People are always saying that the poor people are the ones gambling more than the rich people, now my question is those who are depositing $50k to $100k on casinos are they poor people, because I’m sure poor people won’t have huge amount of money to deposit in a casino.
So it’s the rich people that always deposit huge amount of money on a casino and not the poor and this means the rich are the ones gambling more than the poor.
I can only agree that the poor are more in numbers as gamblers but the rich are the ones spending more money in gambling.
Now, there are two categories here:
- the rich and poor.
- less and more gambling.
With the first category, who is the rich and poor? Do you place a yardstick, or a min-max earning to measure this? Okay, let's go with your description of 50 - 100k deposit as being rich.
Now, this image will give you a clue on this:

(
Source)
Although, we have more deposits under $100, but you can see clearly where the highest volume in terms of 💲 amount sits: the 100k - 1M level. It shows clearly that they're the ones actually moving the market, and this is based o the fact that the deposit higher amount, but the so called "poor"—under $100 to $1k—are making deposit in the millions.
So, how do you measure "who gamble more", Is it by the volume of deposits or 💲 volume?
And the other image shows that the whales in most casinos constitutes the highest deposits in terms of 💲 amount, but that doesn't mean they deposit frequently compared to those on the other side of the spectrum.
Personally, I think I'll measure excessive gambling based on deposit frequency and not amount. Imagine depositing $100 a millions times, that's $100 million deposit, but I'll assume they bet less than or $100, that's a million or more bets. When compared to the guy at the other side of the spectrum, I'd probably say they're high stake gamblers, right? And with less deposit like that—5k deposit—they probably don't gamble as much as a million bets; or they might too, depending on how much they stake.
In conclusion, I'd measure based on bet frequency. But by my logic, I'd say the "poor" usually have low stakes, and thus bets more—based on the statistics presented. Meanwhile, the "rich"/whales usually have high stakes with few deposits, so I assume they stake less.
P.S: I might be wrong, because there's not enough evidence to draw a definite conclusion. So you'll can interpret the data as you see fit