Yes, I don't think it has so much to do with the fact that it's about the World Cup itself, as it does with the historic political moment that the country is going through. With that "America First" thing the focus has been on immigration, and I would almost dare to say that this type of incident, if they are not agreed, at least they do favour a certain wing that seeks controversy to attract the attention of potential voters. Of course, the World Cup and the world in general deserve better.
Since the United State have a to do and is feeling insecure with the whole thing, why are they co-hosting the World Cup?
You have not answered the question of the OP, rather, you are stating reasons why the Americans have decided to take the situation of security to an extreme length, where it is no longer called security but racial discrimination and political differences. Well, I dont blame the Americans, I only blame FIFA.
He's only taking a detour from the obvious given subject which is something that shouldn't be because the World Cup is a game that people spend four years preparing towards and it's really sad to see that they get denied form having access to watching these games live after they have spent so much for both financial, time and energy. A man with so many enemies shouldn't seek to organise a community event, because of course, everyone would be free to want to attend since it's a community event regardless of who the host is. America as a country was coerced to host the games, they voluntarily agreed to, so I really don't understand the many dramas even if security measures has to employed. FIFA indeed has to be blamed over this disruptions.