For years I've noticed that a common theme among account farmers is to use their bounty/campaign earnings to buy aged accounts.
While I personally don't red tag bought accounts, I'm not against it so long as there is ample proof the account has changed hands. Instead, this is a thread for neutral tags in cases where it seems highly likely that the current owner and original owner are different.
Why do this? Mainly because when someone uses a bought account, it gives the impression that the accomplishments of somebody else are their own. Its a misrepresentation of one's own capabilities, accomplishments, and/or standing.
How to do this? Here's my main criteria:
- Long posting gap (1 or more years)
- Noticeable change in writing style
- Quickly joins sig campaign or bounty
- Change in posting habits (places, frequency, etc.)
- No cryptographic proof owner is the original
For instance, while investigating what I believe is a firmly-entrenched alt farm, I came across this account:
cozytrade - registered Dec 15, 2013
It already has a neutral feedback from JollyGood:
| JollyGood | | 2022-12-17 | | Reference | | Serious accusations have been made of this account either being sold or changing hands. I would advise to take precautions when dealing with "cozytrade".
I will revise/modify the feedback if any compelling information is presented. |
This account actually changed hands twice; once between 2018-2022 and once between 2016-2017. The original owner is from the US, then suddenly started speaking fluent Filipino in 2017, then went to using a broken English -- when they're not translating bland sports newsbytes (or so it seems):
Dambulla Sixers vs Galle Marvels 12th match started today at Rangiri Dambulla International Stadium, Dambulla. Dambulla Sixers team came out to bat. Dambulla Sixers team scored 160 runs in 20 overs. Dambulla Sixers team batsman Chamindu Wickramasinghe scored 56 runs off 34 balls. Reeza Hendricks was dismissed for 16 off 13 balls.Kusal Perera was dismissed for 17 off 12 balls.
Then we have this account:
GigaBit - registered December 21, 2013
This is one of the more ridiculous transformations I've seen:
I mean, do I really have to say anything else here? Same thing as before: the account goes from masterful use of the English language (the new owner never changed the
original location of Ontario, Canada) to posting once again drivel in mediocre English in the Gambling board:
KYC is recommended in almost every casino. Some casino sites it is done before betting and on some sites it can be done without kyc. But I think it is better for the gambler to complete KYC to conduct smooth betting. If KYC is not a problem for a gambler who bets small amounts, KYC should be done for big gamblers who gamble a lot otherwise there may be problem. If KYC is shared in terms and conditions then it must be completed prior to gambling. Many people neglect this, but if you get a big win, there may be a problem with the money of that win. So it is better to do KYC to avoid such problems.
From now on I will write a reference in this thread when neutral tagging an account I suspect of being hacked/traded. You can feel free to use it for your own tags, so long as at least the 1st two items in the criteria list are met. I'm against issuing red trust solely based on these criteria, however.