YEET.com | Casino & Sportsbook | Airdrop

[Zwei]

$1500 prize is an enormous amount to reward the users periodically.

Certainly there will always be a lot of competition for a share of that prize. It also shows how profitable this casino is!

Most of the user that participating in the tournament do a calculated gambling therefore they weigh in already the potential profit and loss if they compete on this kind of tournament that push user to wager huge volume to win that prize.

I'm still wondering what makes a user to wager about $60,000 volume for a $600 prize, is that user really doing his thing while the prize comes thereafter or the user deposit for chasing the prize?

I'm getting to understand that you'll win if actually a player is doing his thing, not minding the prize, than a player that deposit chasing the prize.

it all comes down to whether chasing the prize is gonna be +EV or not for you.
if you are going to lose more wagering than you will win from the leaderboard prize + the VIP rewards you will get, then it's not worth chasing the prize.
but if you are gambling anyway, it's a good way to lower your losses and rank up your account for "cheap" for better VIP rewards.

i don't know the exact % you would get back in rewards from yeet VIP program, but i would say once you need to wager more than $90k, it becomes -EV.

[Mahdirakib]

At least it is now better than when they have not changed it, it was for 20 winners before they changed it to 10 winners 1-2 days ago. Nothing they can do with the adjusted prizepool. $1500 can be ideal to be split between 5 winners but it will make others losing hope for smaller prizes. If I am standing in the casino position, what they have now is the best option already.

I know why you are happy with the changed reward distribution . And I do agree with you on the point that the $1.5k is ideal here to split between top 5 ranked users. There won't be any tough competition for the 6th to 10th rank prizes. The reward has dropped by $10 on each rank from the 6th to 10th rank. I believe no one will compete (do wager) to achieve any of those ranks. Anyone with the wagering plan will compete for the top 3 prizes only.

[ryzaadit]

-snip-

Perhaps, we can see the result of the wagering first for the leaderboard.

Even the reward is being decreased, this will lead to fewer participants and fewer waggering results (all hopefully). Meaning even the reward is being decrease, but the waggering result maybe is lowering more than half than the previous tournament.

IMO, still a winning. Since our waggering needed could be half for the position we are gonna to take.

[AbuBhakar]

-snip-

Perhaps, we can see the result of the wagering first for the leaderboard.

Even the reward is being decreased, this will lead to fewer participants and fewer waggering results (all hopefully). Meaning even the reward is being decrease, but the waggering result maybe is lowering more than half than the previous tournament.

IMO, still a winning. Since our waggering needed could be half for the position we are gonna to take.

Agree to this since this is the only way for someone have a decent profit by participating on contest. But I think there will be a tough wagering competition on the lower spot since the wager is just close to each other.

This might be the trigger to push participants to wager more since they will aim to secure their spot until the tournament end.

The psychological effect of securing position and chasing higher position makes tournament like this exciting especially on final hours.

[Beparanf]

Only those whale gambler that gambling naturally with or without tournaments can win a wager contest on normal games including due to their huge bankroll and natural high wager.

It's always good to have a large bankroll to be able to make bets The few tournaments I've participated in have been poker but with a tight balance, It's true as you say because in those tournaments the one with the largest bankroll always wins because they are the poker players who leave you out because they make large bets and at that level, I can't compete Experience is key there because you know how to act at any moment. I don't have that well-established experience.

I have less experience on poker tournaments but at least on that game you have an edge if you are good on poker. I remember watching a lot of poker tournaments that low chips manage to beat the highest chip by continuously winning an all-in round with good hands.

On casino wagering contest like this one, it’s almost impossible to beat a high bankroll player if he is committed to win the tournament.

This is the sad reality for small bankroll player.

[Dr.Osh]

Only those whale gambler that gambling naturally with or without tournaments can win a wager contest on normal games including due to their huge bankroll and natural high wager.

It's always good to have a large bankroll to be able to make bets The few tournaments I've participated in have been poker but with a tight balance, It's true as you say because in those tournaments the one with the largest bankroll always wins because they are the poker players who leave you out because they make large bets and at that level, I can't compete Experience is key there because you know how to act at any moment. I don't have that well-established experience.

