Will AI taking people jobs and make the world worse?

[fruktik]

It's no doubt that AI is going to alter industries like consulting and customer service by automating certain tasks, but it is not a job killer. Rather, in many cases, AI just complements human roles, making them more efficient. With AI handling basic inquiries at call centers, for example, humans become more important in solving complex, emotional tasks. Many jobs will evolve, and new ones will emerge, particularly in the areas of development and oversight of AI. The trick, of course, will be to manage this transition with proper reskilling so that people can actually adapt and move forward in the face of such AI-driven changes.

As far as I know, quite a large number of people have already lost their jobs. For example, some analysts. Now they can easily be replaced by AI. In addition, there are other specialties that will be left without work and will now go looking for new vacancies. Most likely, they will simply need to retrain. It would be good if the companies themselves paid for this training, but this is not always the case.

I remember a case from my life when, when getting a job, I had to pay for training from my own pocket. If I had not done this, I would not have gotten a position in the company. Yes, colleagues, this is also practiced in reality. Be vigilant about this.

[UTON Blockchain]

I can only say, you've underestimated the cost of artificial intelligence.Not to mention, they can be more "emotional" than regular workers, occasionally acting out in irrational ways.

[fruktik]

I can only say, you've underestimated the cost of artificial intelligence.Not to mention, they can be more "emotional" than regular workers, occasionally acting out in irrational ways.

So you want to say that AI has emotions or something like that? If so, then I will hasten to disappoint you. No, AI does not have such a function at the moment. Have you by any chance watched too many science fiction films where this was possible? ))

Yes, AI is developing at an incredible speed, but it is just an algorithm that has neither a soul nor emotional experience.

[ovcijisir]

I can only say, you've underestimated the cost of artificial intelligence.Not to mention, they can be more "emotional" than regular workers, occasionally acting out in irrational ways.

So you want to say that AI has emotions or something like that? If so, then I will hasten to disappoint you. No, AI does not have such a function at the moment. Have you by any chance watched too many science fiction films where this was possible? ))

Yes, AI is developing at an incredible speed, but it is just an algorithm that has neither a soul nor emotional experience.

Ai do not have emotions, but it has hallucinations. Just Google "ai hallucination" to find out more. It means sometimes it can go wild and give unexpected feedback on your prompts.

[ITExpert]

AI is widespread, and I believe that it will continue growing, and so will automation in general. However, that doesn't mean negative consequences for the workforce and the economy. The last World Economic Forum report states that automation is happening, but at a much slower pace than anticipated. The current level of automation of business-related tasks is 34%, which is significantly below the prediction of 47% automation by 2025. Also, with new technologies come new jobs and new demand, and we've seen it happen many times in the past. People just need to learn to be more adaptable and to be ready to learn new skills to get new jobs, and things will be fine.

Yes no doubt AI will be low but it is improving itself day by day if not believe you can compare it. And it also helps us in many things. See many things are said but not proved and if AI is misused in many places then it will not be called bad. For this reason what is benefiting us is not called bad but misused. Predictably, it becomes even more redundant and its employees can easily run their own home. Predictions are only for themselves and many places Google has made predictions and they too have been proven wrong. Obviously, when something new comes, this work will also be different and those who will work hard will have to take more of their share or not?

[martinex]

As far as I know, quite a large number of people have already lost their jobs. For example, some analysts. Now they can easily be replaced by AI. In addition, there are other specialties that will be left without work and will now go looking for new vacancies. Most likely, they will simply need to retrain. It would be good if the companies themselves paid for this training, but this is not always the case.

That's right sir. It's sad, on the one hand it's very helpful on the other hand a lot will be lost. Yes. In the future we will see many changes, the more sophisticated the technology used where all demand speed in completing a job will always be hampered by the capacity of workers. Yes. humans also have limitations, sometimes being healthy is okay, but if there are obstacles such as being unhealthy or being diagnosed by a doctor we have to rest for 1 month from work I think that will be an obstacle and if it is too long it will be considered a problem that can affect the company's income performance, especially if the boss is a workaholic and always gives targets.

[DrBeer]

1. Progress cannot be stopped.
2. AI in the full-fledged sense does not exist yet. What is currently being passed off as “AI” - is just a huge knowledge base wrapped in a large language model, which acts according to human instructions and algorithms written by humans. I.e. it is just a great tool, but not AI.
Yes, today's “semi-intelligent automated systems” will replace manual labor, and there are many reasons for that:
- A human can TRUST or willfully perform poorly, an automated system will run for years without stopping and without demanding pay raises, insurance, sick days, etc.
- with so-called “AI”. - The efficiency of work is higher and the costs and expenses of maintaining these systems are lower than for 1 person.

