If you were given opportunity to invest which would you go for?

[Oasisman]

For you reading this post, which of the investment do you think could be better and worthy enough in the next 5 years?

Well, if you're aiming for a good return in a 5-year span, I'd go with Bitcoin, especially if you only have very limited resources. This could completely change depending on the capital amount.
If you have enough resources to purchase a property in a developed place, near commercial spaces, then I'd go for it. I will have it leased, and then boom, passive income, and an asset that can easily be inherited by your next of kin. We may never know how well Bitcoin is performing in the next 5 years, but then again, if you think you have enough years left, you can hold onto your Bitcoin in the next 10 years or so, as it will surely give you greater profit than what a 5-year span can give you.

Actually, there are no better choices between these two, because both can give you good returns, and that purely depends on how well you manage your investment.

[LOVER BOY 422]

Few weeks back I was in an argument with some people saying that they value landed properties than investing in digital currencies, but however, both of them are so much important to invest on, now investing in bitcoin doesn't give you any risk provided that you are holding for a long duration, same thing applicable with landed properties when you hold for long term especially the area that has been developed you would see your landed property appreciating so quickly than that of the digital currencies.

Based on the argument, I have believed that bitcoin investment is much worthy than landed properties, although this depends on the area of the landed that could make it to boost so faster than as we may think of. Undeveloped areas does not appreciates as we think so easily and even if you must sell when the profits might added it wouldn't the same as someone who invested on bitcoin because as we know is cyclic and also doubled with the halving has been concluded.

For you reading this post, which of the investment do you think could be better and worthy enough in the next 5 years?

While in the next 5 years Bitcoin investment will definitely go up more than land , the problem of land commonly known is the land dispute which will result of many people lossing the land entirely, but to be very honest in Bitcoin investment no one will drag it with you , all you just have to do is to pray that in that next 5 years that it should go up and it will definitely go because it is a volatile asset, it move down and upward so to me I prefer Bitcoin investment than Venturing into landed properties.

[Danica22]

While in the next 5 years Bitcoin investment will definitely go up more than land , the problem of land commonly known is the land dispute which will result of many people lossing the land entirely, but to be very honest in Bitcoin investment no one will drag it with you , all you just have to do is to pray that in that next 5 years that it should go up and it will definitely go because it is a volatile asset, it move down and upward so to me I prefer Bitcoin investment than Venturing into landed properties.

That's incorrect. Land disputes and zoning issues are risks that rarely happen, and only inexperienced and greedy real estate investors tend to fall into them.

The reality is that real estate is an extremely attractive investment channel, but it is a selective one and not for everyone. Not everyone has a large amount of capital to invest in it. Meanwhile, investing in Bitcoin is more accessible because it has no minimum investment requirement.

In fact,  the main reason we chose Bitcoin is because of its limited investment capital and higher volatility.

[summonerrk]

Few weeks back I was in an argument with some people saying that they value landed properties than investing in digital currencies, but however, both of them are so much important to invest on, now investing in bitcoin doesn't give you any risk provided that you are holding for a long duration, same thing applicable with landed properties when you hold for long term especially the area that has been developed you would see your landed property appreciating so quickly than that of the digital currencies.

Based on the argument, I have believed that bitcoin investment is much worthy than landed properties, although this depends on the area of the landed that could make it to boost so faster than as we may think of. Undeveloped areas does not appreciates as we think so easily and even if you must sell when the profits might added it wouldn't the same as someone who invested on bitcoin because as we know is cyclic and also doubled with the halving has been concluded.

For you reading this post, which of the investment do you think could be better and worthy enough in the next 5 years?

Your logic is absolutely clear and correct, but there are nuances. Yes, real estate is one of the most common investments, favored by small investors even without strong money management skills—not the kind of laymen who only invest in bank deposits. And real estate appreciates in value, but as it turns out, not always. I only recently learned that in the city where I live, apartment prices haven't changed for a whole year. This means any small investment in crypto would have been more successful.

