✅ b1exch.to - Instant Auto Exchange | NO KYC | Escrow 0.2 BTC

[TokenTikas]

All of B1exch's services are good, that has to be acknowledged. Sometimes transactions may take longer to complete due to block confirmation delays, but there is no reason to worry. With a little patience, all transactions are completed properly.

The live chat function seems not functioning too because I have not gotten a response from them. What do you suggest I do in this situation?

When you make a ticket about live chat, if you wait a little patiently, you will definitely be able to contact them.

Another contest we're sponsoring is nearing its final stages, but we wanted to highlight one user who really showed creativity! Do you think it would be okay if we voted for this pizza?

There’s no restriction on who you can vote for. Just vote for the entry you like most. If you think someone has done a good making and their creativity stands out to you, feel free to support them with your vote. That’s completely fine.

[The Cryptovator]

Just a quick update, I have finally received the funds and exchange completed. It took about 95 minutes to complete after deposit confirmation, it is long for sure but as long as the funds arrived, I'm satisfied. The fee is good for me as it is one of the lowest I have seen.

Finally, I got a response from the live support and that shows that is also functional.  

Good to see you have received your exchange funds, even if it took a while longer. As per your previous reply, you received LTC, and liquidity was enough to cover your exchange amount. I am curious to know what coins you have sent for exchange. If it's Bitcoin, then it would take some time for confirmation. Have you checked on the explorers that really take 95 minutes after the confirmation?

If it took 95 minutes after confirmation from the explorers, then I would say it's quite longer. The B1exch team should take it seriously to minimize the time for completing the swap. Users often don't want to wait longer to complete the swap. They might be afraid, though at the end of the day they realize you are trusted.

[taufik123]

Another contest we're sponsoring is nearing its final stages, but we wanted to highlight one user who really showed creativity! Do you think it would be okay if we voted for this pizza?

Thank you b1ack for the appreciation, I really appreciate it, I did make a worse Pizza than the other participants,
But I put some creativity into the pizza, the content and also you can notice the pizza cutting board that I used to put the pizza, it was a wooden carving with the writing of Bitcoin pizza.

If you are interested in the creativity of the members of this forum, you can create a new Art Contest and you will get a lot of artwork
that will amaze you and I will also create artwork that you have never seen before.

[internetional]

I'm really trying to understand what's the fuss over it being called "instant" and "b1ack mentioning up to 60 seconds for most pairs". Seriously, is this the discussion we should be having here? Why they say instant when it take 60 seconds?

What happened to obuoma is a perfect illustration of why I see a fundamental difference between "instant" and "up to 60 seconds."

I have finally received the funds and exchange completed. It took about 95 minutes to complete after deposit confirmation, it is long for sure but as long as the funds arrived, I'm satisfied.

If there is no automation set up to dispatch the transaction from the swapping service to the user the exact moment the service receives the user's transaction with the required number of confirmations, then sooner or later a moment may come when 60 seconds turn into 95 minutes. And users must be prepared for this with services where, in principle, even a small delay exists. After all, if there is a delay, there are factors influencing it. And these factors are not static.

This is precisely why I paid so much attention to the difference between "instant" in terms of automated settings and "instant" in terms of everyday perception.

[TryNinja]

I'm really trying to understand what's the fuss over it being called "instant" and "b1ack mentioning up to 60 seconds for most pairs". Seriously, is this the discussion we should be having here? Why they say instant when it take 60 seconds?

What happened to obuoma is a perfect illustration of why I see a fundamental difference between "instant" and "up to 60 seconds."

I have finally received the funds and exchange completed. It took about 95 minutes to complete after deposit confirmation, it is long for sure but as long as the funds arrived, I'm satisfied.

If there is no automation set up to dispatch the transaction from the swapping service to the user the exact moment the service receives the user's transaction with the required number of confirmations, then sooner or later a moment may come when 60 seconds turn into 95 minutes. And users must be prepared for this with services where, in principle, even a small delay exists. After all, if there is a delay, there are factors influencing it. And these factors are not static.

