Without law there will be no society.

[Somto9Light]

I do not oppose or criticise the existence of laws and other in the society, my only concern is how those laws are interpreted when people falls victim to those said laws and other. To the rich and wealthy it looks as if there are part of the laws that has mercy and compassion but to the poor interpretation are done directly as enshrined in the constitution which proves there is no equality before the law when they make us understand that everybody is equal before the law.
To make things right I think the best approach is to interprete and pronounce punishment as enshrined in the constitution be it to the rich or poor so corruption will reduce. 

Of a truth, it appears that the wealth of the rich kinda gives them a kind of an advantage when facing the law, and this is mostly because a lot of poor people may not really know their right neither do they have anyone to help interpret it for them, but it’s important to understand that there are some kind of scenarios that regardless of the person’s wealth, they’ll still feel the full wrath of the law without a single restraint.

[Berry2d]

Day in and out we here the voice and sounds of innocent citizens crying for help and rescue from the hands of individuals and leaders that keeps deaf ears to there cries when they have the said law that is meant to be there strength but never works for the poor but only made for the rich and wealthy, if all this be then is the law that is meant to direct the actions of the citizens of the country or are the poor not among the citizens, that is a question that have not been answered.
With the way things are going now I will be tempted to say without law and orders a nation can stand. There is war everywhere, is there no law to direct the actions of the leaders that are causing war all over the world, we all know there is but nothing can be done to them because they are not the poor.

It is a well known fact that justice only favours the rich and those with affluence while the law is made for the poor. The leaders plays games of interests and as long as responding to your desperate pleas have no economic, political and social advantage to them, they don't bother, but if you get tired of seeking justice and take laws into your own hand, that same justice you were seeking which seemed far from you will immediately come back to work against you.

Rules are good to checkmate society excesses but the leaders lack of regard for it had changed the way it functions, constantly bending it to suit their interests which defeats the purpose of establishing such rules.

Its the right time we see how to make things right in this society, operating under an existing protocol that deprives the poor access to justice is what we need to say no to now that they have made it there culture.  Even in the right moment of a poor man they are still deprived the justice they deserve, thereby giving the rich and wealthy right to oppress and intimidate the poor, although there is no need blaming anyone for such occurrence as that is how corruption and injustice has made it to be .
It is clear laws are meant for the correction and persecution of offenders and most be kept the same way it is be it a rich or poor one.

[Btcdeybodi]

So for those of you, that’s usually think or believe that without law people will be free and enjoy life more, you are very low in thinking.

Law is good to maintain peace and order in the society but humans deserves freedom as well and not to use law and cage them from doing some things. There are laws that doesn't deserve to be, such as restricting civilians from having their own fire arms. We have seen how terrorists have been killing innocent and harmless civilians, it is very unfortunate to watch another man take your life and you can't do anything because you don't have the right to own ammunition to defend yourself with. There are also other laws that needs to be abolished, we need law but the government should not make civilians look stupid.

[Onyeeze]

The only reason people are living together and doing things in common is because there’s a law guiding there attitude or behavior. It is this law that prevents the strongest from taking advantage of the weak, it is this law that makes you stay in your house comfortably without fear, just imagine there’s no law that is guiding people do you think you can live a comfortable life?
Without law being in place society will not exist, because what holds every group of individuals together are laws that are set in place. So for those of you, that’s usually think or believe that without law people will be free and enjoy life more, you are very low in thinking.

in some places or some countries the strongs are taking advantages of the weaks, so I believe that there are some people who does not consider a law and binding of that country or the place there are living and the continue to do this in the way that they like because of their connection, in some countries to rich people does not obey law and the law only speaks for the less privilege so it happens always every time so therefore law can be ignore and they also cannot be ignore can also be accepted and also not being accepted because of whom you are

[Emjay24]

I do not oppose or criticise the existence of laws and other in the society, my only concern is how those laws are interpreted when people falls victim to those said laws and other. To the rich and wealthy it looks as if there are part of the laws that has mercy and compassion but to the poor interpretation are done directly as enshrined in the constitution which proves there is no equality before the law when they make us understand that everybody is equal before the law.
To make things right I think the best approach is to interprete and pronounce punishment as enshrined in the constitution be it to the rich or poor so corruption will reduce. 

Of a truth, it appears that the wealth of the rich kinda gives them a kind of an advantage when facing the law, and this is mostly because a lot of poor people may not really know their right neither do they have anyone to help interpret it for them, but it’s important to understand that there are some kind of scenarios that regardless of the person’s wealth, they’ll still feel the full wrath of the law without a single restraint.

It is not a new thing that the court is no more the last hope of a common man. The rich has access to the best lawyers and have some level of immunity and can skip certain judicial processes because of their influence, so they have more advantage over the outcome of judicial processes as some judges would even want to judge the case in their favor for some obvious advantages later on. Laws are good but the immunity the rich has over it tends to defeat it's purpose.

