[TOOL] ⭐Bitcointalk BRDb score

[DYING_S0UL]

Good morning everyone.

1. Add the actual USERNAME also (if possible), otherwise it's a mess/maze out here! I have no idea who is who ....



2. You need to fix the UI/UX on this section! With LIGHT theme, the names are not readable. Other themes are okay though.



3. The board overview and explorer section missing the footer image!



4. From where do you acquire these security info? ModLog? SecLog? - I tried finding my info, but nothing showed up! Work in progress, I assume?




P.s: Good night to you Ace! You have outdone yourself. Good job once again! You have done so much in so little time! 

[*Ace*]

As long as there is the possibility to check the code you upload is the same than the one runs on our browsers, I think it is good.
Overly cautious users could be leaning toward using greasyfork. What about letting the user decide?

You're absolutely right, friend. I also published the script on greasyforks, so anyone who wants can use that platform and read the script's code directly. But I've done even more.
I have inserted a userscript download page directly into the BRDb.cc menu and from there you can choose whether to install from the site or from greasyforks

Good morning everyone.

1. Add the actual USERNAME also (if possible), otherwise it's a mess/maze out here! I have no idea who is who ....



2. You need to fix the UI/UX on this section! With LIGHT theme, the names are not readable. Other themes are okay though.



3. The board overview and explorer section missing the footer image!



4. From where do you acquire these security info? ModLog? SecLog? - I tried finding my info, but nothing showed up! Work in progress, I assume?




P.s: Good night to you Ace! You have outdone yourself. Good job once again! You have done so much in so little time! 

I'll take note of your feedback and fix it as soon as possible.

You can't find any matches on your UserID for a simple reason

https://bitcointalk.org/seclog.php
https://bitcointalk.org/modlog.php

These two Bitcointalk tools do not return the entire global history of moderation or security activity, but only a narrow range to get them I would have to scrape bpip, But it's a lot of work, so it will only display what happens from now on. Thanks for the feedback, buddy.

[fillippone]

I am scared on how fast you do implement fixes and new features in your product.
To me, you should open a collaboration with Tryninja to include your score on his website, so you can have it more widely recognised!

[DYING_S0UL]

-snip-

Hey bud,

I may have discovered another UI/UX related bug/issue!

When I click the score, I can no longer see the BRDb score history (the graph thing we used to see). It's there but the whole main menu doesn't fit! And there is no way to move that thing.

Right now it looks this way! The only solution was, I had to CTRL + (minus key), and decreases my tab/page size to 80% to fully view it properly!

Btw, which theme are you using for BTT, and from where/whom?

I am scared on how fast you do implement fixes and new features in your product.
To me, you should open a collaboration with Tryninja to include your score on his website, so you can have it more widely recognised!

It means his Jr Dev is better than yours! Just Kidding....

[*Ace*]

-snip-

Hey bud,

I may have discovered another UI/UX related bug/issue!

When I click the score, I can no longer see the BRDb score history (the graph thing we used to see). It's there but the whole main menu doesn't fit! And there is no way to move that thing.

Right now it looks this way! The only solution was, I had to CTRL + (minus key), and decreases my tab/page size to 80% to fully view it properly!

Btw, which theme are you using for BTT, and from where/whom?

I am scared on how fast you do implement fixes and new features in your product.
To me, you should open a collaboration with Tryninja to include your score on his website, so you can have it more widely recognised!

It means his Jr Dev is better than yours! Just Kidding....

Very strange, everything is displayed in its entirety on my screen. I'll check what the problem is in the next few days, as each browser uses different visual settings.

As for the Bitcointalk theme, it's a collection of my userscripts that I use and have collected in an aio. The Thema is copied from Fillippone's xD
I stole some things from it, but it has other features, like a progress bar, ranking status, or a bookmarks section to always have topics at hand. Or even a button to send Merit without leaving the topic page. Usernotes, etc., etc.


https://greasyfork.org/it/scripts/545941-bitcointalk-all-in-one-enhancer

[fillippone]

As for the Bitcointalk theme, it's a collection of my userscripts that I use and have collected in an aio. The Thema is copied from Fillippone's xD
I stole some things from it, but it has other features, like a progress bar, ranking status, or a bookmarks section to always have topics at hand. Or even a button to send Merit without leaving the topic page. Usernotes, etc., etc.

