A legendary member who owns at least 9 more accounts is cheating sig campaigns

[Bitcoin_Arena]

>>snip<<

Indeed, this newly discovered accounts are linked to Baofeng, Kemarit, and Jating. The fact that they never even bothered to respond to the other thread where they were accused of cheating speaks volumes. Maybe OP might have landed on a big account farm that cheats on signature campaigns.

Code: 131jWqYxu5PWMKmxUj3NVq4ZjZ5gwAGwYC 18vmQt2oG4Mj3YiE1rKqVP6g5yzPWJeoa6 1MT7qvJ24FsK6KcYeR1QdenCiJMpwquXa5

All of these 3 output addresses are part of the same Wallet

More linked addresses from the same wallet

Code:

1w5nsRZoQyVGBkYjmxBW8H2o3yuJe4okz
1NbV7PLFmHUaNZ4rv4k4b9MjtHCCbvvg3p

Jating used 12ji3nWvHiATseFELxqhXJM3idpor9tPxH which would later send funds to 1w5nsRZoQyVGBkYjmxBW8H2o3yuJe4okz
https://ninjastic.space/addresses?address=12ji3nWvHiATseFELxqhXJM3idpor9tPxH

Siren used 1B7jZUoDKYwii7y8xu8ghJqgUCg6Td6yTw   which would later send funds to  1NbV7PLFmHUaNZ4rv4k4b9MjtHCCbvvg3p. Siren is banned
https://ninjastic.space/addresses?address=1B7jZUoDKYwii7y8xu8ghJqgUCg6Td6yTw

[Rikafip]

Good job OP, five less spammers on the forum and I hope their places will be filled by some honest members.

Irony is, there’s not a negligible chance that their spots might be filled with even worse spammers or alt accounts due lack of quality members.

The question is whether it’s even in the forum’s best interest to somehow magically remove all spammers and alt account farms, given the ever decreasing activity.

[Yaunfitda]

I'm using a our local exchange (coins.ph), and probably that's what you are seeing the connection?

I'm using a our local exchange (coins.ph), and probably that's what you are seeing the connection?

Are you voluntarily looking to get connected and receive negative feedback?
The bullshit excuse about services should never be accepted. This has practically never happened to anyone who isn't somehow connected to someone else. How exactly you are connected is irrelevant to me.

Haven't you seen that my name is being dragged here? I have to defend myself as I don't have any connections on those accounts.

[Satofan44]

I'm using a our local exchange (coins.ph), and probably that's what you are seeing the connection?

Are you voluntarily looking to receive negative feedback?
The bullshit excuse about services should never be accepted. This has practically never happened to anyone who isn't somehow connected to someone else. How exactly you are connected is irrelevant to me. It is easy to fall back to maybes. If you use Bitcoin the right way you will never be connected to somebody else by chance.

Haven't you seen that my name is being dragged here? I have to defend myself as I don't have any connections on those accounts.

Yes, my dear. Nobody has tagged you yet with a negative, which gives you some opportunity but you are just volunteering with this bullshit. It is not my cousin or my friend this time I swear, it is the exchange! You can ask Coins.ph to provide evidence in your defense if your claim is true.  

If they are a part of the farm I don't expect a response and we will see the same actions as the rest have gotten.

Now you have spoiled it by providing the way for saving at least 1 account.  

[hosemary]

Another Hero Member from Winna campaign- Yaunfitda

I also got suspicious that Yaunfitda might belong to the same farm after checking the transaction posted by lovesmayfamilis. But I didn't mention his/her name because I wasn't sure about that.
Below is the post I made after checking that transaction.

According to this transaction (and its parents), there may be some connection between Siren, Reatim and three other accounts, but I'm not sure of that. Two out of those three accounts are already tagged by DT members for abusing signature campaigns.
I won't share the names publicly until I am completely sure they are owned by the same person. I need more evidence, because they have different posting behavior and it's possible that they have sent the funds to the same exchange.

By the three accounts, I meant Jating, Yaunfitda and Baofeng.

Code: 131jWqYxu5PWMKmxUj3NVq4ZjZ5gwAGwYC 18vmQt2oG4Mj3YiE1rKqVP6g5yzPWJeoa6 1MT7qvJ24FsK6KcYeR1QdenCiJMpwquXa5

All of these 3 output addresses are part of the same Wallet

These addresses have been merged together in the same wallet because they were co-spent to 1MzxakFAiqx7xK9k4mtBS4wSL35C73FSe4 in this transaction.
If you check the transaction history of 1MzxakFAiqx7xK9k4mtBS4wSL35C73FSe4, you will see that it has received 20 BTC (around $340,000 at the time of transactions) in only 2 days. So Yaunfitda may be right. I highly doubt Yaunfitda owned at least $340,000 worth of bitcoin in December of 2017.

I won't post any feedback against Yaunfitda unless there is stronger evidence.

