China taking over the world without military actions.

[Cheema02]

From what I observed by analyzing Chinese strategy during the last two decades, it is obvious that China is the number one beneficiary of all the conflicts made by the USA and the West around the globe. From this approach, it is not in its favor that the Iranian file gets closed by reaching an agreement with west power led by the USA. Lifting international sanctions on Iran means the end of a lucrative period for China and some other countries that have profited from Iran's limited resources and markets.

Trump is scheduled to make a state visit to China from 14 to 15 this month. There are expectations that the crisis in the Strait of Hormuz will reach a solution even if the war against Iran continues.

Your point describes the geo political situations of middle east. If we analysis China take benefits through trade and Iran makes the the alternative trade pattern due to sanctions but behinds this situations many factors are involved like domestic policies. currently the relations of China and US is complex and if a diplomatic talk is arranged among these countries then the main focus is Strait of Hormuz. Because Hormuz is a main oil trade route in middle east and if its closed then its effects the economies of many countries. geopolitical matter should be resolved very sincerely because media changes the talk way in different directions. the moderators should understands the incentives of each country through this mis guidenece becomes low. So the outcomes depends on continuous and peaceful talk between conflicted countries rather than fixed strategies.

[DrBeer]

Yes, the whole world is amazed by China and how, over forty years, they've managed to build their economy so well that they've shown incredible GDP growth. There are also many rumors about China, saying they constantly act in their own interests, without making friends. And that's the right approach. Trump, for example, constantly claims that everyone, even the president, is his friend, but then criticizes him the next day. He's an astonishing figure, saying one thing and doing another.

Everyone who has taken an interest in the history of China’s economic development knows the answer
These include investments by Western companies, opening the market to Chinese goods, the supply of technology and equipment, staff training, and education at Western universities. Without this, China would have remained an agrarian developing country.

The US and its allies are not foolish enough to provide China with technology, equipment, and education without ulterior motives.
The West wants to take advantage of Asia's abundant supply of cheap labor to serve its capitalist interest. They want to move all factories and production lines to China and Asia to minimize environmental pollution in the country. In this way,  they got cheap goods and kept the environment clean
Their mistake was underestimating the Chinese mindset and strategy. Instead of staying a hired hand for the West forever, China has quietly learned, copied, improved, and built its own industrial chain. Now, the West is paying the price for that miscalculation.

I do not really like China either, but I have to admit they are damn good.

Recall the “economic revolution” launched by Deng Xiaoping! He essentially “signed a deal” with the Western world and his own people, stipulating that the West would bring investment and technology to China, while China would begin mass-producing, at low cost, the goods needed by the Western market. At the same time, China developed its own industry by borrowing from this experience. It was precisely this event,and the mutual benefit it provided at the time,that led to the explosive growth of China’s economy. Some saved money and reduced production costs, while others gained a huge number of jobs and access to industrial technologies.

[Swordsoffreedom]

Trump is scheduled to make a state visit to China from 14 to 15 this month. There are expectations that the crisis in the Strait of Hormuz will reach a solution even if the war against Iran continues.

Yes, Trump and several CEOs of leading American technology companies arrived in Beijing today.

I still do not know what the purpose of Trump's trip is. However, I do not think they will be able to resolve the crisis in the Strait of Hormuz. This is a war between the United States and Iran, it has nothing to do with China.

By the way, how will the strait crisis be resolved as the war continues? Iran will never let that happen because it is their strategic bargaining chip to prevent the United States from continuing its invasion of their country.

[abhiseshakana]

Recall the “economic revolution” launched by Deng Xiaoping! He essentially “signed a deal” with the Western world and his own people, stipulating that the West would bring investment and technology to China, while China would begin mass-producing, at low cost, the goods needed by the Western market. At the same time, China developed its own industry by borrowing from this experience. It was precisely this event,and the mutual benefit it provided at the time,that led to the explosive growth of China’s economy. Some saved money and reduced production costs, while others gained a huge number of jobs and access to industrial technologies.

We can say, relation between The West and China were mutually symbiotic at that time. From China the west got cheap product, big margin, large profit and low inflation. In the other hand, China got rapid industrialization, technology transfer, foreign exchange accumulation and national development. But i think western elit did miscalculation, they believed if China getting richer, China will become liberal country but its totally wrong, what we see now, China gets stronger, more independent but still maintain its political system. Matter of fact Deng's strategy was not western style liberalization, but  a state controllled strategy to integrate with global capitalism, China opened up but  state control reamin very strong over bank, land, strategic industries and development direction.what China actually need at that time are technology transfer and upgrading its industry and manufacture, from low cost manufacturing to be high-tech and strategic industries. We see China purpose not to be a cheap factory forever, fullfilled today with its EV, AI, battery, 5G and chip.

