crimealone
|
|
April 21, 2014, 12:25:21 AM |
|
You won't even get enough btc to bribe mintpal. Cause it's unfair for late investors. Too long maturity. People won't even get a chance to sell their coins before it's dead. Why don't you give bonus for different phase investors and reduce the maturity time? It's not the time of economic bubble and people have lost confidence in coins without great innovations. If you want to survive in this hard time, you should adjust your strategy and find out what investors and miners think.
|
|
|
|
dzarmush
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1001
|
|
April 21, 2014, 12:52:03 AM |
|
You won't even get enough btc to bribe mintpal. Cause it's unfair for late investors. Too long maturity. People won't even get a chance to sell their coins before it's dead. Why don't you give bonus for different phase investors and reduce the maturity time? It's not the time of economic bubble and people have lost confidence in coins without great innovations. If you want to survive in this hard time, you should adjust your strategy and find out what investors and miners think.
Then be early investor. What's the problem?
|
|
|
|
thefuturecoin (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
April 21, 2014, 02:55:53 AM |
|
You won't even get enough btc to bribe mintpal. Cause it's unfair for late investors. Too long maturity. People won't even get a chance to sell their coins before it's dead. Why don't you give bonus for different phase investors and reduce the maturity time? It's not the time of economic bubble and people have lost confidence in coins without great innovations. If you want to survive in this hard time, you should adjust your strategy and find out what investors and miners think.
We have plenty of positive feedback. We only promise what we can deliver. Maturity is essential to the long term success of the coin. If more people invest in later phases then phase 1 investors will get a lower share. I believe that this is a fair way to distribute these coins. If the current investors want something changed I would be more than happy to change it however changing things now would be unfair. It seems that all you do is criticize coins because you did not get in on the ground floor. If you do not like this coin please do not invest. We want to restore confidence in IPO coins because they generally last longer and have more support. We want to break the bad image caused by stackcoin and edgecoin.
|
|
|
|
strideknight
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
|
|
April 21, 2014, 06:22:40 AM |
|
How is this anything other than an inferior clone of Myriad with a scammy IPO?
|
|
|
|
procrastinationtm
Member
Offline
Activity: 364
Merit: 10
|
|
April 21, 2014, 11:49:57 AM |
|
How is this anything other than an inferior clone of Myriad with a scammy IPO?
how they are going to scam? only escrow myriad most unfair launch ever
|
|
|
|
AfrikaMan
Member
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
|
|
April 21, 2014, 12:00:36 PM |
|
How is this anything other than an inferior clone of Myriad with a scammy IPO?
how they are going to scam? only escrow myriad most unfair launch ever Myriad had 0% pre-mine and and had pre-announcement (admittedly it was short). Wallets and source code on launch. You can still mine Myriad because of the slow distribution. How is that the "most unfair launch ever"?
|
|
|
|
thefuturecoin (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
April 21, 2014, 07:21:20 PM |
|
How is this anything other than an inferior clone of Myriad with a scammy IPO?
how they are going to scam? only escrow myriad most unfair launch ever Myriad had 0% pre-mine and and had pre-announcement (admittedly it was short). Wallets and source code on launch. You can still mine Myriad because of the slow distribution. How is that the "most unfair launch ever"? 3 out of the 5 algos did not have optimized miners on launch. Pools did also not exist for these algos so only people with enough hashpower could mine these algos on launch. The launch heavily favored people with large rigs and people who know how to make GPU miners. Lack of stable and reliable pools at launch meant that people solo mining less popular algos made much more than people who did not.
|
|
|
|
AfrikaMan
Member
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
|
|
April 21, 2014, 07:52:01 PM Last edit: April 21, 2014, 08:06:05 PM by AfrikaMan |
|
How is this anything other than an inferior clone of Myriad with a scammy IPO?
