LuckyCoin.com - The Casino with Zero to hide - now live in Beta mode

[MuffinMaster]

This type of structure is common in iGaming, where multiple casino brands can operate under the same licensed operator framework while still being managed and operated as separate brands.

LuckyCoin is a separate casino brand with its own management team, commercial setup, product direction and community strategy. The fact that other brands may operate under the same licensed entity does not mean they share the same management, funding, player balances, roadmap or operational standards.

We understand why players look at the broader licence structure, especially in crypto casino communities where trust matters. At the same time, each brand should be judged on its own conduct.

We cannot speak for every other brand operating under the same framework, but we can speak for LuckyCoin. Our focus is to build trust through clear communication, responsive support, fair promotions, reliable withdrawals and a long-term commitment to the community.

Feedback like this is valuable, and we are happy to answer reasonable questions about how the setup works.

Thanks, Tomas

If a couple of casinos operate under the same licence, then aren't they all under one company? I know the brand would be different and management would be different as well, but ultimately they are under the same company. Otherwise, a new company should obtain a new licence. In our country there are a lot of groups of companies that operate different brands under the same licence. We call them 'sister concerns', but the main company is liable for all the sister concerns.

The same goes for your brand; even if your brand is new, if it's been operating under the same licence that has previous issues, then the community would take it negatively. If I understand correctly, then the licence taker is the owner of all the brands and the company is liable for all the brands. Let's see how the community reacts since your old brands have some issues.

I don't really understand what you're asking, but I think concept of what White Label should explain a lot:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White-label_product
Using scripts or licenses by multiple clients is a very popular and legal way to reduce costs. It dont makes them one company. They buy it as service.
I don't see any problem with it at all.

I think OP should tell us more about the structure of bankroll, withdrawals and deposits, and how it is audited.

[SpongeS]

Recently, there have been three casinos using the Lucky name, which has left me quite confused, and their launches were only a short time apart.
Luckycoin
Luckyanon
Luckyfun
Is this all a coincidence?
Maybe I'll give it a try and deposit some money to test it out.

[MuffinMaster]

Recently, there have been three casinos using the Lucky name, which has left me quite confused, and their launches were only a short time apart.
Luckycoin
Luckyanon
Luckyfun
Is this all a coincidence?
Maybe I'll give it a try and deposit some money to test it out.

Lucky.fun has been operating for two or three years. It just recently appeared on Bitcointalk. But Luckyanon and Luckycoin are actually very new.
It seems like it's just a coincidence. The word "lucky" fits the casino's name quite well - in terms of marketing.
All three seem to be running quite smoothly, but once you've deposited and played a bit, share your impressions.

[albon]

This was the same company/operator that owns Betmode.io, Rollchain.io, wagmicasino.com, Wildead.com yes?
Checked those other sites, and they are still online.

Have a look at the General Terms & Conditions. They seem to be written in a copy-paste format; they didn’t even replace the placeholder name and just left (website). This doesn’t reflect professionalism at all.





Also, the Anjouan license doesn’t mean anything for international users, as it doesn’t provide any real assistance in recovering funds in case of a dispute. So it is essentially just a paper license.

Take a look at Article 14.2 as well: in these General Terms & Conditions, they state that the maximum amount they can pay in case of an error on their side is only $500. Limiting liability to such an amount is a red flag, as it may effectively give these platforms the right to confiscate your funds, even if you win millions and only compensate you with $500.

Code:

14.2. in the event that we are held liable for any event under these terms, our total aggregate liability to you under or in connection with these terms shall not exceed

(a) the value of the bets and or wagers you placed via your account in respect of the relevant bet/wager or product that gave rise to the relevant liability, or

(b) eur $500 in aggregate, whichever is lower.

Do you remember this thread -> [SCAM] KasyNoir, Vegascamel, Niagarajackpot & Mybitcoin.casino - Clone Network

I think what is happening here could be similar, especially since there is also the BetMode platform which has a bad reputation and is linked to their licensing.

1- luckycoin.com | URLSCAN
2- betmode.io | URLSCAN
3- feinbet.com  | URLSCAN
4- wildead.com | URLSCAN
5- wagmicasino.com | URLSCAN
6- rollchain.io | URLSCAN

[stompix]

Just to clarify — Lucky Coin is run through a completely separate company and raised its own funding independently.
And yeah, the reward/payout wallets are shared across sites on the same license setup. It keeps the operation lean, improves liquidity, and makes sure payouts are always flowing smoothly.

How the hell does this even make sense?
You got your own funds, raised it from your investors, and then decided it's better to have an aggregate pool in which you don;t have absolute control over your funds?
How does this even work? Forget about making sense?

But still, you said you have nothing to hide, so an obvious question:
Out of those 3 million in so-called pooled money, how much is owned by each casino?
"The Casino with Zero to hide" - your slogan, not mine!

[Pmalek]

I would prefer if I could register an account and log in with my username + password, without always needing to go through my email and click the link received to it.
I couldn't access the sportsbook section. I get an error message saying that my current location is restricted, which is unusual. My country isn't on the restricted countries list and it's not something I usually get. I hope you can correct this so I don't see that error anymore or update your T&Cs with the full list or restricted territories. Adding 2FA would also be a good move. Players would feel safer having it.

I like the dark background and that the landing page isn't over-saturated with too many games and unnecessary content. It makes it going from top to bottom quick.

[Babba86]

Sooo I decided to take a break from shuffle and wanted to try out a new casino. Opened up my account with them yesterday. Depoed around 10k in varies deposits and finally won some on baccarat. Initial withdrawal of 10k went automatically. Seems like they have instant withdrawals. But when I try to withdraw a second time it didn’t work. Seems like they have a 24hour limit window on 10k withdrawals. Took contact with the chat and they told me that it will be handled. So yeah so far everything works but the withdrawal limits could be higher.