Imitation is the greatest form of flattery.
I have been using your script for a long time, and the usernote part is somewhat compelling, as for the tagging, when you have to deal with a large group of users.
Sadly, there is no waty to sync it between various devices.

[Lillominato89]

I can see you’re making good progress with the development of your tool now.
The idea of a modlog and seclog browser is very interesting – even though it’s something we’ve seen before, it’s got that little bit extra! In any case, your commitment is truly remarkable.

Code:

2,401,530
Merit Spent (1,267,293 TX)
31,107,998
Posts
384,544
Users

I’ve been checking your site’s stats for several days now, but I’m convinced they don’t reflect the reality on Bitcointalk. I recall we were supposed to have over a million users; as for the Merit count, I think they’re in sync. Apart from you, can anyone else confirm this?

In any case, I agree with what DYING_SOUL suggested: in the Explorer, it’s better to use usernames rather than user IDs. To find out who has had a post removed or been banned, we inevitably have to click on the UID, but it would be more useful to see who it is directly within the Explorer

[*Ace*]

I can see you’re making good progress with the development of your tool now.
The idea of a modlog and seclog browser is very interesting – even though it’s something we’ve seen before, it’s got that little bit extra! In any case, your commitment is truly remarkable.

Code:

2,401,530
Merit Spent (1,267,293 TX)
31,107,998
Posts
384,544
Users

I’ve been checking your site’s stats for several days now, but I’m convinced they don’t reflect the reality on Bitcointalk. I recall we were supposed to have over a million users; as for the Merit count, I think they’re in sync. Apart from you, can anyone else confirm this?

In any case, I agree with what DYING_SOUL suggested: in the Explorer, it’s better to use usernames rather than user IDs. To find out who has had a post removed or been banned, we inevitably have to click on the UID, but it would be more useful to see who it is directly within the Explorer

You made a good point. No, my database data isn't complete, or rather, it's not fully synchronized with Bitcointalk, nor with Loycev's and Tryninja's tools.

I don't remember the exact numbers but as users we are around 900k, as posts there should be more than 70 million

Instead, Merit's TXs should be more or less synchronized with Loycev's. By the way, @Loycev in your Merit all file, I found about 350 Merit distributed with uid=0. Who is this user? They don't exist on Bitcointalk, so I haven't included them in my database.

[LoyceV]

By the way, @Loycev in your Merit all file, I found about 350 Merit distributed with uid=0. Who is this user?

Did you also notice the negative Merits sent by that userID? The userID ("0") came from the forum, I named it deMerit (Bitcoin Forum). Theymos used this to manually correct a Merit source's Merit abuse:

Merit sent by deMerit (Bitcoin Forum) from January 24, 2018 until September 11, 2026 (source)

