2UP.io | No-KYC Crypto Casino & BTC Sportsbook | Fast Withdrawals + 200% Bonus

[lionheart78]

Yes, some of us may have a different understanding than what they include in the ToS, as there are often sentences that seem to imply a certain meaning, even though they don't actually mean it.

This is why we need to reach out to the support channel in order to confirm whether our understanding of the ToS is the right one or not.  Misunderstanding happens when the reader vaguely understands the written terms and interprets them according to their understanding without verifying whether their understanding is correct.  I once make this mistake so I know this kind of misunderstanding exist.

However, once a casino has determined that a user has committed a violation (of any kind), their decision is usually final, especially if the user hasn't provided a valid and reasonable reason. I've rarely seen a user win when deemed to have committed a violation, so the casino ultimately decides.

True that, just like the recent case in my country, the Bingoplus controversy, where the player won Php397 million or $6,688,513.08, and the platform voided the winnings and insisted that it was a system error. 

[Questat]

However, once a casino has determined that a user has committed a violation (of any kind), their decision is usually final, especially if the user hasn't provided a valid and reasonable reason. I've rarely seen a user win when deemed to have committed a violation, so the casino ultimately decides.

That’s why they bring the issue elsewhere, hoping the casino’s decision might get twisted in their favor. But if the evidence isn’t solid enough, that’s just not going to happen. The problem is, people who read these accusations without properly evaluating the evidence, or without understanding how casinos actually work, will immediately think the casino is a scam.

Some say good or bad publicity is still publicity, but I honestly feel that bad publicity like this can really hurt a casino’s reputation in the long run.

[Kelvinid]

However, once a casino has determined that a user has committed a violation (of any kind), their decision is usually final, especially if the user hasn't provided a valid and reasonable reason. I've rarely seen a user win when deemed to have committed a violation, so the casino ultimately decides.

That’s why they bring the issue elsewhere, hoping the casino’s decision might get twisted in their favor. But if the evidence isn’t solid enough, that’s just not going to happen. The problem is, people who read these accusations without properly evaluating the evidence, or without understanding how casinos actually work, will immediately think the casino is a scam.

Some say good or bad publicity is still publicity, but I honestly feel that bad publicity like this can really hurt a casino’s reputation in the long run.

There are two reasons why a gambler raises an issue against the casino.

 -They claim they have a valid reason, but what happened is that they were blocklisted for having suspicious activity and violating the rules.
 - Some stories are cooked up to ruin someone's reputation. They posted everywhere to gain attention, as they are paid to do it.

Every day, we keep seeing this, and it is no longer surprising. It is likely to happen because many people believe they are entitled, despite making mistakes.

[freedomgo]

-They claim they have a valid reason, but what happened is that they were blocklisted for having suspicious activity and violating the rules.

If that’s the case, then they really need to provide proper evidence and let the community evaluate it. We have a lot of smart gamblers here, and most of us judge based on experience as well. When someone posts accusations just to ruin a casino without showing any proof, it’s usually easy to tell if it’s real or not.

That said, it’s still good to see a casino rep responding to accusations, even those that aren’t really worth entertaining.
At least it shows they care about their image and the community they’re part of.

[Questat]

Every day, we keep seeing this, and it is no longer surprising. It is likely to happen because many people believe they are entitled, despite making mistakes.

We’re not really judging them, since we don’t know them personally. Most of what we say here is based on observation and some speculation, especially on how casinos handle these situations. They don’t think the same way gamblers do, because they’re guided by rules set by their regulators. That also means they don’t have full freedom to say whatever they want. Some things are confidential, and others can only be shared within the limits they’re allowed to disclose.

[impulse709]

Every day, we keep seeing this, and it is no longer surprising. It is likely to happen because many people believe they are entitled, despite making mistakes.

We’re not really judging them, since we don’t know them personally. Most of what we say here is based on observation and some speculation, especially on how casinos handle these situations. They don’t think the same way gamblers do, because they’re guided by rules set by their regulators. That also means they don’t have full freedom to say whatever they want. Some things are confidential, and others can only be shared within the limits they’re allowed to disclose.

Such cases are frequent so that they no longer cause surprise. Numerous players have the right to raise a complaint on a situation that they did not cause, or the situation where they were not familiar with the rules. We are not in a position to judge anybody since we only get a section of the story. Casinos also do not think like gamblers since they have rules and internal policies to adhere to. Secrecy causes them not to be able to share everything and in most cases, this causes confusion between users of the forums.

[Questat]

Secrecy causes them not to be able to share everything and in most cases, this causes confusion between users of the forums.

That’s what some people don’t understand. They think that if a gambler is expected to be transparent, then the casino should also show everything. But casino TOS are fixed, and they’re usually interpreted the same way across different platforms, since most of them share the same license providers and even the same game providers.

Because of that, what we experience in one casino is often very similar to what we’ll see in others. And at the end of the day, casinos are running a profitable business. Why would they risk scamming a relatively small amount if it could cost them their license? That logic alone should already be considered by people who are quick to judge.

[jcojci]

Secrecy causes them not to be able to share everything and in most cases, this causes confusion between users of the forums.

That’s what some people don’t understand. They think that if a gambler is expected to be transparent, then the casino should also show everything. But casino TOS are fixed, and they’re usually interpreted the same way across different platforms, since most of them share the same license providers and even the same game providers.

Because of that, what we experience in one casino is often very similar to what we’ll see in others. And at the end of the day, casinos are running a profitable business. Why would they risk scamming a relatively small amount if it could cost them their license? That logic alone should already be considered by people who are quick to judge.

If people understand the TOS and asks supports what they don't understand so they will not interpret wrongly. They will waiting for the investigation from the casinos and let them resolve the case.

If people wants more details information, they can contact supports then asks for further explanation. That is confidential for public but casinos can gives to them with terms and conditions.

Members here are trying to helps those who complain. But people should not lying giving the evidence and so the casinos. But the casinos should resolve the cases privately because we can't interfere and only tells what we know.

But mostly, those who complains can't be patient waiting for the casinos to do fully investigation and resolve the case.

[gunhell16]

However, once a casino has determined that a user has committed a violation (of any kind), their decision is usually final, especially if the user hasn't provided a valid and reasonable reason. I've rarely seen a user win when deemed to have committed a violation, so the casino ultimately decides.

That’s why they bring the issue elsewhere, hoping the casino’s decision might get twisted in their favor. But if the evidence isn’t solid enough, that’s just not going to happen. The problem is, people who read these accusations without properly evaluating the evidence, or without understanding how casinos actually work, will immediately think the casino is a scam.

Some say good or bad publicity is still publicity, but I honestly feel that bad publicity like this can really hurt a casino’s reputation in the long run.

There are two reasons why a gambler raises an issue against the casino.

 -They claim they have a valid reason, but what happened is that they were blocklisted for having suspicious activity and violating the rules.
 - Some stories are cooked up to ruin someone's reputation. They posted everywhere to gain attention, as they are paid to do it.

Every day, we keep seeing this, and it is no longer surprising. It is likely to happen because many people believe they are entitled, despite making mistakes.

Some complainants will stand their ground, insisting they did nothing wrong. On the other hand, the casino management will also stand by their investigation, claiming their actions were justified.

In scenarios like this, only one side is telling the truth, and the other is lying. It’s as simple as that. To understand what really happened,
We just have to wait and see whose side holds up under scrutiny.