All this was done to let Italy play too

The main reason, however, is simply this: more matches mean more people and more tickets, and more tickets mean higher box-office takings.
Having more nationalities present during the tournament brings a huge economic boost to the host nations as well, so I’m sure this is the main reason that prompted FIFA to take these decisions
But there should be a point to stop right? Just because there will be more money to be made they can't make it consist of hundreds of teams in the future. FIFA should consider the potential quality drop in the World Cup too!
64 teams is a really risky choice after just making it 48. What's the rush? Is it going to be like this all the time from now on? I guess we will see changes very often in the format of this tournament.
I don’t think it’s going to be a normal phenomenon Everytime a World Cup is hosted, Honestly speaking I don’t really like what FIFA is doing, we should stick with the 48 teams that have been started in the just concluded World Cup, adding more teams would increase the chances of having a non interesting games, most especially low quality games, I believe FIFA is doing everything all because of money, they want to generate more money from the competition, I think all this decisions lead to the other decisions of selling off shares in FIFA, I think Infantino should take everything easy with his position as FIFA President.
And this is one of the major reasons why many people believe that people now have personal interests and political interests have also entered FIFA competitions right now and it's all because of money, Because sometimes we see the bias on the pitch and nothing is done about it and if things continue like this, in the near future, we will have the majority of people not interested in football anymore or just don't have passion for it anymore. Even in Africa, we can see the level of inconsistency and moderation and it's looking like they are trying to make a particular country win the title and if football continues like this that a player or a country has already been on their mind to award the title to, then it will no longer be interesting and will feel very scripted. For the shares, I believe they will want to have a personal say on the games they want to go in their favour. Because powerful and influential people will begin to buy shares and will want to also have a say in who they want to win in a game. But I know and hope we will go back to the football we used to know.
Yeah. I want it back too, "the football we used to know". But I think we romanticize some of our past a little, too? Political was always the game. The distinction today is that the amount of cash were too huge to conceal.
They aim to get to 64 teams in 2030.. That is not about inclusion or growing the game or whatever PR language they will use. It all began with CONMEBOL's desire for more host games for the centenary. Infantino also need political favours from African and Asian federations after his big private equity plan fell apart. Cannot buy votes with cash anymore? Fine. Purchasing them with World Cup spots.
And the quality of the football. From 48 to 64 teams, you get a huge pile of group games with teams knowing their fate. Sitting out of the race or out of the country. Those matches look dead because they ARE dead. And then people say "see? It is scripted". It is not scripted it is broken. Which can be worse, really, since at least corruption can be prosecuted.
As for Africa, specifically. It is maddening the inconsistency. However, the grassroots passion in that continent is one of the purest in this game. AFCON still hits different. The problem is CAF leadership getting co-opted into FIFA's voting games.
The soul of the game is not dead. I refuse to believe that. However, the operators of it? They do not mind if it is dead. On the way down they will take every dollar they can and say it is "growing the global game" with a straight face.
