Sig Ban Appeal for Bitinity

[logfiles]

That was a whisper text for humor that's why I kept the font size low for that statement (as I got notified by bot, and could not resist lol).
Since you quoted that, do you believe that merits earned for doing a job are not worth it? Specially when someone puts a lot of efforts (sometime going out of his way) believing that community will find it interesting/meaningful/helpful/profitable?
@Don Pedro Dinero I don't think person like you should categorize someone one way or other. I identify myself as a contributing member of the forum (just like you) instead of attached to some casino.

Nobody is down playing your/or anyone's efforts here or in any other board sir.

We are just trying to paint out a picture that if one is an ordinary member, the chance of them earning merits in the gambling board is very small. So calm your self down  

[memehunter]

nutildah did on page 1 of this very thread.

What he did is presented the data for every member. You added that category thing (casino reps vs normal posters) on top of it (which I am opposing).
Anyway lets be agree to disagree 

Nobody is down playing your/or anyone's efforts here or in any other board sir.
We are just trying to paint out a picture that if one is an ordinary member, the chance of them earning merits in the gambling board is very small. So calm your self down 

Understood sir. 
I understand the argument it is just that I am not agreeing with it.
 

[mindrust]

If you expand it to 1 year, he is the 13th most active poster on the Gambling board but 54th in merits earned on that board. To me that suggests his posts (in general) aren't particularly informative or interesting to most readers.
<snip>
Because this account is particularly lacking in certain areas. They use the same words to describe the same or similar concepts, repeatedly -- for years now, living largely in threads where not many people appear to be reading much of anything.

These are some of the reasons again I am yet to get on board with the way some of the sig bans are getting handed out. It relies heavily on subjective criteria that is almost impossible to argue with. I should clarify first that I have not gone through the post history here, cause I am not replying to this in particular.
I expect bans to be giving for clear reasons; your posts are majorly spam so your signature rights have been revoked for xxxx period of time, if you need proof of that, here is a screenshot of 2-3 pages of your post history showing the regularity of said spam.

Highlighting 2 posts a month apart and suggesting to know what is interesting to others and what they read is not a reason for a ban, merit statistics isn't either, that is backwards inference. You should be saying;
"Your posts as you can see are mostly spam, further shown by your lack of merits from them" not,
"You do not get merits, so your posts must be spam"

What are these repetitive words? Are they by any chance core gambling words that will be used to explain most concepts in that area and were they applicable in the contexts they were used?

Agreed...

The judgement on giving one a sig ban should be direct and shouldn't leave any questions about the user's post quality. If nutildah keeps sig banning every boring poster around, soon there will be no more than 20 posters left in the whole forum.

What nutildah is doing also kind of interferes with the campaign managers' job... The manager already made his/her mind about the poster's post quality and hired him/her based on that.

nutildah is basically acting as a supreme court now. Managing the managers... Because managers themselves are apparently not capable of choosing the right posters.

[snipie]

Can I ask @theymos to sigban everyone posting mostly in the gambling section at once?
I mean the ridiculous judgement of posts quality based on merit is biased in this part of the forum in particular.
You cannot compare the merit earned by a known person there with a regular user regardless of his level. The higher level it is, the lower chance to get merit there. The turnover of posts in gambling is incredible and it is almost impossible to catch everything unless you stop your real life and connect here every half an hour.
@Nutildah, you are not familiar with this part and it is not shameful. I suggest that you hire another person or maybe two advisors to validate your decision before taking it.

[joker_josue]

I just wanted to ask about something I've been reading repeatedly.

I repeatedly read that a certain user is only interested in gaming and therefore only posts there, and that they shouldn't be forced to post anywhere else. First of all, I think it's logical that each person can post wherever they want; that's not even a question.


The question is, subscription campaigns (for the most part) pay in Bitcoin, right?
Many of the casinos that users can use work with crypto, right?

My question is: how can someone say they can't post in other areas of the forum, except in the gaming section?

Let's see, we're in a forum about Bitcoin and crypto. The user receives payments from subscription campaigns in Bitcoin. The user receives payments from subscription campaigns in Bitcoin.

Does the person have any doubts about which wallet to use? About how to convert BTC to fiat or some other cryptocurrency? Do you have no opinion on the direction Bitcoin is taking or should take? If you have to pay taxes, what do you think about that? Do you hold Bitcoin? What security precautions do you take? Do you have any doubts or opinions about Bitcoin?

Well, even after more than 10 years dealing with Bitcoin, I still raise many of these questions.


That's why I get really confused when people say they only know how to talk about things like gambling.
They might make 70% of their posts in the gaming section. But they're incapable of expressing themselves about Bitcoin, crypto, and related topics?

Sorry, I don't understand.

[Xiestar]

.

Maybe you skip the most important part that the signature campaign in question here is “Casino Signature Campaign”. If there’s a mixer campaign no one will make this gambling board poster a big deal because you don’t visit that board. Many “reputable user” becomes involved because they are force to post in there due to their casino campaign requirements.

Do you think casino preferred post on Bitcoin Discussion board over Gambling Board? That’s the main reason why campaign manager keep accepting user like this that regularly post on gambling board regardless of their merit count as long as they are not spamming.