Experiment failed (Gambling on the basis of AI)

[Crypto Library]

In fact, many people think that artificial intelligence can do everything these days. In this case, many people think that artificial intelligence can be used to make profits in everything from trading to gambling.
But the things that can make the situation worse if we don't know are that artificial intelligence can always make the best prediction for you through real-time data and previous historical data. But we have to remember that even if artificial intelligence gives you the best prediction, it doesn't know about the future. And so, incidentally, your betting will sometimes win and sometimes lose. And never rely on artificial intelligence to invest large funds in gambling, otherwise there is a possibility of extinction.

[AmoreJaz]

On the basis of AI, I took a chance at Deepseek promoting it to give me a close guess or tips on what team to win football matches yesterday and somehow it gave a good tips with statistics that gave me a chance to be rational in decision making but because of greed and the payout was quite small so I added my own guess to increase the chance of high return and it turnout that my own guess ruined the bet.

The experiment failed because you introduced your own bias. Or maybe it didn't. To know the true outcome of this, you will have to repeat the experiment. This time do not introduce your own bias. Also repeat the prompt of several games for 5 times. Use only money you know you can afford to lose. Of course you already know this. Then report back to use.

Do not be eager to report..This could take a couple of weeks that is only when you can conclude that it is a truly failed experiment.

Yes, he can do the same experiment without his intervention and just rely purely on AI. But should have similar premises as much as possible so the variables are not that far from his initial experiment. The title of this thread should also be modified as he interjected his own bias with his bets. It is not coming purely from AI.
But when he tries to experiment with the suggestions coming from AI alone, better use extra funds as you can't blame the AI here. It is your own decision why you want to try such route. Who knows, AI is indeed a very good advisor in choosing the outcome of your game?

[jas0190]

Ai isn't psychic, it doesn't have superpowers. At best you could possibly use it to find value in betting lines but predicting who is going to win? No, why would anyone think AI could do that?
The AI would just be going off the same public information that everyone else has, probably wouldn't have access to the private stats that oddsmakers get.

[alegotardo]

Not to create long story! however I did experiment one of my long waited biases yesterday and it did turn out to be some sort of good guess but later failed.

On the basis of AI, I took a chance at Deepseek promoting it to give me a close guess or tips on what team to win football matches yesterday and somehow it gave a good tips with statistics that gave me a chance to be rational in decision making but because of greed and the payout was quite small so I added my own guess to increase the chance of high return and it turnout that my own guess ruined the bet.

Curious to ask, did anyone ever try this out? it could work and also fall.

Dude, I found your experience with AI for sports betting interesting and I believe that the predictions generated by it can really be useful to provide a starting point or even relevant statistics, but they should never replace the final analysis of the bettor. At the end of the day, the human factor is still essential in this process.

In addition to the data provided by AI, there are other factors that can influence the outcome of a match and that are often not captured by machines, such as the physical fatigue of players in tight competitions, such as CONMEBOL, which can directly affect a team's performance, or issues such as extremely hot weather or fields affected by heavy rain, among others.

Even the recent history of clashes between teams (which we often believe to be the strong point of AI for data analysis) can sometimes be out of date or reveal trends that do not always appear in general statistics.

I think the secret is to use AI as a complementary tool, but always cross-reference its tips with other specific variables.... no AI will dispense with your own personal research, opinion and intuition as a bettor.

[Orpichukwu]

Curious to ask, did anyone ever try this out? it could work and also fall.

I have not tried that out; I'm not sure about it, but I have had those thoughts in me, and I think I might have asked it as a question if it works either on this forum or outside, but one thing I believe is sure is that the AI is programmed by humans, and they are only going to make calculations based on the data they have at hand, which could also give wrong predictions, but the only advantage is that they will be faster in determining results more than when humans are analyzing.

[tvplus006]

...Curious to ask, did anyone ever try this out? it could work and also fall.

I can assume that everyone who bets on sports has already tried to use the help of AI. The results predicted by the AI did not meet my expectations. It should be understood that the AI forecast is based on forecasts of various experts, which are freely available, and which, like all of us, may be erroneous.

[FatFork]

...Curious to ask, did anyone ever try this out? it could work and also fall.