[icebar]

So for those of you, that’s usually think or believe that without law people will be free and enjoy life more, you are very low in thinking.

Law is good to maintain peace and order in the society but humans deserves freedom as well and not to use law and cage them from doing some things. There are laws that doesn't deserve to be, such as restricting civilians from having their own fire arms. We have seen how terrorists have been killing innocent and harmless civilians, it is very unfortunate to watch another man take your life and you can't do anything because you don't have the right to own ammunition to defend yourself with. There are also other laws that needs to be abolished, we need law but the government should not make civilians look stupid.

A country can never run properly without law, which is why law is definitely needed, but only if there is law, it will not work properly for the public if that law is not implemented properly. Keeping weapons for ordinary people is against the law, but if terrorists are endangering the lives of ordinary people with weapons. If the law was implemented properly here, then those terrorists would not have been able to endanger the lives of ordinary people with weapons. Terrorists know that they will not be punished for the crime they are committing, which is why they do not respect the law despite the existence of the law. If legislation is enacted, the implementation of that law must be ensured, only then people will benefit from the law.

[Somto9Light]

~~~

It is not a new thing that the court is no more the last hope of a common man. The rich has access to the best lawyers and have some level of immunity and can skip certain judicial processes because of their influence, so they have more advantage over the outcome of judicial processes as some judges would even want to judge the case in their favor for some obvious advantages later on. Laws are good but the immunity the rich has over it tends to defeat it's purpose.

I agree, the rich does have some edge, because wealth can get anyone the best legal representation and of course influence too, which has the potential to bend outcomes in favour of the rich. But the truth is that the system isn’t really entirely broken, yes there are corrupt people but not everyone is like that, there are countless cases where the poor despite their financial status still get the justice they deserve. As long as we can boldly say that there are strong institutions, transparency and accountability in the judicial system, then we can agree that justice isn’t purely a privilege of the rich.

[Findingnemo]

~~~

It is not a new thing that the court is no more the last hope of a common man. The rich has access to the best lawyers and have some level of immunity and can skip certain judicial processes because of their influence, so they have more advantage over the outcome of judicial processes as some judges would even want to judge the case in their favor for some obvious advantages later on. Laws are good but the immunity the rich has over it tends to defeat it's purpose.

I agree, the rich does have some edge, because wealth can get anyone the best legal representation and of course influence too, which has the potential to bend outcomes in favour of the rich. But the truth is that the system isn’t really entirely broken, yes there are corrupt people but not everyone is like that, there are countless cases where the poor despite their financial status still get the justice they deserve. As long as we can boldly say that there are strong institutions, transparency and accountability in the judicial system, then we can agree that justice isn’t purely a privilege of the rich.

Maybe that is the case in your country but in most part of the world you can get away with anything when you have the money, they can do any possible thing to avoid the punishment but if it is not a choice then they will surely go with the minimum that might be penalty or seizing the assets rather than jail time but some random dude who tried to rob for food will spend the rest of his life in the prison.

[Supreme Donvic]

There was also crime that is why there was law, without crime, no law

You are wrong even when there is no crime a law will still be made to prevent a crime that is not in existence in that society take for instance in the garden of Eden in the holy Bible and according to the Bible in the garden of Eden there was no crime there was no sin but God still made a law in the garden of Eden so even in the holiest place there will be a law to guide them, a crime must not be before a law will be made.
Even in heaven or in Paradise according to the holy Bible and the Quran there is no sin and there is no evil in this places but there are laws that always guide the people over their.
When crime is not in existence in a society law must be in existence in that society to guide them in doing things, crime is not the only reason why Law is made.

[DYOR+BTC]

The term rules, laws and other are very important sector that must never be neglected for a nation to be in peace and harmony without any restrictions to its punishment. No nation can ever stand without a well developed law that will help direct the affairs of citizens even  in the normal behaviour. One reason why laws are very important in a society is its effort in reminding citizens of the consequences of the offence if it is committed, so i will say law most never be excluded in a nation  even if not used but must be available to stand as a watch dag to all that may think of going astray

