Tim Pool Sues Kamala Harris Over Alleged Plan to Execute Trump Opponents

[TwitchySeal]

Support for abortion is consistent with ending Roe v. Wade.

Oh, so someone that thinks a woman should have the right to choose whether or not she wants to grow another person inside of her also thinks the government should be able to make it illegal for her to choose not to.  Got it, thanks for explaining. Guess tim pool isn't right wing after all.

If abortion and gay marriage were decided at the global level they would both be illegal. Is that your preference for legal systems? Are you cherry-picking nationalism on this issue?

So, done with Tim Pool then, huh?  Ok, I'll let you derail your own thread.

In my opinion, criticizing an opinion because it's not the most popular opinion is pretty dumb and not very relevant when it comes to determining whether it's a valid opinion or not.... but I'm curious what your source is for your claim about abortion and gay rights because after a few minutes of googling it appears you're wrong on both.  If you just pulled it out of your ass and admitting you were wrong is not something your comfortable with, feel free to tell me to rethink my life or tell me about how stupid polls are or something- but if not, and there's some reasonable data that backs up your claim, I'm genuinely curious if there's something I'm overlooking.  You probably would have been right about the gay marriage views 15 or 20 years ago, maybe the abortion also, but times change, peoples opinions change as humans learn more, science gradually answers more and more questions that people relied on religion for, and we all become less and less ignorant.  There's a reason they call progressives progressives, after all.

Your chart shows the iimportance of localism in public policy. Some entire countries are about 90% in favor of making abortion illegal, and somehow you feel justified in going in and forcing your reviled ways against their moral values on them at gun point?

Seems like you're cherry picking nationalism on this issue

If abortion or gay marriage were decided at the global level they would both be legal. is that your preference for legal systems?

[caroasi]

Support for abortion is consistent with ending Roe v. Wade.

Oh, so someone that thinks a woman should have the right to choose whether or not she wants to grow another person inside of her also thinks the government should be able to make it illegal for her to choose not to.  Got it, thanks for explaining. Guess tim pool isn't right wing after all.

If abortion and gay marriage were decided at the global level they would both be illegal. Is that your preference for legal systems? Are you cherry-picking nationalism on this issue?

So, done with Tim Pool then, huh?  Ok, I'll let you derail your own thread.

In my opinion, criticizing an opinion because it's not the most popular opinion is pretty dumb and not very relevant when it comes to determining whether it's a valid opinion or not.... but I'm curious what your source is for your claim about abortion and gay rights because after a few minutes of googling it appears you're wrong on both.  If you just pulled it out of your ass and admitting you were wrong is not something your comfortable with, feel free to tell me to rethink my life or tell me about how stupid polls are or something- but if not, and there's some reasonable data that backs up your claim, I'm genuinely curious if there's something I'm overlooking.  You probably would have been right about the gay marriage views 15 or 20 years ago, maybe the abortion also, but times change, peoples opinions change as humans learn more, science gradually answers more and more questions that people relied on religion for, and we all become less and less ignorant.  There's a reason they call progressives progressives, after all.

Your chart shows the iimportance of localism in public policy. Some entire countries are about 90% in favor of making abortion illegal, and somehow you feel justified in going in and forcing your reviled ways against their moral values on them at gun point?

Seems like you're cherry picking nationalism on this issue

If abortion or gay marriage were decided at the global level they would both be legal. is that your preference for legal systems?

Very good question, thanks for asking. Sovereignty can only begin at the individual level, otherwise you have unequal rights where a minority forces their morals upon a majority. This policy results in dramatically different laws in different areas because different people have different cultures, and it isn't our place to force our ways on others, an arrogant presumption that our culture of virtues and values is superior to other virtues and values.

The fact we have different rules in different places gives us many places to choose from to live according to our personal virtues and values. Finding a place that well aligns without our way of life is an important step each person in today's world should take. Forming and being part of an intentional community in today's world is of paramount importance to assert our rights while we still can, while the globalists have not yet asserted total dominance.

[suchmoon]

Your post is intellectually dishonest, and I strongly suggest you re-think your life in full on the concept of embracing truth. The worst part is clearly that you interpret a desire to have a civil dialog as "wanting to be embraced". You seem to specifically reject definitions that improve language because you want to disagree with everything I say while avoiding any points of agreement, and that is intellectually dishonest.

There is this thing called a dictionary. I don't need you to define words for me.

