A legendary member who owns at least 9 more accounts is cheating sig campaigns

[dkbit98]

Good work OP.
I think that connection between this accounts is clear, but I am sure we are going to see same old excuses, family members, exchange accounts, etc.

i am an exchanger I buy bitcoin for fiats from multiple users of this forum

And you buy them all at the exact same time right?  
I am sure you can easily provide evidence of previous conversation when you purchased those coins from other members, and I would love to see that.

[CryptoHeadlineNews]

How do they cope making posts in every accounts involve to earn weekly payments? Is it that they hire people to make post for them? I'm just curious because I don't think anyone who has life outside the forum would survive operating multiple accounts like 3,4,5 and more.

Lolz 😂.. maybe the forum is their business, as they devotes their entire hours while avoiding the outside world just to milk signature campaigns by using multiple accounts. It's really crazy. But to be frankly speaking, if these accounts can't actually proof beyond every reasonable doubt that they aren't alts, then I think this will be the highest form of greed I think I may have ever come across on this forum. But however, I'm happy we have the likes of "hosemary" and "lovesmayfamilis" who are doing a good job fishing out signature campaign alts abusers.

I feel embarrassed on behalf of them for failing to come here to defend themselves. What a coward attitude 

It's obvious the evidence are clear, and they just decided to just keep mute, rather than to come lie. But however, it will be a pleasure to hear what they all have to say in defence.

[GxSTxV]

Great job OP, you are a great detective and helped to clean the forum from these bots who are just posting shitty stuff just for the signature campaign.
You really deserve a prize for that, especially from campaign managers, as it will help them to pick deserved members rather than one shitty poster with multiple accounts.
To be honest, I feel like the forum has many other people doing the same thing. I wonder if they have a life outside?

I also wish if there is a tool to check at least every member before joining a signature campaign and check if his address isn’t connected with alts. Tools or something with AI’s help maybe for a faster result.

[FinneysTrueVision]

At one point in January 2024 he had 5 accounts simultaneously participating in lightlord’s campaigns managed by CryptoprenuerBrainboss.

rodskee, kotajikikox, and bitterguy28 were in the Bitvest campaign. btc78 and peter0425 were in the Eloncoin signature campaign.

it is shame on this community, adding idiot to your trust list who does not know what proves altaccounts


do not ask why I use a new account if you have failed to learn the privacy practices

Very interesting that you have the exact same writing style as all of these accounts. You write everything in lowercase letters. Some of these accounts changed their writing style through grammar correction tools or possibly AI, but if you scroll through their post history to a period where they didn’t use them we see it is the same style.

[AB de Royse777]

I still reward users who help me to find cheated account but the user needs to remind me about it when they catch one. Good job OP. Unfortunately for you, this time none are in my campaigns :-D

[rat03gopoh]

but I wonder why someone will know that enrolling alts in the same campaign is cheating and the will continue doing that.

They don't want to achieve personal integrity from the start. Furthermore, if they find a way to easily climb the ranks, they can start a new round with fresh accounts.

I remember one specific rule from a manager (I don't remember who it was), something like "applying with an alt account is allowed, but only one will be hired." So members had to report their alt accounts if they were all accepted.
Well, sometimes money trumps honesty, even though it's actually a good rule to increase the chances of being hired by a campaign. Looser rules = more opportunities for exploitation.

[Rikafip]

but I wonder why someone will know that enrolling alts in the same campaign is cheating and the will continue doing that.

Because they think that they are very smart and that they won't get caught. And many are never caught, despite bitcointalk having excellent forum sleuths (like we saw in this case).

Seems like person behind these accounts decided to remain silent, which also says a lot.

[babo]

but I wonder why someone will know that enrolling alts in the same campaign is cheating and the will continue doing that.

Because they think that they are very smart and that they won't get caught. And many are never caught, despite bitcointalk having excellent forum sleuths (like we saw in this case).

Seems like person behind these accounts decided to remain silent, which also says a lot.

More often than not, people think they're smart and think others are stupid
anyway kudos to the OP for catching this

you even checked the tx of the addresses, you are a real hero, really.. unfortunately I am without merits but you deserve the ones you got.