This is precisely why I paid so much attention to the difference between "instant" in terms of automated settings and "instant" in terms of everyday perception.

That's called a technical issue.

No one cares about the difference of 'instant' and 'up to 60 seconds'. Real users will swap even if it takes 2 or 3 minutes. In this case, 95 minutes was obviously a technical issue, which can happen to any service from time to time. Even your "automation" can have technical issues and it won't be "instant". Maybe we should stop beating the dead horse and move on to a more constructive topic.

[PrivacyG]

I can not remember the last time I entered an 'Instant Exchange' and complained in my mind that it was not INSTANT.  By 'Instant' I understand it takes a couple of minutes at most for the entire process to be finished.  Now I would be angry if that took half an hour and it was not a technical issue.  But other wise, I do not think I ever cared either.  Like 'instant coffee' that takes you a while to heat up the water and swirl until it becomes coffee, this is not worth a serious discussion in my opinion.

[The Cryptovator]

That's called a technical issue.

No one cares about the difference of 'instant' and 'up to 60 seconds'. Real users will swap even if it takes 2 or 3 minutes. In this case, 95 minutes was obviously a technical issue, which can happen to any service from time to time. Even your "automation" can have technical issues and it won't be "instant". Maybe we should stop beating the dead horse and move on to a more constructive topic.

Yes, that would be technical difficulties. But imagine someone using this exchange for the first time for an instant swap, but instead of swapping faster, it takes more than 1.5 hours. This means it won't be instant, and due to that bad experience, users might decide to leave that swap permanently. So ultimately b1exch will lose a potential user.

However, I am not arguing against the concept of the instant swaps. Since there is blockchain use, it would take time to confirm on the chain. Users have to accept this delay. But unusual delays are a matter of concern, and b1exch should focus on improving their service. For the technical issues, b1exch should also notify users so they will realize why it was delayed.

[notocactus]

Yes, that would be technical difficulties. But imagine someone using this exchange for the first time for an instant swap, but instead of swapping faster, it takes more than 1.5 hours. This means it won't be instant, and due to that bad experience, users might decide to leave that swap permanently. So ultimately b1exch will lose a potential user.

However, I am not arguing against the concept of the instant swaps. Since there is blockchain use, it would take time to confirm on the chain. Users have to accept this delay. But unusual delays are a matter of concern, and b1exch should focus on improving their service. For the technical issues, b1exch should also notify users so they will realize why it was delayed.

People mostly don't actually need instant swaps but it's always more convenient to have something fast, not actually instant but not too slow for resulting in uncomfortable experience. With users, it's not only about the convenience but also about their feeling of losing their funds. If a swap takes 1.5 hours to be completed for receiving the fund, many users will feel fearful, even go panic a little bit, especially if it's their "first time" of experiencing swap or swap on privacy exchanges or it's a swap for their big fund.

Surely technical issues to cause unsmooth services for users, not only "Instant Swap" need to be investigated by the team, fixed for providing better and smoother service in the future.

[examplens]

I can not remember the last time I entered an 'Instant Exchange' and complained in my mind that it was not INSTANT.  By 'Instant' I understand it takes a couple of minutes at most for the entire process to be finished.  Now I would be angry if that took half an hour and it was not a technical issue.  But other wise, I do not think I ever cared either.  Like 'instant coffee' that takes you a while to heat up the water and swirl until it becomes coffee, this is not worth a serious discussion in my opinion.

Instant = accountless
There was already a discussion about whether it is an instant exchange if the order is not executed immediately, and that is technically impossible. Instant exchange is closer because, without an account, without providing additional data, verification, and without any conditions. Just a swap.

[Peanutswar]

Just a quick update, I have finally received the funds and exchange completed. It took about 95 minutes to complete after deposit confirmation, it is long for sure but as long as the funds arrived, I'm satisfied. The fee is good for me as it is one of the lowest I have seen.

