biggerz scam casino. closed account without any reason to steal winnings 6.75btc

[AB de Royse777]

Okay at this point you are not co-operating with me with information. That's what understand now.

[aleks86]

Okay at this point you are not co-operating with me with information. That's what understand now.

I answered all the questions. You, however, did not answer; doing so—specifically based on the statistics you sent—would be against the rules.

[aleks86]

Okay at this point you are not co-operating with me with information. That's what understand now.

You’re just listing some statistics, and the implication is that we’re supposed to figure out from this what I did that violated the rules.

But it is okay for scam casino Biggerz. Seems Casino Guru also declined this absurd. that why your casino has 3.0 rating, like total scam.

[cruso]

I don’t have the same information you do.

You don't know what amount I meant with €x and €y?

I'll bite since the op is being uncooperative.

€x = Bull
And
€y = Shit

We can play stupid statistical games all day, or you can just tell us how the op broke the rules or exploited the game.

[AB de Royse777]

I don’t have the same information you do.

You don't know what amount I meant with €x and €y?

When you said you do not have same information that I do, when you are pretending that you don't know what amount I meant with the variables €x and €y - then I have no reasons to believe you anymore. The statistics and the numbers are convincing enough to make a conclusion. However, I will not make the conclusion right now. I still have a few more source of information to check and verify. The numbers and stats are one of the a few sources of information so far. I need some time, later I will make my conclusion.

[rokuen]

I don’t have the same information you do.

You don't know what amount I meant with €x and €y?

When you said you do not have same information that I do, when you are pretending that you don't know what amount I meant with the variables €x and €y - then I have no reasons to believe you anymore. The statistics and the numbers are convincing enough to make a conclusion. However, I will not make the conclusion right now. I still have a few more source of information to check and verify. The numbers and stats are one of the a few sources of information so far. I need some time, later I will make my conclusion.

Dude, what are you even talking about? Who even cares about your "conclusion"? You're literally being paid to promote the casino involved in this dispute, so you're about as biased as it gets.

You're not an independent ADR or complaint platform like Casino Guru, AskGamblers or Casinomeister etc. Why should anyone take your personal verdict seriously?

If BiggerZ has any actual evidence against the player, they should provide it to an independent third party instead of having their paid promoter play judge on Bitcointalk.

[aleks86]

All lucky clovers 100 has rtp about 97%. What kind of nonsense are you writing here I do not know.


But may be genius like you can write here Winning strategy, internet is full of it, how to win at roulette and the same, game with rtp less then 100% with manipulating can may be stay 200 % or 300 %. What an absurd.

[aleks86]

I don’t have the same information you do.

You don't know what amount I meant with €x and €y?

I'll bite since the op is being uncooperative.

€x = Bull
And
€y = Shit

We can play stupid statistical games all day, or you can just tell us how the op broke the rules or exploited the game.

I think also another analytics can be good here. On March player won 250000 euro in bitcoins. Then in next week about 150k more. then bitcoin got from 50k usd to 80k. Seems absolute scam from players side, need to be banned and winnings cconfiscted. Seems really nice.

[AB de Royse777]

STRUCTURED AND REPETITIVE PATTERN
Between December 2025 and May 2026 you played 69,135 rounds and All lucky clovers 100 represents 94% of the activity. Having a slot to be your favorite is not a concern, the concern are following:

Stake-dependent outcomes on your favorite game:
• At stakes up to €15, you had 47,372 rounds, a hit rate of 14.1% and a return of 101.7%.
• At stakes of €x and above, you had 17,440 rounds, a hit rate of only 1.1% and a return of 131.4%, a net of +€413,395.
• The payout profile at the higher stakes is materially different from the lower stakes on the same game.

Consistent method:
You repeated the same sequence in 199 separate high-stake runs:
• a fixed stake of €x, €y or €140, at around 0.8 seconds per round;
• a new deposit whenever the balance was exhausted;
• an immediate return to €5–15 stakes after a large hit.
• Of the 57 runs containing a win of 100x or more, 45 ended on that exact round.
• Winning round cited in the complaint: on 19 March 2026, a payout of €226,702 at a €140 stake (1,619x). It came at the end of an 11-round run at €140, after which you immediately reduced your stake to €15.

