no sure way to guarantee whether a business is a scam or not, even some legit business can turn shady within a day or so. Personally, I'll keep any open accusations in my mind before I start using a new service, especially if I never used them before even if people vouch for them here and there. I'd avoid the same scenario in those accusations if possible, and if I get screwed anyway then I'll post another accusation and move to other platform quickly. At the end of the day, proofs are what people can verify so having as many proofs as possible would be great (albeit some could argue that AI can make investigation become harder). CMIIW.

[Dunamisx]

Since the subject matter on focus here is on the casinos on the bitcointalk forum, we cannot concluded by saying all the accusations are right, but this has a lot to do with who is making the accusation, why is the accusation been made and if there are genuine points and proofs over the alleged experience form using the gambling platform, a casino is here doesn't mean they are hundred percent trust, but we can rely on some that have good reputation even though not all.

[delfastTions]

~ snip ~

~ snip ~

Maybe you have to spend many years here reading various complaints, or you need to grow older and understand how the world works and how people think, I guess that's experience. At first, you may believe everyone, but after a while, the words themselves don't make much sense if they aren't backed up by "something", "anything". The bottom line, many forum members have been in crypto for years/decade, experienced people who tried a lot of things (I am sure that many can write a book about all the things they experienced), and they will not trust anything without checking it, double checking it, taking a look from all possible angles. Just words don't mean much (I already said that) if they are not backed up by some proof! I believe many will agree with me about this, we don't care if account is new/fresh and why they are doing something, we try to be objective and based on our experience we will decide should we trust someone or not... and to repeat once again, many will not trust just words.

I think that a player who has been gambling for a long time can be said to intuitively understand when the claims of an offended player to a casino are really justified and make sense to find out the motives for such unlawful (from the point of view of the offended player) actions of the casino itself. 
Also, an experienced player will most likely recognize custom posts on forums or individual articles about gaming stories by some of the authors of such articles, which are clearly aimed at creating a negative or positive branding of this particular casino. 
It’s just that sometimes you read such an article and you just get struck by how stupid and naive the author of such an article is in presenting arguments that either damage or unnecessarily praise the casino. 
Probably, of course, novice players can take such custom articles and reviews seriously, but experienced players, of course, only laugh at the stupidity of the authors of such articles.  And sometimes even experienced players can admire what utter nonsense the author comes up with, and even seriously tells it to his readers.

As long it would really be that proven on which no matter how old or reputable a site is in the past, it would really be all gone or vanish in an instant on the time that things been proven out. This is why it would really be that recommended that you should really be that making yourself that updated on the time that you would really be dealing or playing on certain sites or specially into the place on where you do make yourself hanging out. We do know that reputation could really be that instantly be broken or would be totally be replaced by being shady if ever they would really be doing things on which arent supposed to be done by a legit platform.
This is why it would really be that much recommended that be make yourself that wary so that you wont really be ending up on getting victimized or your funds would really be held or locked just because you had missed out the community feedback and real time recent comments about a certain platforms. Speaking about % of success rate whether about being legit or not, there are instances that old sites becomes shit just like on what happened on Betnomi on which this one wasnt that expected. We can be able to make up some direct conclusions basing up with real time feedbacks of the community.It would really be that too impossible that you wont really be that making yourself that making up some conclusion basing up on what you have observed.

Most of the time on which accusations is really that made out by newbie accounts. Somehow we cant really be able to tell whether those newbies are really that new people into this
forum or to those people who are really that wary about this forum and just simply making new accounts and doesnt want to get involved with their main accounts and thats why they would really be that deciding on making up some new account to avoid some possible conflicts or problems on the time that accusation wasnt really that true or simply they are really just that trolling. We can really be able to read up
on what are those information been shared up and it would be that impossible that you cant be able to drawn out your decisions whether you would really be dealing with it or not.
There are really just that those people who are really that blindly dealing up sites according into their preference and liking despite of the issues.

