"No finance, no romance" What do you think about it?

[Don Saga]

Money is not a measure for love or romance but could be seen as a material that proves love. There are a lot of marriages where money is not a problem, but love does not exist between both couples and the incidence of cheating begins. This is to say that as much as money is important, it cannot buy love, but could buy the attention and commitment of their partner.

Many people mistake attention and care for love, and that's where they get it wrong. A person could show genuine care and attention but does not love their partner, it's just genuine human courtesy. Generally, money and love are important in a relationship, that's what sustains it.

[9ja Amaka]

Money is not a measure for love or romance but could be seen as a material that proves love. There are a lot of marriages where money is not a problem, but love does not exist between both couples and the incidence of cheating begins. This is to say that as much as money is important, it cannot buy love, but could buy the attention and commitment of their partner.

Many people mistake attention and care for love, and that's where they get it wrong. A person could show genuine care and attention but does not love their partner, it's just genuine human courtesy. Generally, money and love are important in a relationship, that's what sustains it.

There will be problems in a marriage without money. In my entire existence, I have not seen a marriage without money, and the couples are happy about it.

Although there are things I don't understand. Marriage is a union of a man and a woman, agreeing to become one. The man is aware that the lady is poor, and the lady as well is aware the man she wants to get married to is poor. Why get married then? A man should not get married when he can't provide. A woman also should not get married when she has nothing to do to support the man when he is down to his lowest.

[Swordsoffreedom]

Money is not a measure for love or romance but could be seen as a material that proves love. There are a lot of marriages where money is not a problem, but love does not exist between both couples and the incidence of cheating begins. This is to say that as much as money is important, it cannot buy love, but could buy the attention and commitment of their partner.

Many people mistake attention and care for love, and that's where they get it wrong. A person could show genuine care and attention but does not love their partner, it's just genuine human courtesy. Generally, money and love are important in a relationship, that's what sustains it.

There will be problems in a marriage without money. In my entire existence, I have not seen a marriage without money, and the couples are happy about it.

Although there are things I don't understand. Marriage is a union of a man and a woman, agreeing to become one. The man is aware that the lady is poor, and the lady as well is aware the man she wants to get married to is poor. Why get married then? A man should not get married when he can't provide. A woman also should not get married when she has nothing to do to support the man when he is down to his lowest.

Im not sure whether you're married already. But believe me, if you only plan to get married once you are financially stable, you might never get married at all.

And marriage certainly isn't a deal, where the man has to show he can provide first  and the woman is supposed to support him through whatever situation.  True love and willingness to work together are what counts in marriage.

Have you ever seen people who couldn't build wealth or become financially stable while they were single, but once they got married, their financial situation gradually got better? Marriage doesnt have to be financial drain. It may sometimes serve as a catalyst to wealth creation.

[hafiztalha]

Money is most important part of any relationship and it can help in reducing financial stress. I do not agree with the idea that no finance, no romance it is not true. There are couples who are struggling financially but still they have genuine love and respect for each other. Sometimes, spending time together communicating with each other, supporting each other through thick and thin and showing up for each other showing affection that does not require expensive and luxurious vacations or gifts. It is understandable that having financial problems can put a lot of pressure on any relationship, especially when someone is struggling to meet the daily end needs. So I think that money cannot create love but it provide the financial stability, and financial stability can make life easier for love to survive in a good and healthy relationship. A good and the healthy relationship needs both emotional connections and it also requires a lot of responsible financial planning

[BTC FutureKing]

Money is most important part of any relationship and it can help in reducing financial stress. I do not agree with the idea that no finance, no romance it is not true. There are couples who are struggling financially but still they have genuine love and respect for each other. Sometimes, spending time together communicating with each other, supporting each other through thick and thin and showing up for each other showing affection that does not require expensive and luxurious vacations or gifts. It is understandable that having financial problems can put a lot of pressure on any relationship, especially when someone is struggling to meet the daily end needs. So I think that money cannot create love but it provide the financial stability, and financial stability can make life easier for love to survive in a good and healthy relationship. A good and the healthy relationship needs both emotional connections and it also requires a lot of responsible financial planning