The pattern is structured and repetitive. This is not recreational playing that you had a lucky win. It is organized strategy, deliberately aimed at stake levels where the game behaves differently. No responsible operator should be expected to accept it.

SCREENSHOTS OF YOUR WINNINGS
You were identified as displaying a similar strategy and betting pattern when sharing screenshots of your winnings from other casinos with BiggerZ’s VIP team, often involving the exact same games. However, since I have not been provided with the supporting evidence, I cannot independently verify these claims and therefore will not treat them as established facts

CASINO GURU COMPLAINS HISTORY
You have filed 19 complaints against casinos on Casino Guru so far, with BiggerZ being the latest. However, one complaint appears to have been removed from the system, making it impossible to review its details. This leaves 18 complaints currently available for review.

Of these 18 complaints, 4 were resolved in your favor, 9 were rejected, 3 remain unresolved (including the complaint against BiggerZ), and 2 are still open. It is worth noting that 2 of the 4 complaints resolved in your favor date back to the very early stages of your activity on Casino Guru. I strongly suspect that, at the time, there was insufficient data and awareness to identify the pattern of behavior in question. PlayGrand and Winningz may also have failed to recognize the warning signs, or they may simply have paid you because they believed the winnings were legitimate. BiggerZ initially appears to have taken a similar view, paying out €65,000 before subsequently cutting off communication with you.

We can see the cases and their status from below.
Resolved Pledoo Casino, Amount: €8,600:

I registered two days ago, casino without any problem confirmed my deposits. After i started playing and at the end of gambling process i had about 9600 eur.

Resolved 500 Casino, Amount: €24,000:

I made few deposits without bonuses and won about 25000usd Now casino decline all my winnings

Complain rejected - Closed Rox Casino, Amount: €19,999

After i made deposit 80 euro

Complain rejected - Closed Casinoin, Amount: €920

I registred this casino may be 2-3 months ago, made one deposit may be 200 euro and lossed it.

Complain rejected - Closed National Casino, Amount: €9,200

i was scammed to 9200 euro. casino non stop ask new photos. everything is confirmed a lot of times. i send about 7 adress proofs, then photos with id and my notebook.

Resolved PlayGrand Casino, Amount: €4,600

I won from deposit 300 euro

Complain rejected - Closed BetSofa Casino, Amount: €5,200

Hello, today 15.01.2024 i made deposit to betsofa.com casino, 1000 euro,

Complain rejected - Closed SpinSpace Casino, Amount: €2,000

hello, i made 2000 euro deposit to this casino. I started to play and about after 10-15 minutes my account was blocked.

Complain rejected - Closed LionSpin Casino, Amount: €6,000

Then i made deposit without bonus and won more than 10000 euro. casino withdrawed only 4000. Then they said that i need to wait (limits)

Unresolved Blockspins Casino, Amount: €60,000

I played here about 5 months. Had VIP manager and VIP status, loosing here 5-10-20k per month. Played every week, sometimes few time per week. After amazing win of about 60k euro, casino closed my account with reason about some security check, and then they via VIP manager said that my slots game expirience was fraud (do now know how possible to play slots games using some fraud methods 🙂 )

Complain rejected - Closed 2UP Casino, Amount: €41,000

Hi. Registred there app. June-July 2025. I do not know how much deposits I made that time, I think 1000 with welcome bonus, and then about 5000 or 10000 usdt.

Complain rejected - Closed GAMBLR Casino, Amount: €5,199

Made deposit 2000 usdt and received bonus 1000 usdt (site has informatiion about 100% up to 5000 usdt, but seems something do not work, but it is oaky).

Complain rejected - Closed BetFourU Casino, Amount: €5,500

I made registration and then deposit (1335 usdt).

