Glorbet - No KYC Crypto Casino 🔥

[julerz12]

It's very strange that in recent weeks new casinos have been appearing with names very similar to scam casinos. I don't know why this is happening so frequently. Do the owners of these new casinos, when choosing names, not search on Google beforehand to see if any casino with a similar name already exists? This way they would avoid using names similar to scam casinos, because people might associate the new casino with the old scam casino.

You're right. I talked about this in the other thread, too. A brand name is crucial in how users perceive your platform; a good and unique brand name goes a long way. I guess people are running out of ideas to name their new platforms, especially if you have to fit it within the cryptocurrency niche.    They can't use Glorybet, either, 'cause that's already taken. I guess removing the "y" would be much easier. What's more redundant nowadays is the use of bet in every new crypto casino. I mean, sure, it's for a casino, and the word bet reminds a reader of casino/gambling; but, isn't there any other word that could relate to a casino? Maybe, Win, Pot, Edge, then mix it with crypto-related words, like Hash, Block, Seed, Key, etc.
If I had a chance to name a crypto-casino, I'd call it - Seedpot - wait, that's for a different industry, I think. 

[CryptSafe]

Good to see you here mate. You have good visuals and bI could say that it is nice and attractive to the community. I had to check for your ToS and OP, to be frank there are lots of discrepancies as to some legal clauses I encountered on your website ToS with respect to KYC

 How can you terminate an account without pre information, such measures is not ideal for your casino because if you try such to one,  you would be heading towards disaster and it would be very difficult to clear your name of the community drags you for such act.

2.10. Without prejudice to any term of this Agreement, We reserve the right to block and terminate Your Account any time, at our sole discretion, without providing cause or explanation. We will notify You if this happens and refund You all funds available on Your Account at the time of termination.[\quote]

[DYING_S0UL]

Good to see you here mate. You have good visuals and bI could say that it is nice and attractive to the community. I had to check for your ToS and OP, to be frank there are lots of discrepancies as to some legal clauses I encountered on your website ToS with respect to KYC

 How can you terminate an account without pre information, such measures is not ideal for your casino because if you try such to one,  you would be heading towards disaster and it would be very difficult to clear your name of the community drags you for such act.

2.10. Without prejudice to any term of this Agreement, We reserve the right to block and terminate Your Account any time, at our sole discretion, without providing cause or explanation. We will notify You if this happens and refund You all funds available on Your Account at the time of termination.

This is certainly not good in my opinion. Imagine you win a hefty amount. And then, not to pay your winnings, they terminate your account without any sort of explanation. How would you feel? Surely I will feel cheated. Naturally, I would want both my deposits and my winnings.

Btw, there seems to be some issue with the platform. First it wouldn't load properly, was quite slow and then encountered a SSL handshake error. Tried changing the browser and refreshing the tab, but still the same.

[Hispo]

Furthermore, your caption here said you are No KYC casino but your Terms of Use is saying something else. Let me quote section 5.1.1 of it so that you can explain the contradiction better

I also saw that part in their website, i am not surprised though, because i know that casinos that advertise themselves as "No-KYC platforms" use that line as a promotion tactic. They indeed require KYC and even if they do not request it upon registration, mind you that they can ask for it at anytime, prolly when you want to withdraw a huge sum from their website.

That said, if i understood correctly, Glorbet is requesting KYC even before depositing and playing on their website, and that is something many players would appreciate. I have read a lot of users asking that casinos take this approach, rather than hitting them with KYC request later on when they win. As long as Glorbet wouldn't request KYC more than once, then this is a good approach. But lastly, they should take out that "NO-KYC crypto casino", it is not true.

I am actually growing tired of the increasing number of new and small casinos which have not proven anything yet using those advertising tactics in order to get attention from us... is it actually so difficult for them to be honest from the very beginning and admit they are planning to comply fully with KYC and AML measures?
Also, there is the fact they advertise themselves as friendly towards VPN, which is also contradictory to their terms of service. it makes me assume they would only allow people who have gone fully through their KYC process to use VPN in order to change their actual geo-location.

