🚀🚀🚀 bet105.ag | Best Odds in the Game | Low Juice & Winners Welcome 🏈⚾⚽🏀⚾

[notblox1]

Welcome to bitcointalk forum.
This is the first time I see Bet105 casino topic and I dont know how I missed it.
I wanted to register because I sew claims that your casino dont have traditional kyc requirements , but than I found something different written on your website about kyc rules:

in the event of any suspicious transactions, the company may suspend, block or close the account(s) of the relevant player(s) and withhold funds as may be required by law and/or by the competent Authorities. In such special cases KYC will be requested.

https://bet105.ag/en?t=legals&ts=bankingrules

What is the truth, and why are you asking for first and last name during registration?

[Upgrade00]

I wanted to register because I sew claims that your casino dont have traditional kyc requirements , but than I found something different written on your website about kyc rules:

The team has previously replied to this, but here is the response I got from the team. All the suggestions here related to that are also being considered.

Join the conversation ⚽ Who’s been your most profitable team this season?

[Rating Place]

Site offline.

[Upgrade00]

Site offline.

As I wrote earlier, bet105(dot)eu is no longer available, use the new domain, bet105.ag. This is the main domain going forward.

You can continue enjoying great odds.

[Upgrade00]

The last three meetings between Barcelona and Atletico Madrid have been packed with action ⚽🔥 and goals. Who is your pick tonight?
Also bet on your favorite EPL picks on bet105.ag

[Outhue]

I tried to have some fun for my weekly gambling activities on bet105, unfortunately my location is restricted, I want to know if there is a possibility that unsupported locations still have a chance in the future? Or using VPN isn't against the casino rule, anyone facing the same?

Nice looking website though. Thumbs Up

[notocactus]

I tried to have some fun for my weekly gambling activities on bet105, unfortunately my location is restricted, I want to know if there is a possibility that unsupported locations still have a chance in the future? Or using VPN isn't against the casino rule, anyone facing the same?

I can visit bet105.ag with Tor to check their ToS. They have a term 4.1.9 about restricted locations but it's too general. I am unsure that your country belongs to FATF Countries list but you can find it there.
https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/countries/black-and-grey-lists.html

Bet105's Terms of service.

4.1.9. If you are residing in any of the Restricted Countries, FATF Blacklisted countries, including Russia, Ukraine, India and UK.

About VPN, I can not find anything.

[Abu-Naim]

I tried to have some fun for my weekly gambling activities on bet105, unfortunately my location is restricted, I want to know if there is a possibility that unsupported locations still have a chance in the future? Or using VPN isn't against the casino rule, anyone facing the same?

Nice looking website though. Thumbs Up

Same here, but I was able to sign up when I used VPN on my device to change my location, and the notification of restrictions in my location disappeared, but I will also want more explanation on if we should go ahead to make deposits despite the restrictions, or once your region is under restrictions you can’t make deposit and withdrawal in the future platform.

Apart from these, I am very impressed with the pattern and the design of the website, it is matured and have several features and it is use friendly.

[Upgrade00]

Or using VPN isn't against the casino rule, anyone facing the same?

Bet105 is VPN friendly. According to the team, you should not have any issues depositing or withdrawing as long as you do not try to abuse the bonuses available.

What are your predictions for the London derby?

[DYING_S0UL]

A no KYC casino saying, "in such special cases KYC will be requested.", no offense, but isn’t that absurd, mate? I mean, it’s clearly false advertising! I have read the OP’s previous reply where they claimed they would only ask for KYC when suspicious of fraudulent activities, but didn’t in six months. However, this doesn’t change the fact that they’re lying about the no KYC policy. I’m not saying asking for KYC is a bad thing! But if you have the jurisdiction to ask for KYC at any time, then you should probably remove that bold statement about the no KYC rule.

It’s like saying, "We are vegans, we would never eat meat, but on special occasions, we might."

[Upgrade00]

The weekend is here, kick it off with big wins. Enjoy premium pricing at bet105 with bigger profits and no limits.

[Rating Place]

You say no KYC. What happens if a person plays from a banned country such as the US, UK or Russia? What happens if someone multi-accounts? The rules say no relatives, what if they don’t live in the same home? There’s a clause that says you may confiscate deposits. When would this occur?

You claim winners welcome but the rules say that you may cut limits. Will winners get limited? My limits were slashed fast at this site before you changed ownership.

[Abu-Naim]

The weekend is here, kick it off with big wins. Enjoy premium pricing at bet105 with bigger profits and no limits.

The bone of contention here is; can Nottingham Forest defeat Aston Villa again away from home?
They defeated Aston Villa in the first leg with 2-1 by completing a come back within the last five minutes of the match and it’s very impressive because Uni Emrey side thought they have won the match until they were shocked towards the end of the game. However, both of these teams are in good form, they both won their last five matches in all competitions, this match will be a match to help Aston Villa to be comfortable in their Europa League qualification battler.

[notocactus]

The bone of contention here is; can Nottingham Forest defeat Aston Villa again away from home?
They defeated Aston Villa in the first leg with 2-1 by completing a come back within the last five minutes of the match and it’s very impressive because Uni Emrey side thought they have won the match until they were shocked towards the end of the game. However, both of these teams are in good form, they both won their last five matches in all competitions, this match will be a match to help Aston Villa to be comfortable in their Europa League qualification battler.