how they are going to scam? only escrow myriad most unfair launch ever Myriad had 0% pre-mine and and had pre-announcement (admittedly it was short). Wallets and source code on launch. You can still mine Myriad because of the slow distribution. How is that the "most unfair launch ever"? 3 out of the 5 algos did not have optimized miners on launch. Pools did also not exist for these algos so only people with enough hashpower could mine these algos on launch. The launch heavily favored people with large rigs and people who know how to make GPU miners. Lack of stable and reliable pools at launch meant that people solo mining less popular algos made much more than people who did not. Untrue. 4 of the 5 algos had optimised miners (Skein and Qubit already had GPU miners).
|
|
|
|
procrastinationtm
Member
Offline
Activity: 364
Merit: 10
|
|
April 21, 2014, 08:22:02 PM |
|
How is this anything other than an inferior clone of Myriad with a scammy IPO?
how they are going to scam? only escrow myriad most unfair launch ever Myriad had 0% pre-mine and and had pre-announcement (admittedly it was short). Wallets and source code on launch. You can still mine Myriad because of the slow distribution. How is that the "most unfair launch ever"? 3 out of the 5 algos did not have optimized miners on launch. Pools did also not exist for these algos so only people with enough hashpower could mine these algos on launch. The launch heavily favored people with large rigs and people who know how to make GPU miners. Lack of stable and reliable pools at launch meant that people solo mining less popular algos made much more than people who did not. Untrue. 4 of the 5 algos had optimised miners (Skein and Qubit already had GPU miners). they werent compiled i know a guy that mined 4 millino cuz he dominated skein and groestl and qubit in like 2 days.
|
|
|
|
AfrikaMan
Member
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
|
|
April 21, 2014, 08:27:36 PM |
|
How is this anything other than an inferior clone of Myriad with a scammy IPO?
how they are going to scam? only escrow myriad most unfair launch ever Myriad had 0% pre-mine and and had pre-announcement (admittedly it was short). Wallets and source code on launch. You can still mine Myriad because of the slow distribution. How is that the "most unfair launch ever"? 3 out of the 5 algos did not have optimized miners on launch. Pools did also not exist for these algos so only people with enough hashpower could mine these algos on launch. The launch heavily favored people with large rigs and people who know how to make GPU miners. Lack of stable and reliable pools at launch meant that people solo mining less popular algos made much more than people who did not. Untrue. 4 of the 5 algos had optimised miners (Skein and Qubit already had GPU miners). they werent compiled i know a guy that mined 4 millino cuz he dominated skein and groestl and qubit in like 2 days. They were compiled for weeks/months before. You could use the miners from Skeincoin and Qubitcoin.
|
|
|
|
thefuturecoin (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
April 21, 2014, 08:47:08 PM |
|
How is this anything other than an inferior clone of Myriad with a scammy IPO?
how they are going to scam? only escrow myriad most unfair launch ever Myriad had 0% pre-mine and and had pre-announcement (admittedly it was short). Wallets and source code on launch. You can still mine Myriad because of the slow distribution. How is that the "most unfair launch ever"? 3 out of the 5 algos did not have optimized miners on launch. Pools did also not exist for these algos so only people with enough hashpower could mine these algos on launch. The launch heavily favored people with large rigs and people who know how to make GPU miners. Lack of stable and reliable pools at launch meant that people solo mining less popular algos made much more than people who did not. Untrue. 4 of the 5 algos had optimised miners (Skein and Qubit already had GPU miners). they werent compiled i know a guy that mined 4 millino cuz he dominated skein and groestl and qubit in like 2 days. They were compiled for weeks/months before. You could use the miners from Skeincoin and Qubitcoin. There were no pools. The point remains that lots of people who wanted to mine couldnt during launch.
|
|
|
|
AfrikaMan
Member
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
|
|
April 21, 2014, 09:11:26 PM |
|
How is this anything other than an inferior clone of Myriad with a scammy IPO?