[Marvelockg]

~~~

It is not a new thing that the court is no more the last hope of a common man. The rich has access to the best lawyers and have some level of immunity and can skip certain judicial processes because of their influence, so they have more advantage over the outcome of judicial processes as some judges would even want to judge the case in their favor for some obvious advantages later on. Laws are good but the immunity the rich has over it tends to defeat it's purpose.

I agree, the rich does have some edge, because wealth can get anyone the best legal representation and of course influence too, which has the potential to bend outcomes in favour of the rich. But the truth is that the system isn’t really entirely broken, yes there are corrupt people but not everyone is like that, there are countless cases where the poor despite their financial status still get the justice they deserve. As long as we can boldly say that there are strong institutions, transparency and accountability in the judicial system, then we can agree that justice isn’t purely a privilege of the rich.

Maybe that is the case in your country but in most part of the world you can get away with anything when you have the money, they can do any possible thing to avoid the punishment but if it is not a choice then they will surely go with the minimum that might be penalty or seizing the assets rather than jail time but some random dude who tried to rob for food will spend the rest of his life in the prison.

Even in some of the countries you assume that the law doesn't take full action on those that carry out unlawful act, the law still prevails.

There have been several cases where a rich oppress the poor and in the middle of that oppression, it might look like rte rich has all the power to influence the law to his favour but when nemesis catches up with the defaulters and in due time, such defaulter will end up being brought to book.

[Rabata]

The term rules, laws and other are very important sector that must never be neglected for a nation to be in peace and harmony without any restrictions to its punishment. No nation can ever stand without a well developed law that will help direct the affairs of citizens even  in the normal behaviour. One reason why laws are very important in a society is its effort in reminding citizens of the consequences of the offence if it is committed, so i will say law most never be excluded in a nation  even if not used but must be available to stand as a watch dag to all that may think of going astray

Peace also prevails among the people of a country where rules and laws are applied correctly. No nation can be found where there are no rules and laws but the people are very good. If that were in the past, there is no chance of getting that in the present world. Even in the most civilized countries of the world, various incidents of terrorism are now seen. If someone thinks that human nature cannot be changed through law, I will oppose it. If the law is used correctly, there will be no crime, and even if there is, it will be reduced to a great extent. If there is no law, no country or nation can be developed properly and if it is, there will be no peace and order there.

[BADecker]

@OP. You are right. But it goes extremely far deeper than that.

Like nations, or little chunks of society fall apart after a while, people also fall apart with old age and die. So, why do people die?

The two greatest laws are:
1. Love God above all things;
2. Love your neighbor as yourself.

These two laws are 'written' in the depths of your heart (your deepest subconscious), and they flow throughout your whole being, though you don't realize it. When you subconsciously realize this, you have subconscious guilt... guilt that gradually destroys you over the period of your life, because you have broken these laws here and there.

But there really isn't any reason for your self-destruction. Why not? Because God sent His Son, Jesus, in the form of a man. And Jesus took the punishment for all breaking of the laws that everybody has done, over all the years since the Beginning. There is no longer any need for guilt, because in wiping out the breaking of the laws, Jesus also wiped out the guilt.

The problem is, even if we believe and know about what Jesus did, our subconscious still sees the record of our breaking of the law. And our inner 'brain' fights the truth because it still sees and feels the memory of our breaking of the laws.

However, Isaiah says in the Old Testament (Isaiah 59:1,2) - https://biblehub.com/esv/isaiah/59.htm:
"1Behold, the Lord’s hand is not shortened, that it cannot save,
or his ear dull, that it cannot hear;
2but your iniquities have made a separation
between you and your God,
and your sins have hidden his face from you
so that he does not hear."

The inner 'memory' of your natural 'desire' to break the law, hangs onto your guilt, even though God has forgiven it and made it right. Even though you understand and believe about Jesus-God, your inner mind still sees your former guilt like it was real. Even I, who understand this, have a very difficult time making my inner mind accept it.

The good thing is that even though I don't accept it correctly, God works it in me so that I will be saved in the Resurrection, even though I die in this life.

Generally, death is the only way that a person can get rid of his subconscious memory that penetrates his being. A few people over the history of the Earth have been able to bypass death, accepting God's pulling them out of this life without them having to die.

More breaking of the two laws work more unbelief in a person. More filling one's self on the words of God's salvation written in the Bible strengthens one's faith that he is forgiven. Get into the Bible, and slow down your unbelief in God and His salvation, while at the same time building your faith. God has given you this gift.

[Salahmu]

Peace also prevails among the people of a country where rules and laws are applied correctly. No nation can be found where there are no rules and laws but the people are very good. If that were in the past, there is no chance of getting that in the present world. Even in the most civilized countries of the world, various incidents of terrorism are now seen. If someone thinks that human nature cannot be changed through law, I will oppose it. If the law is used correctly, there will be no crime, and even if there is, it will be reduced to a great extent. If there is no law, no country or nation can be developed properly and if it is, there will be no peace and order there.

Even all the countries with high power and laws also sees crime as something inevitable for them so actually law may not turn a bad person to become better person but however it makes them scared to do those bad things they're use to because they no that in every crime they committed even if they're not caught on the act but investigation and evidence will eventually brought them to justice. I was strolling on the street one day and I saw two guys violently fighting each other and people around was very scared to separate them but the moment police came they stopped fighting immediately and the arrested them, so actually my points for bringing this experience was the importance of law in the country because without law the fight could have lead to another thing but however law provides security to everyone.