Creating these expectations on gamblers who are attracted to privacy and then forcing them to go through those processes in order to have access to their money and earnings is completely counter-productive for a service which will try to be sustainable in the long term.

[CryptSafe]

Good to see you here mate. You have good visuals and bI could say that it is nice and attractive to the community. I had to check for your ToS and OP, to be frank there are lots of discrepancies as to some legal clauses I encountered on your website ToS with respect to KYC

 How can you terminate an account without pre information, such measures is not ideal for your casino because if you try such to one,  you would be heading towards disaster and it would be very difficult to clear your name of the community drags you for such act.

2.10. Without prejudice to any term of this Agreement, We reserve the right to block and terminate Your Account any time, at our sole discretion, without providing cause or explanation. We will notify You if this happens and refund You all funds available on Your Account at the time of termination.

This is certainly not good in my opinion. Imagine you win a hefty amount. And then, not to pay your winnings, they terminate your account without any sort of explanation. How would you feel? Surely I will feel cheated. Naturally, I would want both my deposits and my winnings.

Btw, there seems to be some issue with the platform. First it wouldn't load properly, was quite slow and then encountered a SSL handshake error. Tried changing the browser and refreshing the tab, but still the same.

Such an approach from them could end them losing traffic as expected, but I will suggest to them to review such claws and also others I have seen, as they are too strict for the community, as players would not find it convenient to play on their platform. The earlier they attend to it, the better for them.

As for the website, it works perfectly well on my end maybe your network is bad or you clear your cache.

[bitbollo]

...

The problem is simple. Few platforms are "regulated" and able to offer a decent offer to gamblers.
There is the continue search of the bonus, or the best offer...this fuel an endless demand for new platforms.

Mostly new casinos of last weeks appears to be declared scam (pay for withdraw) or just not "clear" with their details and info like this one that has many details missing. At least there is also a "rush" to deploy a product that has many defects without a basic quality check...
Even these doubts must be addressed, it seems they stop to answers

[stadus]

I’m just a bit confused, though not totally. You advertise it as a no-KYC casino, but then it also says users must be 18+. I think that sounds a bit contradictory, because without KYC anyone can easily fake their age, and even minors could still play.

So maybe to align it better, that part could be removed or phrased differently.

Anyway, good luck here. I know this is the trend now, even casinos with licenses promote themselves as no-KYC. And I do understand what that usually means, not totally no KYC, but just not very strict KYC.

[AmoreJaz]

I’m just a bit confused, though not totally. You advertise it as a no-KYC casino, but then it also says users must be 18+. I think that sounds a bit contradictory, because without KYC anyone can easily fake their age, and even minors could still play.

So maybe to align it better, that part could be removed or phrased differently.

Anyway, good luck here. I know this is the trend now, even casinos with licenses promote themselves as no-KYC. And I do understand what that usually means, not totally no KYC, but just not very strict KYC.

That's actually very true. How can they verify if the player is a minor or not if they are not requiring kyc? It is understandable that they do not require KYC as they are not licensed yet. Based from their terms, it is only registered in Costa Rica as a business, but there's no mention about the license. Because those licensed casinos are just the ones which usually require KYC because they also need to comply with their licensing authority. So yes, they need to revise that particular requirement because they have no way of knowing the age of their players. Unless, it is the responsibility of the player if he is not violating their gambling restrictions in the country.

[Slow death]

It's very strange that in recent weeks new casinos have been appearing with names very similar to scam casinos. I don't know why this is happening so frequently. Do the owners of these new casinos, when choosing names, not search on Google beforehand to see if any casino with a similar name already exists? This way they would avoid using names similar to scam casinos, because people might associate the new casino with the old scam casino.