- This solves a lot of problems associated with finding labor, which can be a problem for businesses.

[DubemIfedigbo001]

As far as I know, quite a large number of people have already lost their jobs. For example, some analysts. Now they can easily be replaced by AI. In addition, there are other specialties that will be left without work and will now go looking for new vacancies. Most likely, they will simply need to retrain. It would be good if the companies themselves paid for this training, but this is not always the case.

I remember a case from my life when, when getting a job, I had to pay for training from my own pocket. If I had not done this, I would not have gotten a position in the company. Yes, colleagues, this is also practiced in reality. Be vigilant about this.

Yes of course and I'll tell you why, people who lost their jobs are average workers who lacks the zeal and will to upgrade themselves continuously in their field to be special, also some of them refused to adapt to the changing world of AI and learn how to work with them.

Those who's noticed this change and prepared themselves for it were not displaced. The people living in underdeveloped countries should start getting ready and bracing themselves because sooner or later the wave would reach almost everywhere and those who are not moving with the latest trends in their career would still be swept off by the wave of AI.

[Antotena]

I can only say, you've underestimated the cost of artificial intelligence.Not to mention, they can be more "emotional" than regular workers, occasionally acting out in irrational ways.

I want to agree on the cost of AI and their maintenance but emotional? That's a fiction bro. Forget about what you watch in the movies, 0 and 1 doesn't have emotions because they are machine. All those garbage shown in movies are promoted to make it sweet and real in eye of the viewers. More like marketing to me but in reality, the machines doesn't develop any emotion for anyone but do 0 and 1 continues as they are programmed unless abuse and reprogram to misbehave.

Anything that has an advantage has its own disadvantages. If today we say they should allow AI to take jobs, they would never be able to take all the job. Probably will do 25% accurately, the rest will still need special intervention of man and I'm sure that government wouldn't approve this AI because of how abusive people are with data. We see how Google and some companies are sued with the abuse of informations of customers and their data.

[adzino]

Yeah we all have seen those automated restuarants too, but using machines in restaurants isn't really something new. Remember vending machines and fast food joints with those self-order kiosks? Those existed for decades and the only thing new is that they are more intelligent than they were before. I am pretty much sure you have already seen those videos where AI automated machine was making hotdogs and omelets. It was a pretty mess sometimes.
To be honest, I don't think AI will take over everyone's jobs though. There are things AI just can't do, like jobs that need real human creativity and instant decision making for complex situations. There will always be people looking after and controlling those AIs. Sure  some jobs might change or disappear, but humans have always been good at adapting. People will be using those tools and AI to make their life and their job easier.

[Abiky]

Few years ago in my country there was opening of robot restaurant where special robots prepared food. Don't t know for waiters, but I believe they had human waiters.

Restaurant was opened for year or two, and now it's permanently closed.

When this restaurant opened I thought that food served there will be cheaper than competition, because they didn't hire human cooks, but when I checked price list it was the same as competing restaurants. There was simply no upsides in comparison to other restaurants. Maybe for tech enthusiasts who wanted to check new thing, but I believe they did not have regular customers and when hype around it diminished it just closed the doors.

So I believe that AI and robots will take some jobs, but only if it lowers cost of final product in comparison to competing products.

I believe it's too early for AI to take over the world. It's just not ready for prime time use. There's a lot of hype, but the tech is far from being perfect. I think the only thing that will put the "final nail in the coffin" would be the advent of Quantum Computing. Unless that becomes a reality, AI's potential will be limited.

Funny thing that you've mentioned prices at a "robotic restaurant" were the same as an ordinary one. Typical of greedy businesses. They will save money by using innovative technologies, but they will charge twice as much to get richer. The poor always get affected. I guess that's how the system works. And I'm afraid there's nothing we can do about it. Who knows how long will it take for AI to mature into a "force to reckon with"?

[Huppercase]

As far as I know, quite a large number of people have already lost their jobs. For example, some analysts. Now they can easily be replaced by AI. In addition, there are other specialties that will be left without work and will now go looking for new vacancies. Most likely, they will simply need to retrain. It would be good if the companies themselves paid for this training, but this is not always the case.

I remember a case from my life when, when getting a job, I had to pay for training from my own pocket. If I had not done this, I would not have gotten a position in the company. Yes, colleagues, this is also practiced in reality. Be vigilant about this.