It is true that a reputation can be completely  lost simply because of one mistake, completely by a casino, which becomes publicly known and generally arouses in the reader sympathy for the player and at the same time indignation towards the actions of casino managers.  The example that you recalled is perhaps one of approximately such cases of loss of a good reputation, which, by the way, it took quite a long time to earn.  

As for individual topics on a specific problem, newcomers to the forum apparently simply think that their posts in specialized casino topics, especially if they contain complaints, will be removed from such topics and they will not receive the same reaction from users of the gambling section on our forum as  discussion and recommendations in a separate topic created by themselves.  That’s why sometimes separate topics for newcomers appear with a specific complaint about a specific casino.  And this really focuses the attention of the community and somehow works.

[Quidat]

Since the subject matter on focus here is on the casinos on the bitcointalk forum, we cannot concluded by saying all the accusations are right, but this has a lot to do with who is making the accusation, why is the accusation been made and if there are genuine points and proofs over the alleged experience form using the gambling platform, a casino is here doesn't mean they are hundred percent trust, but we can rely on some that have good reputation even though not all.

And that what makes that people here on this forum itself are really that liking for thing to be known so that they would really be able to make out some judgement on whatever they do saw. It is really that not that hard to make up some searches on which we know that when it comes to this aspect then it would really be that understandable that known members of this forum are really making those fair
and good judgement whether the site in talks are really that guilty or have at fault or really just that simply that those users are really that making some false claims. People who are really that aware
about on this forums existence will really be that basically be trying out to search up relevant information about the issue and find or look out whether its true or not.
It wouldn't really be so hard for you to determine on which one is true or not.

[Wind_FURY]

If the casino has a current signature campaign that's managed by a trustworthy manager, then there's a higher probability that that casino is not a scam. Managers usually stop representing them when they start becoming scams.

Well, being an active casino campaigning on Bitcointalk is a very good layer of trust, nevertheless, with my sincere experience so far, it still does not save anyone entirely. Mind you, this is not a matter of those casinos being a scam, they are often running a legitimate business, but in the cause of running such a legitimate business, there could be some cheating and excesses, this is what we are talking about.

And Bitcointlak or not, there are accusations that have been resolved and there are some that have not been resolved, and will never be resolved. What should we call that? I hope casinos are fair/sincere with their customers and have valid proof if at all they restrict or sanction their customers for any reason whatsoever.

It's not a layer of trust. It's merely an indicator that, CURRENTLY, the casino is still good with the community and that none of the scam accusations, although some of them are real issues, make the casino a "scam".

Because simply, it's very easy for an emotional loser to make a new account in BitcoinTalk and start a thread accusing a casino of scamming him/her.

[Kavelj22]

According to my relatively long experience here on the forum, more than 90% of the accusation topics that are published, whether in the accusations section or in the gambling section or even in comment posts, the user is not right and the casino can find arguments to support its position. Of course, here I mean the accusations that target casinos known for their integrity.

And often, the accusation topics for one casino follow one another in a very short period. This often happens with casinos that operate outside the forum and do not have representation here.

I believe those scam accusations against those casinos that operate outside of the forum, and those that don't have any representation among the trusted campaign of the community, are useless accusations. It will probably be good to be included in a list of which services to avoid. But if a brand new account makes an accusation vs. an unknown casino, what good could that do for us in BitcoinTalk?

Of course, this would be very good even if the casino had no activity on the forum, because this forum is public and open to view without even having to register an account. On this basis, the accusations section can be an important reference for researching and verifying any open cases against any of the companies active in the crypto space, including casinos and crypto-based gaming platforms. Being a member of the forum does not mean that I will not use any service platform outside of it, so it is good that the forum provides a full section for publishing about any of the service platforms.

This does not mean that all casinos are always honest because some of them have turned into scams over time, but in general it can be said that casino projects that have representation on the forum and have active interaction with the community here, are always careful in implementing their policies because they realize that any mistake, no matter how small, could lead to ruining their reputation. This confirms the possibility of considering the forum as a relative guarantee of the integrity of some projects that build part of their reputation using it.

