🎰 SolCasinos.io 🏆 Find The BEST CRYPTO CASINOS 🎁 Best Casino Bonuses ✨

[drangos]

Same thing i wanted to ask, they might ve affiliates but they can't be marketing/ getting commissions from companies they have no idea about  doing that means that they're  being deceitful just to get commission cause people might be mislead into using a casino with the potential of scam and at the end it all falls back to them, so i believe they won't be linking people to casinos without having ideas about them, they should trust does casino's they're being affiliates to that's why they should have knowledge about them too.

Idea: I believe they have no idea about what they are promoting, as they basically are in partnership with the casinos, as I don't see this type of affiliate like those who create accounts and start distributing their links. The problem I'm having with them is that they don't attend to the questions and concerns been raised in this thread maybe they are active in other places, but that does not mean they don't know about what they are promoting.

I agree that it does not have to be a bad thing being an affiliate. But a bigger question is whether it is doing its due diligence with the casinos it promotes. They can't just be a source of providing links to the best crypto casinos. Otherwise users are not expecting anything more. Some openness would be good regarding the procedure for how they are reviewed, how they determine which casinos to keep. And how they go about addressing complaints and allegations of scams. I also feel that the no responses of this thread is worth mentioning. If they promote these casinos. It would be good to answer questions of users sensibly. As long as affiliate relationships are legitimate. It's a difference of transparency between a useful comparison site and one that just makes a lot of cash.

[JoyceBTC]

Players trust may not be to the marketer but could also help the client gain some level of confidence as what they are told when registering is what they believe and reason to stay or quit.

The best thing still remains that players should not only be moved to register to any casino that is listed by SolCasino because they trust SolCasino they should have some level of knowledge to the particular casino they saw and believe that they are good for them to work with. the ratings may be there but a little background check is required by every casino player before they register cause after due findings then you can consider giving them your trust and not do that based on what you see people say. SolCasino is affiliated to them they ought to know them better but you still need to know them by yourself.

Definitely the right thing to do, moreover ratings and reviews can also be manipulated, that why it is good not to rely on one source to trust a casino.
It just good we make our finding from other source too to be sure it okay to use a particular casino and to trust them also, this helps avoid some certain regrets in the future.

[Bushdark]

Idea: I believe they have no idea about what they are promoting, as they basically are in partnership with the casinos, as I don't see this type of affiliate like those who create accounts and start distributing their links. The problem I'm having with them is that they don't attend to the questions and concerns been raised in this thread maybe they are active in other places, but that does not mean they don't know about what they are promoting.

I agree that it does not have to be a bad thing being an affiliate. But a bigger question is whether it is doing its due diligence with the casinos it promotes. They can't just be a source of providing links to the best crypto casinos. Otherwise users are not expecting anything more. Some openness would be good regarding the procedure for how they are reviewed, how they determine which casinos to keep. And how they go about addressing complaints and allegations of scams. I also feel that the no responses of this thread is worth mentioning. If they promote these casinos. It would be good to answer questions of users sensibly. As long as affiliate relationships are legitimate. It's a difference of transparency between a useful comparison site and one that just makes a lot of cash.

The most important aspect of this is how to determine how they rate these casinos on their website. I have been seeing different rating for each casino and I know that this can not be based on ordinary likeness or some simple factor when rating a casino need to be based on discrepancy on the casino and what they have that others might not have. Affiliate is a lucrative business when you have real source of players that will be interested in signing up and making deposit to play game on the casino.

[Barikui1]

The best thing still remains that players should not only be moved to register to any casino that is listed by SolCasino because they trust SolCasino they should have some level of knowledge to the particular casino they saw and believe that they are good for them to work with. the ratings may be there but a little background check is required by every casino player before they register cause after due findings then you can consider giving them your trust and not do that based on what you see people say. SolCasino is affiliated to them they ought to know them better but you still need to know them by yourself.

You are spot on here bro, because In this digital space, it's very important and also necessary to first do your own research before venturing into anything, so since things may not be as it seems or their may be a misconception about it entirely, so I totally agree with you on this  that it's very necessary to do your own research first if it's the first time you are trying to make use of their services, before proceeding or not.

Another thing is that since solcasino is affiliated to these casinos, we should not be surprised if most of these casinos are corrupt to the extent of paying solcasino to rate them very high, when in reality, that's not the case. I am not saying that this is what they are doing, but I am trying to say that it can be possible, so that is why doing your own research as s person is very important.