how they are going to scam? only escrow myriad most unfair launch ever Myriad had 0% pre-mine and and had pre-announcement (admittedly it was short). Wallets and source code on launch. You can still mine Myriad because of the slow distribution. How is that the "most unfair launch ever"? 3 out of the 5 algos did not have optimized miners on launch. Pools did also not exist for these algos so only people with enough hashpower could mine these algos on launch. The launch heavily favored people with large rigs and people who know how to make GPU miners. Lack of stable and reliable pools at launch meant that people solo mining less popular algos made much more than people who did not. Untrue. 4 of the 5 algos had optimised miners (Skein and Qubit already had GPU miners). they werent compiled i know a guy that mined 4 millino cuz he dominated skein and groestl and qubit in like 2 days. They were compiled for weeks/months before. You could use the miners from Skeincoin and Qubitcoin. There were no pools. The point remains that lots of people who wanted to mine couldnt during launch. The first pool was available less than an hour after launch. So your only complaint is that you couldn't insta-mine within the first hour. With the quick difficulty adjustment, instamining was also limited. You could also solo-mine perfectly well for the first couple of days. Well, good luck with your pre-mined, pre-sold IPO, clone-coin. Just try to keep the lying and FUD about Myriadcoin to a minimum.
|
|
|
|
procrastinationtm
Member
Offline
Activity: 364
Merit: 10
|
|
April 21, 2014, 09:17:08 PM |
|
How is this anything other than an inferior clone of Myriad with a scammy IPO?
how they are going to scam? only escrow myriad most unfair launch ever Myriad had 0% pre-mine and and had pre-announcement (admittedly it was short). Wallets and source code on launch. You can still mine Myriad because of the slow distribution. How is that the "most unfair launch ever"? 3 out of the 5 algos did not have optimized miners on launch. Pools did also not exist for these algos so only people with enough hashpower could mine these algos on launch. The launch heavily favored people with large rigs and people who know how to make GPU miners. Lack of stable and reliable pools at launch meant that people solo mining less popular algos made much more than people who did not. Untrue. 4 of the 5 algos had optimised miners (Skein and Qubit already had GPU miners). they werent compiled i know a guy that mined 4 millino cuz he dominated skein and groestl and qubit in like 2 days. They were compiled for weeks/months before. You could use the miners from Skeincoin and Qubitcoin. There were no pools. The point remains that lots of people who wanted to mine couldnt during launch. The first pool was available less than an hour after launch. So your only complaint is that you couldn't insta-mine within the first hour. With the quick difficulty adjustment, instamining was also limited. You could also solo-mine perfectly well for the first couple of days. Well, good luck with your pre-mined, pre-sold IPO, clone-coin. Just try to keep the lying and FUD about Myriadcoin to a minimum. no thanks if myriad slogan is fair mining why first 2 weeks were completely not fair mining? dev did not do enough to promote equal mining on all algo and smart user take advantage. i am 90% of qubit hashrate for first 3 days. skein/groestl someone compile gpu miner and no release. besides myriad shit talk came here first. i will shit talk back cuz i like the idea of this coin.
|
|
|
|
thefuturecoin (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
April 21, 2014, 09:21:30 PM |
|
How is this anything other than an inferior clone of Myriad with a scammy IPO?
how they are going to scam? only escrow myriad most unfair launch ever Myriad had 0% pre-mine and and had pre-announcement (admittedly it was short). Wallets and source code on launch. You can still mine Myriad because of the slow distribution. How is that the "most unfair launch ever"? 3 out of the 5 algos did not have optimized miners on launch. Pools did also not exist for these algos so only people with enough hashpower could mine these algos on launch. The launch heavily favored people with large rigs and people who know how to make GPU miners. Lack of stable and reliable pools at launch meant that people solo mining less popular algos made much more than people who did not. Untrue. 4 of the 5 algos had optimised miners (Skein and Qubit already had GPU miners). they werent compiled i know a guy that mined 4 millino cuz he dominated skein and groestl and qubit in like 2 days. They were compiled for weeks/months before. You could use the miners from Skeincoin and Qubitcoin. There were no pools. The point remains that lots of people who wanted to mine couldnt during launch. The first pool was available less than an hour after launch. So your only complaint is that you couldn't insta-mine within the first hour. With the quick difficulty adjustment, instamining was also limited. You could also solo-mine perfectly well for the first couple of days. Well, good luck with your pre-mined, pre-sold IPO, clone-coin. Just try to keep the lying and FUD about Myriadcoin to a minimum. Not for all the algos. I will even support my claim with evidence. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=483515.msg5337656#msg5337656https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=483515.msg5360183#msg5360183https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=483515.msg5368605#msg5368605These were all posted 1-2 days after launch.