I have less experience on poker tournaments but at least on that game you have an edge if you are good on poker. I remember watching a lot of poker tournaments that low chips manage to beat the highest chip by continuously winning an all-in round with good hands.

On casino wagering contest like this one, it’s almost impossible to beat a high bankroll player if he is committed to win the tournament.

This is the sad reality for small bankroll player.

If you play in a tournament, it has nothing to do with capital, because all chips are divided equally among all participants, so far, that's what I know and I quite often participate in tournaments, skills and experience are really needed as well as patience too

[Beparanf]

Only those whale gambler that gambling naturally with or without tournaments can win a wager contest on normal games including due to their huge bankroll and natural high wager.

It's always good to have a large bankroll to be able to make bets The few tournaments I've participated in have been poker but with a tight balance, It's true as you say because in those tournaments the one with the largest bankroll always wins because they are the poker players who leave you out because they make large bets and at that level, I can't compete Experience is key there because you know how to act at any moment. I don't have that well-established experience.

I have less experience on poker tournaments but at least on that game you have an edge if you are good on poker. I remember watching a lot of poker tournaments that low chips manage to beat the highest chip by continuously winning an all-in round with good hands.

On casino wagering contest like this one, it’s almost impossible to beat a high bankroll player if he is committed to win the tournament.

This is the sad reality for small bankroll player.

If you play in a tournament, it has nothing to do with capital, because all chips are divided equally among all participants, so far, that's what I know and I quite often participate in tournaments, skills and experience are really needed as well as patience too

There’s different kind of tournament and probably you are pertaining to free roll tournaments on poker which I agree to you on this.

My statement is mainly describing on wagering tournament like this one on Yeet that requires huge capital to wager more and get higher spot with higher reward.

Probably the user above is talking about regular poker game.

[Fortify]

There’s different kind of tournament and probably you are pertaining to free roll tournaments on poker which I agree to you on this.

My statement is mainly describing on wagering tournament like this one on Yeet that requires huge capital to wager more and get higher spot with higher reward.

Probably the user above is talking about regular poker game.

Those leaderboards where the whales are competing for higher positions in the top ten are definitely unattainable for the low baller players out there, I can only guess the people on that list are millionaires if they are dropping tens of thousands of dollars a month. However that's life, there will always be some who have much more wealth than us and engage with entertainment at a much higher level. It might be nice if some sort of bracket leaderboard was possible, based on your average spend in the previous 1 or 3 months. Have different leaderboard for players in the <1k/1k+/10k+ brackets with appropriate rewards for each, that way the low rollers could feel some love too

[SquirrelJulietGarden]

Those leaderboards where the whales are competing for higher positions in the top ten are definitely unattainable for the low baller players out there, I can only guess the people on that list are millionaires if they are dropping tens of thousands of dollars a month. However that's life, there will always be some who have much more wealth than us and engage with entertainment at a much higher level.

With similar responsible gamblings, the rich can bet bigger than the poor as they are richer and affordable to spend bigger fund for gambling. Joining contests must be done responsibly too as if you have much smaller fund than other participants, you mist accept it and your incompetitiveness in that contest and move on.

It turns to be irresponsible participation if you leverage too much just because you don't afford your failure. It can result in a more severe failure in the future and know when to stop and move on is vital principle for your risk management.

[Beparanf]

There’s different kind of tournament and probably you are pertaining to free roll tournaments on poker which I agree to you on this.

My statement is mainly describing on wagering tournament like this one on Yeet that requires huge capital to wager more and get higher spot with higher reward.

Probably the user above is talking about regular poker game.

Those leaderboards where the whales are competing for higher positions in the top ten are definitely unattainable for the low baller players out there, I can only guess the people on that list are millionaires if they are dropping tens of thousands of dollars a month. However that's life, there will always be some who have much more wealth than us and engage with entertainment at a much higher level. It might be nice if some sort of bracket leaderboard was possible, based on your average spend in the previous 1 or 3 months. Have different leaderboard for players in the <1k/1k+/10k+ brackets with appropriate rewards for each, that way the low rollers could feel some love too

This is the sad reality I’m always aware so that I will spend huge money just to chase higher position on tournaments that can’t be dominated by low bankroll.