[Stable090]

Based on the argument, I have believed that bitcoin investment is much worthy than landed properties, although this depends on the area of the landed that could make it to boost so faster than as we may think of.

Both bitcoin investment and landed properties is kind of risky, You shouldn’t say bitcoin investment is risk free. Bitcoin investment is more worthy, I agree with that, but it’s because you already have knowledge about bitcoin that’s why you choose to invest in bitcoin. Some people that are into landed properties will also claim that landed property is more profitable.

If you don’t have  much knowledge about bitcoin, then just invest in whatsoever you having much knowledge about. Both bitcoin and landed properties is always a long term investment, you can’t just invest in them and expect reward within a short period of time. If you are financially okay, then you can just invest in both bitcoin, and landed properties, you should diversify your investment.

[Rockstarguy]

For you reading this post, which of the investment do you think could be better and worthy enough in the next 5 years?

It is not everyone who can invest in landed property because to acquire one, you need to gather a substantial amount of money to enter such an investment. Investing in Bitcoin is easy because you can invest an amount that you can afford, and consistently accumulating this for the long term can yield profits from Bitcoin investments, which can then be diversified into landed property. Bitcoin investment is a valuable opportunity from which you can diversify into other investments.

[I_Anime]

Few weeks back I was in an argument with some people saying that they value landed properties than investing in digital currencies, but however, both of them are so much important to invest on, now investing in bitcoin doesn't give you any risk provided that you are holding for a long duration, same thing applicable with landed properties when you hold for long term especially the area that has been developed you would see your landed property appreciating so quickly than that of the digital currencies.

Based on the argument, I have believed that bitcoin investment is much worthy than landed properties, although this depends on the area of the landed that could make it to boost so faster than as we may think of. Undeveloped areas does not appreciates as we think so easily and even if you must sell when the profits might added it wouldn't the same as someone who invested on bitcoin because as we know is cyclic and also doubled with the halving has been concluded.

For you reading this post, which of the investment do you think could be better and worthy enough in the next 5 years?

The truth is that investing in one doesn’t mean you can’t invest in the other . Because both are going to make good investment together, though when come to physical property like land it usually require more capital compare to bitcoin . But is quite stable , less volatile than  bitcoin, though it has its downside like Returns  depend heavily on location and local development , property taxes (legal fees, and maintenance cost may apply).

Now talking of bitcoin is actually more volatile, prices rise and fall dramatically. Regulatory and security risk and its  required careful storage and protection of private keys (lose your key you lose your coins ). Now the upside is that it can appreciate rapidly one reason is the best digital assets , doesn’t require maintenance or property management, and not to mention can be purchased in small amounts (which is golden by the way ). So both have their up and down side , though they still make a pretty good investment.

[Cookdata]

For you reading this post, which of the investment do you think could be better and worthy enough in the next 5 years?

Well, if you're aiming for a good return in a 5-year span, I'd go with Bitcoin, especially if you only have very limited resources. This could completely change depending on the capital amount.
If you have enough resources to purchase a property in a developed place, near commercial spaces, then I'd go for it. I will have it leased, and then boom, passive income, and an asset that can easily be inherited by your next of kin. We may never know how well Bitcoin is performing in the next 5 years, but then again, if you think you have enough years left, you can hold onto your Bitcoin in the next 10 years or so, as it will surely give you greater profit than what a 5-year span can give you.

Actually, there are no better choices between these two, because both can give you good returns, and that purely depends on how well you manage your investment.

Ehmm, this advice looks sweet until you tried them. The Bitcoin you mentioned is the most realistic investment you can try even though you need patience to hold it and that 5 years may look like 10 years to it as a first timer.
Property are cool if you do it on demanding location where  people need housing and roof to put over there head, if you try it in a location where it's not needed, you will not only lack rental customers, you will sell the property at low price to get your capital.

