♻️ CCE.Cash - Instant & Automatic Exchange ♻️ Fees 0.4 - 0.8%!

[uchegod-21]

Check the service from my signature, they recently implemented a free AML check tool.
Please note that the result of any AML check is not universal, and some services may have different scores. It is very important that the service to which you send coins performs AML analysis.

That is true that the result is not universal. Does this mean that a fraudulent service could decide to only be dishing out misleading and wrong scores to make their service look good even when they do nothing?

If there is contradicting scores from two checkers, what do we use as standard? Do we base it on the reputation of the project?

You are right, we should check the AML scores, but sometimes we just know that we do not have to.

In which conditions do we know that we do not need to check?
When you use a service that you trust?

[examplens]

That is true that the result is not universal. Does this mean that a fraudulent service could decide to only be dishing out misleading and wrong scores to make their service look good even when they do nothing?

If there is contradicting scores from two checkers, what do we use as standard? Do we base it on the reputation of the project?

Contradictory results with two different checkers are almost certain.
Here's an example I did yesterday for the same address, but on two different checkers. You can see that the score result varies from 17% to 86%, quite a big difference in risk recognition, right?

[SamReomo]

How exactly do you check the AML score? I never heard that tool exists.
I searched for some tools online, but most of them blocked me. I couldn't find a software or a site where you can check the AML score.

Would you mind sharing it?
Having a good tool for checking AML score is a lot of help at least to avoid lockout or account freezing if the exchange itself detects that your coins have suspicious activity or history.

You can use free AML checking tools at Blockchair as they've been offering such AML things for long time, but now a days we have another platform that's offering such a free AML checking tools that's no other than b1exch, they've released their AML score cheeking tool a few days ago and that's exceptionally a great tool for everyone.

I use that nowadays because that's a very good AML score checking tool, it competes paid AML score checking tools. I think in near future there's chance that CCE.Cash or a few other exchanges might also consider having a similar AML checking tool.

[CCECash]

The news bulletin is already here! We actually wanted to add more, but we decided not to overload you with information!

Tether Treasury burned 2.5 billion USDT on the Ethereum network on July 7, the largest burn since the 3.5 billion destruction on February 10 this year, surpassing the 2 billion burn on May 8. https://t.co/EVNbzPndHI

With best wishes, ♻️ CCE.Cash

[Faisal2202]

Don't tarnish the name of business owners  business owners are generally honest people. The bureaucrats who produce these horrendous laws are just crooks. If we think about this way, a drug dealer is also a businessman 

The difference lies in the morality of the services these people provide, which generate genuine value for society or simply break people's legs to sell crutches, creating problems to sell unique solutions.

Politics is easier when we read some books. I have not read much except the ones in schools or other institutions, and the only thing I have learned so far is that they will create a monopolized environment which will be full of dangers and threats, and then they will sell the solution. They will be the Homelander haha.

The policies they shape or rewrite are not to serve the free market. This is how they monopolize, create distinction and inequality, and preserve the state's own market share or their share haha. In short, they can sell us anything at gunpoint in a legal way.

Check the service from my signature, they recently implemented a free AML check tool.
Please note that the result of any AML check is not universal, and some services may have different scores. It is very important that the service to which you send coins performs AML analysis.

You are right, the results can vary as every service has different ways and formulas. But if your AML is very high, like the one you need to fear, then I guess every AML site will give a high result, and that is enough to be prepared when using an exchange, like receiving payment from a person whose wallet is connected to wallets that had high AML, and like a virus, that AML moved onto us.

[uchegod-21]

That is true that the result is not universal. Does this mean that a fraudulent service could decide to only be dishing out misleading and wrong scores to make their service look good even when they do nothing?

If there is contradicting scores from two checkers, what do we use as standard? Do we base it on the reputation of the project?

Contradictory results with two different checkers are almost certain.
Here's an example I did yesterday for the same address, but on two different checkers. You can see that the score result varies from 17% to 86%, quite a big difference in risk recognition, right?

This seems more believable. I would rather go with this because it has clear analysis of the coin movement. It's better than displaying a score without showing how the result was arrived.

Further more, someone might begin to question how even a coin used for ransom was captured in the analysis. Ransom, Scam, Stolen coin. What's the difference between a scam coin and a stolen coin?

[BitMaxz]

Some of the tools are Telegram bots. For example, there is the Bitcoin AML Checker. It's a paid service, though. The first check is free. You have to pay $0.05 in BTC for subsequent checks.
There is another Telegram AML checking tool called GreenStage.
Also, the Blockchain explorer shows AML ratings on their website. Enter an address and check the results towards the bottom to see what it says.

I haven't tested any of these and don't know how reliable the information they show is. Generally, the only thing that matters is what the custodial service you deposit your coins into says and nothing else.

