The Official Mastercoin Foundation, Master Protocol & Mastercoin Thread

[ejinte]

Does anyone know if MSC were stolen in the bter hack?

[1714152528]

1714152528

[1714152528]

1714152528

[1714152528]

1714152528

[mishax1]

Does anyone know if MSC were stolen in the bter hack?

The 'hot' storage is in place, and my MSC on BTER were not sent anywhere else besides their main address here - http://omnichest.info/lookupadd.aspx?address=14f13yAU3CUgbgEV3WFL4BtsDknfj3fys9

[ejinte]

Does anyone know if MSC were stolen in the bter hack?

The 'hot' storage is in place, and my MSC on BTER were not sent anywhere else besides their main address here - http://omnichest.info/lookupadd.aspx?address=14f13yAU3CUgbgEV3WFL4BtsDknfj3fys9

Wow you have about $7k worth of MSC in there?

[crazy_rabbit]

Does anyone know if MSC were stolen in the bter hack?

The 'hot' storage is in place, and my MSC on BTER were not sent anywhere else besides their main address here - http://omnichest.info/lookupadd.aspx?address=14f13yAU3CUgbgEV3WFL4BtsDknfj3fys9

That is an impressive amount of MSC to a) have and b) be willing to have. Hope it pans out for you!

[mishax1]

Does anyone know if MSC were stolen in the bter hack?

The 'hot' storage is in place, and my MSC on BTER were not sent anywhere else besides their main address here - http://omnichest.info/lookupadd.aspx?address=14f13yAU3CUgbgEV3WFL4BtsDknfj3fys9

That is an impressive amount of MSC to a) have and b) be willing to have. Hope it pans out for you!

I think you misunderstood, that is not my account. That's BTERs' , which is nothing compares to masterxchange

[vokain]

"2015 Mastercoin Foundation board elections"

[mishax1]

"2015 Mastercoin Foundation board elections"

Isn't this Omni Foundation ?

[vokain]

"2015 Mastercoin Foundation board elections"

Isn't this Omni Foundation ?

The goal for the Omni Foundation is to put the community members that are building on the platform in the drivers seat when it comes to core development efforts. We want the projects using the Omni Wallet and Omni Core to drive the priorities of development and lead the effort organically.

Thus the structure where the Omni Foundation is supported directly by the members who sponsor the core developers or contribute their own developers time to improving the open source code of the Omni Wallet and Omni Core.

As for the MSC Foundation it will continue to represent the interests of the broader Omni community by managing the developer token pool and will work to see the token holders are representing in important protocol discussions and development work that will make the Omni Layer sustainable and the token monetized.

So if the new Omni Foundation is the vehicle for gathering support from projects on top of the protocol to drive development of new features, then the MSC Foundation is the vehicle for pushing forward the long term value of the platform's token.

Recently J.R. has generously donated 60,000 Omni tokens (as options) in order to grow the developer pool for contributors to the protocol and the eco-system. The MSC Foundation provides transparency and accountability around this developer pool and will attract other large holders to contribute additional Omni tokens to this effort.

MSC Foundation continues to be the primary vehicle for the holders of the Omni token to express their views on the monetization and sustainability of the platform.    

Best Regards,
David A. Johnston
Managing Director of the Decentralized Applications Fund

[ejinte]

Could we see some screenshots of the upcoming DEx?

[mishax1]

Tether = Fiat on DEX. epic.


Still waiting for an answer btw..

Transactions made on omni started getting "medium priority" thus being delayed a few blocks on the blockchain.  What happened ?

[shmali]

mishax, I'm looking into the priority stuff now and it looks like some of the more recent transactions are being broadcast with smaller miner fees. Are you seeing this on transaction you are broadcasting or is this just a general observation ?

[mishax1]

mishax, I'm looking into the priority stuff now and it looks like some of the more recent transactions are being broadcast with smaller miner fees. Are you seeing this on transaction you are broadcasting or is this just a general observation ?

Doesn't seem like a small transaction fee (0.00011 BTC , 0.00011923 BTC , 0.00012746 BTC).
Those are my "send msc" transactions.

*I just tested it again and everything seem to be back to normal.

[shmali]

mishax, I'm looking into the priority stuff now and it looks like some of the more recent transactions are being broadcast with smaller miner fees. Are you seeing this on transaction you are broadcasting or is this just a general observation ?

Doesn't seem like a small transaction fee (0.00011 BTC , 0.00011923 BTC , 0.00012746 BTC).
Those are my "send msc" transactions.

*I just tested it again and everything seem to be back to normal.