|
|
|
|
AfrikaMan
Member
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
|
|
April 21, 2014, 09:22:38 PM |
|
How is this anything other than an inferior clone of Myriad with a scammy IPO?
how they are going to scam? only escrow myriad most unfair launch ever Myriad had 0% pre-mine and and had pre-announcement (admittedly it was short). Wallets and source code on launch. You can still mine Myriad because of the slow distribution. How is that the "most unfair launch ever"? 3 out of the 5 algos did not have optimized miners on launch. Pools did also not exist for these algos so only people with enough hashpower could mine these algos on launch. The launch heavily favored people with large rigs and people who know how to make GPU miners. Lack of stable and reliable pools at launch meant that people solo mining less popular algos made much more than people who did not. Untrue. 4 of the 5 algos had optimised miners (Skein and Qubit already had GPU miners). they werent compiled i know a guy that mined 4 millino cuz he dominated skein and groestl and qubit in like 2 days. They were compiled for weeks/months before. You could use the miners from Skeincoin and Qubitcoin. There were no pools. The point remains that lots of people who wanted to mine couldnt during launch. The first pool was available less than an hour after launch. So your only complaint is that you couldn't insta-mine within the first hour. With the quick difficulty adjustment, instamining was also limited. You could also solo-mine perfectly well for the first couple of days. Well, good luck with your pre-mined, pre-sold IPO, clone-coin. Just try to keep the lying and FUD about Myriadcoin to a minimum. no thanks if myriad slogan is fair mining why first 2 weeks were completely not fair mining? dev did not do enough to promote equal mining on all algo and smart user take advantage. i am 90% of qubit hashrate for first 3 days. skein/groestl someone compile gpu miner and no release. besides myriad shit talk came here first. i will shit talk back cuz i like the idea of this coin. So you moan about the first two weeks of Myriad mining (which was open to all), but you support a coin with more than 2 weeks worth of mining PRE-MINED. Lol.
|
|
|
|
procrastinationtm
Member
Offline
Activity: 364
Merit: 10
|
|
April 21, 2014, 09:23:47 PM |
|
How is this anything other than an inferior clone of Myriad with a scammy IPO?
how they are going to scam? only escrow myriad most unfair launch ever Myriad had 0% pre-mine and and had pre-announcement (admittedly it was short). Wallets and source code on launch. You can still mine Myriad because of the slow distribution. How is that the "most unfair launch ever"? 3 out of the 5 algos did not have optimized miners on launch. Pools did also not exist for these algos so only people with enough hashpower could mine these algos on launch. The launch heavily favored people with large rigs and people who know how to make GPU miners. Lack of stable and reliable pools at launch meant that people solo mining less popular algos made much more than people who did not. Untrue. 4 of the 5 algos had optimised miners (Skein and Qubit already had GPU miners). they werent compiled i know a guy that mined 4 millino cuz he dominated skein and groestl and qubit in like 2 days. They were compiled for weeks/months before. You could use the miners from Skeincoin and Qubitcoin. There were no pools. The point remains that lots of people who wanted to mine couldnt during launch. The first pool was available less than an hour after launch. So your only complaint is that you couldn't insta-mine within the first hour. With the quick difficulty adjustment, instamining was also limited. You could also solo-mine perfectly well for the first couple of days. Well, good luck with your pre-mined, pre-sold IPO, clone-coin. Just try to keep the lying and FUD about Myriadcoin to a minimum. no thanks if myriad slogan is fair mining why first 2 weeks were completely not fair mining? dev did not do enough to promote equal mining on all algo and smart user take advantage. i am 90% of qubit hashrate for first 3 days. skein/groestl someone compile gpu miner and no release. besides myriad shit talk came here first. i will shit talk back cuz i like the idea of this coin. So you moan about the first two weeks of Myriad mining (which was open to all), but you support a coin with more than 2 weeks worth of mining PRE-MINED. Lol. it was not open to all? r u stupid? in theory it was open to all but only a few poeple had softawre to mine the new algos
|
|
|
|
AfrikaMan
Member
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
|
|
April 21, 2014, 09:24:47 PM |
|
How is this anything other than an inferior clone of Myriad with a scammy IPO?