I remember have a bad experience when my colleague did beverage product manufacturing in China, The factory where she do maklon sells her products directly globally with unlimited quantities and lower prices.

[DrBeer]

Recall the “economic revolution” launched by Deng Xiaoping! He essentially “signed a deal” with the Western world and his own people, stipulating that the West would bring investment and technology to China, while China would begin mass-producing, at low cost, the goods needed by the Western market. At the same time, China developed its own industry by borrowing from this experience. It was precisely this event,and the mutual benefit it provided at the time,that led to the explosive growth of China’s economy. Some saved money and reduced production costs, while others gained a huge number of jobs and access to industrial technologies.

We can say, relation between The West and China were mutually symbiotic at that time. From China the west got cheap product, big margin, large profit and low inflation. In the other hand, China got rapid industrialization, technology transfer, foreign exchange accumulation and national development. But i think western elit did miscalculation, they believed if China getting richer, China will become liberal country but its totally wrong, what we see now, China gets stronger, more independent but still maintain its political system. Matter of fact Deng's strategy was not western style liberalization, but  a state controllled strategy to integrate with global capitalism, China opened up but  state control reamin very strong over bank, land, strategic industries and development direction.what China actually need at that time are technology transfer and upgrading its industry and manufacture, from low cost manufacturing to be high-tech and strategic industries. We see China purpose not to be a cheap factory forever, fullfilled today with its EV, AI, battery, 5G and chip.

I remember have a bad experience when my colleague did beverage product manufacturing in China, The factory where she do maklon sells her products directly globally with unlimited quantities and lower prices.

If we look at China’s history following the onset of this positive revolution, we see that, under Deng Xiaoping’s leadership, China moved toward building socialism with a "capitalist face". True, there were still some domestic policy issues, but the regime could not be called a "bloody regime" or "absolutely totalitarian", and there was a sense that China would continue to develop along this path, becoming a strong and significant global player in the world economy on MUTUALLY BENEFICIAL terms.
Changes occurred with the change in leadership, with the arrival of Xi Jinping. It was he who "slammed the steering wheel to the side" and began steering China back toward totalitarianism and confrontation with the Western world, determined that he is already ready to become the second, if not the first, pole of the earth. Aggressive rhetoric, militarization, plans to seize foreign territories... all of this is Xi Jinping’s policy. Where this will lead-we shall see....

[Chilwell]

China rises on the global map as a leader without using any warfare or military support or involving them in any sort of war. Because of this the global strategy is started shifting from military dominance to economic integration. They have built infrastructures, railway, ports, power plant to connect them to different nations across the world. They have proven influence across the globe by building diplomatic loyality with other countries without using military power. They have achieved dominance by building global networks, controlling supply chains through investment rather than invasions and making their name as a global leader.

I like how China used their strategies to takes over the world, China have conquered all over the world without any chaos or dropping bombs, currently China is above United State of America, i mean when it comes to benefit from all over the world. This is what United state of America should do after gaining so much power but they believe that bombing and killing leaders of a nation will make them conquer the world. China did not use that strategies that is why they are successful today and they only believe that for them to enter war with any nation that means they have exhausted all their plans of making peace.

[Abiky]

Yes, Trump and several CEOs of leading American technology companies arrived in Beijing today.

I still do not know what the purpose of Trump's trip is. However, I do not think they will be able to resolve the crisis in the Strait of Hormuz. This is a war between the United States and Iran, it has nothing to do with China.

By the way, how will the strait crisis be resolved as the war continues? Iran will never let that happen because it is their strategic bargaining chip to prevent the United States from continuing its invasion of their country.

Isn't China Iran's "biggest trading partner"? They are considered allies among each other. China can act as a mediator to help end the conflict between the US and Iran. It's in China's best interests to keep the Strait opened. After all, China depends on oil to survive. It may be the second-largest economy in the world, but it isn't immune from the negative effects of the Middle East conflict.

The recent meeting between China's Xi and US President Donald Trump, is one of the latest efforts to help "fix" ties between the two countries. Behind the scenes, China is slowly advancing in terms of tech and economic superiority. If the US lets its guard down, China will simply "eat its cake". Who knows what lies ahead in the future?

[Swordsoffreedom]

Yes, Trump and several CEOs of leading American technology companies arrived in Beijing today.

