✅ b1exch.to - Instant Auto Exchange | NO KYC | Escrow 0.2 BTC

[SamReomo]

The good thing is b1exch has been using their own liquidity. As long as they refill their liquidity from the legit source and funds are clean, then it isn't necessary to reveal the source. They might even refill from the centralised exchange to get clean funds. It fully depends on how they are going to refill, but we just need fresh funds. Otherwise we might face issues when using these funds in any centralised exchange.

I also believe that b1exch will refill their liquidity from legit sources because they're going to be part of the market for long term and that's why they'll do everything in the best way possible.

I believe so far everyone who had traded on b1exch have got fresh funds with low aml and that means they also fill their liquidity pools from centralized exchanges. I even believe that we're lucky to have a platform like b1exch that cares about their users.

[uchegod-21]

I also believe that b1exch will refill their liquidity from legit sources because they're going to be part of the market for long term and that's why they'll do everything in the best way possible.

I believe so far everyone who had traded on b1exch have got fresh funds with low aml and that means they also fill their liquidity pools from centralized exchanges. I even believe that we're lucky to have a platform like b1exch that cares about their users.

Why are you believing? We don't actually need to believe. In this industry, we don't believe, we don't trust, we simply verify.
Have you swapped recently with b1exch? If yes, did you check the AML score and what was it?

If you haven't tested the exchange, please just do it and show the AML score here, it will do the exchange more nice than just believing and believing.

[joker_josue]

If you haven't tested the exchange, please just do it and show the AML score here, it will do the exchange more nice than just believing and believing.

Performing AML analyses is always very subjective; it's difficult to say whether certain coins fall under AML or not.
An analyzer might say yes, but then in day-to-day use, no platform indicates it, or vice versa.

You might say there's no signage today, and then there might be tomorrow.

Sure, if at least something signals the potential for AML, it's because it could happen. But even without any warning signs, it could still happen.

[TokenTikas]

Both platforms has a different purpose, binance has a mandatory KYC which is we dont want because this it removes the anonimity, and the b1exch of course a No KYC so its the users preferences if they wanted to try these platform both or chooses one, for the beginners they would like to stick with the well known exchange because its the most of the users preferred, now sooner or later they will realize the importance of privacy so for sure they will push next step of security.

From personal preference, everyone will naturally have different goals but from the beginning of its journey till now, the progress of b1exch has been moving smoothly. For beginners, it is normal to first prefer well-known exchanges that are considered secure and you made a very valid point about that. As they gain more experience, compare platforms and understand crypto transactions better, they too will start thinking more about privacy and protecting their personal information. Still, from what I have noticed on the forum, even many newcomers are showing good interest in using b1exch.

It seems the b1exch still have a good run with their services and new users so the reputation speaks itself.

Overall, it is safe to say that b1exch will grow even more in the near future and their services will continue to work more smoothly and efficiently.

[examplens]

If you haven't tested the exchange, please just do it and show the AML score here, it will do the exchange more nice than just believing and believing.

Performing AML analyses is always very subjective; it's difficult to say whether certain coins fall under AML or not.
An analyzer might say yes, but then in day-to-day use, no platform indicates it, or vice versa.

Maybe you took a little out of context what @uchegod-21 wants to say here.
Criticism was directed at the "I believe" argument, and I completely agree that such sweeping claims are unfounded and completely irrelevant.
However, a concrete AML analysis gives much more than an "I believe" analysis and will probably be much closer to a final outcome.

Imagine if you send coins to Bybit and someone from there says, "Hey, these are joker_josue coins, he's a nice guy, and We believe that they must be clean." - Ok, approve and process them further.

[internetional]

Performing AML analyses is always very subjective; it's difficult to say whether certain coins fall under AML or not.
An analyzer might say yes, but then in day-to-day use, no platform indicates it, or vice versa.

You might say there's no signage today, and then there might be tomorrow.

Sure, if at least something signals the potential for AML, it's because it could happen. But even without any warning signs, it could still happen.

I think that pretty soon, most cryptocurrencies will be flagged in AML scorings as linked to illegal activity. So, it's time to start learning to ignore this and try to avoid scenarios where these scorings actually matter.

If someone doesn't know what to do with crypto they're afraid to show anyone, one may send it to b1exch and get something in return that is easy to hide in an untraceable environment.

[Lakai01]

I think that pretty soon, most cryptocurrencies will be flagged in AML scorings as linked to illegal activity.
[...]

Why do you think that?
In my opinion, there are hardly any reasons to block a Bitcoin transaction for anti-money laundering (AML) purposes, for example. Bitcoin is, for instance, much easier to trace than a traditional cash transaction (and there’s no question that cash transactions are also becoming increasingly restricted).

However, this certainly applies to privacy coins. European exchanges, for example, delisted privacy coins like Monero not too long ago; you can no longer deposit or trade Monero there either.

[joker_josue]

I think that pretty soon, most cryptocurrencies will be flagged in AML scorings as linked to illegal activity.
[...]

Why do you think that?
In my opinion, there are hardly any reasons to block a Bitcoin transaction for anti-money laundering (AML) purposes, for example. Bitcoin is, for instance, much easier to trace than a traditional cash transaction (and there’s no question that cash transactions are also becoming increasingly restricted).

However, this certainly applies to privacy coins. European exchanges, for example, delisted privacy coins like Monero not too long ago; you can no longer deposit or trade Monero there either.

It's not because of bitcoin or another crypto, but because of the laws of governments, as happens in the EU.

In fact, things are getting to a level, that few companies will accept currencies that may have an unknown origin.