I can assume that everyone who bets on sports has already tried to use the help of AI. The results predicted by the AI did not meet my expectations. It should be understood that the AI forecast is based on forecasts of various experts, which are freely available, and which, like all of us, may be erroneous.

Yes. I bet most of us here have tried to use AI in some form, myself included in the sense of exploring its capabilities with sports data. And you're right, the initial results can be underwhelming. Not saying AI is useless here.  It just can't capture everything that makes sports unpredictable yet and  the human factor still throws its curves that scramble the numbers.

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

If you had known beforehand that the AI was right about the predicted games, you would have just increased your staking amount so that you would get a good profit that you wanted. Although, the AI could have been wrong too but the good thing was that you actually staked with the amount you were willing to lose. I have not tried this before because I prefer to take my time and do a detailed analysis before I come up with a good prediction. @OP, from your narrative, I didn't hear you mention how many times you tried it but if it was once, you can try it again.

[finaleshot2016]

Curious to ask, did anyone ever try this out? it could work and also fall.

Yep I feel you bro. it's always tempting to change things for higher payout which is obviously greed. But if you're experimenting with AI, you gotta commit to it fully bro. Since you've started it with AI, finish it with AI. If you start mixing in your own guesses, it's gonna ruin with the results.

The whole point of the experiment is to see how the AI performs on its own, right? Adding your own bias just throws off the data you’re trying to collect. Stick with the AI's picks for a while to see if it consistently works, then tweak your strategy later if needed. But at least this is a lesson learned for the future experiments and formulate a good strategy soon.

[Churchillvv]

Sometimes tried this.

But, sometimes the data they're provided is outdated. Example, using the data performance from last years rather than recent matches or a few recent matches. I once tried, and ask the AI to input the resource too.

Suprising for me, the data being used as reference 2023 ~LOL

You absolutely have a different experience altogether because from the reference it (deepseek) gave me, it had current matches and it's outcomes and it also compared several predictions sites to give it's final thoughts on winners.

Curious to ask, did anyone ever try this out? it could work and also fall.

I remember Ognasty posted a thread where he tried using AI to pick the winning team for him, and the last time I saw the thread, he was on a win streak, but I don't know if those were his last bets or if he continued betting after that.

So I looked for the thread Ognasty posted, and from the looks of it, the total result of his bets is 9/16.
Artificial Intelligence Gambling Using Grok! (Results: 9/16)

Had a glance on his thread it also proves that nothing is guaranteed just experimenting like I am.

...Curious to ask, did anyone ever try this out? it could work and also fall.

I can assume that everyone who bets on sports has already tried to use the help of AI. The results predicted by the AI did not meet my expectations. It should be understood that the AI forecast is based on forecasts of various experts, which are freely available, and which, like all of us, may be erroneous.

Majority here haven't tried AI yet.
Exactly as I said about the reference were from a well known prediction site hence it took ideas and thoughts from them to assemble for the final answer or tips.

[len01]

Not to create long story! however I did experiment one of my long waited biases yesterday and it did turn out to be some sort of good guess but later failed.

On the basis of AI, I took a chance at Deepseek promoting it to give me a close guess or tips on what team to win football matches yesterday and somehow it gave a good tips with statistics that gave me a chance to be rational in decision making but because of greed and the payout was quite small so I added my own guess to increase the chance of high return and it turnout that my own guess ruined the bet.

Curious to ask, did anyone ever try this out? it could work and also fall.

When you feel like your bet has failed when you add 1 more match to your betting slip, it's just about you being unlucky. And the analysis that Deepseek provides for me is not always correct or sometimes the results are bad. And you can prove it by betting using the statistics given by Deepseek without adding another match. I'm sure the results will be random.

And I have one question, have you done this experiment using Deepseek many times or is this the first time you have done this experiment using AI?

[ajiz138]

To be honest, I have never gambled based on AI because I am used to my own judgment, but now I am more curious after many people talk about betting based on AI.

But I've asked Grok about upcoming bets such as the Champions League semi-finals and it gave a complete explanation, even giving some odds from low to high for the risk - but until now it's only limited to asking the full question, it hasn't been implemented yet.

Sometimes there are still gamblers who are not sure about betting relying on any AI, they are more confident with their own bets than using tools or advice from others.

[Natalim]

I never try Deepseek, I only make my bets based on the outcome of my analysis. Sometimes it works and wins, but sometimes it also fails. It means that I trust my prediction more than the AI.

