[ANN] CommunityCoin (COMM) | Pure PoS | Original COMM MultiPools Coming Soon

[scam_exposer]

OK so I imported the 2nd round raw list into excel and there is only 284 users.  I thought there were 500 people in the first stake and i assume they all applied for the second stake as well.  Am I missing something?  I can't find 500 recipients on any list available. 

See for yourself:

[Nxtblg]

Thank you everyone for your contributions

a thank you to tintumon as well and the twitter account www.twitter.com/communitycoin1

check out the banner so you can see the concept logo and how it will look elsewhere

i have updated a set of logos showing different sized versions and the comparison to branded version and metalcoin version as well

http://postimg.org/gallery/2b6f9r2k/9b075258/

Thanks!

[scam_exposer]

I am not sure they even finished distribution as there is a second chance form now, so they may not be done yet. Wouldn't it be better to wait until they are finished before looking for everyone's names?

Even with the negativity I think the coin has a lot of nice things going for it. I find it odd that someone without any coins has enough time to waste to pour over data and make spreadsheets, for no reason.

Look at my screen name.  I'm scam_exposer.  That's what I do.

[Buratino]

So I have to leave open the wallet until I mint the stake?
Once I got money, they are all the interest since the day I received the 1000k coins or they are more the more I leave the wallet open?
So basically, can I open the wallet and wait for the mint just once in a while or it is convenient always leave it open?
Leaving the wallet open, I support the network in some way?
Thank you

Yes. But it is better to do it after 24h for stake 1000K COMM.
You may do it in both way. Minting is a probable process.
Yes.

Here is minting hints:
1. Don't make any outcome transactions during period of waiting for minting blocks, thus you destroy accumulated coin-days to zero and you return to beginning. If you want to make outgoing transactions without loss coin-days then create new other wallet and send reserved amount to new. Take care about it in advance.
2. After catching block (first cycle from stake) or catching 2 blocks (second cycle) or catching 4 blocks (third cycle), it is better to send all your coins to new own address (generate fresh one in wallet). Thus you join all transactions into one and minting becomes easy due large stake will accumulate coin-days faster. Difficulty is higher - coin-days also should be higher. Usually I do this: Initial stake -> waiting -> catching block -> send initial stake + reward to new own address and go over again.
Sorry for poor English (Native is Russian).

[scam_exposer]

OK so I imported the 2nd round raw list into excel and there is only 284 users.  I thought there were 500 people in the first stake and i assume they all applied for the second stake as well.  Am I missing something?  I can't find 500 recipients on any list available. 

See for yourself:

Does the dev want to comment on this?  Please provide a list of the initial 500 stakeholders and prove me wrong.

[badam]

OK so I imported the 2nd round raw list into excel and there is only 284 users.  I thought there were 500 people in the first stake and i assume they all applied for the second stake as well.  Am I missing something?  I can't find 500 recipients on any list available. 

See for yourself:

Does the dev want to comment on this?  Please provide a list of the initial 500 stakeholders and prove me wrong.

 Not every user from first giveaway was accepted for the second one, it was discussed earlier.

[unent]

I am not sure they even finished distribution as there is a second chance form now, so they may not be done yet. Wouldn't it be better to wait until they are finished before looking for everyone's names?

Even with the negativity I think the coin has a lot of nice things going for it. I find it odd that someone without any coins has enough time to waste to pour over data and make spreadsheets, for no reason.

The dev said he would realease them after distribution finishes and gave an example of what to expect.

It's in the old thread that got locked.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=529481.msg5966454#msg5966454

Here's the example he gave.

[funkwerk101]

Look at my screen name.  I'm scam_exposer.  That's what I do.

Any chance you could something else for a while?

[scam_exposer]

Look at my screen name.  I'm scam_exposer.  That's what I do.

Any chance you could something else for a while?

No

[djm34]

OK so I imported the 2nd round raw list into excel and there is only 284 users.  I thought there were 500 people in the first stake and i assume they all applied for the second stake as well.  Am I missing something?  I can't find 500 recipients on any list available.  