If you need a property where people live already is usually costly, the aim is to buy low and lease out at high, you see that the idea of property isn't for the weak unless you have big amount of money to start one. You will be frustrated and when you need the money urgently, you will not get because the liquidity around property is poor, you will not even get back your capital if you need the money urgently. I will go with Bitcoin without a doubt even in my next life.

[boyptc]

That's incorrect. Land disputes and zoning issues are risks that rarely happen, and only inexperienced and greedy real estate investors tend to fall into them.

The reality is that real estate is an extremely attractive investment channel, but it is a selective one and not for everyone. Not everyone has a large amount of capital to invest in it. Meanwhile, investing in Bitcoin is more accessible because it has no minimum investment requirement.

I agree, that's the only reason why not everyone will enter into real estate investing as a business. Most of the people only want to get a real estate just for them to call it home and not actually to make it as a source of income.

Because of how expensive it is and how long it will take to pay in full. That's why it's not meant for everyone.

In fact,  the main reason we chose Bitcoin is because of its limited investment capital and higher volatility.

And we can buy fractions of it cheaply compared to parcels of land, it costs a lot.

[M47AK16]

Based on the argument, I have believed that bitcoin investment is much worthy than landed properties, although this depends on the area of the landed that could make it to boost so faster than as we may think of. Undeveloped areas does not appreciates as we think so easily and even if you must sell when the profits might added it wouldn't the same as someone who invested on bitcoin because as we know is cyclic and also doubled with the halving has been concluded.

Both are good, obviously, but they both have different pros and cons. The very first thing that comes in mind when we compare real estate and Bitcoin as investment options is the affordability, because we know that you can't buy a property with $1,000 or with just $100, but you can invest that money in Bitcoin.

Of course, the profits will depend on how much you are investing, but you at least have the option to start with it if you have a small capital. When it comes to real estate, it is considered to be an investment option only for the rich and wealthy because of how costly properties are, which makes it impossible for an average person to become a real estate investor.

[Richbased]

While in the next 5 years Bitcoin investment will definitely go up more than land , the problem of land commonly known is the land dispute which will result of many people lossing the land entirely, but to be very honest in Bitcoin investment no one will drag it with you , all you just have to do is to pray that in that next 5 years that it should go up and it will definitely go because it is a volatile asset, it move down and upward so to me I prefer Bitcoin investment than Venturing into landed properties.

You are right about land disputes which can cause someone to lose their land or enter into legal processes that will take time and money before you can recover your land. I have seen people who bought land and left it for years so that they can resell it and make profits but only for them to find out that the original owners resold the land to someone else thereby leading to a land dispute. There's one land dispute that happened recently whereby the first son of this man sold a family land without the knowledge of his siblings, when they found out they told him to return the money to the buyer but he refused so his siblings told the buyer that it is a family land that their brother sold to him and they are not interested in selling the land. This made the buyer to regret buying the land.

Bitcoin investment has no dispute inasmuch as you keep your seed phrase and your pass codes safe and inaccessible to others. You just invest, hold and relax while your investment is yielding profits. Even if it doesn't yield a good amount of profits in 5 years but the security is better than going for an investment that will generate lots of profits but end up losing it to disputes.

[WatChe]

Both are good, obviously, but they both have different pros and cons. The very first thing that comes in mind when we compare real estate and Bitcoin as investment options is the affordability, because we know that you can't buy a property with $1,000 or with just $100, but you can invest that money in Bitcoin.

Of course, the profits will depend on how much you are investing, but you at least have the option to start with it if you have a small capital. When it comes to real estate, it is considered to be an investment option only for the rich and wealthy because of how costly properties are, which makes it impossible for an average person to become a real estate investor.

The main difference between real estate and Bitcoin is that Bitcoin market is open for everyone and you can start investing in Bitcoin with even 10$. Whereas you need adequate money, even if you are investing in small real estate project. If you are knowledgeable and knows the right real estate project to invest in then you can make fortune. I am investing in Bitcoin mainly because I don't have huge capital to invest in real estate but I am happy that I have developed necessary skills in Bitcoin over Period of time and that’s giving me good return. 