You are 100 percent right because nowadays no one prefers to be with each other without money.Yes if someone says that they are with each other only because of love then it is difficult to believe it because two people who are interested or in love with each other will not prioritize money in the beginning but with the passage of time they will feel financial stability because if you are financially strong then there will be love and peace in every relationship because it is  impossible to meet daily expenses with love but only money can make it easy to meet these expenses.If you have money then there is no reason for fights and problems between you rather money is the solution to every problem and nowadays feel money will have a little more importance.

[Callido]

Although there are things I don't understand. Marriage is a union of a man and a woman, agreeing to become one. The man is aware that the lady is poor, and the lady as well is aware the man she wants to get married to is poor. Why get married then? A man should not get married when he can't provide. A woman also should not get married when she has nothing to do to support the man when he is down to his lowest.

Love at first, money sustains the marriage. Early stages of marriage are mostly the sweetest part, after life goes on, things don't change for good, and the woman begins to see other women enjoying expensive lifestyle in their marriages. Competition sets in, and the woman begins to complain and feel less of herself for the man she married.

Another problem is when the woman relies totally on the man for survival, a woman who supports her man will have most of the household expenses covered. Some women come into marriages as liabilities, with no financial contribution to the family, which makes the marriage a lot more difficult.

[Junii]

Money is very important in every relationships, if you have it you can afford to take care of your expenses without stress and you can afford to surprise your spouse, girlfriend or boyfriend with gifts which would delight them. When money is available in a relationship there is less quarrels about the basic things of life because there are adequate provisions for them, couples would wake up happy every morning knowing that they can afford the material things that they need and want.

I agree that money is important in a relationship but i think we have to separate the importance of money in life from its importance in love. No doubt without money life can become difficult. You can not go to the grocery store and tell the owner that i love my wife and in return he will give u groceries for free. You need money for food housing health care etcetera. It is obvious that financial stability decreases stress and give couple a better quality of life but after money there are many other things that make the relationship stronger like loyalty emotional support respect trust and quality time because if money is only the goal why the bill gates and jeff bezos and many other wealthy people get divorce.

[Vod]

A couple can marry and be happy without money - it's happened millions of times as they conquered new frontiers.   All a settler had was what they could carry.

It can still work today but the couple needs to discuss it ahead of time.  If you know you won't "want for nothing", you should prepare for the times you have different financial priorities.  Missing a bill does not break a happy family up - fighting over it always does.  Also, everyone seems to think the grass could be greener if someone else else was mowing - basically dooming their union at the start by not seeing your partner as everything you need.

[Jewan420]

The more limited your need for money, the happier you will be. There are many couples in the world who, despite having a lot of money, do not find happiness in their material life. They are fighting with each other or complaining about something. This is mainly due to excessive demands and dissatisfaction.

When a couple knows how to be content with little and adapt to the situation, the love that exists between them can never be bought with money. Money and time come together in the lives of very few people, if there is time, there is no money and if there is money, there is no time, this is real life. Those who have money do not get the opportunity to spend time with each other, those who do not have money think that all happiness can be found only with money. Money certainly has some power, but not what we express. Love between couples is built on understanding. What happens through money is not love, but rather self-interest!

[HyperCodexV]

Money is very important in every relationships, if you have it you can afford to take care of your expenses without stress and you can afford to surprise your spouse, girlfriend or boyfriend with gifts which would delight them. When money is available in a relationship there is less quarrels about the basic things of life because there are adequate provisions for them, couples would wake up happy every morning knowing that they can afford the material things that they need and want.

