The Stake campaign is filled with frauds & questionable accounts

[tygeade]

what if you sig banned every signature campaign participant that joined a campaign that required their participants to post more than 20 posts every week?

You may end up with sigbanning an elite poster (who belongs to top 10% of active posters category) for the reason of participating in a campaign which allows more than 20 posts/week. Do you still find your suggestion fair enough?

[Free Market Capitalist]

what if you sig banned every signature campaign participant that joined a campaign that required their participants to post more than 20 posts every week?

LOL. Considering the idea will you say 15 posts per week and a high per post rate is a good idea and guarantee that no participants will be banned? I am going to experiment it with Zeto signature campaign.

If that became widespread, having more than one account would also become widespread. If people are used to getting paid for 25 posts—keeping in mind that most write more than that, say about 30—and campaigns pay for 15, all you have to do is create a new account, wait at least half a year to start monetizing it, and get paid for two campaigns of 15.

The CM campaign paid up to 50 posts per week, having the best quality posters on the forum. The problem is not the number of posts.

[AB de Royse777]

The CM campaign paid up to 50 posts per week, having the best quality posters on the forum. The problem is not the number of posts.

I think on Sinbad I also had up to 50 posts per week to pay. Problem is never in the number of posts. Problem is in the intention of the person who is posting.

Update: In the last 10 hours I made 10 posts, I slept around 5 to 6 hours in between which means I made those 10 posts in 4 to 5 hours. There are some with not even two words. Do I look like I am posting for displaying signature?

When a poster's sole intention is to display his signature and earn from it then they are going to spam no matter if that's 15 posts per week or 50 posts per week. I see members to make exactly 15 posts per week when the requirement is 15, and the same user also can make exactly 50 posts per week when the requirement increase to 50.

[FinneysTrueVision]

LOL. Considering the idea will you say 15 posts per week and a high per post rate is a good idea and guarantee that no participants will be banned? I am going to experiment it with Zeto signature campaign.

If it was a maximum of 20 posts per week, you would probably get much higher quality applicants than the current ones so far. With 15 posts, you are only paying $60-$75 per week. There are already plenty of campaigns paying this much or higher. You are going to get a fair amount of account farmers and spammers. They aren’t going to put any more effort into writing better posts because they have a reduced quota in one campaign if they are already in 4 or 5 other campaigns that have higher requirements.

[Woodie]

I think getting ALL the managers together and making a change for a max number of posts in every campaign would be a solution worth having a discussion about.

Managers coming together is the only remedy that will help the forum raise the bar as you speak with one voice & set the standard! Just hope stake will play along  

Btw you guys did it with SMAS and it was a success ,maybe consider revamping this.. as CMs have that kind of influence which the forum can benefit from..

[Lucius]

~snip~
The CM campaign paid up to 50 posts per week, having the best quality posters on the forum. The problem is not the number of posts.

That was probably one of the most successful and generous campaigns on the forum and to this day none of the managers have tried anything similar, and when I say "similar" I mean that there is a sig campaign that will gather the best posters and which will of course reward them with the best pay rates.

Obviously, that model doesn't suit anyone (I mean managers), because if one such campaign appeared, all other campaigns would suffer because of it. A win-win situation is to keep the pay rates uniform and thus spread the best posters between as many campaigns as possible.

Besides, a question for all managers that many would like to ask - why don't you fight for better pay rates considering that nothing has changed for years, and we all know that $50 or $100 today is not worth even half of what it was worth 4-5 years ago?

Those who advertise on the forum should appreciate the members who promote them a little more, especially those who fall into the category of good, very good and excellent posters.

[Free Market Capitalist]

Obviously, that model doesn't suit anyone (I mean managers), because if one such campaign appeared, all other campaigns would suffer because of it. A win-win situation is to keep the pay rates uniform and thus spread the best posters between as many campaigns as possible.

That sounds quite socialist to me, and I know we are not going to agree on that.

Besides, a question for all managers that many would like to ask - why don't you fight for better pay rates considering that nothing has changed for years, and we all know that $50 or $100 today is not worth even half of what it was worth 4-5 years ago?

Whatever the managers may say, I believe that the price of Bitcoin hasn’t kept pace. If we were in a bear market at $280K after having reached a price of almost $400K last year, the payouts would probably be higher. But today you can buy a Bitcoin at the same price as on 13 November 2021, and that has an impact.