Finally, I got a response from the live support and that shows that is also functional.  

In what pair you made a swap? I am curious because this time I made a swap with the USDC and Bitcoin right now just to check it out if this problem stay occurs well after a ~13 minutes I received my bitcoin already in my wallet.

Also wondering if there is any chance once the deposited funds confirmed at least 1-2 the process of the swapping starts so does not take too much time? well just my cents. Still smooth swapped to b1exch.

[cygan]

hello guys!
it's time once again to present the fifth raffle in this great series!
if you're interested in winning a cool b1exch x Icarus card, follow this link and try your luck: [FREE RAFFLE #5] b1eXch x Icarus Custom Card✅🔐🎰

[SamReomo]

Instant = accountless
There was already a discussion about whether it is an instant exchange if the order is not executed immediately, and that is technically impossible. Instant exchange is closer because, without an account, without providing additional data, verification, and without any conditions. Just a swap.

You've explained instant exchange in the best way possible, another good aspect of instant exchange like b1exch is that a user can exchange coins from anywhere without any issues because such exchanges work pretty well on Tor. I've not yet used a centralized exchanges via Tor but I know that will be troublesome because they will freeze or suspend my account without any warning and when they ask for KYC then it will be difficult to complete that either because Tor users get different locations automatically to have maximum privacy.

[bitmover]

I can not remember the last time I entered an 'Instant Exchange' and complained in my mind that it was not INSTANT.  By 'Instant' I understand it takes a couple of minutes at most for the entire process to be finished.  Now I would be angry if that took half an hour and it was not a technical issue.  But other wise, I do not think I ever cared either.  Like 'instant coffee' that takes you a while to heat up the water and swirl until it becomes coffee, this is not worth a serious discussion in my opinion.

Instant = accountless
There was already a discussion about whether it is an instant exchange if the order is not executed immediately, and that is technically impossible. Instant exchange is closer because, without an account, without providing additional data, verification, and without any conditions. Just a swap.

I think that is a good definition, but there are some instant exchanges which allow you to create accounts to get bonus.

I thought of another definition.

Instant = You don't need to withdrawal funds, this is done automatically.

[Numeral]

You've explained instant exchange in the best way possible, another good aspect of instant exchange like b1exch is that a user can exchange coins from anywhere without any issues because such exchanges work pretty well on Tor. I've not yet used a centralized exchanges via Tor but I know that will be troublesome because they will freeze or suspend my account without any warning and when they ask for KYC then it will be difficult to complete that either because Tor users get different locations automatically to have maximum privacy.

It never even crossed my mind to access a CEX via Tor, since it’s unlikely to end well, but they do let you in via a VPN with a changed geolocation - provided, of course, that they support that geolocation.

It makes sense to use Tor to access sites that provide an Onion mirror, like b1exch. KYC exchanges, on the other hand, don’t provide such mirrors.

[Forsyth Jones]

You've explained instant exchange in the best way possible, another good aspect of instant exchange like b1exch is that a user can exchange coins from anywhere without any issues because such exchanges work pretty well on Tor. I've not yet used a centralized exchanges via Tor but I know that will be troublesome because they will freeze or suspend my account without any warning and when they ask for KYC then it will be difficult to complete that either because Tor users get different locations automatically to have maximum privacy.

Accessing your CEX accounts is looking trouble with that CEX, it may be that one or anothrer won't cause issues, others may demand an explanation or simply close your account while your amount is still inside and it will be a saga to recover those funds.

As for using VPNs, some cex only give you a hard time if you have a USA server selected, while others might take issue with the use of a VPN altogether. To avoid problems, it is best not to use one especially with intenacional cex like Bybit.

[SamReomo]

It never even crossed my mind to access a CEX via Tor, since it’s unlikely to end well, but they do let you in via a VPN with a changed geolocation - provided, of course, that they support that geolocation.