  352. Fri 17 Apr 2020 08:07:56 PM CEST: -44 (569) to PIOUPIOU99 (history) for deleted post
.......
.......
.......
   16. Tue 05 Feb 2019 11:07:11 PM CET: -2 (-104) to cryptohunter (Trust list) (history) for deleted post
   15. Tue 05 Feb 2019 11:07:10 PM CET: -5 (-102) to peloso (Trust list) (history) for deleted post
   14. Tue 05 Feb 2019 11:07:10 PM CET: -2 (-97) to Deena (Trust list) (history) for deleted post
   13. Tue 05 Feb 2019 11:07:10 PM CET: -9 (-95) to hoop (Trust list) (history) for deleted post
   12. Tue 05 Feb 2019 11:07:10 PM CET: -1 (-86) to Rmcdermott927 (Trust list) (history) for deleted post
   11. Tue 05 Feb 2019 11:07:10 PM CET: -9 (-85) to TheCoinFinder (Trust list) (history) for deleted post
   10. Tue 05 Feb 2019 11:07:10 PM CET: -7 (-76) to Tupsu (Trust list) (history) for deleted post
    9. Tue 05 Feb 2019 11:07:10 PM CET: -8 (-69) to LiQio (Trust list) (history) for deleted post
    8. Tue 05 Feb 2019 11:07:10 PM CET: -2 (-61) to mich (Trust list) (history) for deleted post
    7. Tue 05 Feb 2019 11:07:10 PM CET: -10 (-59) to Quickseller (Trust list) (history) for deleted post
    6. Tue 05 Feb 2019 11:07:10 PM CET: -10 (-49) to TECSHARE (Trust list) (history) for deleted post
    5. Tue 05 Feb 2019 11:07:10 PM CET: -10 (-39) to gwsukabokepjepang (Trust list) (history) for deleted post
    4. Tue 05 Feb 2019 11:07:10 PM CET: -4 (-29) to Bazinga442 (Trust list) (history) for deleted post
    3. Tue 05 Feb 2019 11:07:10 PM CET: -10 (-25) to Thule (Trust list) (history) for deleted post
    2. Tue 05 Feb 2019 11:07:10 PM CET: -10 (-15) to cryptohunter (Trust list) (history) for deleted post
    1. Tue 05 Feb 2019 11:07:10 PM CET: -5 (-5) to H8bussesNbicycles (Trust list) (history) for deleted post

If you check those users' history, you'll see the Merit was received from user stingers.

On December 2, 2019, the same userID was used to send 1, 2 or 10 Merit to users for non-existing posts. If you want to know the details, look up theymos' posts around that date.

[*Ace*]

By the way, @Loycev in your Merit all file, I found about 350 Merit distributed with uid=0. Who is this user?

Did you also notice the negative Merits sent by that userID? The userID ("0") came from the forum, I named it deMerit (Bitcoin Forum). Theymos used this to manually correct a Merit source's Merit abuse:

Merit sent by deMerit (Bitcoin Forum) from January 24, 2018 until September 11, 2026 (source)

  352. Fri 17 Apr 2020 08:07:56 PM CEST: -44 (569) to PIOUPIOU99 (history) for deleted post
.......
.......
.......
   16. Tue 05 Feb 2019 11:07:11 PM CET: -2 (-104) to cryptohunter (Trust list) (history) for deleted post
   15. Tue 05 Feb 2019 11:07:10 PM CET: -5 (-102) to peloso (Trust list) (history) for deleted post
   14. Tue 05 Feb 2019 11:07:10 PM CET: -2 (-97) to Deena (Trust list) (history) for deleted post
   13. Tue 05 Feb 2019 11:07:10 PM CET: -9 (-95) to hoop (Trust list) (history) for deleted post
   12. Tue 05 Feb 2019 11:07:10 PM CET: -1 (-86) to Rmcdermott927 (Trust list) (history) for deleted post
   11. Tue 05 Feb 2019 11:07:10 PM CET: -9 (-85) to TheCoinFinder (Trust list) (history) for deleted post
   10. Tue 05 Feb 2019 11:07:10 PM CET: -7 (-76) to Tupsu (Trust list) (history) for deleted post
    9. Tue 05 Feb 2019 11:07:10 PM CET: -8 (-69) to LiQio (Trust list) (history) for deleted post
    8. Tue 05 Feb 2019 11:07:10 PM CET: -2 (-61) to mich (Trust list) (history) for deleted post
    7. Tue 05 Feb 2019 11:07:10 PM CET: -10 (-59) to Quickseller (Trust list) (history) for deleted post
    6. Tue 05 Feb 2019 11:07:10 PM CET: -10 (-49) to TECSHARE (Trust list) (history) for deleted post
    5. Tue 05 Feb 2019 11:07:10 PM CET: -10 (-39) to gwsukabokepjepang (Trust list) (history) for deleted post
    4. Tue 05 Feb 2019 11:07:10 PM CET: -4 (-29) to Bazinga442 (Trust list) (history) for deleted post
    3. Tue 05 Feb 2019 11:07:10 PM CET: -10 (-25) to Thule (Trust list) (history) for deleted post
    2. Tue 05 Feb 2019 11:07:10 PM CET: -10 (-15) to cryptohunter (Trust list) (history) for deleted post
    1. Tue 05 Feb 2019 11:07:10 PM CET: -5 (-5) to H8bussesNbicycles (Trust list) (history) for deleted post

If you check those users' history, you'll see the Merit was received from user stingers.

