Politics and bills

[letteredhub]

In many if not all underdeveloped and developing countries, politics has the views and consideration that has made it the greatest enemy to the country at large. One of the painful view is that politics can change someone's lifestyle from poor or average to rich in a very short time another is that politics is a dirty game that should be played very dirty and many more.

Overnight success are usually one of the common things which makes the politicians in such category not willing to think of the truth talk more of upholding it in that politics pays their bills legitimately and illegitimately. That's they become direct energy to their nation and also anything that has to do with truth. People becomes enemies of the truth when politics pays their bills.

Almost everyone in politics has one silly perception about politics which may not have any positive impact on the populace, most of these perceptions are without ideologies that could bring about positive changes in the society at large.
Some people are in politics just for personal aggrandisement and some for the accolades and if you marry both you would find out that at the end of the day its the people that would be at losing end due to bad policies or governance and that why political parties have to draft out policies which they can transcribe into physical development when they eventually get into power.

[Jessie2121]

In many if not all underdeveloped and developing countries, politics has the views and consideration that has made it the greatest enemy to the country at large. One of the painful view is that politics can change someone's lifestyle from poor or average to rich in a very short time another is that politics is a dirty game that should be played very dirty and many more.

Overnight success are usually one of the common things which makes the politicians in such category not willing to think of the truth talk more of upholding it in that politics pays their bills legitimately and illegitimately. That's they become direct energy to their nation and also anything that has to do with truth. People becomes enemies of the truth when politics pays their bills.

Politics is not how it used to be, while I was growing up things politicians do then and now are different, they do lie to the public yes we know but back then they try to make it look equal at least the public have to gain too even if they do have the larger share, compare it to now, it has become a must that they enjoy every penny. Politics also can change a good person to be bad in the sense that the person's conscience will completely die off without the person considering anything he's being told, like nothing is entering his ears only what will be their gain that is why when the masses cry for things they need non of these politicians listen, highest they act like they want to do something but at the end they switch to default settings. If they keep behaving like this I see no reason why an underdeveloped country will grow, take a look at what's happening now in some countries, is all in their making. Must all politicians play politics in a dirty way? Honestly is politicians use this same energy they are using to loot money to think of developing their country I believe we won't be having report of countries suffering from hunger and other things that kills the economy of the country.

[Popkon6]

In many if not all underdeveloped and developing countries, politics has the views and consideration that has made it the greatest enemy to the country at large. One of the painful view is that politics can change someone's lifestyle from poor or average to rich in a very short time another is that politics is a dirty game that should be played very dirty and many more.

Overnight success are usually one of the common things which makes the politicians in such category not willing to think of the truth talk more of upholding it in that politics pays their bills legitimately and illegitimately. That's they become direct energy to their nation and also anything that has to do with truth. People becomes enemies of the truth when politics pays their bills.

In politics, no one can ever move forward on the path of truth, the more lies they can tell, the more they can move forward. Because the biggest leaders in politics are those who are powerful and can tell many lies while keeping one truth hidden and proving it wrong to the people. Those people play the best role in politics. Those who do politics on the path of truth are forced to leave their lives after a few days, because they cannot deceive the people. If the people like them, they destroy this person of truth in a moment.

[hafiztalha]

Depending on any political leader for any sort of financial support is going to create pressure but that doesn't mean a person has sold their conscience. We just need to distinguish between the people who are deliberately trying to defend the politician because they are getting some personal benefits in exchange and the people who are genuinely in need of help . If a family is struggling financially and they are accepting any assistance because a system has failed to provide them the required amount of opportunity we cannot blame them at that point. There are wealthy individual that remain silent when they believe that if they will speak they will lose their business contracts, government connection or other privileges that they are getting. That is something that shows that financial Independence is not the only problem but the lack of accountability and integrity are also serious concern. We need a system where politicians are not treated as a saviour. But they are public servants because they are using public resources. Everyone has equal right to question the bad policies. If any politician is giving any sort of assistance but that should never come in return of any silent criticism or in demand of loyalty in return

Agree that there are people who are struggling financially and they should not be judged for accepting any form of assistance. But they should also know that these political handouts are going to create a culture of dependency. And people start depending on the political leaders to meet their basic needs; then they stop questioning those politicians who are not working. Okay, they stop questioning out of fear that they lose support in future from them in any form.