how they are going to scam? only escrow myriad most unfair launch ever Myriad had 0% pre-mine and and had pre-announcement (admittedly it was short). Wallets and source code on launch. You can still mine Myriad because of the slow distribution. How is that the "most unfair launch ever"? 3 out of the 5 algos did not have optimized miners on launch. Pools did also not exist for these algos so only people with enough hashpower could mine these algos on launch. The launch heavily favored people with large rigs and people who know how to make GPU miners. Lack of stable and reliable pools at launch meant that people solo mining less popular algos made much more than people who did not. Untrue. 4 of the 5 algos had optimised miners (Skein and Qubit already had GPU miners). they werent compiled i know a guy that mined 4 millino cuz he dominated skein and groestl and qubit in like 2 days. They were compiled for weeks/months before. You could use the miners from Skeincoin and Qubitcoin. There were no pools. The point remains that lots of people who wanted to mine couldnt during launch. The first pool was available less than an hour after launch. So your only complaint is that you couldn't insta-mine within the first hour. With the quick difficulty adjustment, instamining was also limited. You could also solo-mine perfectly well for the first couple of days. Well, good luck with your pre-mined, pre-sold IPO, clone-coin. Just try to keep the lying and FUD about Myriadcoin to a minimum. no thanks if myriad slogan is fair mining why first 2 weeks were completely not fair mining? dev did not do enough to promote equal mining on all algo and smart user take advantage. i am 90% of qubit hashrate for first 3 days. skein/groestl someone compile gpu miner and no release. besides myriad shit talk came here first. i will shit talk back cuz i like the idea of this coin. So you moan about the first two weeks of Myriad mining (which was open to all), but you support a coin with more than 2 weeks worth of mining PRE-MINED. Lol. it was not open to all? r u stupid? in theory it was open to all but only a few poeple had softawre to mine the new algos Untrue. The skein and qubit miners were available for months.
|
|
|
|
procrastinationtm
Member
Offline
Activity: 364
Merit: 10
|
|
April 21, 2014, 09:25:53 PM |
|
Untrue. The skein and qubit miners were available for months.
no they fucking werent people didnt even know HOW to mine skein/qubit/groestl it only got popularized AFTER it got instamined
|
|
|
|
foodies123
|
|
April 21, 2014, 09:28:13 PM |
|
there's a difference between fair mining and distribution and spoonfeeding everyone. there were enough resources for everyone to mine with a fair chance.
|
nope
|
|
|
AfrikaMan
Member
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
|
|
April 21, 2014, 09:28:22 PM |
|
Untrue. The skein and qubit miners were available for months.
no they fucking werent people didnt even know HOW to mine skein/qubit/groestl it only got popularized AFTER it got instamined Nonsense. Here's the thread explaining how to mine skein, 3 months BEFORE myriad. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=322828.msg4092927;topicseen#msg4092927Same for Qubit, go look it up.
|
|
|
|
|