Nottingham Forest are on fire in this season and they are counting down match by match to finish this season amazingly with a position in top four. They have only 8 matches to achieve this sweet ending and now they have 57 points, 9 points more than Aston Villa, that is big difference. Aston Villa are still in top four race with many clubs including Nottingham Forest, and by hosting this match, they will not waste this opportunity to have 3 points from a direct competitor, first to reduce point difference with Nottingham Forest, and second to wait for chances of climbing up on the ranking table.

https://www.premierleague.com/tables

Nottingham Forest are able to have 1 point from Aston Villa, but 3 points in a home away match, I am really unsure about it.

[Upgrade00]

"Barcelona vs Betis

⚡️11 of the last 14 La Liga meetings between these two have seen over 3.5 total goals."

With Real Madrid losing earlier today, Barcelona has a big chance to edge Eve further away in the title race. How do you think this will end?

[Rating Place]

You say no KYC. What happens if a person plays from a banned country such as the US, UK or Russia? What happens if someone multi-accounts? The rules say no relatives, what if they don’t live in the same home? There’s a clause that says you may confiscate deposits. When would this occur?

You claim winners welcome but the rules say that you may cut limits. Will winners get limited? My limits were slashed fast at this site before you changed ownership.

I’d like to put up a rating for Bet105 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=717790.0 and it would help if you would answer the questions.

[Ambatman]

"Barcelona vs Betis

⚡️11 of the last 14 La Liga meetings between these two have seen over 3.5 total goals."

With Real Madrid losing earlier today, Barcelona has a big chance to edge Eve further away in the title race. How do you think this will end?

I'm currently biased towards Barcelona for their recent forms
They are on a draw now. But I confidence waned after Madrid loss.
So had to bet on goal over 1.5, a win already
Which is looking safer than picking a favorite to win.

[Outhue]

A no KYC casino saying, "in such special cases KYC will be requested.", no offense, but isn’t that absurd, mate? I mean, it’s clearly false advertising! I have read the OP’s previous reply where they claimed they would only ask for KYC when suspicious of fraudulent activities, but didn’t in six months. However, this doesn’t change the fact that they’re lying about the no KYC policy. I’m not saying asking for KYC is a bad thing! But if you have the jurisdiction to ask for KYC at any time, then you should probably remove that bold statement about the no KYC rule.

It’s like saying, "We are vegans, we would never eat meat, but on special occasions, we might."

One a special occasions vegans do eat meats though.....kidding.

Honestly, every gamblers should accept that KYC can be asked at any time, forget what was written, anything can change at any moment, i t is good that you have nothing against KYC but I don't see anything wrong when they say that KYC isn't required.

It is not required until it is, a gambler can gamble and win some money and be able to withdraw without any verification, but if any need for KYC verifications come up they won't need to explain why to you, because if changes nothing, or maybe they should have wrote.

KYC isn't required but there is a high chance that you can be asked to go through verifications? I don't blame online casinos honestly, one reason might be to avoid chasing gamblers away and the other my be rules and regulations.

[notocactus]

Honestly, every gamblers should accept that KYC can be asked at any time, forget what was written, anything can change at any moment, i t is good that you have nothing against KYC but I don't see anything wrong when they say that KYC isn't required.

If they join a gambling site that claims to be no-KYC, they will less expect any KYC request from the site in future. On online centralized platforms, it's risky that their platform policy, ToS can change anytime and it can be enforced very quickly by instinct centralization of their platform.

On user side, if you're aware about this risk, you must prepare for policy change from no-KYC from KYC, but it is less shocking change if the platform does not advertise as no-KYC platform before.

It is not required until it is, a gambler can gamble and win some money and be able to withdraw without any verification, but if any need for KYC verifications come up they won't need to explain why to you, because if changes nothing, or maybe they should have wrote.

KYC isn't required but there is a high chance that you can be asked to go through verifications?

Casinos can be mandatory KYC on all users and you can see many online gambling sites like this with more stricter regulations on KYC, AML and very strict and expensive punishments on companies fail do enforce KYC and AML. With transparent ToS like this, you only are able to access your account features, deposit and bet after you finished KYC.

On casinos that advertise as no-KYC, you can use their platforms easily at beginning but if you are not a person who care too much about KYC and privacy, I advice you finishing KYC before depositing your money into your account for betting, and even for trading on centralized exchanges.

[DYING_S0UL]

Honestly, every gamblers should accept that KYC can be asked at any time, forget what was written, anything can change at any moment, i t is good that you have nothing against KYC but I don't see anything wrong when they say that KYC isn't required.

It is not required until it is, a gambler can gamble and win some money and be able to withdraw without any verification, but if any need for KYC verifications come up they won't need to explain why to you, because if changes nothing, or maybe they should have wrote.

KYC isn't required but there is a high chance that you can be asked to go through verifications? I don't blame online casinos honestly, one reason might be to avoid chasing gamblers away and the other my be rules and regulations.

I will not argue with what is wrong or right! If you are okay with KYC then go on and play! But if you are not you should probably find some other alternatives! But these are not the issues here! I am aware of the fact that at the end of the day, most of the casinos require it's consumers to do the mandatory KYC but when you claim to be a non KYC platform you should stick to your word here! The tos should be straightforward, transparent! You say one thing here and the other thing there, what does it makes you? Personally at this time, I don't have a issue with KYC. But imagine someone who though it was a non KYC site, gambled a bit and ended up with asking for KYC? If the site doesn't require KYC then say No KYC, but if it does (i don't case about special cases) then don't claim to be non KYC platform mate. Don't mislead others! I assume you understood my point...