The blockchair explorer under dApp seems all addresses giving similar results. I tested 3 addresses the other AML checker seems to be giving low results on the Telegram AML checker.
It seems the one shared by examplens above is giving me a better risk result than the other AML checkers.
The blockchain dApps look like they are just a design; when clicking the source, it's asking for payment. Anyway, thanks.

[SamReomo]

In which conditions do we know that we do not need to check?
When you use a service that you trust?

When  you receive coins directly from a centralized exchange wallet then you don't need to do any kind of AML score check because those coins are mostly low in AML and can be used without rethinking about the AML scoring.

But, as extra precaution it's not bad to use AML score checking tools to see AML of the received coins. Surely, the coins that you receive from centralized exchanges will have very low AML score and those coins will be accepted everywhere.

[Pmalek]

I was going to ask the same question about which AML tool you are using, but then you answered it below. Well, BestChange is a good option. They have their own AML checker, and as of now I have heard that B1Exch has also introduced its own AML checker. Now it would be great if CCE.Cash also introduced its own AML checker. If not free, then they can charge for it, just like BestChange.

According to OrangeFren, CCE.Cash already offers manual AML score checks. You just have to ask their support about it. I just found out about it myself. if you initiate a swap on OrangeFren, you will get results with the best offers. Above those results you will see various filters. One of them is "Free AML check." Click on it and you will see all services that provide free AML checks if you ask them to. If you want to make the swap on their platform, get in touch with the support and ask for an AML check.

[examplens]

This seems more believable. I would rather go with this because it has clear analysis of the coin movement. It's better than displaying a score without showing how the result was arrived.

Some of the other tools listed above also provided additional analytics, but I deliberately shortened it to just the results.
It seemed too risky to me, especially because I knew the source of the coins could be suspicious, so I decided to do additional mixing.

[uchegod-21]

In which conditions do we know that we do not need to check?
When you use a service that you trust?

When  you receive coins directly from a centralized exchange wallet then you don't need to do any kind of AML score check because those coins are mostly low in AML and can be used without rethinking about the AML scoring.

Oh okay. That's correct. It is usually CEXS that flags coins of high AML, it is understandable that every coin emanating from it should have a low AML score.

This seems more believable. I would rather go with this because it has clear analysis of the coin movement. It's better than displaying a score without showing how the result was arrived.

Some of the other tools listed above also provided additional analytics, but I deliberately shortened it to just the results.
It seemed too risky to me, especially because I knew the source of the coins could be suspicious, so I decided to do additional mixing.

Okay. That is how experts succeed in this space. You are simply aware of the environment, hence the suspension. An average jeo will easily get into troubles if care is not taking.

Binance once flagged my BTC from a casino, the mistake I made was not testing.

[Faisal2202]

When  you receive coins directly from a centralized exchange wallet then you don't need to do any kind of AML score check because those coins are mostly low in AML and can be used without rethinking about the AML scoring.

But, as extra precaution it's not bad to use AML score checking tools to see AML of the received coins. Surely, the coins that you receive from centralized exchanges will have very low AML score and those coins will be accepted everywhere.

Yes we should not worry if the coins we are are receiving from CCE.Cash, but if we are sending coins to them then maybe you should, but I never checked because I know my coins and I know they do not have high AML. But if I had to check the AML of my wallet I would use the De.Fi platform, which I once joined as an airdrop and it was giving me a score, but to do that I had to connect my EVM wallet.

If you have a BTC wallet, then the ones mentioned above are enough.

[Forsyth Jones]

Politics is easier when we read some books. I have not read much except the ones in schools or other institutions, and the only thing I have learned so far is that they will create a monopolized environment which will be full of dangers and threats, and then they will sell the solution. They will be the Homelander haha.

The policies they shape or rewrite are not to serve the free market. This is how they monopolize, create distinction and inequality, and preserve the state's own market share or their share haha. In short, they can sell us anything at gunpoint in a legal way.

The state is a bubble, citizens must constantly keep an eye on it, monitoring and limiting the power of politicians, whether by electing pro-freedom politicians whoe are less inclined to expand the state, unfortunately, when a country does well and starts to take off economically, some politicians get spoiled and start providing more welfare programs paid for with people's tax money, sometimes, the population itself approves of this (facepalm).

the results can vary as every service has different ways and formulas. But if your AML is very high, like the one you need to fear, then I guess every AML site will give a high result, and that is enough to be prepared when using an exchange, like receiving payment from a person whose wallet is connected to wallets that had high AML, and like a virus, that AML moved onto us.

According to OrangeFren, CCE.Cash already offers manual AML score checks. You just have to ask their support about it. I just found out about it myself. if you initiate a swap on OrangeFren, you will get results with the best offers. Above those results you will see various filters. One of them is "Free AML check." Click on it and you will see all services that provide free AML checks if you ask them to. If you want to make the swap on their platform, get in touch with the support and ask for an AML check.