Love is a verb which means that it is an action word and when it is expressed in physical terms it helps to strengthen the bonds between couples, in this generation love is mostly expressed in physical things which money can buy. Imagine surprising your partner with a brand new car for their birthday, it would surely help to express your feelings of love or taking the person on a vacation that is fully funded by you, the romance would be massive.

Can romance be meaningful in a relationship without money to take care of material things to blossom and rekindle the romance? If a couple are struggling to survive which means that they can hardly afford basic necessities and luxuries of life do you think that they will be truly happy or just managing to remain in the relationship?

If your bank account can't match up your romantic fantasies, then all you are doing is delusional because, as much as you say those sweet words, if at the end of the day some flashy dates and trips don't back it up, then they all mean nothing to a woman. At first, you will be led to believe this fake notion that true romance is not about buying expensive stuff or going on vacations, but about how you treat each other and how well you listen. That's all a scam. As soon as reality hits, you will realize that money makes life easier and you need very stable financial capabilities to in order to make a relationship blossom and last long.

[Son Of Blockchain (SOB)]

When there is money, there is love in abundance. When there is no money, love is limited.

Love in a relationship shouldn't be based on finances because if the finances stop coming, the love will be broke. It wasn't like this when we were growing up to become adults. Love was genuine, not minding the circumstances. A man will meet someone to love him for who he is. But in today's society, a broke woman, ugly, without a stunning body figure, also needs a dark, tall, rich, charming man to marry. The woman has made a relationship transaction, so the man has agreed to pay for it but won't dare to fall in love anymore.

It is only in today's society that we will see a single mother with 7 children. Like, is she an animal?

It's sad how love lately is now defined by how much money someone has? I've seen a situation whereby someone has alot but stopped having along the line due to some circumstances, should love for that person be limited? But you'll be shocked that it was.
 Well be live in a cruel world where people easily forget good deeds, they only show love and loyalty when people have something to offer them (money especially) so it won't be suprising to be if there are people who thinks love should be gotten when there's money to give.

[uneng]

Imagine surprising your partner with a brand new car for their birthday, it would surely help to express your feelings of love or taking the person on a vacation that is fully funded by you, the romance would be massive.

I wouldn't feel comfortable in a relationship like that in neither of the roles. I think a relationship has to count with efforts, dedication and support from both sides to work properly. A vacation funded by financial resources of both individuals would be awesome. A car purchased with mutual funds or each one having their own vehicle would be also great. Feelings can be expressed this way too, as you care about sharing the financial burden with the one who you promised to love.

But there are those who feel more important by being the provider in 100% of the situations, while others feel special by being provided 100% of the times...

[New Judgement]

They are just managing to be in that relationship, but deep down they are not happy. Without money you won’t enjoy relationships that’s my honest opinion. You won’t be happy when you know things you are supposed to solve with money are just there staring at you. The joy of a man is money, it must not be huge money, but a man need to have money to be happy. Relationships are never enjoyable without money. Other people can think otherwise, but for me without money there’s no meaningful romance, because that relationship will scatter along the line.

[Majestic-milf]

Not everybody thinks that money should determine the success or failure of relationships. You can have a good relationship if both parties understand each other. You shouldn't buy expensive gifts to buy love. Love is unconditional and you should give gifts that you can afford to your partner. They will cherish the gift regardless of the cost it they really love you.

Its very rare to find someone that shares this thought process. It is mostly women who find it hard to stay in a relationship where there's no financial abundance because their mentality is always about comfort more than the love that's supposed to be in the relationship.
Love in a relationship becomes redundant when there's no purchasing power that's why if the woman is materialistic, she can be easily swayed when the person she's with isnt giving what she wants whereas another is offering to do so.
 Back then, love and relationship is determined by how strong the man is to take care of the woman, but now that things have evolved, some women are more invested in how deep the pocket is and would be quick to justify it with the saying "I didn't come to this life to suffer". Funny thing is, some of them aren't willing to do anything for work, rather preferring to be given soft girl treatment by their boyfriends

[Hewlet]

Can romance be meaningful in a relationship without money to take care of material things to blossom and rekindle the romance? If a couple are struggling to survive which means that they can hardly afford basic necessities and luxuries of life do you think that they will be truly happy or just managing to remain in the relationship?