You're right. I talked about this in the other thread, too. A brand name is crucial in how users perceive your platform; a good and unique brand name goes a long way. I guess people are running out of ideas to name their new platforms, especially if you have to fit it within the cryptocurrency niche.    They can't use Glorybet, either, 'cause that's already taken. I guess removing the "y" would be much easier. What's more redundant nowadays is the use of bet in every new crypto casino. I mean, sure, it's for a casino, and the word bet reminds a reader of casino/gambling; but, isn't there any other word that could relate to a casino? Maybe, Win, Pot, Edge, then mix it with crypto-related words, like Hash, Block, Seed, Key, etc.
If I had a chance to name a crypto-casino, I'd call it - Seedpot - wait, that's for a different industry, I think. 

It's very strange that in the last two months, people have been creating accounts to advertise their new casinos, and that these new casinos have names similar to old casinos that were scams. Even if they were lazy people like me when it comes to choosing names, why would someone choose a name similar to that of a shady company? It doesn't make sense.

Unless the shady company belongs to the guy who created the new casino. My guess is that someone created a casino in the past, stole people's money, came back now and created a new casino with a similar name, and he did this because he knows that there will be people who will think it's impossible that the new casino is owned by the same person as the scam casino. It's probably a psychological game that the guy is playing.

[Yamifoud]

I’m just a bit confused, though not totally. You advertise it as a no-KYC casino, but then it also says users must be 18+. I think that sounds a bit contradictory, because without KYC anyone can easily fake their age, and even minors could still play.

So maybe to align it better, that part could be removed or phrased differently.

Anyway, good luck here. I know this is the trend now, even casinos with licenses promote themselves as no-KYC. And I do understand what that usually means, not totally no KYC, but just not very strict KYC.

That's actually very true. How can they verify if the player is a minor or not if they are not requiring kyc? It is understandable that they do not require KYC as they are not licensed yet. Based from their terms, it is only registered in Costa Rica as a business, but there's no mention about the license. Because those licensed casinos are just the ones which usually require KYC because they also need to comply with their licensing authority. So yes, they need to revise that particular requirement because they have no way of knowing the age of their players. Unless, it is the responsibility of the player if he is not violating their gambling restrictions in the country.

In reality, NO-KYC is just a marketing strategy to make gamblers turn their heads, and those who are not able to read their rules end up in huge regret.

See, no explanation is coming from them (representatives) to explain this. I don't want to assume, but I think they also don't understand what KYC means. In fact, if the casino has a license, they are also obliged to do KYC, even the basic one, as a mandatory rule from the authority.

[Coyster]

I’m just a bit confused, though not totally. You advertise it as a no-KYC casino, but then it also says users must be 18+. I think that sounds a bit contradictory, because without KYC anyone can easily fake their age, and even minors could still play.

That is not only what's contradictory about this platform. One of their requirement is that players must submit personal information (KYC) before depositing and playing on the website, but yet they advertise their casino as a NO-KYC one.

Thank you everyone for the feedback. I’ll go through all the comments carefully and do my best to respond to each of you shortly.

Quite a lot of issues have been raised. It would be great if you read them and responded accordingly, because right now a lot of us are skeptical on what's true or not about this platform.

[SquirrelJulietGarden]

You're right. I talked about this in the other thread, too. A brand name is crucial in how users perceive your platform; a good and unique brand name goes a long way. I guess people are running out of ideas to name their new platforms, especially if you have to fit it within the cryptocurrency niche.    They can't use Glorybet, either, 'cause that's already taken. I guess removing the "y" would be much easier. What's more redundant nowadays is the use of bet in every new crypto casino. I mean, sure, it's for a casino, and the word bet reminds a reader of casino/gambling; but, isn't there any other word that could relate to a casino? Maybe, Win, Pot, Edge, then mix it with crypto-related words, like Hash, Block, Seed, Key, etc.
If I had a chance to name a crypto-casino, I'd call it - Seedpot - wait, that's for a different industry, I think. 

Choosing a brand name for a company is very difficult especially if the brand name relates to core products of your company and it was already taken by another or other companies. This will be very disappointed when you find that information, and it's also hard to modify it or move to an entire new brand name. Sometimes people want to do some small adjustment like your example.