I still do not know what the purpose of Trump's trip is. However, I do not think they will be able to resolve the crisis in the Strait of Hormuz. This is a war between the United States and Iran, it has nothing to do with China.

By the way, how will the strait crisis be resolved as the war continues? Iran will never let that happen because it is their strategic bargaining chip to prevent the United States from continuing its invasion of their country.

Isn't China Iran's "biggest trading partner"? They are considered allies among each other. China can act as a mediator to help end the conflict between the US and Iran. It's in China's best interests to keep the Strait opened. After all, China depends on oil to survive. It may be the second-largest economy in the world, but it isn't immune from the negative effects of the Middle East conflict.

The recent meeting between China's Xi and US President Donald Trump, is one of the latest efforts to help "fix" ties between the two countries. Behind the scenes, China is slowly advancing in terms of tech and economic superiority. If the US lets its guard down, China will simply "eat its cake". Who knows what lies ahead in the future?

China is Iran's largest trading partner and oil importer. More accurately, Iran is heavily dependent on China, not the other way around

They are not allies like Israel and the United States. China and Iran are only strategic partner through a 25 year cooperation agreement.

Of course, China could play a mediating role, but how far do you think that will go? It will go nowhere if the United States imposes unreasonable condition.

China depend on oil and is the world's largest oil importer, but it does not rely solely on Iran. They import from Russia, Brazil, and Malaysia.

The rise of China is inevitable.

[DYOR+BTC]

Recall the “economic revolution” launched by Deng Xiaoping! He essentially “signed a deal” with the Western world and his own people, stipulating that the West would bring investment and technology to China, while China would begin mass-producing, at low cost, the goods needed by the Western market. At the same time, China developed its own industry by borrowing from this experience. It was precisely this event,and the mutual benefit it provided at the time,that led to the explosive growth of China’s economy. Some saved money and reduced production costs, while others gained a huge number of jobs and access to industrial technologies.

We can say, relation between The West and China were mutually symbiotic at that time. From China the west got cheap product, big margin, large profit and low inflation. In the other hand, China got rapid industrialization, technology transfer, foreign exchange accumulation and national development. But i think western elit did miscalculation, they believed if China getting richer, China will become liberal country but its totally wrong, what we see now, China gets stronger, more independent but still maintain its political system. Matter of fact Deng's strategy was not western style liberalization, but  a state controllled strategy to integrate with global capitalism, China opened up but  state control reamin very strong over bank, land, strategic industries and development direction.what China actually need at that time are technology transfer and upgrading its industry and manufacture, from low cost manufacturing to be high-tech and strategic industries. We see China purpose not to be a cheap factory forever, fullfilled today with its EV, AI, battery, 5G and chip.

I remember have a bad experience when my colleague did beverage product manufacturing in China, The factory where she do maklon sells her products directly globally with unlimited quantities and lower prices.

If we look at China’s history following the onset of this positive revolution, we see that, under Deng Xiaoping’s leadership, China moved toward building socialism with a "capitalist face". True, there were still some domestic policy issues, but the regime could not be called a "bloody regime" or "absolutely totalitarian", and there was a sense that China would continue to develop along this path, becoming a strong and significant global player in the world economy on MUTUALLY BENEFICIAL terms.
Changes occurred with the change in leadership, with the arrival of Xi Jinping. It was he who "slammed the steering wheel to the side" and began steering China back toward totalitarianism and confrontation with the Western world, determined that he is already ready to become the second, if not the first, pole of the earth. Aggressive rhetoric, militarization, plans to seize foreign territories... all of this is Xi Jinping’s policy. Where this will lead-we shall see....

Yes the unconditional development of China is a complete example of good leadership and wise decision making especially when it matters most. Looking at the way the transformation was achieved, you will see it was more of proper introductions of knowledge and not through war.
After clearly look at deng Xiaoping's I noticed the revolution was achieved with a strategic leadership means and sacrifice but not through violence and selfishness the way most leadership teams intend getting to that same level. If only all administrative structures will be runned on this existing protocol, I believe China will become one of the best nations in years to come.

[Zlantann]

I like how China used their strategies to takes over the world, China have conquered all over the world without any chaos or dropping bombs, currently China is above United State of America, i mean when it comes to benefit from all over the world. This is what United state of America should do after gaining so much power but they believe that bombing and killing leaders of a nation will make them conquer the world. China did not use that strategies that is why they are successful today and they only believe that for them to enter war with any nation that means they have exhausted all their plans of making peace.