Even though they have not sold their conscience, their freedom to speak against things becomes very limited. The main solution is not to be dependent on politicians for any form of goodwill but to make strong system that provides an equal amount of opportunities, employment, and basic services to all citizens at an equal level. Getting financial assistance is not an issue; it should be right where needed, not a political favour.

[Taricoins]

Politics is incredibly crazy in making an average man filthy rich and influential, think of Hegseth a Major in the US military controlling the affairs in Pentagon, and department of war. He commands the military and makes decisions alongside generals and CIA directors, just for being appointed by President Trump to run this department. The last time I watched him speak in the US senate chamber, he was demanding for a trillion dollar to finance the war against Iran. Even though the money doesn't go directly to him, having access to such amount of money puts him on the line to the kind of riches he wouldn't have imagined to possess his entire life, if he wasn't in this position.

We've had many of such occurrences here and it's no joke, but the biggest difference between your appointment and ours is that most of the requested for can be accounted for but in our case, alot of the appointment comes with the fundamental believe of stealing from the country, it's a dirty game.

From the OP's question, I don't think the politics can make someone extremely poor or stop the financial growth of individuals because they are lots of ways people can earn money, of course prices of things will go high but humans are very dynamic

[AgriTrack]

Depending on any political leader for any sort of financial support is going to create pressure but that doesn't mean a person has sold their conscience. We just need to distinguish between the people who are deliberately trying to defend the politician because they are getting some personal benefits in exchange and the people who are genuinely in need of help . If a family is struggling financially and they are accepting any assistance because a system has failed to provide them the required amount of opportunity we cannot blame them at that point. There are wealthy individual that remain silent when they believe that if they will speak they will lose their business contracts, government connection or other privileges that they are getting. That is something that shows that financial Independence is not the only problem but the lack of accountability and integrity are also serious concern.

It's very common in our society that wealthy people and business owners who have strong business empires give financial support to political leaders. Why do individuals do those kinds of activities? It's very simple. They just invest money in political leaders because their elected supporters are elected, and then they use their power for their personal benefits, like the protection of their businesses. It does not mean that if someone gives financial support to another, he becomes the owner of his conscience.

Not everyone has the same financial conditions because people accept financial support only when their efforts don't pay off as they expect. We don't have concerns about it, but the problem starts when politicians prevent those individuals on the basis of their personal behalf. In reality, they are the servants of the nation and public responsibilities should be the priority for them.

[Johnlomape]

In many if not all underdeveloped and developing countries, politics has the views and consideration that has made it the greatest enemy to the country at large. One of the painful view is that politics can change someone's lifestyle from poor or average to rich in a very short time another is that politics is a dirty game that should be played very dirty and many more.

Politics is a dirty game so why are you allowing the foolish and greedy politicians to lead and control your economy?
Sometimes I laughed when I see how people are lamenting about bad governance but they are still going to vote for the same people they have been complaining about that is making life harder for them. We need to be wise as humans as fight for truth and choose revolution.

Overnight success are usually one of the common things which makes the politicians in such category not willing to think of the truth talk more of upholding it in that politics pays their bills legitimately and illegitimately. That's they become direct energy to their nation and also anything that has to do with truth. People becomes enemies of the truth when politics pays their bills.

Politicians are making money and that's why they have been enrolling their families and friends to take over power so that their influence can continue. These thieves are only looting the funds and they have nothing to offer at all. If we don't fight and remove the bad leaders they would corrupt the system and make livelihood difficult.

[Cleanshit]

It's very common in our society that wealthy people and business owners who have strong business empires give financial support to political leaders. Why do individuals do those kinds of activities? It's very simple. They just invest money in political leaders because their elected supporters are elected, and then they use their power for their personal benefits, like the protection of their businesses. It does not mean that if someone gives financial support to another, he becomes the owner of his conscience.

Not everyone has the same financial conditions because people accept financial support only when their efforts don't pay off as they expect. We don't have concerns about it, but the problem starts when politicians prevent those individuals on the basis of their personal behalf. In reality, they are the servants of the nation and public responsibilities should be the priority for them.