Resolved Winningz Casino, Amount: €12,000

hi. I made deposit here 1000 euro. won about 12000.

Unresolved 29Black Casino, Amount: €69,999

I made deposit 2000 usdt. Loosed real balance, and then started to play bonus balance.

OPEN case AkibaWin Casino

hi, yesterday made deposit here, 13500 usd (without any bonuses) Won 52000 playing slots. Made withdraw.

OPEN case Magicianbet Casino

Made few deposits with bonuses, loosed. then made 2000 usd deposit without bonus, and won, total amount on account is 5773 eur.

Unresolved BiggerZ Casino, Amount: €360,000
https://casino.guru/complaints/biggerz-casino-player-s-withdrawal-has-been-delayed-1


TRUSTPILOT REVIEW HISTORY
You have posted 134 reviews on Trustpilot dating back to September 23, 2023, which is also the date you filed your first complaint with Casino Guru. If my calculations are correct, 4–5 of these reviews concern services other than casinos, while the remaining 129–130 reviews are related to casinos. Of the casino reviews, 11 have ratings of 4 or 5 stars, while the overwhelming majority - more than 120, are 1-star reviews describing very negative experiences.

The issue is not the negative reviews themselves. Any player can have a bad experience with a casino, and leaving a negative review is entirely understandable in such circumstances. What stands out, however, is the apparent pattern across your reviews: at almost every casino, the relationship between your deposits and your reported winnings seems unusual. It always ending with big winnings where the total deposit is comparatively low. This again indicates that you are not playing with luck but playing with a precise strategy and exploiting the system.

The responses posted by casino representatives to your reviews are also worth reading, as they may provide additional context and insight into the disputes. However, since we cannot independently verify the claims made by either side, those statements should be treated with caution rather than accepted as established facts.

MY OBSERVATION
My observation does not matter anymore to be honest. Nevertheless, having reviewed the complaint history, review history, reported betting statistics, and the patterns described above, I believe it is important to state my conclusion clearly. In my assessment, the overall picture raises serious concerns about the nature and purpose of your gambling activity. The reported stake dependent differences in outcomes, the repeated sequences, the timing of substantial wins, and the immediate reduction in stakes following major payouts collectively suggest a structured and deliberate approach rather than ordinary recreational gambling.

What concerns me most is not simply that you won substantial amounts of money. My concern is the cumulative pattern of activity described in this case, it is consistent with deliberately targeting particular game to obtain an advantage. I also find the broader history relevant. Since September 2023, you have submitted numerous casino complaints and published a substantial number of negative reviews. When this history is considered alongside the reported betting patterns and the substantial winnings in question, I believe it warrants scrutiny beyond the individual complaints and reviews.

My conclusion is that the evidence presented raises serious doubts about whether you are acting solely as a player seeking redress for legitimate grievances. Rather, I am inclined to believe that the casinos may be the parties being exploited, while complaint site (Casino Guru) and review platform (TrustPilot) are being used to pursue or reinforce your position when disputes arise. The wider history gives me substantial grounds to question the legitimacy of your position.

For these reasons, I am not persuaded that your allegations should be accepted at face value. In my view, the available information warrants serious consideration of the possibility that the casinos, rather than you, are the parties being taken advantage of.

[bitbollo]

Since you mentioned Lizex, I want to point out that Ab de Royse777 himself left negative feedback on Lizex's profile and supported the flag himself.

We must say thank you because they are "in contact with scammers?" Also your friend Little Mouse was seeking for "better contest idea" for a site "knowing as managed by the same scammer"

Luckyanon aka Frogbet
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5591848.msg67225261#msg67225261

I appreciate their effort because, these "campaign managers" are bringing well known scammer sites in bitcointalk - despite the evidence they just don't care to verify nothing.
It's not easy spend all this time to harass users, and wasting time continuing to promote and defend a scam every month.

It's evident that you are able to defend only people that send you few coins sometimes with these ridicolous theft.

