Rizzy.com | Crypto Casino | VIP TRANSFER | 100% Deposit Match + 100 FS

[SeriouslyGiveaway]

That level 2 completion usually only cover their basic verification of their identity. But it does not remove the risk, since the real issue will usually occur when Rizzy or other casino asked for that level 3 or 4 verification.

What I also notice that lots of casino act the same and failures from level 2 rarely happens. But usually those withdrawal will get freeze if they cannot comply or pass on those high level identity checking.

So to avoid having such problem better stay away with those things that can put their account in bad position. Maybe better to read the TOS to learn something about what practice is good to do when they are playing in their casino.

That's how risk from KYC and AML works with time, mostly escalating with time, and users don't know when a company will use AML/ KYC card against their accounts and funds. I exclude scammers and cheaters on casinos from this context, but with honest users who don't cheat anything on casinos, they still have risk of problems with their accounts, and more important with their funds.

When such AML and KYC cards are used by casinos against users, they have almost no chance to win. It's like if a company want to scam users, users have big disadvantage if their funds are stored at that platform.

Obeying ToS is important with users but they can not control and eliminate all risks for their accounts.

[Patikno]

Wow, I just had a stroke of luck while playing at Rizzy. I guess this is a case of "getting exactly what you wished for". Honestly, I was hoping for some entertainment, plus a little extra (a win) before I signed up at Rizzy, and that is exactly what I got. I started off by playing a slot game I hadn't touched in a long time, that is; "Sweet Bonanza". Before long, I landed a win, all in under 300 spins. I will keep playing until I have fully satisfied the curiosity I felt about the game I had long since abandoned. Of course, I won't go overboard; I just want to have fun, and act responsibly.

How about you, friends ? have you started having some luck today ? I hope you all have the same luck I did, and remember to play responsibly.

Wow
This is indeed some good luck.
300 free spins is the real deal man.
You gotta give us some updates on how it went.
Unfortunately, I haven’t been that lucky lately like I used to be in the past but then my consolation is that I play responsibly and know when to quit.
I haven’t forgotten my bad experience from the past.

The results were satisfying, and I felt lucky that night (since I won). I also managed to raise my account rank to Bronze and am on my way to Bronze 2. Even, I will be getting the weekly bonus soon. Unfortunately, I am not yet eligible for the monthly bonus, as that requires reaching the Silver rank.

Well, I just felt lucky, and I started out using money I could afford to lose. I just wanted to entertain myself by playing, and if my luck wasn't in, I wouldn't force myself to go beyond my limits. I hope you all play responsibly when it comes to gambling, too.

By the way, it wasn't 300 free spins; those were just regular spins I played.

[Davidvictorson]

The results were satisfying, and I felt lucky that night (since I won). I also managed to raise my account rank to Bronze and am on my way to Bronze 2. Even, I will be getting the weekly bonus soon. Unfortunately, I am not yet eligible for the monthly bonus, as that requires reaching the Silver rank.

Well congratulations.
This was some positive gambling experience on the Rizzy casino for you as well as me who is reading and interacting with you.
I wish you continue on this responsible gambling path and get to the Silver rank.

Well, I just felt lucky, and I started out using money I could afford to lose. I just wanted to entertain myself by playing, and if my luck wasn't in, I wouldn't force myself to go beyond my limits. I hope you all play responsibly when it comes to gambling, too.

This is very key. Anything other than this is just going to come with regret and losses.

By the way, it wasn't 300 free spins; those were just regular spins I played.

Thank you for the clarification.

[Bitcoin_Arena]

~snip~ Have you ever wondered why there are so many cases of funds getting frozen by casinos vs. exchanges? Yet money flows in and out of exchanges at a higher level compared to casinos

Only the level 2 KYC verification is mandatory at Rizzy. You will rarely see any casinos to freeze users funds for failing to complete the level 2 KYC verification. The percentage won't be even 1% there. It usually happens at every casino when a user fails to complete the proof of address and source of funds (level 3 and level 4) verification. So, completing level 2 identity verification before making a deposit doesn’t guarantee that your funds won’t be frozen by the Rizzy team in the future.

I am sorry to bring this up, but just for comparison, almost all crypto exchanges I use are just at level 2 KYC verification. No proof of address and source of funds, and yet there have never been any issues yet!
Anyway, that was not the point. My point was mainly regarding having users verify before they deposit vs. them verifying only when it's time to withdraw. So many things could go wrong in the latter scenario. In the former, if my verification fails, that means I won't have to deposit.

I loved the old times when KYC was not a thing, even for casinos, but unfortunately that is now history.

[lionheart78]

I am sorry to bring this up, but just for comparison, almost all crypto exchanges I use are just at level 2 KYC verification. No proof of address and source of funds, and yet there have never been any issues yet!
Anyway, that was not the point. My point was mainly regarding having users verify before they deposit vs. them verifying only when it's time to withdraw. So many things could go wrong in the latter scenario. In the former, if my verification fails, that means I won't have to deposit.

I loved the old times when KYC was not a thing, even for casinos, but unfortunately that is now history.

Yeah, it would be great to have the KYC done before we can deposit any amount.  Those who require KYC before withdrawing sound shady to me, as if they are looking for a hole not to give us our money.

