Sexy Question

[Bitram]

I expected Aprils Fools joke, but i guess not

Sexy

[MarketNeutral]

Lads, keep your standards high. If you must partake, always practice safe hashing, especially with they whose affections are negotiable.

Sloots always gonna sloot, so be wise.

Neither literal prostitutes (ladies of the night) nor figurative prostitutes (men of the IRS) likely fully understand your precious cryptocoins as well as you do.

[serenitys]

The point of the question or OP wasn't for a meltdown about social standards and morality - it was legitimately inspired by the article mentioned that touched on sex workers and being unable to track them, and made me wonder in light of the IRS classifying bitcoin as property, wouldn't that change the definition of "whore" since it's more closely accurate to that of "wife" - because wives generally marry for status and bank (and property) even when they've lied to themselves about what they're up to.

I am female, anti marriage, atheist and open minded about sex. I recognize human sexuality has no intrinsic value outside procreation and mating economics, I'm not a romantic sort and consider the idea of leveraging body parts against our self worth to be imbecilic and ignorant but that's how society has embraced sex and virtue because it fancies itself the masters of the universe with a special purpose and can't accept the fact we're none of those things at the end of the day - we're just mating animals trying to mate, it's not special or sweet, it's just what we do and it shouldn't have become a social commodity (nearly replacing a reproductive one).

I've got self esteem and my sense of worth is tied into what sort of person I am and not whether or not I'd have sex for money, have sex for free, have sex with more than one person, the same gender, or not at all. It's not tied to sex one way or the other, which is the most productive and healthiest approach. It hasn't got anything to do with "standards" or my virtue.

While I'm not the sort who would exchange sex for money, I've never taken issue with it and my position is that more power to ya. I'd support it any day because it's not that big a deal to me. I'd rather support legalizing prostitution than gay marriage - ONLY BECAUSE I don't think marriage should be legal or a thing at all. I'd much rather see marriage outlawed than prostitution or homosexuality 

So, that's all it amounts to.  

[Brangdon]

Prostitution is illegal

Not in the UK. Lots of activities around it are illegal, such as kerb-crawling and soliciting. The law is mostly geared around protecting women from being forced into prostitution, and protecting non-prostitutes from being hassled, and protection of minors. (It's not always ideal for achieving those goals.)

As an aside, one problem with Bitcoin for websites is that it doesn't have a good subscription model. There isn't infrastructure to make monthly recurring payments.

[DannyHamilton]

wives generally marry for status and bank (and property) even when they've lied to themselves about what they're up to.

I disagree with this statement, and find it offensive, repulsive, and disgusting.  It's quite sad that this is your concept of a committed relationship.

I've got self esteem and my sense of worth is tied into what sort of person I am and not whether or not I'd have sex for money, have sex for free, have sex with more than one person, the same gender, or not at all. It's not tied to sex one way or the other, which is the most productive and healthiest approach. It hasn't got anything to do with "standards" or my virtue.

I'm glad to hear it.  It just a shame that you choose to believe that a committed (or sexual) relationship between two people relies on one of those people "buying" the commitment (or sex) of the other one with status, bank, and/or property. And even more of a shame that you assume that men are the ones doing the buying and women are the ones doing the selling.

While I'm not naive enough to believe that there aren't any women that sell their commitment (or sex) in exchange for status, bank, and/or property, I think its quite naive and prejudiced to assume that there aren't men that do so as well, or to assume that there aren't committed (or sexual) relationships that aren't on equal standing built from an emotional connection driving mutual attraction.

[serenitys]

wives generally marry for status and bank (and property) even when they've lied to themselves about what they're up to.

I disagree with this statement, and find it offensive, repulsive, and disgusting.  It's quite sad that this is your concept of a committed relationship.

I've got self esteem and my sense of worth is tied into what sort of person I am and not whether or not I'd have sex for money, have sex for free, have sex with more than one person, the same gender, or not at all. It's not tied to sex one way or the other, which is the most productive and healthiest approach. It hasn't got anything to do with "standards" or my virtue.

I'm glad to hear it.  It just a shame that you choose to believe that a committed (or sexual) relationship between two people relies on one of those people "buying" the commitment (or sex) of the other one with status, bank, and/or property. And even more of a shame that you assume that men are the ones doing the buying and women are the ones doing the selling.

While I'm not naive enough to believe that there aren't any women that sell their commitment (or sex) in exchange for status, bank, and/or property, I think its quite naive and prejudiced to assume that there aren't men that do so as well, or to assume that there aren't committed (or sexual) relationships that aren't on equal standing built from an emotional connection driving mutual attraction.

I specifically distinguished between healthy relationships and typical females banking on marriage as their financial salvation = whores at the end of the day. Read the OP again and pay attention

[jesse11]

I'd totally pay for sex with Bitcoin, especially if it's completely legal.

Talk to your local pimps about accepting Bitcoin.

This Guy must be ugly as SIN LOL

I GET IT FOR FREE LOL

[grifferz]

I specifically distinguished between healthy relationships and typical females banking on marriage as their financial salvation = whores at the end of the day. Read the OP again and pay attention

I too disagree with the characterisation of "general" and "typical" females as being gold diggers, and it's your use of "generally" and "typical" that is the problem. I've also seen quite a few male gold diggers.

This is a bit of an extreme view and also not really related to Bitcoin (any more).

[grosminer]

lol!

Localbitcoinpimps.com ?

[Beliathon]

This Guy must be ugly as SIN LOL

I found a video of him!

The OP is a female so..

I doubt that very much, but alright.

I'm married; I've deduced that women think about sex way more than men do. Most women don't talk about their sexual thoughts freely outside of their own close (same sex) social niche.

Related:

http://www.alternet.org/sex-dawn-9-interesting-things-weve-learned-about-sex-studying-our-ancient-ancestors

http://www.salon.com/2010/06/27/sex_at_dawn_interview/

[serenitys]

This Guy must be ugly as SIN LOL

I found a video of him!

The OP is a female so..

I doubt that very much, but alright.

I am OP and I am female Not all women are sappy romantics who live only to get married and dress up like a princess. I got better things to do!

[Equus]

I don't know where you live, but none of the wives I know (including my own) are exchanging sex for princess costumes.

If a man is demanding sex from his wife in exchange for property and giving his call girl gifts to show his devotion, then he is doing it wrong.


Good on you for being self-fulfilled and having goals outside of marriage.  I think you make a mistake by thinking that you are not typical.

[ibminer]

Looks like someone has stumbled across the next alt coin (BTP) BitPimps