[Minor Miner]

Your logic is absolutely clear and correct, but there are nuances. Yes, real estate is one of the most common investments, favored by small investors even without strong money management skills—not the kind of laymen who only invest in bank deposits. And real estate appreciates in value, but as it turns out, not always. I only recently learned that in the city where I live, apartment prices haven't changed for a whole year. This means any small investment in crypto would have been more successful.

Apartments are also considered real estate and are part of this industry. However, it should not be lumped together with other types of real estate such as land plots or townhouses, since each has its own characteristics, use cases, and growth potential. Nor should you generalize the potential of the entire real estate market just because some apartment are not increasing in price.
You need to understand that real estate is not just an asset, but also a business market. And you probably also know that achieving good result in business requires many factor working together.

In addition, each type of asset or market has its own cycle. The fact that an apartment or real estate has not increased in value over the past year does not mean it will never increase in value in the future. It is similar to investing in Bitcoin at 126k$ 7 month ago and now being down more than 40%, would you consider that a bad investment?

[Bitcoin.com97]

I won't lie the two are very good investment,if you invest in a landed property for the duration of 5years,trust me you will see how massive the growth will be and also investing in Bitcoin for the next 5years you will also see how massive it will be ,but I think I will chose to invest in Bitcoin because I feel it's a kind of better but the both investment are really good .

[AgriTrack]

With what performance silver and gold has done in the few years it is unconfirmed what asset will do better than another in the future aside from we using historical performances of an asset to project what future outcome can be possible.

What constitute an interest to invest in any asset is knowledge, and I draw my context from those of Warren Buffet which is about investing in digital assets you have good knowledge of. Every investor has to invest more on what they think has worked more perfectly for them where they understand the value they are investing into.

Both are recommend as a investment because both have the potential to generate profit. However by looking current scenario of the world, Bitcoins or gold's  prices and profit has been highly volatile. Last two months were the very problematic or challenging for the holders. Sometime increases or some time faced  huge decline in their prices. If I got chance of investment then my choice would be land. Because less risk is involved here. Land has more qualities like it is a physical assets or it serves me in many ways. Like if hold it I can use it as renting or production of something, or farming means it give me reward while it is in my possession but when I tried to sold it then it give returns with higher percentage. Means no fear of loss in any circumstances or in any uncertainty.

[Royal Cap]

However, along with profitability, liquidity plays a big role here. Even though land or flats give good returns in the long run, it is quite difficult to sell them quickly and get cash in times of danger and sometimes it takes up to several months. On the other hand, Bitcoin is a highly liquid asset, which you can convert into any amount of cash at any time of the day or night. Let's say an urgent medical emergency, where you need some money in a hurry, then selling a part of the land quickly is almost impossible, but it is easily possible with Bitcoin. So real estate may provide stability for the next 5 years, but Bitcoin will be far ahead in terms of quick decisions and the possibility of large returns. Although this is my personal opinion.

[Fiasem20]

For you reading this post, which of the investment do you think could be better and worthy enough in the next 5 years?

In my own opinion,both investment are worthy of investing and they’re capable of yielding profits in the next 5 years or more.There are few differences between landed properties and digital assets(bitcoin),bitcoin is volatile and landed properties isn’t volatile.The land you bought some years back can’t be sold out with that same amount you bought it and when the land appreciates it doesn’t decrease rather it would keep increasing as long as the area is developing.Many investors would use bitcoin’s volatility as an excuse to why they don’t prefer bitcoin investment,if I am asked to choose between bitcoin investment and landed properties,ofcourse I would go for bitcoin then I would diversify my money in landed properties as well(remember don’t put all your eggs in one basket).