See for yourself:

Does the dev want to comment on this?  Please provide a list of the initial 500 stakeholders and prove me wrong.

if you want the list for the first round, look into communitycoin post, you should find it.

[funkwerk101]

Look at my screen name.  I'm scam_exposer.  That's what I do.

Any chance you could something else for a while?

Watch TV, domino's for one, guard a bridge. Must be something else to help pass the hours  

[scam_exposer]

I am not sure they even finished distribution as there is a second chance form now, so they may not be done yet. Wouldn't it be better to wait until they are finished before looking for everyone's names?

Even with the negativity I think the coin has a lot of nice things going for it. I find it odd that someone without any coins has enough time to waste to pour over data and make spreadsheets, for no reason.

The dev said he would realeae them after distribution finishes and gave an example of what to expect.

It's in the old thread that got locked.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=529481.msg5966454#msg5966454

Here's the example he gave.

That example doesn't show anything.  Also, The list I just posted was the second round raw list.  That should have all the initial stakeholders on it as it should be the list the dev went through to decide on a second round stake.

Even if they weren't'  accepted for the second round they should still be on the raw list.  That's what a raw list is.  A list that get gone through.  Everyone should be on it.  This could all be solved if the list was provided.  What's the problem with that?  Why the delay?

[funkwerk101]

Look at my screen name.  I'm scam_exposer.  That's what I do.

Any chance you could something else for a while?

Watch TV, domino's for one, guard a bridge. Must be something else to help pass the hours  

Guess taking excel screen shots is more fun.. 

[poornamelessme]

Look at my screen name.  I'm scam_exposer.  That's what I do.

Any chance you could something else for a while?

No

And this is why most of what you post isn't worthwhile. And I even agree that the lost coins issue needs to be dealt with. But you seemingly have endless time to post nonstop here, check out hundreds of names, and seemingly just try to disrupt this coin (and others). Basically you are a troll, with all the normal troll-like tendencies. Your trust issue alone sort of demonstrates this.

No normal person, with normal motives, would post like you do. Hence why your arguments hold less weight and are less effective the more you post.

[kcanup]

Look at my screen name.  I'm scam_exposer.  That's what I do.

And your trust ratings says what you do, right? 

[mugwampbro]

Look at my screen name.  I'm scam_exposer.  That's what I do.

Any chance you could something else for a while?

No

good answer But he does have something to do....get busy

[scam_exposer]

OK so I imported the 2nd round raw list into excel and there is only 284 users.  I thought there were 500 people in the first stake and i assume they all applied for the second stake as well.  Am I missing something?  I can't find 500 recipients on any list available.  

See for yourself:

Does the dev want to comment on this?  Please provide a list of the initial 500 stakeholders and prove me wrong.

if you want the list for the first round, look into communitycoin post, you should find it.

I just went through communitycoins posts and there is no list.  I did find this post from March 28th that I find interesting.  It seems the main goal was to get on an exchange.  Hmm


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=529481.msg5954846#msg5954846

Target 1: Get us on a exchange vote list - Don't sit!
We continue delivery and those who gets cryptos should work now!

[funkwerk101]

I just went through communitycoins posts and there is no list.  I did find this post from March 28th that I find interesting.  It seems the main goal was to get on an exchange.  Hmm

Stop the press...

We have just exposed a coin that wanted to get onto an exchange...  

Your work here is done....

[scam_exposer]

Look at my screen name.  I'm scam_exposer.  That's what I do.

Any chance you could something else for a while?

No

good answer But he does have something to do....get busy

I'm busy but I don't think people are going to like what I find.  I already know what's going on but some just can't see it or don't want to believe it.  Even after I post definitive  proof there will be those that will refuse to accept it and will attack me and accuse me of spreading fud.  

[scam_exposer]

Look at my screen name.  I'm scam_exposer.  That's what I do.

And your trust ratings says what you do, right? 

My trust rating was was lowered by false accusations.  I have never traded with anyone for anything and i never blackmailed anyone.  There is a screenshot of some scammer called sitefive that was used to discredit me after I stopped a scamcoin IPO. 

The trust rating on this site is meaningless.  I could give you a negative trust rating right now if I wanted to.  But i won't.