You seem to put anti-war commentators like Tim Pool who have strong leftist tendencies

^^^ Speaking of "intellectually dishonest" or more likely in this case - just plain old lying.

your comment he is for Putin invading Ukraine seems dishonest

It isn't because he is. He has repeatedly stated that Putin was "provoked" to invade Ukraine (the favorite excuse of putinists, Kremlin-approved).

You would have to redefine some words again to make it sound like Putin's "special operation" was not really war, but Ukraine defending itself is war, therefore putinists are against war.

Do you also falsely categorize Jimmy Dore as an authoritarian dictator Putin puppet because he is an anti-war leftist, or is your categorization reserved for people who the mainstream news has targeted?

No idea who that is, but if this Jimmy is praising Putin (with or without getting paid for it), then I would probably "categorize" him in some unflattering way.

[TwitchySeal]

Do you also falsely categorize Jimmy Dore as an authoritarian dictator Putin puppet because he is an anti-war leftist, or is your categorization reserved for people who the mainstream news has targeted?

No idea who that is, but if this Jimmy is praising Putin (with or without getting paid for it), then I would probably "categorize" him in some unflattering way.

He's exactly who you would imagine he is.  A conspiracy theorist with a youtube channel. 

James Patrick Anthony Dore is an American stand-up comedian, political commentator, conspiracy theorist, podcaster and YouTube personality.

[caroasi]

Do you also falsely categorize Jimmy Dore as an authoritarian dictator Putin puppet because he is an anti-war leftist, or is your categorization reserved for people who the mainstream news has targeted?

No idea who that is, but if this Jimmy is praising Putin (with or without getting paid for it), then I would probably "categorize" him in some unflattering way.

He's exactly who you would imagine he is.  A conspiracy theorist with a youtube channel. 

James Patrick Anthony Dore is an American stand-up comedian, political commentator, conspiracy theorist, podcaster and YouTube personality.

"Conspiracy theorist" in this context you use name-calling word salad as an ad-hominem distraction argument. Is Jimmy Dore a leftist or not? Once again your focus on people and their alleged flaws, not the strength of arguments. You (and leftists as whole) would do well for your selves to focus on facts an evidence. Centrists like Tim Pool and Jimmy Dore who are both in favor of gay marriage legality, adult trans gender transition legality, and abortion before the third trimester, CAN focus on the facts in many cases. Just admit those issues make Tim Pool a centrist while Jimmy Dore is on your team as a leftist because of his favor for heavy economic restraint on wealthy people.

You act like there is nobody who exists who believes gay marriage should be illegal when a few short years ago that was a majority opinion. Yes, the right wing still does really exist, Those are not the people Kamala Harris seems to want to get executed the most by labeling them dictators and tyrants. The one's she labels to get those people shot at are the ones causing her problems personally... she doesn't care about general philosophies she just cares about the pragmatics of calling her enemies "tyrants" or "dictators" to get them shot at.

[caroasi]

Your post is intellectually dishonest, and I strongly suggest you re-think your life in full on the concept of embracing truth. The worst part is clearly that you interpret a desire to have a civil dialog as "wanting to be embraced". You seem to specifically reject definitions that improve language because you want to disagree with everything I say while avoiding any points of agreement, and that is intellectually dishonest.

There is this thing called a dictionary. I don't need you to define words for me.

You seem to put anti-war commentators like Tim Pool who have strong leftist tendencies

^^^ Speaking of "intellectually dishonest" or more likely in this case - just plain old lying.

your comment he is for Putin invading Ukraine seems dishonest

It isn't because he is. He has repeatedly stated that Putin was "provoked" to invade Ukraine (the favorite excuse of putinists, Kremlin-approved).

You would have to redefine some words again to make it sound like Putin's "special operation" was not really war, but Ukraine defending itself is war, therefore putinists are against war.

Do you also falsely categorize Jimmy Dore as an authoritarian dictator Putin puppet because he is an anti-war leftist, or is your categorization reserved for people who the mainstream news has targeted?

No idea who that is, but if this Jimmy is praising Putin (with or without getting paid for it), then I would probably "categorize" him in some unflattering way.

True or false, someone who believes in progressive taxation brackets, gay marriage legality, trans surgery legality, and abortion, leans left? If true, then it would seem you are the liar. Only you are not, because you believe your own nonsense. I comprehend reality while you do not. if you think I don't believe my own words, you are are not a liar, but worse, a fool. You blanketly believe the cartoonish nonsense offered by your corporate tool allies at the mainstream news agaisnt Tim Pool. That is you being a fool, not me being a liar.