[Yaunfitda]

Another Hero Member from Winna campaign- Yaunfitda

I also got suspicious that Yaunfitda might belong to the same farm after checking the transaction posted by lovesmayfamilis. But I didn't mention his/her name because I wasn't sure about that.
Below is the post I made after checking that transaction.

According to this transaction (and its parents), there may be some connection between Siren, Reatim and three other accounts, but I'm not sure of that. Two out of those three accounts are already tagged by DT members for abusing signature campaigns.
I won't share the names publicly until I am completely sure they are owned by the same person. I need more evidence, because they have different posting behavior and it's possible that they have sent the funds to the same exchange.

By the three accounts, I meant Jating, Yaunfitda and Baofeng.

Code: 131jWqYxu5PWMKmxUj3NVq4ZjZ5gwAGwYC 18vmQt2oG4Mj3YiE1rKqVP6g5yzPWJeoa6 1MT7qvJ24FsK6KcYeR1QdenCiJMpwquXa5

All of these 3 output addresses are part of the same Wallet

These addresses have been merged together in the same wallet because they were co-spent to 1MzxakFAiqx7xK9k4mtBS4wSL35C73FSe4 in this transaction.
If you check the transaction history of 1MzxakFAiqx7xK9k4mtBS4wSL35C73FSe4, you will see that it has received 20 BTC (around $340,000 at the time of transactions) in only 2 days. So Yaunfitda may be right. I highly doubt Yaunfitda owned at least $340,000 worth of bitcoin in December of 2017.

I won't post any feedback against Yaunfitda unless there is stronger evidence.

Thank you very much. Not unless I wanted the authorities to track me down with that huge amount of money that time and not use a mixing service. 

[BeyazTurk]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5280190.msg56077177#msg56077177

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2480363.msg25961476#msg25961476

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2480363.msg25961476#msg25961476

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5197049.msg54082288#msg54082288

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5551526.msg65619359#msg65619359



Some Twist 

[Pandu Geddon]

Thank you very much. Not unless I wanted the authorities to track me down with that huge amount of money that time and not use a mixing service. 

What about small token transactions sent to the same address?
https://etherscan.io/address/0x7d2a30fffaf80a9f16685b0e05679e72d87e5bab#tokentxns

ETH Address: 0x450c702cF1b5b19587058C1bEf277bf18188CB0f

https://ninjastic.space/post/33971258

Eth Address: 0x1212bd75E420347918D8ad68660088B86F9292e7

https://ninjastic.space/post/48224663

[hosemary]

What about small token transactions sent to the same address?
https://etherscan.io/address/0x7d2a30fffaf80a9f16685b0e05679e72d87e5bab#tokentxns

Great find, Pandu Geddon.
It seems that I was too optimistic about Yaunfitda and I guess I will have to change my mind soon.

Yaunfitda, waiting to hear from you before adding another account to my list in OP.

[Yaunfitda]

Thank you very much. Not unless I wanted the authorities to track me down with that huge amount of money that time and not use a mixing service.  

What about small token transactions sent to the same address?
https://etherscan.io/address/0x7d2a30fffaf80a9f16685b0e05679e72d87e5bab#tokentxns

ETH Address: 0x450c702cF1b5b19587058C1bEf277bf18188CB0f

https://ninjastic.space/post/33971258

Eth Address: 0x1212bd75E420347918D8ad68660088B86F9292e7

https://ninjastic.space/post/48224663

I'm sorry but again, it's another exchange address that I used before. And I can't recall everything as this is 7 years ago.

[Pandu Geddon]

I'm sorry but again, it's another exchange address that I used before. And I can't recall everything as this is 7 years ago.

I don't believe that is an exchange address. First, the address only contains a few transactions. Second, look at the transaction time gaps. Even if you do P2P with local merchants in your country, I am sure that if they are actively running their services, the address would not only have a few transactions. If you are conducting transactions on a local exchange (coins.ph) as you mentioned, wouldn't the address also show transactions similar to those done by @Jating?

[julerz12]

If you are conducting transactions on a local exchange (coins.ph) as you mentioned, wouldn't the address also show transactions similar to those done by @Jating?

I don't think that's a coins.ph wallet address. If it was, it should say Coins.ph: Hot wallet
If you look up coins.ph on etherscan, that exchange already labelled their own hot wallets in the block explorer.
Here's an example: https://etherscan.io/address/0xd84b4436b6aba0fa348c5cf35b4682448e94724a

As for that exchange's BTC wallet, I'm not sure if they upgraded it yet but previously they are known to have used only one wallet, each user in their exchange then generates a deposit address which resulted to many earlier accounts in this forum having a bunch of connections if viewed in walletexplorer.com
[EDIT]: Here's an example, my previous BTC deposit address from that exchange: 36pXnVVoyDekpcQAXNtsk65iofwpwewKS5
If you look it up on walletexplorer, it's connected to a wallet that has thousands of addresses, most have numerous transactions: https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/00000dd86b2f6402/addresses

[Lucius]

Good job OP, five less spammers on the forum and I hope their places will be filled by some honest members.

