Again, you are not getting the point.
Your reward strategy is anti-miner. Your bounty and development/promotion premine is too high. Miners get nothing while those guys get everything. See now? you need BALANCE.
MisO69,
Thank you for sharing your opinion.
Our primary focus is on two things - development and promotion.
A coin which has both would have a good value and there will be enough miners who would be happy with the profit they are getting.
On the other hand, if we follow the rule you proposed and take a commission of 0.2% from each block, it would take a year before we gather enough coins to pay for Android wallet or to publish an article.
No miner will wait for a year and the coin would be dead before it got any promotion. And we don't think that's the way TWC miners would want us to follow.
That wasn't what I was suggesting.
The income you get from the coin, the developer payment (salary if you will) should be taken block by block, like us miners. Its more fair this way and keeps the developers and promoters paid and gives them a reason to stay with the coin.
The bounties and bribe money for the exchanges should be taken immediately at block 0 and held in public escrow. Where anyone can see the ledger and only the escrow service has access to the coins.
With these two things, good promotion and fair distribution you will have a very successful coin.