On December 2, 2019, the same userID was used to send 1, 2 or 10 Merit to users for non-existing posts. If you want to know the details, look up theymos' posts around that date.

Yes I had also noticed these transactions, I excluded all the positive and negative tx of uid 0, because I did not know how to handle them
There aren't many of them and they don't significantly impact BRDb scores, so I preferred to leave them alone. But thanks for the clarification. I'll go find the posts where they discuss what happened then, just to understand better

[LoyceV]

Yes I had also noticed these transactions, I excluded all the positive and negative tx of uid 0, because I did not know how to handle them

You could just process them as numbers: chances are it just works when there's a negative number inside a summation.

[*Ace*]

Yes I had also noticed these transactions, I excluded all the positive and negative tx of uid 0, because I did not know how to handle them

You could just process them as numbers: chances are it just works when there's a negative number inside a summation.

Ok, it can work, I'll add them to the next Merit dump so I can also check if I'm aligned

I'm currently working on minor bugs and topic alignment by board_id, but unfortunately out of 31 million posts there are more than a million topics and the fetch is slow, to avoid IP bans

[LoyceV]

more than a million topics and the fetch is slow

If you only need the title and topic ID, it's quite fast to scrape all boards. I made a script for this last year.
If you want, I can update these files:
https://loyce.club/other/boards.txt
https://loyce.club/other/board_topicID_title.txt

[*Ace*]

more than a million topics and the fetch is slow

If you only need the title and topic ID, it's quite fast to scrape all boards. I made a script for this last year.
If you want, I can update these files:
https://loyce.club/other/boards.txt
https://loyce.club/other/board_topicID_title.txt

With just one post you solved 90% of my problems with this tool  
Has anyone ever told you you're a genius? The two files would be fine for me too, actually I have already mapped the boards, what I'm missing is mapping the topics by board id, so if you can update it, you'll do me a big favor, otherwise I'll scrape the rest from October 13th to today

[LoyceV]

With just one post you solved 90% of my problems with this tool  

It took me years to realize there's an easy way to do this.

Has anyone ever told you you're a genius?

I have my moments

The two files would be fine for me too, actually I have already mapped the boards, what I'm missing is mapping the topics by board id, so if you can update it, you'll do me a big favor

I'll let you know when the update is ready.
Note that some topics were moved to different boards, so the Merit list isn't 100% accurate anymore.

[*Ace*]

Over the last few days I’ve made a few updates to my tool; one of these was the board overview feature.
Today, having imported the board_ids, I think the results are fairly consistent, although not 100 per cent.
Unfortunately, many topics and posts have been deleted over time, and I’ve had difficulty recovering many of them.

It’s now possible to download data from the tool in BBCode (beta version – I’m still working on improving the layout), Markdown and CSV formats.

Here are two examples of this board’s overview; please let me know what you think.

Thanks in advance to everyone.

BBCODE EXAMPLE

Meta
Board Overview (includes 1 child boards)
14 Sep 2026 → 21 Sep 2026

STATISTICS

Posts: 472

Merits: 544

Users: 155

Topics: 38

POSTERS	RECEIVERS	SENDERS	IMPACT
1. joker_josue [31]	1. promise444c5 [71]	1. vapourminer [130]	1. promise444c5 [110.0]
2. LoyceV [23]	2. TryNinja [39]	2. LoyceV [48]	2. TryNinja [63.5]
3. nutildah [14]	3. LoyceV [29]	3. nutildah [33]	3. LoyceV [55.0]
4. DYING_S0UL [14]	4. joker_josue [26]	4. PowerGlove [31]	4. joker_josue [54.5]
5. notocactus [13]	5. nutildah [24]	5. JayJuanGee [23]	5. nutildah [43.0]
6. snipie [11]	6. FinneysTrueVision [24]	6. EFS [22]	6. FinneysTrueVision [38.5]
7. *Ace* [11]	7. DYING_S0UL [16]	7. Xal0lex [21]	7. DYING_S0UL [31.0]
8. antialbon [10]	8. NotATether [14]	8. joker_josue [16]	8. NotATether [25.0]
9. TryNinja [10]	9. PrivacyG [14]	9. Don Pedro Dinero [15]	9. *Ace* [25.0]
10. alegotardo [9]	10. *Ace* [13]	10. fillippone [15]	10. notocactus [24.5]