Huh weird indeed.
If you still have them can you post or pm the txid of some of the tx's you saw like that.
I'd like to take another look.

[dexX7]

mishax, I'm looking into the priority stuff now and it looks like some of the more recent transactions are being broadcast with smaller miner fees. Are you seeing this on transaction you are broadcasting or is this just a general observation ?

Doesn't seem like a small transaction fee (0.00011 BTC , 0.00011923 BTC , 0.00012746 BTC).
Those are my "send msc" transactions.

*I just tested it again and everything seem to be back to normal.

Hey mishax1,

the coin selection selects unspent outputs randomly, until the amount to spent is collected. Those amounts are usually not high enough to get a free pass or anything alike, so let's call it bad luck, if you had the impression of a delayed confirmation.

[Viva!]

This image is self-explanotary

No activities in 11 days, and only very few activities in the last 21 days.

That's a fact.

[udecker]

This image is self-explanotary

No activities in 11 days, and only very few activities in the last 21 days.

That's a fact.

Most of the work has been happening in a Zathras’ and DexX7’s repos, with merges going in as recently as yesterday:
https://github.com/mastercoin-MSC/mastercore/pulse

And you can see that that past week and half have been devoted to getting an Omni Wallet Desktop (Windows QT UI for Omni Core / Master Core) release candidate build:
https://github.com/mastercoin-MSC/mastercore/issues/292

On our all-hands call yesterday, we laid out some of our upcoming initiatives (in order):
1. Omni Wallet Desktop 0.0.9.1 Release Candidate (Windows/Linux, 64-bit only)
2. Omni Wallet Desktop Release (possibly will include OS X, otherwise will wait until 0.0.10)
3. Omniwallet.org re-skin competion (current progress can be seen at https://staging.omniwallet.org/ )
4. 0.0.10 work (working off of Bitcoin Core 0.10)
5. DEx 2 (token-token exchange) completion (90% complete already, includes the following)
5a. DEx 2 testnet testing complete
5b. DEx 2 testnet Windows client for public release / testing
5c. DEx 2 mainnet testing complete
5d. DEx 2 mainnet blockheight determination
5e. DEx 2 core release
6. 80-Byte OP_RETURN conversion of eligible transaction types (99.9% of transactions are eligible)
7. Address-anchoring spec addition
8. Futures market spec addition

Not to mention a whole slew of new partner integrations (several of which will be announced via other channels / projects).

Please don’t forget that there is a huge amount of work happening behind the scenes, not only with our core development but also with partners.

Craig

[littleblue]

Hi, where is msc ? msc=0.0082  , is dead ? what about msc ? msc=omni ? How?
Thanks MSC DEV's great work ,again .

[Viva!]

.....Omnicore 0.0.9.1 reday for the launch
https://github.com/mastercoin-MSC/mastercore/issues/298

[dexX7]

Again, all you have to do is send a dust transaction from an omni-holding address to send an equivalent amount of votes to a candidate.

Hi vokain,

those instructions are a bit short in my opinion. In particular:

- Who is eligible to vote?

- When does the vote end? 20th March 2015 12:00 AM EST

- How does one vote?

Assuming eligible voters are Mastercoin holders, and from what I read of your message, it appears holders should send dust to the above mentioned destinations. I further assume votes are going to be counted based on the Mastercoin balance when the vote ends, but it's unclear to me, if there is any relation between the amount to send (e.g. 0.00001 BTC or 0.001 BTC) and the vote weight? Or does sending "any" amount of BTC equal "vote with the weight of the whole balance I have"?

Is a standard Bitcoin transaction sufficient, or does it require a special Master/Omni transaction, or an output to the Exodus address?

[vokain]

Hi, where is msc ? msc=0.0082  , is dead ? what about msc ? msc=omni ? How?
Thanks MSC DEV's great work ,again .

Littleblue, in our so-called "Great Transition", mastercoins are now termed omnis to reflect the universal nature of the token and protocol. There is no practical or technical difference aside from the name change. The Mastercoin Foundation, incorporated in 2013 in Austin, TX, USA still has custody of the Exodus Fund, of which remains the devMSCs (now presumably to be referred to as devOMNIs or what you wish) and as such, this foundation, which is separate from the newly incorporated Omni Foundation in Switzerland, has responsibility for the disbursement of this fund towards whatever the board as representatives of the community deems to be in the community's and protocol's best interests. The Omni Foundation, on the other hand, is responsible for representing the sponsors of our protocol to direct software development according to the needs of said sponsors that use the Omni Protocol.

Any further clarification needed, please ask away!

Antony