I agree but even by using a VPN one can still face issues with CEX but those problems are solved when we use instant exchanges like b1exch which allow both use of VPN and use of Tor.

Accessing your CEX accounts is looking trouble with that CEX, it may be that one or anothrer won't cause issues, others may demand an explanation or simply close your account while your amount is still inside and it will be a saga to recover those funds.

If I'm not wrong, all of the centralized exchanges will do strange things with a user who access the site via Tor and somehow uses his/her account while browsing via Tor. When it comes to VPN then once again there will be issues for users at many centralized exchanges. So in such case when it's about privacy one should use an instantly no Kyc exchange like b1exch.

[The Cryptovator]

As for using VPNs, some cex only give you a hard time if you have a USA server selected, while others might take issue with the use of a VPN altogether. To avoid problems, it is best not to use one especially with intenacional cex like Bybit.

You should not access Bybit or any other exchange you have been using through a VPN or Tor. If you are travelling abroad and have all the travel documents, then it shouldn't be an issue. Because if the exchange raises concern about travelling, then you will have all the necessary documents, and you can provide them upon asking. But still, you need to be careful, especially when you have funds on the exchange.

I have used many centralised exchanges including Bybit and Binance when travelling, but I haven't faced issues. But it doesn't mean anyone else will not face it. So I would prefer to move your funds to a hardware wallet before travelling, and if you need to exchange them, then use an instant swap like b1exch that never asks for your KYC or any other personal documents.

[examplens]

I have used many centralised exchanges including Bybit and Binance when travelling, but I haven't faced issues. But it doesn't mean anyone else will not face it. So I would prefer to move your funds to a hardware wallet before travelling, and if you need to exchange them, then use an instant swap like b1exch that never asks for your KYC or any other personal documents.

I see that people often compare services only because their basis is the exchange of cryptocurrencies. We cannot compare traditional CEX with exchanges that we call instant or swap (which are also CEX in terms of functionality). Their purpose is different, like we don't compare a passenger car with a truck just because both groups use wheels and roads and can transport you from point A to point B.
Also, regarding the use of VPN, every no-KYC exchange should not have anything against vpn or have any geo-restrictions because they are not interested in KYC or the IP of the user. Again, there are services like one very renowned no-KYC exchange, where there are geo-limits and a prohibition on using vpn when using it.

[SamReomo]

I see that people often compare services only because their basis is the exchange of cryptocurrencies. We cannot compare traditional CEX with exchanges that we call instant or swap (which are also CEX in terms of functionality). Their purpose is different, like we don't compare a passenger car with a truck just because both groups use wheels and roads and can transport you from point A to point B.

Yes, it's true that instant exchanges and swaps are somehow close to centralized exchanges but they aren't centralized exchanges if I'm not wrong because in a centralized exchange one has to create an account and they give you deposit addresses whose keys they own, while at instant exchanges one doesn't need any account or account's deposit address instead a user has to send coins to instant exchange's address that they provide when user starts a transaction.

However, it's true that those exchanges can't be called as decentralized either because there're people who're controlling those exchanges. But, we should also understand that it's much better to use a no-KYC instant exchange like b1exch as they don't have many restrictions and one can easily swap one coin to other without doing any kind of KYC or creating an account. And, the best thing about such services is that we can use Tor on those without any issues.

[PrivacyG]

You should not access Bybit or any other exchange you have been using through a VPN or Tor. If you are travelling abroad and have all the travel documents, then it shouldn't be an issue. Because if the exchange raises concern about travelling, then you will have all the necessary documents, and you can provide them upon asking. But still, you need to be careful, especially when you have funds on the exchange.

Being asked for TRAVEL PROOF by a centralized exchange because they want you to prove you are not using a VPN sounds like an absolute nightmare!  I thought ID and proving the source of your Bitcoin was enough but having to keep travel documents ready for when they ask you to prove your location?  Set these exchanges on fire!  Not actually on fire but you get it!