Irony is, there’s not a negligible chance that their spots might be filled with even worse spammers or alt accounts due lack of quality members.
The question is whether it’s even in the forum’s best interest to somehow magically remove all spammers and alt account farms, given the ever decreasing activity.

I wanted to be optimistic, but I agree with you, the forum is simply full of spammers and alt accounts who are in some way to blame for the low pay rates because it's obviously very good for them if they have 5-10 accounts in sig campaigns. Part of the blame lies with the sig managers who should set much higher criteria, and not ask for 5 merits in 120 days and similar things that have nothing to do with quality.

[hosemary]

I'm sorry but again, it's another exchange address that I used before. And I can't recall everything as this is 7 years ago.

That's 7 years ago, but if the accusation against you is right, it means that you are still cheating signature campaigns.
Are you claiming you don't know peter0425 at all and no coins/tokens have been transfered between you?

I don't believe that is an exchange address.

0x7d2a30fffaf80a9f16685b0e05679e72d87e5bab should be their deposit address on HitBTC and it means that Yaunfitda and peter0425 have made deposit to the same HitBTC account.
Considering this and other evidence, Yaunfitda and peter0425 should be owned by the same person.

[Sandra_hakeem]

I haven't gone into the business of connecting accounts before, but I wonder why someone will know that enrolling alts in the same campaign is cheating and the will continue doing that.

What is even more laughable is the fact that there are so many signature campaigns lately and almost each passing we there are open slots available for members to join. Only a greedy and not smart member will try to enroll his alt accounts in the same signature campaign instead of different campaigns.

Even if they decided to enroll in different campaigns, isn't that still breaking one of the rules of multi- accounting? Is there something I'm not being told? The first point is also one of the most underlying factor on why most people develop the idea to create Alt accounts. Scrolling through the service board and seeing so many open spots, and new campaigns every week can be tempting for some.

I wanted to be optimistic, but I agree with you, the forum is simply full of spammers and alt accounts who are in some way to blame for the low pay rates because it's obviously very good for them if they have 5-10 accounts in sig campaigns. Part of the blame lies with the sig managers who should set much higher criteria, and not ask for 5 merits in 120 days and similar things that have nothing to do with quality.

It's good that most campaign managers have abandoned that old scrutiny methods on accounts for their campaigns. Spammers will always evolve a new way to cope with an outlined rule; but they can't manipulate the system if the managers just keep their criteria to themselves and pick who's best for a position in a campaign.

[PX-Z]

Even if they decided to enroll in different campaigns, isn't that still breaking one of the rules of multi- accounting? Is there something I'm not being told? The first point is also one of the most underlying factor on why most people develop the idea to create Alt accounts. Scrolling through the service board and seeing so many open spots, and new campaigns every week can be tempting for some....

There's actually no forum rule against having multiple accounts. Even some moderators have alternate accounts and have joined different campaigns using them. The issue only comes in when those accounts join the same campaign, that's generally considered cheating, which makes it a violation of the campaign's own rules, thus they deserved negative tag.

[hosemary]

Favorite profiles Yaunfitda has sent sMerit to:



Source: bpip.org

These can't be coincidences.

I added Yaunfitda, Baofeng, Kemarit and Jating to my list in OP. Please read the above posts for the proof.
10 accounts so far.

[khaled0111]

Baofeng, Kemarit and Jating.. What a shitshow!!
hosemay, you deserve to be rewarded (by all the involved campaign managers) for exposing these alt accounts.

[Free Market Capitalist]

Ok, so I learn about this case now and there is something I don't understand. Does anyone think it is humanly possible for just 1 person to manage 9 accounts? I think I wouldn't be able to, even if that was my only job and I took 5 coffees a day. Don't get me wrong, they might be part of a farm or something, and the lack of response on this thread I think shows guilt but I find it hard to understand how one person could manage so many accounts. I imagine it's a combination of living in a poor country where every payment from an additional campaign is very significant, plus dedicating yourself solely to that and producing kind of mediocre quality writing.

[lovesmayfamilis]

Ok, so I learn about this case now and there is something I don't understand. Does anyone think it is humanly possible for just 1 person to manage 9 accounts?

Just because we don't understand it doesn't mean it can't happen. It's like with UFOs. Although I would agree, there's a difference in posting.

It's good they didn't start inventing fathers and cats; otherwise, it would be outdated.

Favorite profiles Yaunfitda has sent sMerit to:

I checked his profile just for sending merits and found the transaction that I was sure you could use to unravel the mystery .

Sometimes farmers are very stupid and expose themselves by regularly sending merits to their accounts. This situation is currently occurring in the local Nigerian section, but everything will happen in due time. It's very frustrating to lose ten accounts just when you thought you'd achieved what you wanted.

Even if they decided to enroll in different campaigns, isn't that still breaking one of the rules of multi- accounting? Is there something I'm not being told?

Check the company's signature Vave; accounts from 2016 are suddenly reviving, like resurrections from the dead. Do you have to be a psychic to not realize they all belong to the same person