About Seedpot, that reminds me about Honeypot which surely not be recommended to use by any casino. That can be a first bad impression on any people and makes any company with that brand name more suspicious and even dangerous.

[Kavelj22]

We highly value community feedback, please feel free to share your thoughts and suggestions, as we strive to build a professional and continuously improving platform.

Since you posted this comment three days ago, you have just made one reply one day after. Since then, you showed no sign and your last reply just responded to selective queries but not everything. Community wants to know about the validity of your activity license (still unknown) and your compliance with AML policies. In the TOS it is stipulated that you can close any account at anytime without providing your valid reasons to do so. This is a big red flag, please explain.

I think it's good to see more new casinos coming every couple of days, which proves how much this is a promising industry. However, there are still few casinos who can run for long time and satisfy it's clients with compliance of their license conditions.

[Perfectbaby]

I almost getting tempted, and of course anyone who see where much bonuses are being given to the first timer they wouldn't care to check the reputation of the site before jumping into, most of the things most casinos preached are actually what they are but, nowadays it's actually hard to know the real intentions of most of the gambling that are launched over here. We could build trust at the beginning but after they have succeeded gaining more attention of gambler here then you would see them gradually draining people because they had already build trust. Anyway welcome to community and I hope you people should maintain whatever you have preached to be.

[Odohu]

I’m just a bit confused, though not totally. You advertise it as a no-KYC casino, but then it also says users must be 18+. I think that sounds a bit contradictory, because without KYC anyone can easily fake their age, and even minors could still play.

So maybe to align it better, that part could be removed or phrased differently.

Anyway, good luck here. I know this is the trend now, even casinos with licenses promote themselves as no-KYC. And I do understand what that usually means, not totally no KYC, but just not very strict KYC.

The 18+ specification is a requirement by every casino to discourage underage gambling. Casinos that do not enforce KYC can still put such conditions to protect their business from litigation because if they don't put that as a caveat, they can be sued by someone whose child gambles and in some jurisdiction, the case can go against the casino. But when such statement is boldly written in the casino website and also in their TOS, then they will be exonerated from such legal issues.  

[luiz3002]

Anyone test this house? Payments, bonus..

[glorbet.com]

Hello everyone,

There’s no way you will not ask KYC on any given circumstances since you have license to operate which you are claiming with your ToS. Maybe KYC friendly is the proper term if your goal is to emphasize that you will not required KYC as much as possible except when there’s an investigation needed on a certain account.

You can embed you casino link too on the image by using the url bbcode to make your image clickable directly to your website since the casino website is not disclosed on the title and just name.

I hope you can answer all the concern including the license verification.

Hello, thanks for your feedback,

We are a licensed crypto casino and we operate as a fully No KYC platform. That said, as outlined in our Terms & Conditions, there are certain situations where KYC may be required, for example, in cases involving suspected fraud, violations of our terms, or other critical scenarios. In such cases, verification is necessary to confirm a user’s identity and ensure platform security.

Regarding the license, all the relevant details are clearly listed on our website https://glorbet.com/terms-of-use, and you’re welcome to verify them at any time.

Thanks again for your input.

There’s no way you will not ask KYC on any given circumstances since you have license to operate which you are claiming with your ToS. Maybe KYC friendly is the proper term if your goal is to emphasize that you will not required KYC as much as possible except when there’s an investigation needed on a certain account.

You can embed you casino link too on the image by using the url bbcode to make your image clickable directly to your website since the casino website is not disclosed on the title and just name.

I hope you can answer all the concern including the license verification.

This is what they have written on their TOS https://glorbet.com/terms-of-use.

8.1. As a crypto-based platform, we believe in fairness and transparency. To that end, we do not require KYC procedures solely at the point of withdrawal, as we find it unfair to our users. Instead, we will only request KYC verification in cases where fraudulent activity is suspected. This policy applies to all users making transactions to or from their accounts in cryptocurrency. We expect users to comply with any KYC requests promptly when required.