[Haunebu]

Sooo I decided to take a break from shuffle and wanted to try out a new casino. Opened up my account with them yesterday. Depoed around 10k in varies deposits and finally won some on baccarat. Initial withdrawal of 10k went automatically. Seems like they have instant withdrawals. But when I try to withdraw a second time it didn’t work. Seems like they have a 24hour limit window on 10k withdrawals. Took contact with the chat and they told me that it will be handled. So yeah so far everything works but the withdrawal limits could be higher.

Never understood why some people like you deposit such big amounts into new sites like this one with glaring issues and red flags surrounding them. You mentioned getting played by a separate site too recently which makes this move odd to say the least.

Then again, you did defend Betnomi which is a proven scam site sometime back that says a lot about you. All the best high risk gambler.

[acroman08]

Sooo I decided to take a break from shuffle and wanted to try out a new casino. Opened up my account with them yesterday. Depoed around 10k in varies deposits and finally won some on baccarat. Initial withdrawal of 10k went automatically. Seems like they have instant withdrawals. But when I try to withdraw a second time it didn’t work. Seems like they have a 24hour limit window on 10k withdrawals. Took contact with the chat and they told me that it will be handled. So yeah so far everything works but the withdrawal limits could be higher.

Any chance you can provide evidence backing up your claims? I am not saying that you are lying or anything, but with the current discussion that is happening on this thread, what you wrote could look like that you are shilling for the casino.

[Itz-prisigold]

Recently, there have been three casinos using the Lucky name, which has left me quite confused, and their launches were only a short time apart.
Luckycoin
Luckyanon
Luckyfun
Is this all a coincidence?
Maybe I'll give it a try and deposit some money to test it out.

Lucky.fun has been operating for two or three years. It just recently appeared on Bitcointalk. But Luckyanon and Luckycoin are actually very new.
It seems like it's just a coincidence. The word "lucky" fits the casino's name quite well - in terms of marketing.
All three seem to be running quite smoothly, but once you've deposited and played a bit, share your impressions.

I think you are actually right on this, I just feel LUCKY is probably one of the popular names that a casino will actually like to use because it perfectly fits the whole theme about gambling.

But I think that all this new casino's should be watched very carefully, because the way new casino's keeps launching every day someone might not know which one is genuine. At the beginning everything will look so smooth, but the real value of a casino is how smooth and fast their withdrawal is and how they actually handled users complain later on will the determine everything.

But for this luckycoin.com I think the platform is very smooth, because I've actually registered there but I haven't deposited money yet. So maybe a small review from players that have actually make use of the casino will help others a lot.

[Bitinity]

Sooo I decided to take a break from shuffle and wanted to try out a new casino. Opened up my account with them yesterday. Depoed around 10k in varies deposits and finally won some on baccarat. Initial withdrawal of 10k went automatically. Seems like they have instant withdrawals. But when I try to withdraw a second time it didn’t work. Seems like they have a 24hour limit window on 10k withdrawals. Took contact with the chat and they told me that it will be handled. So yeah so far everything works but the withdrawal limits could be higher.

Any chance you can provide evidence backing up your claims? I am not saying that you are lying or anything, but with the current discussion that is happening on this thread, what you wrote could look like that you are shilling for the casino.

If we look at the live transactions information in the casino, there is indeed a $10k withdrawal 17hours ago.

It can be his 1st withdrawal since he said that his 2nd withdrawal is not processed yet. Of course it will be nice if he can provide a personal proof of his claim. Frankly this site reminds me to betmode, a place where I used to play but turned to be something bad eventually. I will prefer to skip it although he can prove his claims.

[LuckyCoin_]

Happy Friday folks 

Fair questions around the Bankroll, we’ll try to clarify this better.

The aggregated liquidity setup is designed to benefit players, not the other way around. The bankroll’s primary purpose is simply to provide liquidity across the sites so players can always get paid smoothly when they win. By operating this way, we’re able to support significantly higher withdrawal capacity than most smaller standalone operations could on their own.

All other operational costs are handled separately by each individual brand/company. This includes promotions, challenges, races/tournaments, marketing and general business operations.

It also allows us to be more transparent publicly with available liquidity. If every brand operated completely isolated wallets, that transparency would actually become harder to provide in practice.

If there’s something specific anyone feel we should clarify further around the structure or transparency, we genuinely welcome the feedback. We’re here answering questions because we want to be open about how the setup works, especially this early into launch.

Thanks, Tomas

[TheAndy500]

Happy Friday folks 

Fair questions around the Bankroll, we’ll try to clarify this better.

The aggregated liquidity setup is designed to benefit players, not the other way around. The bankroll’s primary purpose is simply to provide liquidity across the sites so players can always get paid smoothly when they win. By operating this way, we’re able to support significantly higher withdrawal capacity than most smaller standalone operations could on their own.

All other operational costs are handled separately by each individual brand/company. This includes promotions, challenges, races/tournaments, marketing and general business operations.

It also allows us to be more transparent publicly with available liquidity. If every brand operated completely isolated wallets, that transparency would actually become harder to provide in practice.

If there’s something specific anyone feel we should clarify further around the structure or transparency, we genuinely welcome the feedback. We’re here answering questions because we want to be open about how the setup works, especially this early into launch.

Thanks, Tomas

I have the impression that this shared bankroll works similarly to the Liquidity Pool on decentralized exchanges (DEXs). The idea seems good. I wonder how it works from a security perspective.