Bitcoin Forum
September 20, 2017, 08:34:06 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.0.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 [322] 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 ... 469 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Answer the question above with a question.  (Read 643164 times)
picolo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714


🌟ATLANT ICO: 7/09/17🌟


View Profile
December 20, 2014, 09:37:02 AM
 #6421


shouldn't we go with this fork, since it's more interesting?

Let's get rid of all the quotes, shall we?

......ATLANT......
..Real Estate Blockchain Platform..
                     ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
                    ████████████░
                  ▄██████████████░
                 ▒███████▄████████░
                ▒█████████░████████░
                ▀███████▀█████████
                  ██████████████
           ███████▐██▀████▐██▄████████░
          ▄████▄█████████▒████▌█████████░
         ███████▄█████████▀██████████████░
        █████████▌█████████▐█████▄████████░
        ▀█████████████████▐███████████████
          █████▀████████ ░███████████████
    ██████▐██████████▄████████████████████████░
  ▄████▄████████▐███████████████░▄▄▄▄░████████░
 ▄██████▄█████████▐█████▄█████████▀████▄█████████░
███████████████████▐█████▄█████████▐██████████████░
▀████████▀█████████▒██████████████▐█████▀█████████
  ████████████████ █████▀█████████████████████████
   ▀██▀██████████ ▐█████████████  ▀██▀██████████
    ▀▀█████████    ▀▀█████████    ▀▀██████████

..INVEST  ●  RENT  ●  TRADE..
  ✓Assurance     ✓Price Discovery     ✓Liquidity     ✓Low Fees





███
███
███
███
███
███





███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███

◣Whitepaper ◣ANN ThreadTelegram
◣ Facebook     ◣ Reddit          ◣ Slack


███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███





███
███
███
███
███
███



1505939646
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1505939646

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1505939646
Reply with quote  #2

1505939646
Report to moderator
1505939646
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1505939646

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1505939646
Reply with quote  #2

1505939646
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
Gleb Gamow
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1162


@ 🎥 YuTü.Co.in 🎥


View Profile WWW
December 20, 2014, 10:15:36 AM
 #6422


shouldn't we go with this fork, since it's more interesting?

Let's get rid of all the quotes, shall we?

Only if, "Are you going to tell me why my former quark pic won't load?"


mm5aes
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 176

Unix Admin For Hire.


View Profile WWW
December 20, 2014, 02:13:53 PM
 #6423


shouldn't we go with this fork, since it's more interesting?

Let's get rid of all the quotes, shall we?

Only if, "Are you going to tell me why my former quark pic won't load?"



This thread has taken a paltry direction has it not?

Now job in IT? Try http://techwork.uk/
galdur
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616



View Profile
December 20, 2014, 02:34:31 PM
 #6424


shouldn't we go with this fork, since it's more interesting?

Let's get rid of all the quotes, shall we?

Only if, "Are you going to tell me why my former quark pic won't load?"



This thread has taken a paltry direction has it not?

Do we need a more blue-sky approach to knowledge-based logistical consulting ?

teodor87
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154


Man is King!


View Profile
December 20, 2014, 03:44:56 PM
 #6425


shouldn't we go with this fork, since it's more interesting?

Let's get rid of all the quotes, shall we?

Only if, "Are you going to tell me why my former quark pic won't load?"



This thread has taken a paltry direction has it not?

Do we need a more blue-sky approach to knowledge-based logistical consulting ?

Do we need more "Do-we-need"s?

1BXi1DWT9U8snSr8wmuL7iihqphNiPRN9k
blablaace
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350

ANONYMIZE YOUR BITCOIN: BITLAUNDER.COM


View Profile
December 20, 2014, 04:38:54 PM
 #6426


shouldn't we go with this fork, since it's more interesting?

Let's get rid of all the quotes, shall we?

Only if, "Are you going to tell me why my former quark pic won't load?"



This thread has taken a paltry direction has it not?

Do we need a more blue-sky approach to knowledge-based logistical consulting ?

Do we need more "Do-we-need"s?
Why wouldn't we need it?

** ANONYMIZE BITCOINS ** https://www.BitLaunder.com/?aid=42
Bubbsandbubbs3
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 270


Squirtle squirt.


View Profile WWW
December 20, 2014, 05:44:51 PM
 #6427


Why wouldn't we need it?
Why would we?

mm5aes
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 176

Unix Admin For Hire.


View Profile WWW
December 21, 2014, 12:11:41 AM
 #6428


Why wouldn't we need it?
Why would we?
How else are we going to get the bread to rise?

Now job in IT? Try http://techwork.uk/
JorgeStolfi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 896



View Profile
December 21, 2014, 07:03:03 AM
 #6429

Why wouldn't we need it?
Why would we?
How else are we going to get the bread to rise?
Will you guys be annoyed if I bring back that chickens and quacks picture, for no particular reason?

Academic interest in bitcoin only. Not owner, not trader, very skeptical of its longterm success.
aacoins
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112

Run a Full Node-Just Do It!


View Profile
December 21, 2014, 07:27:27 AM
 #6430

Why wouldn't we need it?
Why would we?
How else are we going to get the bread to rise?
Will you guys be annoyed if I bring back that chickens and quacks picture, for no particular reason?


Would you believe that I wouldn't?