[Erumo]

There were active posters, but after being exposed, suddenly became silent. What a coincidence or a confirmation that hosemary is correct with accusation

[JollyGood]

It must be disappointing to learn you cannot earn from some of the named accounts again as some campaign managers have already taken action and maybe some will take action soon. Many account farmers do not sleep with ease knowing their accounts could be exposed any time therefore the unease is understandable.

this is complete bull shit

i am an exchanger I buy bitcoin for fiats from multiple users of this forum

@nutildah
don't you know how real world btc transactions work? lost your fucking head?


it is shame on this community, adding idiot to your trust list who does not know what proves altaccounts


do not ask why I use a new account if you have failed to learn the privacy practices

[Lucius]

Good job OP, five less spammers on the forum and I hope their places will be filled by some honest members. As far as I can see, at least two accounts have been teleported to the ATT forum, although it seems to me that only one is participating in the signature campaign.

[Majestic-milf]

Good job OP, five less spammers on the forum and I hope their places will be filled by some honest members. As far as I can see, at least two accounts have been teleported to the ATT forum, although it seems to me that only one is participating in the signature campaign.

I agree with you. It's sad that someone let his greed get the best of him and now he has lost everywhere. That moment when you thought you were smart but in truth you were just being stupid and careless. I guess karma has paid him in full.

[AakZaki]

Productive capital from my own understanding is just that it is something that produces something. As mentioned for example machines. That’s a productive capital because it produces something could be food or clothing or whatever. Bitcoin doesn’t really do that but it doesn’t mean it doesn’t have any value nor is it not productive.

He was talking about something productive, but he was actually destroying his own productivity. It's truly embarrassing for people like him. This will reduce the number of cheaters. Hhampuz has kicked him off the signature campaign. Also, thanks to OP, there's a new opportunity in the signature campaign for people who have been honest in their work on this forum.
We need to support people like OP. Two words from me: "Good Job."

[rbynxx]

Damn it's even my countrymen, it's a shame that he have been farming this for years I guess. Great job OP, there's no room for cheaters when someone out there are grasping to find a signature campaign. The busted accounts probably know this thread but never got the time for an explanation, that raises question that it's probably true.

[Bitcoin_Arena]

I haven't gone into the business of connecting accounts before, but I wonder why someone will know that enrolling alts in the same campaign is cheating and the will continue doing that.

What is even more laughable is the fact that there are so many signature campaigns lately and almost each passing we there are open slots available for members to join. Only a greedy and not smart member will try to enroll his alt accounts in the same signature campaign instead of different campaigns.

[KingsDen]

but I wonder why someone will know that enrolling alts in the same campaign is cheating and the will continue doing that.

They don't want to achieve personal integrity from the start. Furthermore, if they find a way to easily climb the ranks, they can start a new round with fresh accounts.

I remember one specific rule from a manager (I don't remember who it was), something like "applying with an alt account is allowed, but only one will be hired." So members had to report their alt accounts if they were all accepted.
Well, sometimes money trumps honesty, even though it's actually a good rule to increase the chances of being hired by a campaign. Looser rules = more opportunities for exploitation.

I remember that rule and it was done in a good fate, just that the greedy ones might not overcome the urge to keep both accounts in the same campaign if they were both accepted. Let's say Mr. Bob has two accounts (Bob and B-alt) The rule simply means that Bob can apply with Bob and B-alt which increases his chances of being accepted. If eventually both are acceptable, he could just Pm the campaign manager with one account and decline the offer, not necessarily stating the reason for declining. I saw that as a harmless rule but then it is also a bait for the greedy ones who could just want to continue with both accounts since they are already accepted lol.

[nutildah]

@nutildah
don't you know how real world btc transactions work? lost your fucking head?

wat

i didn't even say anything. I didn't leave any negative trusts like this one 

Satofan44

2025-11-04

Reference

Cheating piece of shit and account farming retard.