[RockBell]

Both bitcoin investment and landed properties is kind of risky, You shouldn’t say bitcoin investment is risk free. Bitcoin investment is more worthy, I agree with that, but it’s because you already have knowledge about bitcoin that’s why you choose to invest in bitcoin. Some people that are into landed properties will also claim that landed property is more profitable.

They all have there own risk but if you want to look into this is only when you want to buy properties that is were the problem usually comes from because there is a lot of scams out there and Bitcoin the only risk is when you want to trade but if it is about holding them I don't even see any risk there and the only thing people see as risk is when the price is coming down and it takes a longer period to recover that is the only thing that I see as risk and is not even a risk.

If you don’t have  much knowledge about bitcoin, then just invest in whatsoever you having much knowledge about. Both bitcoin and landed properties is always a long term investment, you can’t just invest in them and expect reward within a short period of time. If you are financially okay, then you can just invest in both bitcoin, and landed properties, you should diversify your investment.

And people don't want to do research and that is why they are having problems with Bitcoin and it is very easy for you to understand everything about Bitcoin is straight forward it's interpretation is what matters a lot and you won't limit your self to holding you can also trade just that people that want to trade they should be more prepared in term of knowledge because no two ways about it you will just have to prepared for what you going into.

[Versatile_choice]

If I have enough resources I would go for the both, because if you buy a land with the intention of building a house and then make it available for rent. You would be making profit every month or year depending on how you plan it, at the same time making your bitcoin Investment. I think this is going to make your bitcoin Investment to go smoothly as you already have different cash flow together with your job. I believe there are people out there who are investing in bitcoin at the same time running thier estate business and they don't get affected reason been that it's well planned.

[slapper]

While in the next 5 years Bitcoin investment will definitely go up more than land , the problem of land commonly known is the land dispute which will result of many people lossing the land entirely, but to be very honest in Bitcoin investment no one will drag it with you , all you just have to do is to pray that in that next 5 years that it should go up and it will definitely go because it is a volatile asset, it move down and upward so to me I prefer Bitcoin investment than Venturing into landed properties.

You are right about land disputes which can cause someone to lose their land or enter into legal processes that will take time and money before you can recover your land. I have seen people who bought land and left it for years so that they can resell it and make profits but only for them to find out that the original owners resold the land to someone else thereby leading to a land dispute. There's one land dispute that happened recently whereby the first son of this man sold a family land without the knowledge of his siblings, when they found out they told him to return the money to the buyer but he refused so his siblings told the buyer that it is a family land that their brother sold to him and they are not interested in selling the land. This made the buyer to regret buying the land.

Bitcoin investment has no dispute inasmuch as you keep your seed phrase and your pass codes safe and inaccessible to others. You just invest, hold and relax while your investment is yielding profits. Even if it doesn't yield a good amount of profits in 5 years but the security is better than going for an investment that will generate lots of profits but end up losing it to disputes.

Once that firstborn sold the land (even if the money comes back), the family is damaged in an irreversible way. Nobody thinks about that expense when thinking about land as an investment. There is no column to write in the spreadsheet that says "your brother betrayed the whole family and now holidays are ruined permanently".

And the buyer. I have been thinking about the buyer as well.

He saved, most likely for years. Did what he was supposed to do. Purchased an actual object to which he could say this is mine. Returned back and discovered that his investment was something else's family trouble. It just keeps happening and we don't think of it as a structural risk, simply because land is "safe". In the meantime, Bitcoin is "volatile" and people trust the feeling more than the architecture.

Bitcoin's trustlessness is in fact much more humanistic design. No betrayal is possible, that's one of the reasons. A protocol without a ability to make unauthorised transfers cannot be betrayed. No first born problem. There's no resale-without-consent problem. The protocol doesn't have a social layer to exploit.

You're talking about security: sleeping at night knowing that no one can deny that you have Bitcoin, that's a greater return than many. Since returns are susceptible to disputes. Security based on protocol? That holds.