[Bitcoin Maxi]

With this, I’m sure so many persons will not want to believe anything coming from them and some persons might even feel like their platform isn’t a legit platform at the same time very unserious.
So as I said before I think we shouldn’t just conclude that maybe they are ignoring everyone here, they might be having an issue from their end causing the delay of response, so let continue waiting if any representative will come up.

Anyhow they want to do it should not be a problem of anyone here. If they want to leave their thread for many months without writing their or replying anyone, that's also there problem and we don't know what they may be cooking as an update.
I have seen few threads here that are not being updated by the casino representative.

[Wakate]

I just checked the casinos rating on the SolCasino website and I can see that Winna has the highest rating of 5.0 followed by Casino and Thrill which has the third rating. What's your opinion about this? Do you think these casinos actually worth the rating or their is a criteria that we need to know which has been used to rate these casinos? There are many other casinos on the line but they have lower rating compared to these ones.

[Promocodeudo]

The best thing still remains that players should not only be moved to register to any casino that is listed by SolCasino because they trust SolCasino they should have some level of knowledge to the particular casino they saw and believe that they are good for them to work with. the ratings may be there but a little background check is required by every casino player before they register cause after due findings then you can consider giving them your trust and not do that based on what you see people say. SolCasino is affiliated to them they ought to know them better but you still need to know them by yourself.

That's the right thing to do as a gambler, gamblers don't need to start gambling with a casino just like that without trying to know few or more things about the casino, we don't know how the casinos in SolCasino site are been rated, and why will any gambler start gambling with them without knowing more about them, However, most casinos can start being untrustworthy from one day, we can never know it all, but to some extent, if a gambler have interest to gamble in a new casino, as important as the Tos is, that is how it is, with running a thorough review on gambling site before doing anything, because it serves as insight for a gambler to either go ahead to register or not.

[Lida93]

I just checked the casinos rating on the SolCasino website and I can see that Winna has the highest rating of 5.0 followed by Casino and Thrill which has the third rating. What's your opinion about this? Do you think these casinos actually worth the rating or their is a criteria that we need to know which has been used to rate these casinos? There are many other casinos on the line but they have lower rating compared to these ones.

From Solcasino claims on day one of ANN thread creation they said they always get to use the casinos them self using real money on playing time as well as testi other features of each casino before giving it their rating on their site. I don't want to raise question about all of that with which casino they rate high or low since it's not Impossible to test all platforms before giving it a score. But nevertheless, we don't have to trust easily but try to test it for ourself with a few dollars and get a first hand experience to compare it with the rating given.

[Johnlomape]

Idea: I believe they have no idea about what they are promoting, as they basically are in partnership with the casinos, as I don't see this type of affiliate like those who create accounts and start distributing their links. The problem I'm having with them is that they don't attend to the questions and concerns been raised in this thread maybe they are active in other places, but that does not mean they don't know about what they are promoting.

I agree that it does not have to be a bad thing being an affiliate. But a bigger question is whether it is doing its due diligence with the casinos it promotes. They can't just be a source of providing links to the best crypto casinos. Otherwise users are not expecting anything more. Some openness would be good regarding the procedure for how they are reviewed, how they determine which casinos to keep. And how they go about addressing complaints and allegations of scams. I also feel that the no responses of this thread is worth mentioning. If they promote these casinos. It would be good to answer questions of users sensibly. As long as affiliate relationships are legitimate. It's a difference of transparency between a useful comparison site and one that just makes a lot of cash.

Take your time and evaluate the website so that you can have full understanding about what you are skeptical about.
If you read through the website and check their TOS, I think you will understand the website and how they are rating casinos that are partnering with them. It's not going to take an hour for you to read and get a full details of what your enquiry may be and if it's still difficult for you, you can ask their support if any other enquiries you will like to make about the website for your clarity.

[Odohu]

I just checked the casinos rating on the SolCasino website and I can see that Winna has the highest rating of 5.0 followed by Casino and Thrill which has the third rating. What's your opinion about this? Do you think these casinos actually worth the rating or their is a criteria that we need to know which has been used to rate these casinos? There are many other casinos on the line but they have lower rating compared to these ones.