I believe a casino that asks for KYC before any transaction is more reliable than casinos that asked KYC before withdrawal.  Just like what you stated, passing KYC before deposit is like caring for the player and the casino being concerned about player losses.  Unlike those that asked KYC before anyone can withdraw, which I think are only concern about their own(platform) gain.

[khaled0111]

Anyway, that was not the point. My point was mainly regarding having users verify before they deposit vs. them verifying only when it's time to withdraw. So many things could go wrong in the latter scenario. In the former, if my verification fails, that means I won't have to deposit.

If a casino requires kyc then I prefer them to enforce completing it before you can make your first deposit for the exact reason you mentioned.
Many gamblers complain about having their accounts banned or their funds seized because they failed to complete kyc. If they were asked to complete it before making any deposits then they wouldn’t find themselves in that situation.
If, as a casino, you don’t want to enforce identity verification upon registration for whatever reason, then at least make it optional.

[BlackBoss_]

If a casino requires kyc then I prefer them to enforce completing it before you can make your first deposit for the exact reason you mentioned.
Many gamblers complain about having their accounts banned or their funds seized because they failed to complete kyc. If they were asked to complete it before making any deposits then they wouldn’t find themselves in that situation.
If, as a casino, you don’t want to enforce identity verification upon registration for whatever reason, then at least make it optional.

Some casinos enforce that policy, and some exchanges do mandatory KYC similarly too. Before you complete your KYC, you can not get your account details for Deposits, no addresses given for you to fund your account, and surely you can not play games or trade before completing your KYC.

It's applied when KYC is mandatory on one platform but KYC itself has different levels and what described above is like the least KYC requirements to use your accounts for playing or trading. After that, during your experience on that platform, they might require you doing further KYC at higher levels and when such requests come, they're actually annoying and uncomfortable for users.

[maydna]

Anyway, that was not the point. My point was mainly regarding having users verify before they deposit vs. them verifying only when it's time to withdraw. So many things could go wrong in the latter scenario. In the former, if my verification fails, that means I won't have to deposit.

If a casino requires kyc then I prefer them to enforce completing it before you can make your first deposit for the exact reason you mentioned.
Many gamblers complain about having their accounts banned or their funds seized because they failed to complete kyc. If they were asked to complete it before making any deposits then they wouldn’t find themselves in that situation.
If, as a casino, you don’t want to enforce identity verification upon registration for whatever reason, then at least make it optional.

If they fail to the verification, their document is already in the casino so they need to think twice with that. If they don't minds, that is up to them but the scam casino might use their document for many things that they don't know. No guarantee they will pass the verification because that will depends on the casino consideration. Verification is something that they should do because it is difficult to see casino will not request that to their members. Casinos need to be transparent to the members so there is no misunderstanding to members.

[mitchr4]

...
If they fail to the verification, their document is already in the casino so they need to think twice with that. If they don't minds, that is up to them but the scam casino might use their document for many things that they don't know. No guarantee they will pass the verification because that will depends on the casino consideration. Verification is something that they should do because it is difficult to see casino will not request that to their members. Casinos need to be transparent to the members so there is no misunderstanding to members.

I think whether verification fails or succeeds, once a document is given to a casino for KYC players should already understand the risk that comes with it from the start. So to stay safe, it is better to read the terms and conditions first before playing, especially which casino needs KYC. This also connects with the point above about documents already being given away, because once the casino has it, the player cannot control what happens to that doc anymore. That is why a casino's reputation and transparency about data policy matters more to check early, not after the KYC process already happens.

[avp2306]

Anyway, that was not the point. My point was mainly regarding having users verify before they deposit vs. them verifying only when it's time to withdraw. So many things could go wrong in the latter scenario. In the former, if my verification fails, that means I won't have to deposit.

If a casino requires kyc then I prefer them to enforce completing it before you can make your first deposit for the exact reason you mentioned.
Many gamblers complain about having their accounts banned or their funds seized because they failed to complete kyc. If they were asked to complete it before making any deposits then they wouldn’t find themselves in that situation.
If, as a casino, you don’t want to enforce identity verification upon registration for whatever reason, then at least make it optional.

This is what I really like to happen to so that there would be no reason for them to request a verification once I want to cash out my winning.

Because some casino says that you are fine to gamble without doing KYC first, but later on they used that as an excuse to delay or give you an issue to try bothering our withdrawals request.

Also hard to see a big casino does not ask KYC and usually those platform offering a NO KYC thing are the small ones which I'm afraid to engage since they have huge tendency or chances to scam their gamblers.

[Catenaccio]

This is what I really like to happen to so that there would be no reason for them to request a verification once I want to cash out my winning.

Because some casino says that you are fine to gamble without doing KYC first, but later on they used that as an excuse to delay or give you an issue to try bothering our withdrawals request.

Also hard to see a big casino does not ask KYC and usually those platform offering a NO KYC thing are the small ones which I'm afraid to engage since they have huge tendency or chances to scam their gamblers.

Want it or not, it's what you have to adapt to and accept in the present towards the future when KYC will be used more and enforced more strictly. If after you finish your KYC, you can withdraw your fund, it's good and somewhat acceptable. Because it at least shows that the casino is not scam, and ready to proceed withdrawals for you while KYC is like only a condition.

I know it is still not convenient, not comfortable for your experience but if it goes this way, it's still better than scam casinos that ask for KYC but after users submitting documents, they only mark KYC failed and refuse to proceed withdrawals for users.