There is nothing wrong with wealthy individuals or businesses owners supporting political candidates financially, provided such support is transparent and does not come with expectations of special treatment. The problem begins when financial contributions become a way of buying political influence or securing personal Favour at the expense of the public.

[BADecker]

I think the OP is talking about Donald (Duck) Trump... Duck bills, that is.

[WhoYouCantKill]

Almost everyone in politics has one silly perception about politics which may not have any positive impact on the populace, most of these perceptions are without ideologies that could bring about positive changes in the society at large.
Some people are in politics just for personal aggrandisement and some for the accolades and if you marry both you would find out that at the end of the day its the people that would be at losing end due to bad policies or governance and that why political parties have to draft out policies which they can transcribe into physical development when they eventually get into power.

I think the first way to access and evaluate a political party is how their promises (while they were yet to assume power) translates to policies that goes a long way to improve the daily lives of their citizens and constituents. It’s not just enough to have impressive ideas and promises on paper if there are actually no real plans of implementing those ideas. Another way would be for citizens to pay close attention to how they handled the previous opportunities given to them before. You can’t screw things before and promise to magically become a saint overnight, it just doesn’t work that way in politics.

[BADecker]

Almost everyone in politics has one silly perception about politics which may not have any positive impact on the populace, most of these perceptions are without ideologies that could bring about positive changes in the society at large.
Some people are in politics just for personal aggrandisement and some for the accolades and if you marry both you would find out that at the end of the day its the people that would be at losing end due to bad policies or governance and that why political parties have to draft out policies which they can transcribe into physical development when they eventually get into power.

I think the first way to access and evaluate a political party is how their promises (while they were yet to assume power) translates to policies that goes a long way to improve the daily lives of their citizens and constituents. It’s not just enough to have impressive ideas and promises on paper if there are actually no real plans of implementing those ideas. Another way would be for citizens to pay close attention to how they handled the previous opportunities given to them before. You can’t screw things before and promise to magically become a saint overnight, it just doesn’t work that way in politics.

We need to make the platform that the politicians run on, to be a literal contract with the people. If a politician wins the office, and doesn't fulfill the contract in a timely manner, execution. Government office is too important to play around the way that politicians do.

Of course, this idea is simply basic. We might even work into it ways for the politician to not be executed... like life in prison with no chance for parole. And of course, the contract would be binding on whoever came into office after the elected politician. We can work out the details.

[WhoYouCantKill]

We need to make the platform that the politicians run on, to be a literal contract with the people. If a politician wins the office, and doesn't fulfill the contract in a timely manner, execution. Government office is too important to play around the way that politicians do.

Of course, this idea is simply basic. We might even work into it ways for the politician to not be executed... like life in prison with no chance for parole. And of course, the contract would be binding on whoever came into office after the elected politician. We can work out the details.

Well I couldn’t agree more with you, that’s indeed a topic worth discussing. But however, I think execution of life imprisonment is rather extreme and would create way more serious risks, especially when some policies depend on budgets, decision beyond one person’s control and changing circumstances. A much preferable approach in my opinion would be immediate impeachment for proven corruption, deliberate abuse of office and failure to fulfill their promises. At least that way, others who plan to come in subsequently would be mindful of the promises they make during campaign.

[BADecker]

We need to make the platform that the politicians run on, to be a literal contract with the people. If a politician wins the office, and doesn't fulfill the contract in a timely manner, execution. Government office is too important to play around the way that politicians do.

Of course, this idea is simply basic. We might even work into it ways for the politician to not be executed... like life in prison with no chance for parole. And of course, the contract would be binding on whoever came into office after the elected politician. We can work out the details.

Well I couldn’t agree more with you, that’s indeed a topic worth discussing. But however, I think execution of life imprisonment is rather extreme and would create way more serious risks, especially when some policies depend on budgets, decision beyond one person’s control and changing circumstances. A much preferable approach in my opinion would be immediate impeachment for proven corruption, deliberate abuse of office and failure to fulfill their promises. At least that way, others who plan to come in subsequently would be mindful of the promises they make during campaign.

Look at how many people died under warmongering Biden. Look at how many people died under "peaceful" Trump. This is serious. We don't need anybody in office if all they are going to do is kill us off. We die easily enough without them. If they are too chicken to fulfill their promises, but rather kill us off, what do we need them for?