As and active member of Bitcointalk, I would say that I'm not comfortable with that rating given what we know Winna did in this forum. As we know, Winna has a terrible reputation in this forum following what they did with one of the moderator of this forum so that should be a red flag for anyone who care about integrity in business. A casino rating website with active presence in Bitcointalk should already be aware of that incidence should already be aware of that incidence and therefore adjust their feedbacks about the casino, hence, seeing them as the number one in Solcasino makes me feel uncomfortable.

[Donneski]

I just checked the casinos rating on the SolCasino website and I can see that Winna has the highest rating of 5.0 followed by Casino and Thrill which has the third rating. What's your opinion about this? Do you think these casinos actually worth the rating or their is a criteria that we need to know which has been used to rate these casinos? There are many other casinos on the line but they have lower rating compared to these ones.

5.0 is a staggering rating number that will easily convince people to use Winna but just like you said, I think we should know the criteria behind the number. A rating can only be make sense when the criteria is made open for users to know. I don't think it'll be bad to compare a few lower rated casinos, I won't assume that they're bad because they score less.

Sometimes, it's not the rating that actually tells of how safe or poor a casino can be.

[maydna]

I just checked the casinos rating on the SolCasino website and I can see that Winna has the highest rating of 5.0 followed by Casino and Thrill which has the third rating. What's your opinion about this? Do you think these casinos actually worth the rating or their is a criteria that we need to know which has been used to rate these casinos? There are many other casinos on the line but they have lower rating compared to these ones.

The rating just based on the site that review the casino and that is not be a thing because people have their own rating for the casinos. So I will not bother to think about the rating but looking at how they service their members. If they can gives the best services and many people here like it, they deserve to be on top casinos and vice versa. We have seen many good casinos here and members review how they work so we can check the casinos one by one to finds the right casinos.

[pawanjain]

I just checked the casinos rating on the SolCasino website and I can see that Winna has the highest rating of 5.0 followed by Casino and Thrill which has the third rating. What's your opinion about this? Do you think these casinos actually worth the rating or their is a criteria that we need to know which has been used to rate these casinos? There are many other casinos on the line but they have lower rating compared to these ones.

5.0 is a staggering rating number that will easily convince people to use Winna but just like you said, I think we should know the criteria behind the number. A rating can only be make sense when the criteria is made open for users to know. I don't think it'll be bad to compare a few lower rated casinos, I won't assume that they're bad because they score less.

Sometimes, it's not the rating that actually tells of how safe or poor a casino can be.

I just checked BTCGOSU and found that Winna is not even there on the list and Thrill is actually on the top of the list.
So far I believe BTCGOSU to be the most reputed and trusted casino review site and I don't really trust ratings from any other review sites.

[GiftedMAN]

I just checked the casinos rating on the SolCasino website and I can see that Winna has the highest rating of 5.0 followed by Casino and Thrill which has the third rating. What's your opinion about this? Do you think these casinos actually worth the rating or their is a criteria that we need to know which has been used to rate these casinos? There are many other casinos on the line but they have lower rating compared to these ones.

From Solcasino claims on day one of ANN thread creation they said they always get to use the casinos them self using real money on playing time as well as testi other features of each casino before giving it their rating on their site. I don't want to raise question about all of that with which casino they rate high or low since it's not Impossible to test all platforms before giving it a score. But nevertheless, we don't have to trust easily but try to test it for ourself with a few dollars and get a first hand experience to compare it with the rating given.

SolCasino rating on each casino on their list is based on what they had discovered while testing the casinos it you do not want to follow their ratings you can as well visit the casinos they have rated to confirm if you should believe in their ratings or not. SolCasino has not mandated anyone to judge eahs casinos based on their ratings but your choice to do your findings should help you to rate each casino as you wish. Don't forget to always do your own research as what is good in the eyes of someone could be better or bad in your eyes.

[Zwei]

I just checked the casinos rating on the SolCasino website and I can see that Winna has the highest rating of 5.0 followed by Casino and Thrill which has the third rating. What's your opinion about this? Do you think these casinos actually worth the rating or their is a criteria that we need to know which has been used to rate these casinos? There are many other casinos on the line but they have lower rating compared to these ones.