This scam accusation about LIZEX was created on 19th Septemeber and despite all evidences it has been added this red trust only on 05 October 2026 - without supporting flag and leaving the site able to continue to scam!
Did you have missed that first there was others scam accusations on forum not evaluated of a few months ago? Right?
Come on, you invented shit with 13 years old address in my possess, you can verify other complaints posted here about Lizex.
They take care of "the community" once they need to get pay by the sponsor.
It's a evidence that there are the same "campaign manager" in most all of SCAM ACCUSATIONS TOPIC!

...
September 19, 2026, 12:19:28 PM
...

...
5 October 2026
...

How many times we are seeing the same shows - did you really think that since there are a bunch of coackroaches promoting scam now the whole forum must change name to "SCAMTALK"?

This topic by OP was opened on 08 Septemeber meanwhile the scam "campaign manager" has decided to promote here and AFTER decide to take care of this complaint.

...
13th Ocotber 2026
...

Have you see the strategy "he is not surprised this time"? The same scheme or "lets find your error" with OP.
They have verified ALL of your post in bitcointalk and trustpilot just to move the accusation on HIM and stop to look for the real issue.
They are saying this very clear. They don't care to find evidence and avoid people get scammed.
They are wasting energy and resources only for defend the scammer. Same scheme for promoting, harassing users - defend scammers.
I would be worried for "the real" consequences of these shitty actions/scam promotion. It's not anymore a game for a keyboard warrior.

edit
Just to mention about data and statistics - for people that are not mini0ns paid by these scams.

Think about your playing style - read slowly "the consistent method" and be honest - would this work as proof for a scam?
Did we can define this a "pattern" after has been dismissed also by a third party?

here there is another confirmation they are absolutely untrustable to help bitcointalk community:

They are trying to use a profit obtained by OP of 131,4% - since he plays with an highstake.
Meanwhile he has won "Only" 101,7% with low stake.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5593577.msg67247091#msg67247091
If he has won more with high stakes why should be not pay? It is the proof to have a scam?

"• The payout profile at the higher stakes is materially different from the lower stakes on the same game."

Consistent method:
You repeated the same sequence in 199 separate high-stake runs:
• a fixed stake of €x, €y or €140, at around 0.8 seconds per round;
• a new deposit whenever the balance was exhausted;
• an immediate return to €5–15 stakes after a large hit.
• Of the 57 runs containing a win of 100x or more, 45 ended on that exact round.
• Winning round cited in the complaint: on 19 March 2026, a payout of €226,702 at a €140 stake (1,619x). It came at the end of an 11-round run at €140, after which you immediately reduced your stake to €15.

- if you have a profit higher once you play bigger you would confirmed as scammer.
- if you change your stake you will be a scammer
- if you deposit after losing and then you win you will be a scammer.

[cruso]

Lets assume your figures about the players betting history, casino guru complaints and trustpilot reviews are all accurate. How does any of that prove that he cheated Biggerz?

Previous complaints being rejected does not prove this complaint is invalid. complaints resolved in the players favour do not prove he exploited casinos either. And leaving negative reviews about casinos is not evidence of cheating. Each case must be judged on its own evidence.

Re; the slot statistics, playing one game repeatedly, varying stakes, depositing again after loss, playing quickly and reducing stakes after a big win are not, in themselves, cheating, neither is a high historical return. The figures may look unusual, but unusual results are not proof of how those results were achieved.

You also suggest that other casinos may have paid the op because they failed to recognise the alleged pattern. Thats speculation, not evidence. You cannot turn a lack of proof in other cases into proof of wrongdoing in this one.

The central question remains unanswered, we have to know what exactly did the player do that constitutes cheating, which specific rule did he violate, and what evidence demonstrates that violation?

Bigger zed has provided statistics describing betting behaviour and outcomes. What it needs to provide is evidence connecting those figures to a specific exploit or prohibited activity.

If that evidence exists, present it and let people assess it. But a collection of suspicious looking statistics, previous complaints and negative reviews is not proof.

