"No finance, no romance" What do you think about it?

[Ishicryptic]

Money is very important in every relationships, if you have it you can afford to take care of your expenses without stress and you can afford to surprise your spouse, girlfriend or boyfriend with gifts which would delight them. When money is available in a relationship there is less quarrels about the basic things of life because there are adequate provisions for them, couples would wake up happy every morning knowing that they can afford the material things that they need and want.

Love is a verb which means that it is an action word and when it is expressed in physical terms it helps to strengthen the bonds between couples, in this generation love is mostly expressed in physical things which money can buy. Imagine surprising your partner with a brand new car for their birthday, it would surely help to express your feelings of love or taking the person on a vacation that is fully funded by you, the romance would be massive.

Can romance be meaningful in a relationship without money to take care of material things to blossom and rekindle the romance? If a couple are struggling to survive which means that they can hardly afford basic necessities and luxuries of life do you think that they will be truly happy or just managing to remain in the relationship?

[9ja Amaka]

When there is money, there is love in abundance. When there is no money, love is limited.

Love in a relationship shouldn't be based on finances because if the finances stop coming, the love will be broke. It wasn't like this when we were growing up to become adults. Love was genuine, not minding the circumstances. A man will meet someone to love him for who he is. But in today's society, a broke woman, ugly, without a stunning body figure, also needs a dark, tall, rich, charming man to marry. The woman has made a relationship transaction, so the man has agreed to pay for it but won't dare to fall in love anymore.

It is only in today's society that we will see a single mother with 7 children. Like, is she an animal?

[Popkon6]

In the current situation, the more money a person has, the more love he or she will have, because nowadays women give the most importance to money.
But money should not be considered the most important thing in this married life of the two, because when you have money, you can spend it as you wish. You can give good gifts to your partner, but when you do not have money, love will also seem worthless to you.

A man loves happiness and peace the most in his married life, but those who have more money in their family have more happiness and those who have less money in their family have less love. In married life, he goes through hardships and difficulties, and there is less love. But love should never be measured by money.

[Merit.s]

Love is superior to money and without money love exists. It's just that nowadays, girls put their love in money and not because they love the guy. This is why you will see them getting married and file for a divorce just to take part of the man wealth.

Money is good because it can give you the comfort you need but money cannot buy true love. Money cannot buy true happiness.

[Doan9269]

Can romance be meaningful in a relationship without money to take care of material things to blossom and rekindle the romance? If a couple are struggling to survive which means that they can hardly afford basic necessities and luxuries of life do you think that they will be truly happy or just managing to remain in the relationship?

In a relationship, we needed finance to maintain it not because that is the only reason why is relationship must stand, but it's part of the essentials that needed to keep it running as expected because no one will wanted to settle for less, when it comes to romance, this is something else because having a true love does not really have to come with having more intimacy together in a relationship, Romans is needed but should not be taken for granted who has an advantage against the other partner, especially the female, if care is not taken romance could lead to unwanted pregnancy in a relationship and this could be a reason why some may have strong challenge with their relationship before marriage.

[PhilosopherKing]

Money bring fake love and happiness, it is only true love that can bring happiness. Lot of couple started form nothing and still enjoy the relationship, they struggled together with each other but they are even more happy because of the understanding the lots have for each other. They are ready to support each other in difficult times, that is true love.

Still money is good to have but person should not make it the reason why they are in that relationship. I am just talking, how the hell do we even know if person is in for the money or the love

That is why difficult time is good too at times because it can reveal the real nature of people. As there is no money, there will be nothing to blow off and show off just to impress another, and if anyone is still willing to  stay and struggle with you that can mean much than person who only is seen when things is good

[Judith87403]

Can romance be meaningful in a relationship without money to take care of material things to blossom and rekindle the romance? If a couple are struggling to survive which means that they can hardly afford basic necessities and luxuries of life do you think that they will be truly happy or just managing to remain in the relationship?

The society is the reason why relationships, marriages and courtship is now centered on money because they have configured their mind in such a way that they equate love to someone who is giving money to who they say they love. A relationship built in financial gains cannot stand because if the money is not there, whatever you both feel for each other will begin to die.
The society also brainwashed a lot of girls to think that a man will provide all their needs, they never teach these ladies how to be productive for themselves and this is why it is looking difficult for a woman to see contributing to the growth of her marriage as something that ought not to be. However, nobody will be happy that they ran out of finance to run their homes, even those who loves themselves unconditionally will still not be happy till they are out of that situation.

[Mr_Brilliant$]

I think when money is the only thing that makes a relationship stand then it is disguised as prostitution. The woman is selling herself and the man is willing to pay. Money is important but when it sits at the main cause to make a relationship stand then it is as well a business enterprise by a prostitute and her client. Don't get me wrong. Money is important but it shouldn't be the thing making a relationship to stand. That's trash and rubbish. Anybody encouraging that is regarded as emotionless person

[Fiatless]

Money is very important in every relationships, if you have it you can afford to take care of your expenses without stress and you can afford to surprise your spouse, girlfriend or boyfriend with gifts which would delight them. When money is available in a relationship there is less quarrels about the basic things of life because there are adequate provisions for them, couples would wake up happy every morning knowing that they can afford the material things that they need and want.