That's why it's relevant to use at least more than one AML bot to evaluate whether it's worthwhile to spend coins on a particular type of service or to mix to get a new origin. That's why I love this forum, I believe that if I were to discover services like CCECash, AML bots and other incredible services promoted here, I wouldn't know most of them if I didn't frequent it..

[SamReomo]

Oh okay. That's correct. It is usually CEXS that flags coins of high AML, it is understandable that every coin emanating from it should have a low AML score.

Yes, any coins that come directly from centralized exchanges should be low in AML and it should be accepted by any centralized service/platform without any issues. Since CCE.Cash isn't a centralized exchange itself but they offer quite good services to those users who want maximum privacy, one can easily swap low AML coins on CCE.Cash without any issue, personally I think it's wise to first check AML score of the coins before swapping those via CCE.Cash.

[Pmalek]

Oh okay. That's correct. It is usually CEXS that flags coins of high AML, it is understandable that every coin emanating from it should have a low AML score.

That's the fake AML system they have set up. The only one that is worse than that is the one used by governments and law enforcement agencies. They will seize "dirty bitcoin" with high AML scores from dangerous criminals and masterminds, deposit them into their wallets and addresses, make a few calls, auction the seized bitcoin off, aaaaand the coins are no longer dirty and don't have a high AML score. It's magic. 

[hugeblack]

Yes, any coins that come directly from centralized exchanges should be low in AML and it should be accepted by any centralized service/platform without any issues. Since CCE.Cash isn't a centralized exchange itself but they offer quite good services to those users who want maximum privacy, one can easily swap low AML coins on CCE.Cash without any issue, personally I think it's wise to first check AML score of the coins before swapping those via CCE.Cash.

Unfortunately, this is no longer true. A country can ban withdrawals from an exchange^[1], making all related transactions high-risk even though they originated from a central platform. Therefore, everything related to AML is variable and will only end by avoiding any centralized platform that requires KYC.

[1] UK blacklists HTX crypto exchange over Russia support in sanctions crackdown

[CCECash]

What do you think of this news?

PayPal's USD stablecoin PYUSD will be natively issued on the Polygon network and integrated into Polygon’s Open Money Stack, making it easier for businesses to handle collections, cross-border settlement, and payouts in one place https://t.co/PhWU0SN4VX

With best wishes, ♻️ CCE.Cash

[mikel_012]

What do you think of this news?

PayPal's USD stablecoin PYUSD will be natively issued on the Polygon network and integrated into Polygon’s Open Money Stack, making it easier for businesses to handle collections, cross-border settlement, and payouts in one place https://t.co/PhWU0SN4VX

With best wishes, ♻️ CCE.Cash

Polygon is the best network now to release things like this

Fees are very low where you can spend with $0,0001 and it is the network for several big projects like in the case of Polymarket. It is also accepted by all exchanges I know

But PYUSD exists for a long time and I never saw anyone using it for anything, because we already have USDC and USDT.

[Forsyth Jones]

What do you think of this news?
PayPal's USD stablecoin PYUSD will be natively issued on the Polygon network and integrated into Polygon’s Open Money Stack, making it easier for businesses to handle collections, cross-border settlement, and payouts in one place https://t.co/PhWU0SN4VX

Polygon is the best network now to release things like this

Fees are very low where you can spend with $0,0001 and it is the network for several big projects like in the case of Polymarket. It is also accepted by all exchanges I know

But PYUSD exists for a long time and I never saw anyone using it for anything, because we already have USDC and USDT.

Stablecoins are really in the sights of these companies, they love stablecoins (of which there are already so many out there), but they leave Bitcoin aside, which is what really matters... as the saying goes: "they love the blockchain, but hate Bitcoin..."

If all these companies made the same effort to adopt BTC, BTC would have already reached mass adoption.

[Taskford]

Yes, any coins that come directly from centralized exchanges should be low in AML and it should be accepted by any centralized service/platform without any issues. Since CCE.Cash isn't a centralized exchange itself but they offer quite good services to those users who want maximum privacy, one can easily swap low AML coins on CCE.Cash without any issue, personally I think it's wise to first check AML score of the coins before swapping those via CCE.Cash.

Unfortunately, this is no longer true. A country can ban withdrawals from an exchange^[1], making all related transactions high-risk even though they originated from a central platform. Therefore, everything related to AML is variable and will only end by avoiding any centralized platform that requires KYC.

[1] UK blacklists HTX crypto exchange over Russia support in sanctions crackdown

When certain country starts to do those crazy blacklisting of certain exchange, next possible situation going to happen is those funds connected with it will be at high risk. Even if it comes with centralized platform that asked KYC. This situation just show that their regulation done is not stable especially on their AML policy.

Since everything will depends on the governments sudden changes of their regulatory decision. So better action to do is to minimize the usage of centralized exchange or those KYC platforms to avoid such possible problems.