8.2. CDD Measures and KYC Procedures may include any of the following: requesting personal information about the End User in order to identify him/her, which may include requesting a valid and duly certified identification document and a selfie; verifying the personal information provided by the End User; requesting the information and documents about the End User’s occupation, source of funds and source of income used by the End User in the Gaming Services; checking the personal and professional information about the End User; checking and analyzing the gambling activity pattern of the End User, etc.

So if it happens they finds something suspicious matters happening by that time they asked KYC. They can use that reasons to simply obligate their player to do KYC.

This is the reason why I don't believe immediately on No KYC claims and read first their TOS, because you can read all the information you need to avoid to get confuse on what they are implementing on their casino.

Thanks for taking the time to review our TOS and share your thoughts, that’s absolutely fair.

You’re correct that our Terms clearly state KYC may be required in certain situations. We aim to be transparent about this from the start.

When we say “No KYC,” we mean that we do not require verification as a standard process for deposits, gameplay, or withdrawals. KYC is only requested in exceptional cases, such as suspected fraud, abuse, or violations of our Terms, which is a common practice across licensed platforms.

Our goal is to provide a smooth and privacy-friendly experience for the vast majority of users, while still maintaining security and compliance when truly necessary.

We always encourage users to read the Terms (as you did), so they fully understand how the platform operates.

Appreciate your feedback 🙌

Welcome to this forum.
I see your casino, the appearance is quite good but there is a little that is off because the display of your crypto payment logo overlaps the last winning display, making it not very pleasant to look at.
What promotions have you prepared for the members here?

Thank you for the warm welcome and for checking out our casino, really appreciate it!

Also, thanks for pointing out the UI issue with the crypto payment logo overlapping the last win display. We’ll pass this to our team and work on fixing it soon.

As for promotions, we’re currently preparing some exclusive offers for forum members, including bonuses and special deals. We’ll be sharing the details very soon, so stay tuned!
If you have any suggestions on what kind of promotions you’d like to see, feel free to let us know 🙌

So if it happens they finds something suspicious matters happening by that time they asked KYC. They can use that reasons to simply obligate their player to do KYC.

This is the reason why I don't believe immediately on No KYC claims and read first their TOS, because you can read all the information you need to avoid to get confuse on what they are implementing on their casino.

Nowadays, it's like a common marketing clickbait trick from many casinos with no KYC in their business marketing headline for catching attention of readers, viewers and turn them to users. Initially people are welcome to join their casinos without KYC, from registration, account funding and even playing, withdrawal too but the casino has terms for KYC enforcement in the future.

Like terms quoted above, KYC is available to use by the casino based on their terms, and explanation can be popularly used like if they don't do anything shady, you are well.

It's just like that, and users can not change anything, so if they want to use this casino and others, prepare for KYC, and reminder is never storing big fund on online platforms.

Thanks for sharing your perspective,

We completely understand the skepticism around “No KYC” claims, especially since many platforms use it as a marketing angle without clearly explaining the conditions behind it. That’s exactly why we try to be transparent in our Terms.

To clarify our position: we do not require KYC as part of the normal user journey, registration, deposits, gameplay, and withdrawals can all be completed without verification in standard cases.

KYC is only applied in exceptional situations, such as suspected fraud, abuse, or violations of our Terms. This isn’t meant to restrict users, but rather to protect both the platform and the community.

We agree with you on one thing — users should always read the Terms and stay informed before using any platform. Transparency is key, and that’s what we aim to provide.

Appreciate you taking the time to share your thoughts 🙌

Could you please what is meant by VIP wagering? I have never seen any casinos have this so I have no idea about this thing.
Looking at the number, it is of course about wagering requirement but wagering requirement for what?
For the cashback or bonus drop or other things and what is the VIP bonuses as it is filled with the name of the VIP level only?

Great question, happy to clarify!