I always aim only on lower position when participating the tournament but sometimes I do some risky wager run when I calculated that it’s manageable to get higher spot based on the wager in the leaderboard.

Yeet leaderboard is still calm. I bet many competitors is still on the watch mode.

[@nn@_pen9]

I have less experience on poker tournaments but at least on that game you have an edge if you are good on poker. I remember watching a lot of poker tournaments that low chips manage to beat the highest chip by continuously winning an all-in round with good hands.

On casino wagering contest like this one, it’s almost impossible to beat a high bankroll player if he is committed to win the tournament.

This is the sad reality for small bankroll player.

Yes, limited chips sometimes mean we have to be able to survive our opponents' attacks, otherwise we'll be eliminated from the tournament. We have to be careful in our play, waiting for the right moment to bet or fight other players. More skilled players can make better decisions and exploit the situation more effectively. Patience is key even with limited capital, we can still turn the tables. Yes, a large bankroll is certainly an advantage in this case, giving them more freedom to bluff their opponents.

[bettercrypto]

At least it is now better than when they have not changed it, it was for 20 winners before they changed it to 10 winners 1-2 days ago. Nothing they can do with the adjusted prizepool. $1500 can be ideal to be split between 5 winners but it will make others losing hope for smaller prizes. If I am standing in the casino position, what they have now is the best option already.

I know why you are happy with the changed reward distribution . And I do agree with you on the point that the $1.5k is ideal here to split between top 5 ranked users. There won't be any tough competition for the 6th to 10th rank prizes. The reward has dropped by $10 on each rank from the 6th to 10th rank. I believe no one will compete (do wager) to achieve any of those ranks. Anyone with the wagering plan will compete for the top 3 prizes only.

Only 10 will share the $1500 in the contest? It seems like it would be even harder to be among those 10 winners. It seems like 20 winners would be even better
so that at least many people will have fun at least in those event games.

Maybe the other players instead of participating will not participate because the chances are even lower, of course out of 10 winners to be chosen, it's hard to be among them,
so it's just a matter of luck.

[Beparanf]

I have less experience on poker tournaments but at least on that game you have an edge if you are good on poker. I remember watching a lot of poker tournaments that low chips manage to beat the highest chip by continuously winning an all-in round with good hands.

On casino wagering contest like this one, it’s almost impossible to beat a high bankroll player if he is committed to win the tournament.

This is the sad reality for small bankroll player.

Yes, limited chips sometimes mean we have to be able to survive our opponents' attacks, otherwise we'll be eliminated from the tournament. We have to be careful in our play, waiting for the right moment to bet or fight other players. More skilled players can make better decisions and exploit the situation more effectively. Patience is key even with limited capital, we can still turn the tables. Yes, a large bankroll is certainly an advantage in this case, giving them more freedom to bluff their opponents.

It’s true because we have limited chances or one miss you die scenario which is crucial game unlike huge bankroll player that is still okay regardless if they will bet in equivalent to your all in hands.

Assuming both player has same skills, it’s always the huge bankroll gambler will win due to the much better try to beat the small bankroll player with good hands.

[hyudien]

It’s true because we have limited chances or one miss you die scenario which is crucial game unlike huge bankroll player that is still okay regardless if they will bet in equivalent to your all in hands.

Assuming both player has same skills, it’s always the huge bankroll gambler will win due to the much better try to beat the small bankroll player with good hands.

My usual strategy when I only bring a small bankroll to the poker table is to be patient, waiting for a good hand, and ignoring my opponents' bluffs throughout the game, but sometimes if my patience runs out, I'll go all-in early,   provided I have a high card of at least one of the two cards in my hand, such as an AS. This sometimes works because some opponents will fold, leaving only 2/3 of the table. But of course it is much better to bring a large capital to the table, because this will increase self-confidence.