If the casino has a current signature campaign that's managed by a trustworthy manager, then there's a higher probability that that casino is not a scam. Managers usually stop representing them when they start becoming scams.

The campaign doesn’t necessarily have to be ongoing to verify the project’s eligibility, but it could have successfully campaigned on the forum and not been accused of anything since its launch. Such forum activity could still be evidence of integrity since it is easily proven and available on search engines. I’m not saying that every casino that has or has had a representation here on the forum is necessarily honest, but a large part of ensuring integrity can be proven through the forum.

[Wiwo]

And Bitcointlak or not, there are accusations that have been resolved and there are some that have not been resolved, and will never be resolved. What should we call that? I hope casinos are fair/sincere with their customers and have valid proof if at all they restrict or sanction their customers for any reason whatsoever.

I mean there's no sure way to guarantee whether a business is a scam or not, even some legit business can turn shady within a day or so. Personally, I'll keep any open accusations in my mind before I start using a new service, especially if I never used them before even if people vouch for them here and there. I'd avoid the same scenario in those accusations if possible, and if I get screwed anyway then I'll post another accusation and move to other platform quickly. At the end of the day, proofs are what people can verify so having as many proofs as possible would be great (albeit some could argue that AI can make investigation become harder). CMIIW.

The ratio is around 2/2 legit casino vs scam casino, so for sure scammers always leave traces, and for you to say a legit casino can turned scam at anytime may be likely a little bit out of proportion, although there are situations we're a good company also goes bad and there are alot of things that can cause that to happen such as market incidents.

But for a scam team, they may not have any reason to scam other than just following they lay down plans of scamming they unsuspecting client's.

[EarnOnVictor]

And Bitcointlak or not, there are accusations that have been resolved and there are some that have not been resolved, and will never be resolved. What should we call that? I hope casinos are fair/sincere with their customers and have valid proof if at all they restrict or sanction their customers for any reason whatsoever.

I mean there's no sure way to guarantee whether a business is a scam or not, even some legit business can turn shady within a day or so. Personally, I'll keep any open accusations in my mind before I start using a new service, especially if I never used them before even if people vouch for them here and there. I'd avoid the same scenario in those accusations if possible, and if I get screwed anyway then I'll post another accusation and move to other platform quickly.

You are making sense and more reason why we should be neutral about any allegation and urge both parties to prove themselves fairly first. It gets worse when you see a casino that is well respected and appreciated by people still engaging in some practice that can only be termed cheating. This can never make such a casino a scam but can't also change the fact that they are still cheating some or a very few percentage of their customers and nothing will change that. Sadly, a thing like this is now common to many companies these days, you will see them targeting some customers/clients for some ugly reasons and would give the best services to others to avoid all of their customers complaining.

This ugly behaviour is no doubt to make more money by either hook or crook style and if it is meted out to all customers/clients, they will lose them. So they will now target a certain proportion of the customers, but when you detect that, your advice is the best, just move to another. Talking about companies generally, take Bybit for instance, I've stopped swapping crypto with them because I detected they were cheating with it. If my brother and I swap the same amount of a certain coin, they chart me like 3-6 times extra, my brother could not believe this until I proved it. This means that they have different servers routed to different accounts, so their service and fairness can not be the same depending on their motives on each server.

[bitterguy28]

Let those accusation come because in the end it is the truth that will prevail  , because most of those who starts the accusations ending leaving those thread when the casino answered them with valid proofs of them cheating or taking advantage of the casino(sometimes it is the generosity of casinos that being abused)

the reputation and scam accusation section is the proof that majority of those cases are just made up or twisting things to favor them trying to at least compensate from what they are planning .
but casino nowadays are mature enough and know that they need to comply and prove necessary documents to answer those wrong words against them.

