Duel.com -- The first casino with 0% house edge games

[mikel_012]

it's tricky to compare based on deposit volume alone, not to mention not all deposits are tracked (talking about btc, ltc, doge).
if you change the filters to last year, they are not far from each other.



but with how strong duel is growing, it won't be long before they leave gamdom behind.

Duel is only 1 year old and Gamdom exists since 2016

If you select for 1 year, you are looking at the first and second month of Duel since they were created, and comparing with two months for the casino that exists for 10 years.

But compare 1 month and you see the current market where they are already above Gamdom

[Haunebu]

Duel is only 1 year old and Gamdom exists since 2016

If you select for 1 year, you are looking at the first and second month of Duel since they were created, and comparing with two months for the casino that exists for 10 years.

But compare 1 month and you see the current market where they are already above Gamdom

Deposit volume comparison like this is just one factor and you would need to take multiple factors into consideration in order to effectively compare both in my opinion. Similarweb shows Duel having way more monthly visitors than Gamdom currently.

Based on multiple factors, it definitely looks like Duel is easily more popular than Gamdom, but acquisition is a completely different ballgame though which is not what is happening here clearly.

[Wind_FURY]

?

Gamdom is the significantly larger casino. Plus if Duel actually got absorbed by a larger casino, then the reason would be definitely financial. Payment will be in cash, and a portion of ownership shares in the larger casino.

That gives the seller profit, future profit from acquired shares, WITHOUT the operational labor of running the casino.

I do not think Gamdom is a larger casino

https://www.tanzanite.xyz/centralized/volume

If you look at this chart, you can confirm that Duel is the number 4 with most volume in this month with $245m deposits. And Gamdom is number 6 with $179m deposits

This month? Zoom out, ser. Could you get more information for each casino's total revenue, and total number of active users since the start of each of their existence?

ONE MONTH of volume/deposits does NOT make one casino larger over another. That's a fallacy.

[Mahdirakib]

~snip~ If Duel has managed to get into the top five of casinos by deposits, it is because they have done exceptionally good in terms of marketing and withdrawals. ~

Yeah, they have really done well in terms of marketing. Initially, they were doing the marketing in a professional way to get the users. Duel had gained good attention from the gamblers by doing the marketing in a proper way. But they started to do the marketing in a controversial way. Which also helped them to get more attention from the gamblers. But it also created a negative impact among a small group of users.

[mikel_012]

This month? Zoom out, ser. Could you get more information for each casino's total revenue, and total number of active users since the start of each of their existence?

ONE MONTH of volume/deposits does NOT make one casino larger over another. That's a fallacy.

All you need to do is check the chart and not just a number from a 1 year period that includes the first and second month of a casino since existence.





Look where Duel started and look at this chart. In total deposits it is very close in absolute numbers, but compare month after month and Duel is already bigger than Gamdom

What I find funny is that you said Gamdom is the significantly larger casino but the difference is super small. Just look at the charts and dare to say significantly larger again

[Hispo]

~snip~ If Duel has managed to get into the top five of casinos by deposits, it is because they have done exceptionally good in terms of marketing and withdrawals. ~

Yeah, they have really done well in terms of marketing. Initially, they were doing the marketing in a professional way to get the users. Duel had gained good attention from the gamblers by doing the marketing in a proper way. But they started to do the marketing in a controversial way. Which also helped them to get more attention from the gamblers. But it also created a negative impact among a small group of users.

Controversial or not, we have to admit that all of it worked. In my personal case as a casual gambler, I had never given so much attention to Duel before, but they actually caught my attention when they started with their controversial marketing on their Blackjack tables, since it is something I had never seen before on an actual professional cryptocurrency casino.

It makes me wonder how Jewish people actually feel about this if there were genuinely gambling before Duel decided to use controversy to grow faster.

This is a matter of statistics, Duel knows they were going to make some people feel upset, but many other will stay and come to see all this wacky stuff.

[salad daging]

What I find funny is that you said Gamdom is the significantly larger casino but the difference is super small. Just look at the charts and dare to say significantly larger again

Yep, a slight difference between Duel.com and Gamdom so it can be said Gamdom is also a great casino because it has a weekly deposit volume is quite large with the others, but can not compare with Stake.com.

I refer to the data on 2 different sites.

- https://gamstat.io/casinos
- https://www.circus.fyi/casinos

[Potato Chips]

If we're talking about deposit volume, fairgambling (the website folks were using for odds comparison as well) supports more chains like BTC and LTC. Their numbers are close but Duel is ahead in a one year time frame and most likely will be closing the gap more over time.

[mikel_012]

If we're talking about deposit volume, fairgambling (the website folks were using for odds comparison as well) supports more chains like BTC and LTC. Their numbers are close but Duel is ahead in a one year time frame and most likely will be closing the gap more over time.