[memehunter]

The only thing a player can do while playing slots is change the stakes as he likes. If that is also suspicious, I don’t know what to say. That ABOUT 0.8 second per spin time can easily be explained by auto spins (and other settings) and the way we usually click slots, and I don’t think there is much substance in this theory.

I also think that @AB de Royse777 has every right to represent the case on his client’s behalf (if that is what biggerz is choosing), but since biggerz is sharing some info with Royse, he should have no objection to sharing it with some other reputable member/s here (provided OP agrees).

Biggerz should also have no objection to posting the entire betting history of OP here, as OP is willing to share it (if he can’t access it).

How I can get my casino betting history, I do not know I have just few screenshots, where I got winnings 50k, 100k, 140k, 180k, 240k

As of now, the casino should do two things:

1.) Immediately provide proof of funds to pay out legitimate winners in accordance with the max bet.
2.) Prove mathematically that the slot in question can be manipulated, and demonstrate it.
 

[rokuen]

1. Account flag: Our platform provider flags customers based on its internal tracking. What we receive is a tag on the account identifying the customer as problematic. In this case, the customer is tagged as a Bonus Abuser and Strategy Player on Slots.

2. Telegram screenshot: I’d prefer not to share this. If you can let me know what you need it for, I’ll check whether the team is willing to provide it.

3. Breakdown: It’s exactly as you described above. Please see the more detailed breakdown below:

Findings from the player’s game history

We analysed the player’s complete game history: 69,135 rounds between 4 December 2025 and 3 May 2026. The round-level data is attached (workbook, “Rounds” sheet).

• Overall result: total wagered €2,291,935, total paid out €2,916,873. The player’s net result is +€624,938, an overall return of 127%.
• Concentration: 94% of all rounds (65,056) were on a single game, All Lucky Clovers 100, with a net result of +€412,013 on that game.
Stake-dependent outcomes on that game:
• At stakes up to €15, the player had 47,372 rounds, a hit rate of 14.1% and a return of 101.7%.
• At stakes of €66 and above, he had 17,440 rounds, a hit rate of only 1.1% and a return of 131.4%, a net of +€413,395.
• The payout profile at the higher stakes is materially different from the lower stakes on the same game.

Consistent method: the player repeated the same sequence in 199 separate high-stake runs:
• a fixed stake of €66, €100 or €140, at around 0.8 seconds per round;
• a new deposit whenever the balance was exhausted;
• an immediate return to €5–15 stakes after a large hit.
• Of the 57 runs containing a win of 100x or more, 45 ended on that exact round.
• Winning round cited in the complaint: round 7728523 on 19 March 2026, a payout of €226,702 at a €140 stake (1,619x). It came at the end of an 11-round run at €140, after which the player immediately reduced his stake to €15.

For some reason, BiggerZ's post was deleted from this thread. Luckily, it's still available on BitList(https://bitlist.co/post/67247720)
And the most important question remains unanswered: what exactly did the player do wrong, and which rule did he break?
Instead of getting a clear answer from the casino itself, we got a massive post from their paid promoter trying to make the player look guilty.

[aleks86]

scam casino Biggerz representee (AB de Royse777) still do not wrote, what the rule waas broken? At this moment the fact that I played with 140 euro bet and 5 euro bet. So casino do not want to pay 500000 euro, reason: gambler changed bets and try to withdraw winnings. nothing more at this time.

[aleks86]

This guy just keeps claiming that I’m at fault for being lucky. He never even specified what exactly I supposedly violated. It’s just empty talk. He wrote a massive wall of text containing only one actual fact: someone won a large sum at a casino and now wants to withdraw those winnings.


At this is best proof that Biggerz casino are total scam.

[aleks86]

Since you mentioned Lizex, I want to point out that Ab de Royse777 himself left negative feedback on Lizex's profile and supported the flag himself.

We must say thank you because they are "in contact with scammers?" Also your friend Little Mouse was seeking for "better contest idea" for a site "knowing as managed by the same scammer"

Luckyanon aka Frogbet
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5591848.msg67225261#msg67225261

I appreciate their effort because, these "campaign managers" are bringing well known scammer sites in bitcointalk - despite the evidence they just don't care to verify nothing.
It's not easy spend all this time to harass users, and wasting time continuing to promote and defend a scam every month.