[arwin100]

If the casino has a current signature campaign that's managed by a trustworthy manager, then there's a higher probability that that casino is not a scam. Managers usually stop representing them when they start becoming scams.

Well, being an active casino campaigning on Bitcointalk is a very good layer of trust, nevertheless, with my sincere experience so far, it still does not save anyone entirely. Mind you, this is not a matter of those casinos being a scam, they are often running a legitimate business, but in the cause of running such a legitimate business, there could be some cheating and excesses, this is what we are talking about.

And Bitcointlak or not, there are accusations that have been resolved and there are some that have not been resolved, and will never be resolved. What should we call that? I hope casinos are fair/sincere with their customers and have valid proof if at all they restrict or sanction their customers for any reason whatsoever.

It's not a layer of trust. It's merely an indicator that, CURRENTLY, the casino is still good with the community and that none of the scam accusations, although some of them are real issues, make the casino a "scam".

Because simply, it's very easy for an emotional loser to make a new account in BitcoinTalk and start a thread accusing a casino of scamming him/her.

That's somehow good indicator at all but it doesn't tell everything since we also encounter a supposed to be reputable casino with running a signature campaign pays good to their participant turn into a scam. That's why we should look for their current activities done to avoid getting compromised if there's sudden changes especially for the service they provide to their gamblers.

In the case of those sore losers its easy to determine if their accusation is valid since usually they don't have proof to show and what they want to spread is just pure hoax and their intention is to create trouble to the community, because they want to take revenge on he losses they get for playing in those casino. if people have tendency to do those crazy actions much better for them to stop participating on gambling activities since its like they can't handle well their losses since they can't accept the fact that they are the one who made a mistake on why they lose their money.

[NotATether]

Inevitably since casinos advertise to everyone on their website that they have a Bitcointalk thread here, and that they are also very responsible, there are more casino scam accusations from frustrated players here than any other type of service combined.

Of course, I'd be inclined to think that most of those accusers just want to get their money back and are not interested in running a smear campaign against a casino or anything.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

Inevitably since casinos advertise to everyone on their website that they have a Bitcointalk thread here, and that they are also very responsible, there are more casino scam accusations from frustrated players here than any other type of service combined.

Of course, I'd be inclined to think that most of those accusers just want to get their money back and are not interested in running a smear campaign against a casino or anything.

Well, you are right, I also have always wondered how possible It is that some persons will just decide to accuse a casino wrongly for no reason, and I've also never believed in this stuff as another rival casino playing some persons to create false scam accusation against their counter-part casino, this is unimaginable and not really possible if am asked.

But again on the other hand, it's also very possible that some gamblers create scam accusations against a casino out of anger after having lost so bad on the casino.
We all know the feeling at times after losing to a game you possibly expected to win on, you feel like you were cheated on, this is usually hard to bear for some gamblers, so they start looking for ways to retaliate back, and this is also why we sometimes see, or will see scam accusation against a casino where the accuser won't be able to provide any clear evidence to back up whatever he claim the casino did to him/her, such can always be ignored by the community.

[Odusko]

Inevitably since casinos advertise to everyone on their website that they have a Bitcointalk thread here, and that they are also very responsible, there are more casino scam accusations from frustrated players here than any other type of service combined.

Of course, I'd be inclined to think that most of those accusers just want to get their money back and are not interested in running a smear campaign against a casino or anything.

Yes majority of the accuser really want to get the refund, and that is why they employ every possible means to reach out to those platforms and services that they think can help to facilitate the recovery of the money back to them, but still yet, also we have some of the accusers who never hard any dealings with such accused casinos, and the type of accusers are mostly newbies who keep on creating fuds around the scene with endless amount of accusations, without any form of evidence to prove they point in any ways, and when they are press to provide such a evidence, the abandon the thread and suddenly become inactive.
But the ratio of legit complaints are much more higher than that of fake ones so we can say that to this extent that t all good and the forum is indeed acting and providing them the platform to air their grievance since the forum is mentioned on thos site's.