Thank you for the extra data

So Duel is 1 year old and already bigger than Gamdom that exists for 10 years. I can see why Gamdom is joking with Duel and want to farm with the good moment of growth they have now

[Haunebu]

Controversial or not, we have to admit that all of it worked. In my personal case as a casual gambler, I had never given so much attention to Duel before, but they actually caught my attention when they started with their controversial marketing on their Blackjack tables, since it is something I had never seen before on an actual professional cryptocurrency casino.

It makes me wonder how Jewish people actually feel about this if there were genuinely gambling before Duel decided to use controversy to grow faster.

This is a matter of statistics, Duel knows they were going to make some people feel upset, but many other will stay and come to see all this wacky stuff.

It worked all right, but you need to see the bigger picture. This sort of stuff goes viral only in the short term while long term customer retention is far more important and that is their big test. Looks what happened to way bigger sites like BC.Game, Freebitco etc.

Staying popular consistently for a long period of time is extremely tough in this oversaturated crypto gambling environment and only few sites like Stake, Roobet etc have achieved that distinction. Doubt Duel will be one of them.

[Catenaccio]

Yep, a slight difference between Duel.com and Gamdom so it can be said Gamdom is also a great casino because it has a weekly deposit volume is quite large with the others, but can not compare with Stake.com.

I refer to the data on 2 different sites.

- https://gamstat.io/casinos
- https://www.circus.fyi/casinos

If people want to have reviews on Duel.com and Gamdom.com casinos with some criteria, not about user deposit volumes, they can try another site. Here are links of reviews on Duel and Gamdom.

https://www.tanzanite.xyz/casinos/duelcom
https://www.tanzanite.xyz/verify/gamdomcom

With information about user deposit volumes, two sites you shared provide very good information.

[mitchr4]

...
If people want to have reviews on Duel.com and Gamdom.com casinos with some criteria, not about user deposit volumes, they can try another site. Here are links of reviews on Duel and Gamdom.

https://www.tanzanite.xyz/casinos/duelcom
https://www.tanzanite.xyz/verify/gamdomcom

With information about user deposit volumes, two sites you shared provide very good information.

After checking both review links shared, the format looks exactly the same both for Gamdom and Duel, all criteria like Provably Fair, Responsible Gambling, and others are marked pass the same way.
This makes the review hard to use as a comparison, since ideally there should be some detail difference for each casino, not just the same checklist for every site.
It might help more if there was a more detailed explanation on how each casino actually meets those criteria, instead of just showing a pass status.

[Wind_FURY]

This month? Zoom out, ser. Could you get more information for each casino's total revenue, and total number of active users since the start of each of their existence?

ONE MONTH of volume/deposits does NOT make one casino larger over another. That's a fallacy.

All you need to do is check the chart and not just a number from a 1 year period that includes the first and second month of a casino since existence.





Look where Duel started and look at this chart. In total deposits it is very close in absolute numbers, but compare month after month and Duel is already bigger than Gamdom

What I find funny is that you said Gamdom is the significantly larger casino but the difference is super small. Just look at the charts and dare to say significantly larger again

I may be wrong in posting that Gamdom is significantly the larger casino, but merely because Gamdom was founded years before Duel, and because from a brand perspective it's probable that it's more popular, then I would assume that Gamdom probably has two times more in Net Gaming Revenue than Duel.

BUT, you're right, as a mere PLEB, I could be wrong. If anyone can verify Gamdom and Duel's Net Gaming Revenue please.

[Hispo]

Controversial or not, we have to admit that all of it worked. In my personal case as a casual gambler, I had never given so much attention to Duel before, but they actually caught my attention when they started with their controversial marketing on their Blackjack tables, since it is something I had never seen before on an actual professional cryptocurrency casino.

It makes me wonder how Jewish people actually feel about this if there were genuinely gambling before Duel decided to use controversy to grow faster.

This is a matter of statistics, Duel knows they were going to make some people feel upset, but many other will stay and come to see all this wacky stuff.

It worked all right, but you need to see the bigger picture. This sort of stuff goes viral only in the short term while long term customer retention is far more important and that is their big test. Looks what happened to way bigger sites like BC.Game, Freebitco etc.

Staying popular consistently for a long period of time is extremely tough in this oversaturated crypto gambling environment and only few sites like Stake, Roobet etc have achieved that distinction. Doubt Duel will be one of them.

Well, time will tell though.
We just need to stay around and keep an eye on Duel now and then and see if they still manage to pull so many views on Twitter and Instagram, that is where they get most of their engagement anyways.
Also see if their deposit statistics stay as high as they are nowadays.

I am not sure if it would be fair to compare Duel with Freebitcoin and BC GAME, as two latter casinos have become selective (BC) and total scams (Freebitcoin).

Duel remains a service with good reputation, as far as I know, in terms of deposits and withdrawals.

[shemil]

Duel actually has games with a 0% house edge. You can play them at true 50/50 odds, but only up to a certain amount of total wagering. Once you hit that limit, the conditions change.

https://slotsims.com/casino/duel