If not that we are leaving in a society where people define love based on the financial benefit they enjoy from a third party, how is money the most important ingredient that encourages love? ideally, both parties involved in any kind of relationship ought to take their financial life as there personal responsibility and not to hold a believe that a their partner is supposed to be responsible for it. that s why most relationship are suffering because it is more like an avenue where a party gains financial benefit from the relationship while the other suffers from it.

Times have changed and unfortunately, the kernel of most romance is money. take money out of the equation and most relationship will fail with time. this i think is an error.

[Ishicryptic]

A couple can marry and be happy without money - it's happened millions of times as they conquered new frontiers.   All a settler had was what they could carry.

It can still work today but the couple needs to discuss it ahead of time.  If you know you won't "want for nothing", you should prepare for the times you have different financial priorities.  Missing a bill does not break a happy family up - fighting over it always does.  Also, everyone seems to think the grass could be greener if someone else else was mowing - basically dooming their union at the start by not seeing your partner as everything you need.

You're speaking from a matured perspective and from eras where relationships were not based on material things, then there were unconditional love where all that mattered was who you love, even in poverty they would remain happy. But things are different now, it is very hard to see a woman that would stay with you when you cannot comfortably afford basic expenses and buy her things, she would say that she didn't enter into a relationship to suffer, many of these type of women don't bring anything meaningful to the table, they want to live a very comfortable soft life while the man provides almost everything. There is this unfortunate mindset about some women whereby they see their own money as their personal money while the man's money is for the family, that afterall he is the head of the home, to earn their respect means that you must provide and buy them things.

[HelliumZ]

The wise say that when poverty knocks on the door, love flies out the window.
This is true in reality and it is happening now, especially in many families, the relationship between them ends only due to lack of money. Love is really proportional to money, that is, if there is money, there is love, if there is no money, there is no love. If you wake up in the morning and kiss your wife on the forehead and go out with a smile and bring a good gift for your wife at night, you will see that your wife will love you a lot more. But if you do not give your wife a gift, but if you give her a lack of rice and clothes, you will see that your wife will show you temper instead of love. The law of the world is that love is born only from money and love lasts as long as you have money.

[Alonso_]

There are people who see money as everything in life, when you have money people would definitely want to associate with you, I don’t see where so many people wants to associate with a poor man, which is why I think that money can give you opportunity to so many things even love from women, most women are mostly interested in money, if you ask any young girl now about marriage, they will tell you that they want to get married to a rich man, everybody wants to associate with a rich man, as a poor man no romance for you, you can get romance when you have money, even a poor man doesn’t have peace as well, everything is always against a poor man, I heard someone say justice for poor men.

[Alpha Marine]

When there is money, there is love in abundance. When there is no money, love is limited.

A false narrative that was set by foolish people in society to make it look like money is all that matters in love. So now, love is like a transactional affair. They have made it seem like you need to have money to get love, which is false. Women benefit from this, but when the men have the money, they believe they can get more women since money is all that matters.
I understand what money means in society, but that doesn't mean love can't work without money. If money were all that is required for love to work, then rich people's relationships and marriages wouldn't be failing the way they are. I don't have any data to back it up, but I believe relationships and marriages fail more than those that have no money. Money doesn't solve everything.
Love has nothing to do with money. You either love the person, or you don't. If money is an incentive, then it's not real love.

[Thewatchman]

Money makes love easier irrespective of how love and romance wants to be defined making the small things in the relationship to have comfort without anxiety it creates volume for fun and other exciting experiences that would occur as the relationship continues money makes create abundance which is a good tool in dating and relationships.