It's evident that you are able to defend only people that send you few coins sometimes with these ridicolous theft.

This scam accusation about LIZEX was created on 19th Septemeber and despite all evidences it has been added this red trust only on 05 October 2026 - without supporting flag and leaving the site able to continue to scam!
Did you have missed that first there was others scam accusations on forum not evaluated of a few months ago? Right?
Come on, you invented shit with 13 years old address in my possess, you can verify other complaints posted here about Lizex.
They take care of "the community" once they need to get pay by the sponsor.
It's a evidence that there are the same "campaign manager" in most all of SCAM ACCUSATIONS TOPIC!

...
September 19, 2026, 12:19:28 PM
...

...
5 October 2026
...

How many times we are seeing the same shows - did you really think that since there are a bunch of coackroaches promoting scam now the whole forum must change name to "SCAMTALK"?

This topic by OP was opened on 08 Septemeber meanwhile the scam "campaign manager" has decided to promote here and AFTER decide to take care of this complaint.

...
13th Ocotber 2026
...

Have you see the strategy "he is not surprised this time"? The same scheme or "lets find your error" with OP.
They have verified ALL of your post in bitcointalk and trustpilot just to move the accusation on HIM and stop to look for the real issue.
They are saying this very clear. They don't care to find evidence and avoid people get scammed.
They are wasting energy and resources only for defend the scammer. Same scheme for promoting, harassing users - defend scammers.
I would be worried for "the real" consequences of these shitty actions/scam promotion. It's not anymore a game for a keyboard warrior.

edit
Just to mention about data and statistics - for people that are not mini0ns paid by these scams.

Think about your playing style - read slowly "the consistent method" and be honest - would this work as proof for a scam?
Did we can define this a "pattern" after has been dismissed also by a third party?

here there is another confirmation they are absolutely untrustable to help bitcointalk community:

They are trying to use a profit obtained by OP of 131,4% - since he plays with an highstake.
Meanwhile he has won "Only" 101,7% with low stake.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5593577.msg67247091#msg67247091
If he has won more with high stakes why should be not pay? It is the proof to have a scam?

"• The payout profile at the higher stakes is materially different from the lower stakes on the same game."

Consistent method:
You repeated the same sequence in 199 separate high-stake runs:
• a fixed stake of €x, €y or €140, at around 0.8 seconds per round;
• a new deposit whenever the balance was exhausted;
• an immediate return to €5–15 stakes after a large hit.
• Of the 57 runs containing a win of 100x or more, 45 ended on that exact round.
• Winning round cited in the complaint: on 19 March 2026, a payout of €226,702 at a €140 stake (1,619x). It came at the end of an 11-round run at €140, after which you immediately reduced your stake to €15.

- if you have a profit higher once you play bigger you would confirmed as scammer.
- if you change your stake you will be a scammer
- if you deposit after losing and then you win you will be a scammer.

That is the whole point of what they are saying. He writes a long, empty text, framing the fact that I made a deposit after a loss as some sort of serious act of malice. And if I happened to win after a deposit—well, that’s also presented as a fact and, supposedly, an act of malice. And then, as yet another act of malice, I actually wanted to withdraw that amount.

This is nice proof that Biggerz is absolute scam.


This man think if he generated full wall of text, which do not have any sense, but the weight will be significant, and people might get the impression that he is actually saying something meaningful. But the reality is simply that the player played a slot machine and wanted to withdraw their winnings.

[Woodie]

aleks86 is a high roller and that's is an undeniable fact.

Just wondering, maybe game provider is the third party flagging your games..

@alex do you play a variety of casino games on all these other casino's or maybe you stick to your favourites ?

And do you play on bigger gambling platforms like Roo or Stake that show capacity to pay..

[aleks86]

aleks86 is a high roller and that's is an undeniable fact.

Just wondering, maybe game provider is the third party flagging your games..