[Findingnemo]

~
Even in some of the countries you assume that the law doesn't take full action on those that carry out unlawful act, the law still prevails.

There have been several cases where a rich oppress the poor and in the middle of that oppression, it might look like rte rich has all the power to influence the law to his favour but when nemesis catches up with the defaulters and in due time, such defaulter will end up being brought to book.

Yeah, it is very much possible that the rich face the treatment but at what cost, it is the same as the poor treated. Nope, the judicial system has never been fair to poor and they can be locked up pretty easily, but with rich, they need everything to be solid and even with that it takes that extra effort to lock them up for good.

[Charcol]

The laws of a country are made with the aim of establishing order in that country. But currently, the legal system of some poor countries has become so bad that the law is used only for the benefit of the rich. Although it is not the case in all cases. However, I have seen in most cases such situations where the rich people easily get out of the shackles of the law with the power of money. However, the law is becoming a thorn in the throat of the poor people, who are supposed to benefit the most from the law and establish their rights. I will not blame the law for this matter, rather, if there is no law, the situation in poor countries will become even worse. I will blame those who are doing illegal things with the power of money within the law.

[BADecker]

Without law there will be no society.


Are you sure about that? After all, Without society there will be no law, right?

[Charcol]

So for those of you, that’s usually think or believe that without law people will be free and enjoy life more, you are very low in thinking.

Law is good to maintain peace and order in the society but humans deserves freedom as well and not to use law and cage them from doing some things. There are laws that doesn't deserve to be, such as restricting civilians from having their own fire arms. We have seen how terrorists have been killing innocent and harmless civilians, it is very unfortunate to watch another man take your life and you can't do anything because you don't have the right to own ammunition to defend yourself with. There are also other laws that needs to be abolished, we need law but the government should not make civilians look stupid.

It should also be considered that when you are allowed to possess firearms according to the law, criminals will also move around freely with firearms. Because according to the law, everyone can have firearms. At present, firearms are mostly with criminals and they will use them secretly. But when you make a law on possession of firearms, the opportunities for criminals will increase even more. Therefore, the government should ensure that firearms or illegal weapons are not in the possession of anyone except government officials. In addition, if criminals are proven guilty, they should be severely punished. The issue is not that if you have a firearm, you will be safe, but rather the government should ensure that criminals cannot possess firearms illegally.

[BADecker]

So for those of you, that’s usually think or believe that without law people will be free and enjoy life more, you are very low in thinking.

Law is good to maintain peace and order in the society but humans deserves freedom as well and not to use law and cage them from doing some things. There are laws that doesn't deserve to be, such as restricting civilians from having their own fire arms. We have seen how terrorists have been killing innocent and harmless civilians, it is very unfortunate to watch another man take your life and you can't do anything because you don't have the right to own ammunition to defend yourself with. There are also other laws that needs to be abolished, we need law but the government should not make civilians look stupid.

It should also be considered that when you are allowed to possess firearms according to the law, criminals will also move around freely with firearms. Because according to the law, everyone can have firearms. At present, firearms are mostly with criminals and they will use them secretly. But when you make a law on possession of firearms, the opportunities for criminals will increase even more. Therefore, the government should ensure that firearms or illegal weapons are not in the possession of anyone except government officials. In addition, if criminals are proven guilty, they should be severely punished. The issue is not that if you have a firearm, you will be safe, but rather the government should ensure that criminals cannot possess firearms illegally.

The government should use 'an eye for an eye' to punish criminals for any wrongdoing they do. This should include punishment for criminal attorneys and criminal judges who see to it that innocent people are punished.

[DYOR+BTC]

The term rules, laws and other are very important sector that must never be neglected for a nation to be in peace and harmony without any restrictions to its punishment. No nation can ever stand without a well developed law that will help direct the affairs of citizens even  in the normal behaviour. One reason why laws are very important in a society is its effort in reminding citizens of the consequences of the offence if it is committed, so i will say law most never be excluded in a nation  even if not used but must be available to stand as a watch dag to all that may think of going astray

Peace also prevails among the people of a country where rules and laws are applied correctly. No nation can be found where there are no rules and laws but the people are very good. If that were in the past, there is no chance of getting that in the present world. Even in the most civilized countries of the world, various incidents of terrorism are now seen. If someone thinks that human nature cannot be changed through law, I will oppose it. If the law is used correctly, there will be no crime, and even if there is, it will be reduced to a great extent. If there is no law, no country or nation can be developed properly and if it is, there will be no peace and order there.

The correct and equal application of the already established rules and regulations is what we lack all over ther words. All over the world now, judgement is done based of level and connection thereby creating more problems that stands as a barrier to the development of.
With the way things are now i think we need to look into the things to see if equality before the law can be established because all deserves to be equal