Not everybody thinks that money should determine the success or failure of relationships. You can have a good relationship if both parties understand each other. You shouldn't buy expensive gifts to buy love. Love is unconditional and you should give gifts that you can afford to your partner. They will cherish the gift regardless of the cost it they really love you.

Love is a verb which means that it is an action word and when it is expressed in physical terms it helps to strengthen the bonds between couples, in this generation love is mostly expressed in physical things which money can buy. Imagine surprising your partner with a brand new car for their birthday, it would surely help to express your feelings of love or taking the person on a vacation that is fully funded by you, the romance would be massive.

Buy a brand new car if you can afford it. Love can also be expressed through respect, patience, and support. Not by just giving gifts.

Can romance be meaningful in a relationship without money to take care of material things to blossom and rekindle the romance? If a couple is struggling to survive, which means that they can hardly afford basic necessities and luxuries of life, do you think that they will be truly happy or just managing to remain in the relationship?

Money is essential in every relationship. I have seen many couples who are struggling financially, yet they love each other.

[Pi-network314159]

Can romance be meaningful in a relationship without money to take care of material things to blossom and rekindle the romance? If a couple are struggling to survive which means that they can hardly afford basic necessities and luxuries of life do you think that they will be truly happy or just managing to remain in the relationship?

Romance can not be meaningful in a relationship without money, money is a lubricant that lubricate love. The female partner may claim or pretend to cope without money in the relationship just to make the man feel that without money the love will be meaningful, but all are just propergander just to make their partner see them as an understanding person whereas they are not. I have been in a relationship without money and also made money in that relationship and saw the difference.

Some women can cope without big money but atleast let it be enough to sort out minor things, but not having at all is the worst. While some women can't even mange the least, instead they will chose to leave the relationship. Although money may not be the only thing that make relationship meaningful but it is necessary because long term understand of partner without money may kill the love and affection.

[Spaceman1000$]

Money is very important in every relationships, if you have it you can afford to take care of your expenses without stress and you can afford to surprise your spouse, girlfriend or boyfriend with gifts which would delight them. When money is available in a relationship there is less quarrels about the basic things of life because there are adequate provisions for them, couples would wake up happy every morning knowing that they can afford the material things that they need and want.

Love is a verb which means that it is an action word and when it is expressed in physical terms it helps to strengthen the bonds between couples, in this generation love is mostly expressed in physical things which money can buy. Imagine surprising your partner with a brand new car for their birthday, it would surely help to express your feelings of love or taking the person on a vacation that is fully funded by you, the romance would be massive.

Can romance be meaningful in a relationship without money to take care of material things to blossom and rekindle the romance? If a couple are struggling to survive which means that they can hardly afford basic necessities and luxuries of life do you think that they will be truly happy or just managing to remain in the relationship?

Like I've always said and I will continue to say, of all the creations that God created, it is only man or human being that needs money to survive, the rest of the things God created does not require money to leave their life or to survive. The human being have so idolized money that without money they cannot show love or show appreciation to people, when most of the things that actually means a lot to us as human beings were given to us by God freely. Air is the most essential thing in the human life and is given free, if we can loosen up a little as human beings and not bind everything that has value on money, it will greatly give improvement to life, I really don't have to be too wealthy, or buy something too expensive in a bid to show you appreciation, but then, that's likely impossible with the current reality of life today.

[passwordnow]

Can romance be meaningful in a relationship without money to take care of material things to blossom and rekindle the romance? If a couple are struggling to survive which means that they can hardly afford basic necessities and luxuries of life do you think that they will be truly happy or just managing to remain in the relationship?

That is applicable several decades ago, this time it's still applicable but you'll rarely find the partner that will not look at that aspect. It's not always love that will keep you alive but the pockets are involved when both of you are altogether in unison. Marriage is a real life that you'll have to think of including the finances and it's even more expensive if both of you agrees to divorce. One has to take that into court and you'll spend thousands and even more based on how the settlement will be. If one can't provide then it's on how you talk and deal with it, better not to get into if you have no means.

[Bd officer]

There is a common saying, When poverty comes in at the door, love flies out of the window.

Nowadays it is very difficult to sustain a romance or relationship without money. Although women in the past accepted poverty but the present is different from the past because now there are opportunities for women to earn money. I always like to talk about myself, my wife takes money every month to fulfill her hobbies, if I can't give her money then she starts fighting with me. If I give my wife any gift then she is happy. So love is from the heart or from emotions but money is needed to sustain love.

[Ishicryptic]

There is a common saying, When poverty comes in at the door, love flies out of the window.

Nowadays it is very difficult to sustain a romance or relationship without money. Although women in the past accepted poverty but the present is different from the past because now there are opportunities for women to earn money. I always like to talk about myself, my wife takes money every month to fulfill her hobbies, if I can't give her money then she starts fighting with me. If I give my wife any gift then she is happy. So love is from the heart or from emotions but money is needed to sustain love.