So they wait for AI to be build and they sack some of their workers. There are many things that will happen later AI refused to go as we expected. A machine to minic what men can do only to take the job from them. They didn't even try to comfirm if they can work continuously with having a problem because no matter how it's design to help the human and take their chop, the AI work can't never be like human, what are they going to do about AI when the internet don't exist again.

There is one aspect of AI I hate the most, the ones that create image for customers to use for contents and must pay for the images but they forget that some of the images created by AI are combination of other things. When you search for anything, the AI doesn't have the ability to do that unless it's searches everywhere on the internet and some looks abused by many users. AI need to he regulated very faster before they have to regulate cryptocurrency.

[TastyChillySauce00]

I can only say, you've underestimated the cost of artificial intelligence.Not to mention, they can be more "emotional" than regular workers, occasionally acting out in irrational ways.

how is that? AI as far as I know is so efficient that it become the main reason large corporations are funding them by billions. You just need to rent computing power to run AI and thats it, AI could pretty much solve repetitive task in really fast manner that's why many people are afraid with the presence of AI it will replace the blue collar job, exactly the job where so many people are making a living from.

the concern about AI is valid and considering that AI is made to do tasks and to have no emotion or consciousness to complain, i'm pretty sure its less emotional too, the very reason why the manufacturing industry might be interested in it.

your word about AI occasionally acting out in irrational ways because it's still imperfected, but considering current AI growth, such thing will be solved in the future, more reason to have concern about it.

[Argoo]

I believe it's too early for AI to take over the world. It's just not ready for prime time use. There's a lot of hype, but the tech is far from being perfect. I think the only thing that will put the "final nail in the coffin" would be the advent of Quantum Computing. Unless that becomes a reality, AI's potential will be limited.

It doesn't matter much whether AI is ready to actively influence many processes in people's lives. This industry is very promising for development and it will develop regardless of whether we want it or not. AI is capable of finding the right solutions millions and billions of times faster than humans. In any case, AI will replace humans in many professions and in many workplaces. But I don't see anything bad in this. There will simply be a redistribution of labor. And there will be enough work for everyone, if there is a corresponding desire. But in general, AI will greatly help humans. In the future, when AI's capabilities grow, it will be necessary to limit its ability to harm humans, otherwise humanity will have big problems.

[uswa56]

I believe it's too early for AI to take over the world. It's just not ready for prime time use. There's a lot of hype, but the tech is far from being perfect. I think the only thing that will put the "final nail in the coffin" would be the advent of Quantum Computing. Unless that becomes a reality, AI's potential will be limited.

It doesn't matter much whether AI is ready to actively influence many processes in people's lives. This industry is very promising for development and it will develop regardless of whether we want it or not. AI is capable of finding the right solutions millions and billions of times faster than humans. In any case, AI will replace humans in many professions and in many workplaces. But I don't see anything bad in this. There will simply be a redistribution of labor. And there will be enough work for everyone, if there is a corresponding desire. But in general, AI will greatly help humans. In the future, when AI's capabilities grow, it will be necessary to limit its ability to harm humans, otherwise humanity will have big problems.

Whether we are ready to accept the technology that is developing today, of course, we must be able to accept if we want to continue to develop and it is very unlikely that we can develop without accepting all the changes that are happening now and so on, and in terms of AI will replace human work as a whole, I think something is possible, but there will still be humans who have to carry it out, because without humans, I think it is very It is impossible, but as humans, of course we must have the ability to be able to adapt to the developing technology because if we do not continue to develop ourselves, of course, it will be very easy to be eliminated from the work we do.
Yes, you are right, if the development of AI can hurt humans, of course this will have a very bad impact, of course everyone will not want such technology because it is very detrimental to the humans themselves who created it.

[Smartprofit]

In my opinion, artificial intelligence technology appeared in our world at the right time. In the 21st century, this technology is simply necessary.

What is the main event of the 21st century? This is the slowdown in the growth of the Earth's population. In the middle of the 21st century, the population growth of planet Earth will slow down, then stabilize, and then the number of earthlings will begin to decrease. And this is a very important event. The entire world economy, the entire social structure of our planet is based on the constant growth of the population. Artificial intelligence and total robotization can solve this problem.

Robots and algorithms will increase the number of earthlings and prevent the slowdown of scientific and technological progress. Perhaps we will come to a new form of ethical slavery (where robots and algorithms will be used instead of people - slaves).

[Lanatsa]

I believe it's too early for AI to take over the world. It's just not ready for prime time use. There's a lot of hype, but the tech is far from being perfect. I think the only thing that will put the "final nail in the coffin" would be the advent of Quantum Computing. Unless that becomes a reality, AI's potential will be limited.