@alex do you play a variety of casino games on all these other casino's or maybe you stick to your favourites ?

And do you play on bigger gambling platforms like Roo or Stake that show capacity to pay..

Roo and Stake can not do it. I do not play there, but I know personally people who was scammed there.

I play few games which I like. Time by time my choice might change. If I’m doing really poorly in a game, I’ll stop playing it.

About some flagging I do not think. I had casino where I am lucky playing all lucky clovers, but do not have any problem to withdraw. For example 5bet. They have 200 euro bet per spin. And I also had great hits there. Everything is okay. It would be so absurd if BGaming provided a slot that you’re allowed to play, but then—if you change your bet size—BGaming flags it as a "red flag." I don’t know; maybe that’s actually the case, but it’s just absurd.

[cruso]

As of now, the casino should do two things:

1.) Immediately provide proof of funds to pay out legitimate winners in accordance with the max bet.
2.) Prove mathematically that the slot in question can be manipulated, and demonstrate it.

Great suggestions that would settle this mess one and for all.... Over to you now BiggerZ, show us some real proof.

1. Account flag: Our platform provider flags customers based on its internal tracking. What we receive is a tag on the account identifying the customer as problematic. In this case, the customer is tagged as a Bonus Abuser and Strategy Player on Slots.

2. Telegram screenshot: I’d prefer not to share this. If you can let me know what you need it for, I’ll check whether the team is willing to provide it.

3. Breakdown: It’s exactly as you described above. Please see the more detailed breakdown below:

Findings from the player’s game history

We analysed the player’s complete game history: 69,135 rounds between 4 December 2025 and 3 May 2026. The round-level data is attached (workbook, “Rounds” sheet).

• Overall result: total wagered €2,291,935, total paid out €2,916,873. The player’s net result is +€624,938, an overall return of 127%.
• Concentration: 94% of all rounds (65,056) were on a single game, All Lucky Clovers 100, with a net result of +€412,013 on that game.
Stake-dependent outcomes on that game:
• At stakes up to €15, the player had 47,372 rounds, a hit rate of 14.1% and a return of 101.7%.
• At stakes of €66 and above, he had 17,440 rounds, a hit rate of only 1.1% and a return of 131.4%, a net of +€413,395.
• The payout profile at the higher stakes is materially different from the lower stakes on the same game.

Consistent method: the player repeated the same sequence in 199 separate high-stake runs:
• a fixed stake of €66, €100 or €140, at around 0.8 seconds per round;
• a new deposit whenever the balance was exhausted;
• an immediate return to €5–15 stakes after a large hit.
• Of the 57 runs containing a win of 100x or more, 45 ended on that exact round.
• Winning round cited in the complaint: round 7728523 on 19 March 2026, a payout of €226,702 at a €140 stake (1,619x). It came at the end of an 11-round run at €140, after which the player immediately reduced his stake to €15.

For some reason, BiggerZ's post was deleted from this thread. Luckily, it's still available on BitList(https://bitlist.co/post/67247720)
And the most important question remains unanswered: what exactly did the player do wrong, and which rule did he break?
Instead of getting a clear answer from the casino itself, we got a massive post from their paid promoter trying to make the player look guilty.

I saw that, I think they meant to send a private message to their campaign manager and inadvertently posted it here

[bitbollo]

losing DT voting

This means I need to be harassed if I get scammed by little mouse and his "partners"?
This means I have no freedom of speech and talk about dozens of similar scams?

Who cares about this "power" at this point?

Anyone can verify what I have posted - open the reference and the proofs posted. 
Meanwhile except a long list of insults you have provided only the proof to be completely untrustworthy.

None of my accusation has been proved not true and you have trolled me 200 times with a retard accusation old 10 years.
At this point you have missed the clue that you had to refrain to insults me so heavily and call these accusations as barely true.
The over reaction for having exposed all these scammers is just the latest confirmation that was needed about this scam farms.

As you may seen I would continue to posts about these scams and these users involved all the time that would be needed.