It is true that love can still exist without a lot of money in a relationship but when there is a total lack even when you truly love the person you won't be truly fulfilled, I agree that in the past wives were more understanding when their is no money but that understanding is presently lacking in many relationships now. Romance can exist between a couple but with money it is sustained and everybody will be happier than when their is no money especially to take care of basic expenses, I've seen many wives who are disrespectful to their husbands because they are not financially bouyant. Love should be unconditional, it should be for better for worse but that was in the past, it is not the case in this age because people in relationships are comparing themselves with other relationships which is myopic. What I can conclude is that love and romance can exist between couples without money but there would be a lot of tolerance in the relationship. Money is very important in a marriage although good character is the most important.

[$crypto$]

Love is superior to money and without money love exists. It's just that nowadays, girls put their love in money and not because they love the guy. This is why you will see them getting married and file for a divorce just to take part of the man wealth.

Money is good because it can give you the comfort you need but money cannot buy true love. Money cannot buy true happiness.

Realistically, without money there is no true love, only money can strengthen it until their immortal dies, an example case in today's era where couples who get divorced due to insufficient economy means there is no true love right?

With no money at your disposal you can make your partner, family, friends, and other close people happy, even many people love you when you have a lot of finances.

[Agbamoni]

There is a common saying, When poverty comes in at the door, love flies out of the window.

Nowadays it is very difficult to sustain a romance or relationship without money. Although women in the past accepted poverty but the present is different from the past because now there are opportunities for women to earn money. I always like to talk about myself, my wife takes money every month to fulfill her hobbies, if I can't give her money then she starts fighting with me. If I give my wife any gift then she is happy. So love is from the heart or from emotions but money is needed to sustain love.

Women need to be considerable regardless of the need to be given money frequently. If you always give your wife money to fulfill her hobbies she shouldn’t fight you if you don’t have money to give her this one time. That’s where consideration comes in. She knows when you have you will surely give to her.

There is also a saying in my local dialect but I’ll translate it to English. They say “It is not who have that gives, it is he who gives that gives”. It actually means that a man may have money but won’t be a giver while some men don’t really have at the moment but when they have they give a lot.

Women chasing men with money should always remember to chase the one who is willing to give to them.

[Rockson1]

When there is money, there is love in abundance. When there is no money, love is limited.

It is only in today's society that we will see a single mother with 7 children. Like, is she an animal?

Money is not love, but money is needed to maintain love, whether we like it or not, there are things that are just there, in the modern era love goes with money, there are people that pretend to be in a relationship with you, but they are not, rather they are business partners that literally contributes nothing but benefit more.

To me, love is sweeter, when there is money, this days we have more fakers than the real people, there is one thing that makes me feel that majority of the other Gender do not do more of love again, because most of them contributes nothing, even if they have, they won't give, it is either babe give me this or that, single mother with 7 children with different father I guess, hehehehe funny.

[Marykeller]

This current situation of no finance, no romance, is an unfortunate situation we are living in, whereby love is now based on the amount of money you have will determine the kind of love you are to get, less or more.

Love then becomes a transaction: a man bringing his money in line, the lady offering his body in return. This is not the kind of love many of our parents had when they were young. I don't know how everything changed so badly for relationships to exist and last long nowadays; the man has to be a good spender, and the lady has to willingly offer her body in return.

This kind of attitude is no longer funny anymore because the guys are doing unspeakable things to get the money, while the ladies are doing unspeakable things to stay attractive for the highest bidder to spend on them.

[BALIK]

When there is money, there is love in abundance. When there is no money, love is limited.

Love in a relationship shouldn't be based on finances because if the finances stop coming, the love will be broke. It wasn't like this when we were growing up to become adults. Love was genuine, not minding the circumstances. A man will meet someone to love him for who he is. But in today's society, a broke woman, ugly, without a stunning body figure, also needs a dark, tall, rich, charming man to marry. The woman has made a relationship transaction, so the man has agreed to pay for it but won't dare to fall in love anymore.

It is only in today's society that we will see a single mother with 7 children. Like, is she an animal?

How do you know love wasn't like this back then?
It's not that couples back then didn't care about their circumstances. It is just that society was not as developed as it is today, and most people were in roughly the same financial situation. They just didn't have as many choices as we do today.

Do you? Would you actually fall in love with and marry an ugly woman who genuinely loved you and was even willing to die for you? I do not think you would be any different from everyone else.

Women nowadays love a man's money, while men love a woman's looks and youth. We‘re all the same, not just women.

[Nasdel4]

Love without money has a lot to prove, when there is money in a relationship it's very much sweeter. When there is money the fights and arguments won't be about provision but attention. Money makes a relationship easier to enjoy because love can't take you on vacations, love can't even buy you breakfast so it's an essential for a healthy relationship. Doesn't mean a relationship can't survive without it but it's presence means a lot and goes a long way to strengthen a relationship. Don't get me wrong, nobody likes to suffer.