VIP wagering refers to the wagering (or turnover) requirements tied specifically to VIP-related rewards. This can include things like cashback, bonus drops, or other perks that are available within the VIP program.

For example, if you receive a VIP cashback or a bonus, there may be a certain wagering requirement you need to complete before those funds can be fully withdrawn. The exact requirements can vary depending on the type of reward and your VIP level.

As for VIP bonuses, they are usually tailored benefits based on your level in the VIP program, higher levels unlock better rewards such as higher cashback rates, exclusive bonuses and personalized offers.

If anything is unclear, feel free to ask happy to explain in more detail 🙂

There’s no way you will not ask KYC on any given circumstances since you have license to operate which you are claiming with your ToS. Maybe KYC friendly is the proper term if your goal is to emphasize that you will not required KYC as much as possible except when there’s an investigation needed on a certain account.

You can embed you casino link too on the image by using the url bbcode to make your image clickable directly to your website since the casino website is not disclosed on the title and just name.

I hope you can answer all the concern including the license verification.

You'd rather forget about the KYC matter, mate, because no matter how the casino says this stuff is "KYC free," it will become impossible. If not asked today, it can be asked in the future, especially if you win a huge amount.

That is why I now believe such claims. But of course, that never means I have to ignore them as well. Besides, it was not the KYC thing that could stop people from gambling but their credibility. I know gamblers can afford to lose privacy as long as they can trust the casino.

Appreciate your perspective, that’s a very fair point.

You’re absolutely right that trust and credibility matter far more than just the “No KYC” label. At the end of the day, players want to feel confident that the platform is reliable and treats them fairly.

Regarding KYC, we try to be as transparent as possible, it’s not part of the standard user flow, but like most licensed platforms, it may be required in exceptional cases (for example, in situations involving security or compliance).

Our main focus is to build long-term trust by providing a smooth experience, fair gameplay, and clear terms, so users know exactly what to expect.

Thanks for sharing your thoughts 🙌

Welcome to the forum, your casino has a very nice design, the name of your casino is very similar to a casino that existed in the past and disappeared, I'm talking about casino globet.com which, from what I see, didn't end well according to this article that explains a lot:

https://www.sbo.net/blacklist/globet/

It's very strange that in recent weeks new casinos have been appearing with names very similar to scam casinos. I don't know why this is happening so frequently. Do the owners of these new casinos, when choosing names, not search on Google beforehand to see if any casino with a similar name already exists? This way they would avoid using names similar to scam casinos, because people might associate the new casino with the old scam casino.

Thanks for the warm welcome and for sharing that article, really appreciate you taking the time.

We completely understand your concern. The similarity in names is purely coincidental, and we are not connected in any way to the casino you mentioned.

As you pointed out, there have been cases in the industry where platforms developed poor reputations due to issues like payout delays or unfair practices, and we fully agree that this is something players should be cautious about.

That’s exactly why we focus on transparency, fair terms, and building trust from day one, so users can clearly see how we operate and make their own informed decision.

Thanks again for raising this 🙌

[glorbet.com]

It's very strange that in recent weeks new casinos have been appearing with names very similar to scam casinos. I don't know why this is happening so frequently. Do the owners of these new casinos, when choosing names, not search on Google beforehand to see if any casino with a similar name already exists? This way they would avoid using names similar to scam casinos, because people might associate the new casino with the old scam casino.

You're right. I talked about this in the other thread, too. A brand name is crucial in how users perceive your platform; a good and unique brand name goes a long way. I guess people are running out of ideas to name their new platforms, especially if you have to fit it within the cryptocurrency niche.    They can't use Glorybet, either, 'cause that's already taken. I guess removing the "y" would be much easier. What's more redundant nowadays is the use of bet in every new crypto casino. I mean, sure, it's for a casino, and the word bet reminds a reader of casino/gambling; but, isn't there any other word that could relate to a casino? Maybe, Win, Pot, Edge, then mix it with crypto-related words, like Hash, Block, Seed, Key, etc.
If I had a chance to name a crypto-casino, I'd call it - Seedpot - wait, that's for a different industry, I think. 