[suchmoon]

True or false, someone who believes in progressive taxation brackets, gay marriage legality, trans surgery legality, and abortion, leans left? If true, then it would seem you are the liar. Only you are not, because you believe your own nonsense. I comprehend reality while you do not. if you think I don't believe my own words, you are are not a liar, but worse, a fool. You blanketly believe the cartoonish nonsense offered by your corporate tool allies at the mainstream news agaisnt Tim Pool. That is you being a fool, not me being a liar.

You are lying that he's anti-war. Then you made-up this very specific criteria of how to label somewhat "leftist" so that it fits him. What's the point? He's a failed "journalist" who saw an opportunity to pander to gullible right-wing nutjobs and he's quite good at it but that doesn't make him smart or worth listening to or otherwise notable, frivolous lawsuits notwithstanding.

[BADecker]

True or false, someone who believes in progressive taxation brackets, gay marriage legality, trans surgery legality, and abortion, leans left? If true, then it would seem you are the liar. Only you are not, because you believe your own nonsense. I comprehend reality while you do not. if you think I don't believe my own words, you are are not a liar, but worse, a fool. You blanketly believe the cartoonish nonsense offered by your corporate tool allies at the mainstream news agaisnt Tim Pool. That is you being a fool, not me being a liar.

You are lying that he's anti-war. Then you made-up this very specific criteria of how to label somewhat "leftist" so that it fits him. What's the point? He's a failed "journalist" who saw an opportunity to pander to gullible right-wing nutjobs and he's quite good at it but that doesn't make him smart or worth listening to or otherwise notable, frivolous lawsuits notwithstanding.

Yes, but, he did it successfully. You are failing at it.     

[TwitchySeal]

You act like there is nobody who exists who believes gay marriage should be illegal when a few short years ago that was a majority opinion.

Of course there are people who believe gay marriage should be illegal.  

You said:

If abortion and gay marriage were decided at the global level they would both be illegal.

And then I responded:

I'm curious what your source is for your claim about abortion and gay rights because after a few minutes of googling it appears you're wrong on both.  If you just pulled it out of your ass and admitting you were wrong is not something your comfortable with, feel free to tell me to rethink my life or tell me about how stupid polls are or something- but if not, and there's some reasonable data that backs up your claim, I'm genuinely curious if there's something I'm overlooking.

I appreciate that you kind of sort of admitted you were wrong by throwing in that "a few short years ago" the majority opinion was against gay marriage.  But why try to make it look like I think there are no people against gay marriage?  It seems like you're only goal is to pwn the libs.  And you aren't doing a very good job.  You should be patient and wait for a lib to do or say something deserving of being pwnd.  When you try and force it, you risk pwning yourself.

[suchmoon]

You are lying that he's anti-war. Then you made-up this very specific criteria of how to label somewhat "leftist" so that it fits him. What's the point? He's a failed "journalist" who saw an opportunity to pander to gullible right-wing nutjobs and he's quite good at it but that doesn't make him smart or worth listening to or otherwise notable, frivolous lawsuits notwithstanding.

Yes, but, he did it successfully. You are failing at it.     

I'm not trying to pander to right-wing nutjobs so of course I'm failing at that. Unless you're saying that I'm failing at what I am trying to do, i.e. ridiculing said nutjobs, in which case I apologize, I'll try harder next time to make you feel more ridiculed.

[BADecker]

You are lying that he's anti-war. Then you made-up this very specific criteria of how to label somewhat "leftist" so that it fits him. What's the point? He's a failed "journalist" who saw an opportunity to pander to gullible right-wing nutjobs and he's quite good at it but that doesn't make him smart or worth listening to or otherwise notable, frivolous lawsuits notwithstanding.

Yes, but, he did it successfully. You are failing at it.     

I'm not trying to pander to right-wing nutjobs so of course I'm failing at that. Unless you're saying that I'm failing at what I am trying to do, i.e. ridiculing said nutjobs, in which case I apologize, I'll try harder next time to make you feel more ridiculed.

That's similar to what he does. But he does it successfully... especially if you consider the amount of money he is making, and the effect he is having on the world.

Keep working at it. Maybe you will catch up to him sometime... in a million years, or so.

[suchmoon]

That's similar to what he does. But he does it successfully... especially if you consider the amount of money he is making, and the effect he is having on the world.

I don't know if being a traitorous liar is what most people would consider "success" but at least you have something to aspire to so that's great.