Impact = 0.5 × posts + 1.5 × merits

MERIT FLOWS
Top 10 of 244 pairs in this period — full list in chart below

#	From	To	Merit	Tx
1	vapourminer	promise444c5	21	3
2	EFS	promise444c5	20	1
3	LoyceV	promise444c5	12	1
4	Don Pedro Dinero	Sterlino	10	1
5	vapourminer	joker_josue	9	9
6	PowerGlove	LoyceV	9	5
7	fillippone	*Ace*	9	3
8	vapourminer	TryNinja	8	5
9	Xal0lex	TryNinja	8	2
10	*Ace*	LoyceV	6	4

CHARTS

Daily Posts & Merits

Merit Flows — sender → receiver (sankey)

Merit Flows Network — user connections

Merit Flows Heatmap — flow intensity

BRDb SCORE — TOP USERS

Users who posted in this period, ranked by BRDb Score

#	User	Posts	Score	Rep
1	PowerGlove	1	8.71	#2
2	fillippone	8	8.24	#7
3	LoyceV	23	7.84	#14
4	GazetaBitcoin	2	7.75	#17
5	nutildah	14	7.55	#23
6	cygan	1	7.55	#24
7	NotATether	8	7.47	#34
8	Cricktor	3	7.47	#33
9	TryNinja	10	7.40	#37
10	LFC_Bitcoin	1	7.37	#39
11	Rikafip	8	7.36	#41
12	vapourminer	2	7.36	#42
13	hosemary	2	7.32	#45
14	JayJuanGee	1	7.30	#46
15	ABCbits	1	7.24	#55
16	dkbit98	6	7.14	#68
17	bitmover	5	6.96	#82
18	PrivacyG	5	6.89	#90
19	lovesmayfamilis	2	6.88	#91
20	stompix	2	6.83	#97

Generated by BRDb.cc — Bitcointalk Reputation Database

Unfortunately, Markdown formatting isn’t supported on BitcoinTalk, but don’t worry – I’ve worked out a way to show it to you by creating a special tool just for you 

Board Overview: Meta Period: 2026-09-14 - 2026-09-21

[fillippone]

Nice work!
You know I like graphs!
But some of them are quite confusing: merit network, as example.
How do I read it? Why there are two LoyceV on it?

[*Ace*]

Nice work!
You know I like graphs!
But some of them are quite confusing: merit network, as example.
How do I read it? Why there are two LoyceV on it?

I realise that the image I posted is a bit confusing; the graph isn’t static – it’s a 3D graph, which you can see in the board overview, and it’s a bit easier to understand there.
But I’ll answer the questions.
As you can see, we have senders and receivers: the senders are all coloured blue, whilst the receivers are random colours. The circles indicate the amount of merit, both sent and received; the larger the circle, the greater the total amount of merit sent or received. Then there are the connecting lines, which indicate the transactions carried out between the two nodes; the thicker the line, the more merit transactions have taken place between those two nodes.
This is, so to speak, a summary of how the flow works.
Why do you see two circles for LoyceV? Simply because he has both received and sent merit. So, in the graph, you can see the nodes between LoyceV and the other users to whom he has sent merit, and vice versa, the nodes that have sent merit to him.
In any case, you’ll understand how it works better once you’ve tried it out.
If you’d like to find out more, I drew inspiration from this discussion on BitcoinTalk for this graph.    
Interact & Explore the Merit Network

[LoyceV]

Those files are updated:

https://loyce.club/other/boards.txt
https://loyce.club/other/board_topicID_title.txt