Hello, Fair point, naming a casino these days is definitely getting more challenging 😄

You're absolutely right that branding plays a huge role in how users perceive a platform, and we understand the concern around similarities with existing or past projects. In our case, the name choice was not intended to relate to or resemble any previous platforms, it just ended up being a similar combination.

Also agree with you on the "bet" trend, it's everywhere in the industry. Your suggestions like "Win," "Pot," "Edge," or even crypto-inspired names are actually pretty creative 👀

At the end of the day though, we believe the brand will be defined more by how we operate, transparency, fairness, and user experience, rather than just the name itself.

Appreciate the input! 🙌

[glorbet.com]

Good to see you here mate. You have good visuals and bI could say that it is nice and attractive to the community. I had to check for your ToS and OP, to be frank there are lots of discrepancies as to some legal clauses I encountered on your website ToS with respect to KYC

 How can you terminate an account without pre information, such measures is not ideal for your casino because if you try such to one,  you would be heading towards disaster and it would be very difficult to clear your name of the community drags you for such act.

2.10. Without prejudice to any term of this Agreement, We reserve the right to block and terminate Your Account any time, at our sole discretion, without providing cause or explanation. We will notify You if this happens and refund You all funds available on Your Account at the time of termination.[\quote]

Hello, thanks for the warm welcome and for taking the time to go through our ToS.

You raise a valid concern regarding that clause. To clarify, this type of wording is quite standard across many platforms and is primarily intended to give us the ability to act quickly in situations involving security risks, fraud, or serious violations of our Terms.

That being said, it’s not something we apply arbitrarily or without reason. Our goal is always to act fairly and responsibly. In any such case, users are notified, and as stated, any remaining balance is returned.

We understand how this clause might sound at first glance, and we’re actively working on making our Terms clearer and more transparent to avoid any confusion.

Trust is extremely important to us, and we have no interest in taking actions that would harm our reputation or our users’ confidence.

Appreciate you bringing this up 🙌

[glorbet.com]

Good to see you here mate. You have good visuals and bI could say that it is nice and attractive to the community. I had to check for your ToS and OP, to be frank there are lots of discrepancies as to some legal clauses I encountered on your website ToS with respect to KYC

 How can you terminate an account without pre information, such measures is not ideal for your casino because if you try such to one,  you would be heading towards disaster and it would be very difficult to clear your name of the community drags you for such act.

2.10. Without prejudice to any term of this Agreement, We reserve the right to block and terminate Your Account any time, at our sole discretion, without providing cause or explanation. We will notify You if this happens and refund You all funds available on Your Account at the time of termination.

This is certainly not good in my opinion. Imagine you win a hefty amount. And then, not to pay your winnings, they terminate your account without any sort of explanation. How would you feel? Surely I will feel cheated. Naturally, I would want both my deposits and my winnings.

Btw, there seems to be some issue with the platform. First it wouldn't load properly, was quite slow and then encountered a SSL handshake error. Tried changing the browser and refreshing the tab, but still the same.

Hello, thanks for your feedback,

Regarding the ToS clause, we completely understand how it might sound concerning at first. To clarify, this type of provision is standard across many platforms and is intended strictly for exceptional situations, such as fraud, abuse, or serious violations of our Terms.

It's not something we use to avoid paying winnings or act against legitimate players. If an account is ever restricted, the process is handled carefully, and as stated, any available balance is refunded. Our goal is to operate fairly and build long-term trust, not damage it.

We also understand your point, no one would feel comfortable in that scenario, and that's exactly why we aim to be as transparent as possible and are working on improving how these terms are presented.

Regarding the technical issue, thanks for flagging it. That definitely shouldn't be happening. We'll pass this to our tech team immediately and investigate the SSL/loading problem. If you don't mind, could you also let us know your device/browser or approximate time when this happened? It would help us identify the issue faster.

Appreciate your feedback 🙌