I had to share this because I legit laughed out loud when I read it.

it is shame on this community, adding idiot to your trust list who does not know what proves altaccounts

except he does know it and he did prove it. Falling back on the old exchanger story is a last resort manuver, but thanks for dragging me into this, for no apparent reason, other than I merited the OP.

There were active posters, but after being exposed, suddenly became silent. What a coincidence or a confirmation that hosemary is correct with accusation

Perhaps the most damning of all was the lack of rebuttal, sans that extremely weak one quoted above.

Great work hosemary at putting the dots together in a manner that is convincing and easy to understand.

[Minor Miner]

The following three accounts currently enrolled in the Betpanda signature campaign seem to be connected. It's possible that I am mistaken but I don't believe these suspicions are entirely unfounded.

The three accounts are: Baofeng, Kemarit, and Jating. I have interacted with them many times over the years and I have noticed their writing has many similarities. All these users also have the same merit fishing tactic of making scam/malware warning threads. This isn't a smoking gun necessarily because people can pick up on certain habits and mannerisms from each other when you are from the same region, share many of the same interests and always visit the same forum boards so I decided to look a bit further.

On February 25, the payment for the Betpanda signature campaign was made in transaction e754321bbd2b4049c3ae2462c048e4fae52c846b16ebcf6015d38289747b9a4b
Kemarit sends his payment to address bc1qnfg74ycx774tkk9d82vh9900t25xjgv08l7kn4
Baofeng sends his payment to address bc1qhp6hq70za7yle52gpnssvekyj9p9vmxnrre8qv
Both of these transfers use the same feerate and are included in the same block.

The following accounts are all owned by the same person.

• peter0425 (hero member)
• kotajikikox (sr. member)
• rodskee (full member)
• bitterguy28 (full member)
• btc78 (full member)
• Reatim (sr. member)

Another Hero Member from Winna campaign- Yaunfitda


Proof:

Bitcointalk name: Yaunfitda
Bitcoin Address: 1CaBDSUQHzi2HKTy88UVgwWJegvnKZRWWT

Yaunfitda sent his campaign payment to this address - 131jWqYxu5PWMKmxUj3NVq4ZjZ5gwAGwYC

Btctalk name: Baofeng
BTC Address: 15HqMP4KRM93Bs23Lf9THt7uWZfQrymrFp

Baofeng sent his campaign payment to this address - 18vmQt2oG4Mj3YiE1rKqVP6g5yzPWJeoa6

Bitcointalk Username: Reatim
BTC Address: 15U2xStSKXYEPh62iXTSjZXCrknTBUjcsE

Reatim sent his campaign payment to this address - 1MT7qvJ24FsK6KcYeR1QdenCiJMpwquXa5

Code: 131jWqYxu5PWMKmxUj3NVq4ZjZ5gwAGwYC 18vmQt2oG4Mj3YiE1rKqVP6g5yzPWJeoa6 1MT7qvJ24FsK6KcYeR1QdenCiJMpwquXa5

All of these 3 output addresses are part of the same Wallet

[yahoo62278]

Another Hero Member from Winna campaign- Yaunfitda


Proof:

Bitcointalk name: Yaunfitda
Bitcoin Address: 1CaBDSUQHzi2HKTy88UVgwWJegvnKZRWWT

Yaunfitda sent his campaign payment to this address - 131jWqYxu5PWMKmxUj3NVq4ZjZ5gwAGwYC

I sent Yaunfitda a message asking them to respond here(we will see if they do) since I have them in bitslers campaign on altcoinstalks forum. When users transfer on the forum we know they are the account from here, so it's fair to use trusts gained on this forum against accounts there as well IMO.

If they are a part of the farm I don't expect a response and we will see the same actions as the rest have gotten.

[Lucius]

~snip~
If they are a part of the farm I don't expect a response and we will see the same actions as the rest have gotten.

As things develop, in the end it could be shown that perhaps 50% of all participants in sig campaigns are someone's alt. Considering that those who do this are not very intelligent (as can be seen from the specific example), if all the IP addresses of forum members could be compared, I think that a bunch of brothers, sisters and cousins ​​would appear.

I think OP deserves at least a beer for his efforts.