It doesn't matter much whether AI is ready to actively influence many processes in people's lives. This industry is very promising for development and it will develop regardless of whether we want it or not. AI is capable of finding the right solutions millions and billions of times faster than humans. In any case, AI will replace humans in many professions and in many workplaces. But I don't see anything bad in this. There will simply be a redistribution of labor. And there will be enough work for everyone, if there is a corresponding desire. But in general, AI will greatly help humans. In the future, when AI's capabilities grow, it will be necessary to limit its ability to harm humans, otherwise humanity will have big problems.

Whether we are ready to accept the technology that is developing today, of course, we must be able to accept if we want to continue to develop and it is very unlikely that we can develop without accepting all the changes that are happening now and so on, and in terms of AI will replace human work as a whole, I think something is possible, but there will still be humans who have to carry it out, because without humans, I think it is very It is impossible, but as humans, of course we must have the ability to be able to adapt to the developing technology because if we do not continue to develop ourselves, of course, it will be very easy to be eliminated from the work we do.
Yes, you are right, if the development of AI can hurt humans, of course this will have a very bad impact, of course everyone will not want such technology because it is very detrimental to the humans themselves who created it.

Whether we do like it or not, change is coming and this is something inevitable. There's nothing we can do since companies would really be trying out to make use or integrate these technology on which we cant be able to deny that machine is much more better than humans when it comes to efficiency and accuracy when doing jobs. Somehow there would really be those jobs that cant really be that done by robots but
majority could really be possibly done and this is why they would really be trying to make it use specially on industries that would be needing up that fast productions. This is why we could really be able to say that one day there would really be some massive laid off for human labor and would be placed up by robots on which this is really that a negative news for those people who are working on such industries.

Somehow we do know if there's cons then there's really those pro's too on which faster production or doing jobs will really be leading up into more progressive economy on which this is something a plus.
This is why as a workers point of view then if you do see yourself being that affected with this possible lay off, then it will really be that wise that you should really be trying out to make some side income
on which that in case if these things do happen then you wont really be that worrying yourself since you do know that you could be able to sustain out or able to survive despite of such situation.
Its important that you should really be wise on taking up decisions on which you do seem that works for you.

[lepbagong]

I can only say, you've underestimated the cost of artificial intelligence.Not to mention, they can be more "emotional" than regular workers, occasionally acting out in irrational ways.

So you want to say that AI has emotions or something like that? If so, then I will hasten to disappoint you. No, AI does not have such a function at the moment. Have you by any chance watched too many science fiction films where this was possible? ))

Yes, AI is developing at an incredible speed, but it is just an algorithm that has neither a soul nor emotional experience.

Ai do not have emotions, but it has hallucinations. Just Google "ai hallucination" to find out more. It means sometimes it can go wild and give unexpected feedback on your prompts.

Maybe what you say can make sense and, however, the advantages that AI has, but certainly there is something that is still lacking when compared to humans, so that it could be.
Some may have work that can be taken, but there are parts that cannot be done by him. I thought about what between the difference at the beginning of a robot entering production and, eventually, it could be accepted and integrated with humans.

[Dr.Osh]

Well, we have to realize that the development of technology is currently happening so fast. Maybe AI will make someone's business or work easier, so they might not need some people to do their jobs anymore. That can be good and bad. However, we all have to try to continue to adapt to this development. It's the same as smartphones that make many things easier, but make some of them unnecessary, or maybe drones, which can record from the sky, that's a good thing, but make someone lose their job. However, we have to keep adapting to this. Smart people are those who take advantage of the technology that is developing today, not complain about it.

[fruktik]

That's right sir. It's sad, on the one hand it's very helpful on the other hand a lot will be lost. Yes. In the future we will see many changes, the more sophisticated the technology used where all demand speed in completing a job will always be hampered by the capacity of workers. Yes. humans also have limitations, sometimes being healthy is okay, but if there are obstacles such as being unhealthy or being diagnosed by a doctor we have to rest for 1 month from work I think that will be an obstacle and if it is too long it will be considered a problem that can affect the company's income performance, especially if the boss is a workaholic and always gives targets.

Many modern technologies of the present time will seem like outdated junk in a few years. We will only remember them with nostalgia.

Yes, AI will now become the main tool of many companies that increase revenue by replacing employees with technology. The same thing happens everywhere. We just know little about it and are practically not interested in this fact. If you want, you can always find information on this matter.

"AI Is Taking Over Jobs: 28 Shocking Statistics".