5.0 is a staggering rating number that will easily convince people to use Winna but just like you said, I think we should know the criteria behind the number. A rating can only be make sense when the criteria is made open for users to know. I don't think it'll be bad to compare a few lower rated casinos, I won't assume that they're bad because they score less.

there is no real "criteria" behind the ratings/rankings on affiliate websites like solcasinos.io.
the casino that offers them the best deal (and i don't know if they charge for listings) gets the highest spot/best rating, it's as simple as that.

i mean, can that be any more clear when they gave winna #1 with a 5/5 rating? when almost every serious gambler who does their research knows they are a scam.

[Nwada001]

Definitely the right thing to do, moreover ratings and reviews can also be manipulated, that why it is good not to rely on one source to trust a casino.
It just good we make our finding from other source too to be sure it okay to use a particular casino and to trust them also, this helps avoid some certain regrets in the future.

The source that we should trust in terms of casino reputation and reviews should be based on how reputable that source is and not the platform where reviews are moderated and can be deleted, or paid reviews can be more massive than the ones from experienced users. This forum and BTCGOSU have been places I take their opinion seriously more than any other place.

From Solcasino claims on day one of ANN thread creation they said they always get to use the casinos them self using real money on playing time as well as testi other features of each casino before giving it their rating on their site.

They also said their rating is subject to change based on how people rate the same casino in other places, including social media, but how often have we seen any listed casino rating changed in their review? And as they are not active on this thread, how can they be updated when there is a change in the way a casino behaves based on reports from players?

[Ronsbit]

I just checked the casinos rating on the SolCasino website and I can see that Winna has the highest rating of 5.0 followed by Casino and Thrill which has the third rating. What's your opinion about this? Do you think these casinos actually worth the rating or their is a criteria that we need to know which has been used to rate these casinos? There are many other casinos on the line but they have lower rating compared to these ones.

The rating just based on the site that review the casino and that is not be a thing because people have their own rating for the casinos. So I will not bother to think about the rating but looking at how they service their members. If they can gives the best services and many people here like it, they deserve to be on top casinos and vice versa. We have seen many good casinos here and members review how they work so we can check the casinos one by one to finds the right casinos.

From the little experience I have gained in this review stuff of a thing,  reviews are basically on personal experience with casinos which is why you see comments about uch casinos on review website's about casinos. It is all about a first hand experience with the casino like how a player was treated while playing with the casino.
Mostly casinos with good ratings are the one's with good services as experienced by player's so there is no two ways about it that is how I think about it except otherwise.

[mvdheuvel1983]

Take your time and evaluate the website so that you can have full understanding about what you are skeptical about.
If you read through the website and check their TOS, I think you will understand the website and how they are rating casinos that are partnering with them. It's not going to take an hour for you to read and get a full details of what your enquiry may be and if it's still difficult for you, you can ask their support if any other enquiries you will like to make about the website for your clarity.

Going through the Tos of solcasino will not give you a detailed explanation of how they go with the ratings of the casino you will need to chat their support before seeing the way they rate the casino which could be based on their own review. To acertain the best among the listed casinos you can also check some of the reviews done by others they will not follow what the affiliated site is rating the casinos so their judgement may be considered as much better or you go ahead to rate the casinos based on your own personal observation and experience.

[BADERO]

SolCasino rating on each casino on their list is based on what they had discovered while testing the casinos it you do not want to follow their ratings you can as well visit the casinos they have rated to confirm if you should believe in their ratings or not. SolCasino has not mandated anyone to judge eahs casinos based on their ratings but your choice to do your findings should help you to rate each casino as you wish. Don't forget to always do your own research as what is good in the eyes of someone could be better or bad in your eyes.

I dont think it’s a logical thing to keep the same rating for a casino that is already known as a scam an affiliate or rating site should be updated everytime, anything u can rate couldn’t keep the same rating since his beginning, many factors can change, and honestly if they continue this way they can due harm to themselves

[Rockson1]

Definitely the right thing to do, moreover ratings and reviews can also be manipulated, that why it is good not to rely on one source to trust a casino.
It just good we make our finding from other source too to be sure it okay to use a particular casino and to trust them also, this helps avoid some certain regrets in the future.

Before trusting any rating made by any casino listing site, you are to make your research that is the best way to go about it, rating a company or any casino should be based on what you know about the company, your experience and so forth, using a service without considering all these things could bring about misfeelings later which would have been avoided if we were careful enough to take the right steps initially, of course anything is possible contracted listing sites can do whatever there business partners ask them to do because of what they stand to gain, gamblers should have known this, which is why we are not expected to do things ignorantly.