[Ronsbit]

snip

snip

snip

If you play in a tournament, it has nothing to do with capital, because all chips are divided equally among all participants, so far, that's what I know and I quite often participate in tournaments, skills and experience are really needed as well as patience too

Playing in tournaments has nothing to do with bankroll or capital because these factors are not what plays the game to victory, but what is in function here is your skills, experience, and tactics deployed to play the games. Your funds are just a gateway to you having access to the tournament, and that does not guarantee a win for you if you join the table, but you will have to use your skills because all chips are shared equally amongst the players for a start.

[Bitinity]

At least it is now better than when they have not changed it, it was for 20 winners before they changed it to 10 winners 1-2 days ago. Nothing they can do with the adjusted prizepool. $1500 can be ideal to be split between 5 winners but it will make others losing hope for smaller prizes. If I am standing in the casino position, what they have now is the best option already.

I know why you are happy with the changed reward distribution . And I do agree with you on the point that the $1.5k is ideal here to split between top 5 ranked users. There won't be any tough competition for the 6th to 10th rank prizes. The reward has dropped by $10 on each rank from the 6th to 10th rank. I believe no one will compete (do wager) to achieve any of those ranks. Anyone with the wagering plan will compete for the top 3 prizes only.

Only 10 will share the $1500 in the contest? It seems like it would be even harder to be among those 10 winners. It seems like 20 winners would be even better
so that at least many people will have fun at least in those event games.

Maybe the other players instead of participating will not participate because the chances are even lower, of course out of 10 winners to be chosen, it's hard to be among them,
so it's just a matter of luck.

If the winners remain 20 while the prizepool is $1500, the wagering contest will get less total number wager which is the main purpose of wagering contest. Why? Simply because players will not try to wager as much as they can as the prize will not be something worth. As a result, the total wager by all participants will be low which will be something not worth for the casino to spend the money on the prizepool. That's why I do even believe that with $1500 prizepool, 5 winners will be much more competitive. 20 winners on the other side is good for participants only because some players may win something nice with low wager.

[Beparanf]

If the winners remain 20 while the prizepool is $1500, the wagering contest will get less total number wager which is the main purpose of wagering contest. Why? Simply because players will not try to wager as much as they can as the prize will not be something worth. As a result, the total wager by all participants will be low which will be something not worth for the casino to spend the money on the prizepool. That's why I do even believe that with $1500 prizepool, 5 winners will be much more competitive. 20 winners on the other side is good for participants only because some players may win something nice with low wager.

Totally agreed on this one. Typically, those top spot is the one who heavily being competed by whale players compared to the lower spot so a good top spot prize will surely attract whale players to compete in their tournament.

But as a low bankroll player that wants to participate on tournaments, I do preferred a balance between prize amount and total participants just like the previous tournament structure.

[Mahdirakib]

If the winners remain 20 while the prizepool is $1500, the wagering contest will get less total number wager which is the main purpose of wagering contest. Why? Simply because players will not try to wager as much as they can as the prize will not be something worth. ~

This is going to happen in this round. We won't see a tough contest for the prizes like it happened in the previous one. I could be wrong, but the result can be verified within next 3 days. I won't be surprised if the prizepool is reduced to $1k or less than that in the upcoming rounds. May I know how much you have received for the VIP tier-up bonus until now?

[vanesha]

If you look at the current leaderboard, it's very easy to catch up with them, but I'm very confident that everything will change when time runs out. Just like in the past, I saw a $20 bet on dice, and it was very quickly done. Even though in the last contest I won $60, I spent $50 on it. I can't imagine not getting anything.

Are you still interested in participating?
If not, I'm very happy because the competition isn't tight

[Pumared]

If you look at the current leaderboard, it's very easy to catch up with them, but I'm very confident that everything will change when time runs out. Just like in the past, I saw a $20 bet on dice, and it was very quickly done. Even though in the last contest I won $60, I spent $50 on it. I can't imagine not getting anything.

Are you still interested in participating?
If not, I'm very happy because the competition isn't tight

First place is already guaranteed, that's a fact. However, it's still possible to compete for lower positions. However, I'll stick to my betting strategy as the competition nears its end.