BTC-1AacoiNQXHJtsVuTFZRZnX6iGXtFgHHYae
XPY-PAACoin14KZNe2sPcpFUH4SDah6LkbqPsF
Tip Jar Smiley
Gleb Gamow
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1162


@ 🎥 YuTü.Co.in 🎥


View Profile WWW
December 21, 2014, 09:55:26 AM
 #6431

Why wouldn't we need it?
Why would we?
How else are we going to get the bread to rise?
Will you guys be annoyed if I bring back that chickens and quacks picture, for no particular reason?


Would you believe that I wouldn't?

Would you believe that the anagram for I Wouldn't is Wold Unit, wold being an Old English term for a forest or an area of woodland on high ground, of which its tree are of wood, in turn (which rhymes with term and tern, the latter a bird that doesn't nests in trees), rhymes with would?

Bubbsandbubbs3
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 270


Squirtle squirt.


View Profile WWW
December 21, 2014, 05:05:21 PM
 #6432

Why wouldn't we need it?
Why would we?
How else are we going to get the bread to rise?
Will you guys be annoyed if I bring back that chickens and quacks picture, for no particular reason?


Would you believe that I wouldn't?

Would you believe that the anagram for I Wouldn't is Wold Unit, wold being an Old English term for a forest or an area of woodland on high ground, of which its tree are of wood, in turn (which rhymes with term and tern, the latter a bird that doesn't nests in trees), rhymes with would?
Is there a way to get rid of this image?

Gleb Gamow
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1162


@ 🎥 YuTü.Co.in 🎥


View Profile WWW
December 21, 2014, 08:05:31 PM
 #6433

Why wouldn't we need it?
Why would we?
How else are we going to get the bread to rise?
Will you guys be annoyed if I bring back that chickens and quacks picture, for no particular reason?

Would you believe that I wouldn't?

Would you believe that the anagram for I Wouldn't is Wold Unit, wold being an Old English term for a forest or an area of woodland on high ground, of which its tree are of wood, in turn (which rhymes with term and tern, the latter a bird that doesn't nests in trees), rhymes with would?
Is there a way to get rid of this image?

What if we made it smaller and moved it around, would that work for you?


aacoins
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112

Run a Full Node-Just Do It!


View Profile
December 21, 2014, 08:31:51 PM
 #6434

Why would you believe that satoshi would approve of that?

BTC-1AacoiNQXHJtsVuTFZRZnX6iGXtFgHHYae
XPY-PAACoin14KZNe2sPcpFUH4SDah6LkbqPsF
Tip Jar Smiley
blablaace
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350

ANONYMIZE YOUR BITCOIN: BITLAUNDER.COM


View Profile
December 21, 2014, 09:55:17 PM
 #6435

Why would you believe that satoshi would approve of that?
Why didn't you quote last reply?

** ANONYMIZE BITCOINS ** https://www.BitLaunder.com/?aid=42
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 994


View Profile
December 21, 2014, 10:05:43 PM
 #6436

Why would you believe that satoshi would approve of that?
Why didn't you quote last reply?

via Imgflip Meme Maker

Forgive my petulance and oft-times, I fear, ill-founded criticisms, and forgive me that I have, by this time, made your eyes and head ache with my long letter. But I cannot forgo hastily the pleasure and pride of thus conversing with you.
Gleb Gamow
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1162


@ 🎥 YuTü.Co.in 🎥


View Profile WWW
December 22, 2014, 09:02:59 AM
 #6437

Could it be because he's so excited about the new wallpaper he just purchased?









picolo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714


🌟ATLANT ICO: 7/09/17🌟


View Profile
December 22, 2014, 10:37:03 AM
 #6438

Why would you believe that satoshi would approve of that?

We don't know but can't we speculate?

......ATLANT......
..Real Estate Blockchain Platform..
                     ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
                    ████████████░
                  ▄██████████████░
                 ▒███████▄████████░
                ▒█████████░████████░
                ▀███████▀█████████
                  ██████████████
           ███████▐██▀████▐██▄████████░
          ▄████▄█████████▒████▌█████████░
         ███████▄█████████▀██████████████░
        █████████▌█████████▐█████▄████████░
        ▀█████████████████▐███████████████
          █████▀████████ ░███████████████
    ██████▐██████████▄████████████████████████░
  ▄████▄████████▐███████████████░▄▄▄▄░████████░
 ▄██████▄█████████▐█████▄█████████▀████▄█████████░
███████████████████▐█████▄█████████▐██████████████░
▀████████▀█████████▒██████████████▐█████▀█████████
  ████████████████ █████▀█████████████████████████
   ▀██▀██████████ ▐█████████████  ▀██▀██████████
    ▀▀█████████    ▀▀█████████    ▀▀██████████

..INVEST  ●  RENT  ●  TRADE..
  ✓Assurance     ✓Price Discovery     ✓Liquidity     ✓Low Fees





███
███
███
███
███
███





███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███

◣Whitepaper ◣ANN ThreadTelegram
◣ Facebook     ◣ Reddit          ◣ Slack


███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███





███
███
███
███
███
███



Gleb Gamow
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1162


@ 🎥 YuTü.Co.in 🎥


View Profile WWW
December 22, 2014, 06:07:45 PM
 #6439

Why would you believe that satoshi would approve of that?

We don't know but can't we speculate?










Seriously, you're not questioning the dude's recent wallpaper purchase?

Bubbsandbubbs3
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 270


Squirtle squirt.


View Profile WWW
December 22, 2014, 08:20:39 PM
 #6440

Why would you believe that satoshi would approve of that?

We don't know but can't we speculate?










Seriously, you're not questioning the dude's recent wallpaper purchase?
I am, aren't you?

Pages: « 1 ... 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 [322] 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 ... 469 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!