But let us say that AI prediction is right based on your statement. The question is, have you tried doing it again and winning? Because if you win consistently, then this is the time that the casino will fall. But I don't think it completely works. Of course, just like how we normally make predictions, AI also gets it right and sometimes wrong.

[SmartGold01]

Did you also considered that when you added your games to increase the odd and it won what would you do again? Wouldn't you considered yourself a pro gambler on someone who is that correct in their analysis?
Usually, as we know gambling is not something we could say that we are certain on the resulting outcome because most time you may have the correct guess but just as you said of you were greedy since the odds were very small you decided to increase it to stand a chance of winning something a bit higher than the previous. That is why we must learn to control ourselves, emotions and also our greed level in order not to ruin our games.

[Ryu_Ar1]

This is a risky thing and I personally want to ask about your motivation for doing something like that? Is it really just a matter of trying or is there a goal you want to achieve?

I think we know that in gambling we cannot be said to be someone who can gamble if we still rely on other parties. I always avoid things like this because for me gambling will feel more impressive if we really make all decisions based on ourselves as a benchmark, not on other people, let alone AI.

But this can be a very good lesson so that in the end a situation like this will not happen again because after all asking for directions or advice even to AI in gambling I think it will not help much, it will actually make you lost.

[Findingnemo]

I never tried and I just tried on ChatGPT and all it does is summarise the two teams recent form and in the name of prediction it just gives more neutral stance unless the opponent is too weak. I guess that's what will happen with Deepseek too, and it's good to summarise the recent form of a player or team then we can make our own analysis but I don't think GPT or any AI will likely pick a possible winner, it's against what it is...

[Sanitough]

I admire your curiosity, but from the start, we already knew that AI can’t help us win in gambling.
If it could, the bookies would’ve been bankrupt by now ..., right?

I don’t blame you though, AI is very popular right now. But remember, bookies are smart too,  they adjust everything to keep the balance so people can’t abuse the system. So I hope you learned your lesson.

Since you called it a "fail," no more trying to rely on AI alone for betting, okay?

[Sandra_hakeem]

On the basis of AI, I took a chance at Deepseek promoting it to give me a close guess or tips on what team to win football matches yesterday and somehow it gave a good tips with statistics that gave me a chance to be rational in decision making but because of greed and the payout was quite small so I added my own guess to increase the chance of high return and it turnout that my own guess ruined the bet.

Greed has played a major role in reducing the chances of earning a fortune in bet business. The predictions platforms were right, but your skepticism ruin the whole story. One thing I love doing is diverting my best; if I get a different set of games, I'll split the tickets and wager on them separately. That would have saved you in this case and at least one of those  tickets would have been a win win.

Curious to ask, did anyone ever try this out? it could work and also fall.

I also tried something similar to this and it worked though, but the stakes were too low and the potential winnings wasn't even nothing to write home about. The only mistake I made was the low stakes.

To be honest, I have never gambled based on AI because I am used to my own judgment, but now I am more curious after many people talk about betting based on AI.

Just because this came as predicted, doesn't mean every prediction from Grok works the same way.

[rodskee]

Not to create long story! however I did experiment one of my long waited biases yesterday and it did turn out to be some sort of good guess but later failed.

On the basis of AI, I took a chance at Deepseek promoting it to give me a close guess or tips on what team to win football matches yesterday and somehow it gave a good tips with statistics that gave me a chance to be rational in decision making but because of greed and the payout was quite small so I added my own guess to increase the chance of high return and it turnout that my own guess ruined the bet.

Curious to ask, did anyone ever try this out? it could work and also fall.

this is not a true experiment since you added something you shouldn’t which is your own guess i wouldn’t say this failed because i wouldn’t even consider this a real experiment so just repeat it again and this time try to not do anything that would change the outcomes of your experiment

[freedomgo]

AI again? How many times do we have to fail before we fully understand that relying on AI to predict game outcomes just doesn’t work?
AI is just like us, it only uses the information available online.
And since not everything written is 100% accurate, it’s not a solid basis to win.

What about the rumors? Games being rigged, refs favoring one team, real-time injury updates.. AI can’t catch all that.
So if we just blindly follow it, we’re bound to be misled.