The rise of China is unstoppable. They have strategically positioned themselves as a global force to be reckoned with in global affairs. Before now, only a few people in my country were considering schooling in China. Most of them preferred to go to school in Western schools. Now, due to China's advancement in technology, there has been a rise in the number of students who are seeking quality education in China. China have also taken over the extractive and industrial sector in many countries in my continent.

[Youngrebel]

Now, due to China's advancement in technology, there has been a rise in the number of students who are seeking quality education in China.

This part is one hundred percent true because we humans we naturally pay attention to countries that are leading in development like technology and mostly economic growth, and China is one of the countries that have been active in area of advance technology. Chaina have also invested massively mostly in areas like artificial intelligence, manufacturing, infrastructure and engineering and this thing are now changing the world currently.

[DrBeer]

Recall the “economic revolution” launched by Deng Xiaoping! He essentially “signed a deal” with the Western world and his own people, stipulating that the West would bring investment and technology to China, while China would begin mass-producing, at low cost, the goods needed by the Western market. At the same time, China developed its own industry by borrowing from this experience. It was precisely this event,and the mutual benefit it provided at the time,that led to the explosive growth of China’s economy. Some saved money and reduced production costs, while others gained a huge number of jobs and access to industrial technologies.

We can say, relation between The West and China were mutually symbiotic at that time. From China the west got cheap product, big margin, large profit and low inflation. In the other hand, China got rapid industrialization, technology transfer, foreign exchange accumulation and national development. But i think western elit did miscalculation, they believed if China getting richer, China will become liberal country but its totally wrong, what we see now, China gets stronger, more independent but still maintain its political system. Matter of fact Deng's strategy was not western style liberalization, but  a state controllled strategy to integrate with global capitalism, China opened up but  state control reamin very strong over bank, land, strategic industries and development direction.what China actually need at that time are technology transfer and upgrading its industry and manufacture, from low cost manufacturing to be high-tech and strategic industries. We see China purpose not to be a cheap factory forever, fullfilled today with its EV, AI, battery, 5G and chip.

I remember have a bad experience when my colleague did beverage product manufacturing in China, The factory where she do maklon sells her products directly globally with unlimited quantities and lower prices.

If we look at China’s history following the onset of this positive revolution, we see that, under Deng Xiaoping’s leadership, China moved toward building socialism with a "capitalist face". True, there were still some domestic policy issues, but the regime could not be called a "bloody regime" or "absolutely totalitarian", and there was a sense that China would continue to develop along this path, becoming a strong and significant global player in the world economy on MUTUALLY BENEFICIAL terms.
Changes occurred with the change in leadership, with the arrival of Xi Jinping. It was he who "slammed the steering wheel to the side" and began steering China back toward totalitarianism and confrontation with the Western world, determined that he is already ready to become the second, if not the first, pole of the earth. Aggressive rhetoric, militarization, plans to seize foreign territories... all of this is Xi Jinping’s policy. Where this will lead-we shall see....

Yes the unconditional development of China is a complete example of good leadership and wise decision making especially when it matters most. Looking at the way the transformation was achieved, you will see it was more of proper introductions of knowledge and not through war.
After clearly look at deng Xiaoping's I noticed the revolution was achieved with a strategic leadership means and sacrifice but not through violence and selfishness the way most leadership teams intend getting to that same level. If only all administrative structures will be runned on this existing protocol, I believe China will become one of the best nations in years to come.

I would rank Deng Xiaoping as one of the greatest leaders of our time. Yes, there were many bad moments on the way to prosperity, which cannot be blamed on subsequent success, but..... Today's China is the merit of Deng Xiaoping and the Chinese people, who were able to turn their country from a backward, agrarian third world country into a world leader!
China's problem in Xi Jinping's policy.... It destroys the strategic idea laid down and realized by Deng Xiaoping, which can be seen in such “initiators” as Evergrande, and for example BYD, about which we will soon hear some unusual news.
Who wants - can read about their financial statements, how they are formed, to understand what is going on with this company, where “unattainable indicators” come from....

PS Although....  maybe Trump will save China now

[LGD2Business]

China is one of the major powers, but it hasn't taken over the world or anything like that. There are major powers in the world. USA, Russia, China, UK etc. There is no longer a unipolar world. The balance of power shifted after the Cold War and now we are seeing a multipolar world once again. In this era, no single power can rule the world on its own. Current conditions don't allow for that. No matter who becomes overly powerful on their own, other countries will stop them.
China continues to grow, so do other countries. The balance of power may shift, but China cannot become powerful enough to dominate the world on its own.