CLOSED...

[Jonesd]

I'm helping out QubitCoin (Q2C) by building a new wallet.

Orginal thread:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=411065.0

My update:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=576815.0

That's it, I'm qubitcoin from the outset.

After disappearing devs. We had many messiah talked, talked and that was ended.

willowrose has balls of steel. These coins need.

Glory him for it!

Glory

I'll add a +2 behind Qubit, because you're they second person supporting it

[pr0d1gy]

Sounds like a good idea. Good luck!

[platorin]

Cleanwatercoin and other coins like that could use it. But honestly, if something dies, leave it be. I wouldn't like to see projects like CWC or SC revive.

[Jonesd]

Cleanwatercoin and other coins like that could use it. But honestly, if something dies, leave it be. I wouldn't like to see projects like CWC or SC revive.

I'm talking about good coins with lazy devs. It is wrong to let coins die just because the dev is unreliable. CWC is indeed not one we should revive. Better to let it drown

[Jonesd]

Sounds like a good idea. Good luck!

Thanks!

I see you're quite senior on the forum. Any tips on how not to do it?

[Majormax]

I'm helping out QubitCoin (Q2C) by building a new wallet.

Orginal thread:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=411065.0

My update:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=576815.0

That's it, I'm qubitcoin from the outset.

After disappearing devs. We had many messiah talked, talked and that was ended.

willowrose has balls of steel. These coins need.

Glory him for it!

Glory

I'll add a +2 behind Qubit, because you're they second person supporting it

Technically, Qubit is very clean, very fast. It has no dev now, and a low level of activity, but good distribution.


Also Thor is inactive. Fast function, well conceived and a PoS coin.

[derrend]

May I also suggest radioactive coin, scrypt-jane, 3 min block times, client available in 10 languages and a total cap of 25,000,000
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=405481.0

[Obfuscode]

+1 for the idea/foundation

[claycoins]

They are not worth rescuing.

[loonb]

+1 q2c - clean, good coin

[shursight]

They are not worth rescuing.

can you explain what coins you are talking about?

[sample]

agree, Q2C is a clean coin. Also the community is supporting quite well while the dev's gone.

[loonb]

Qubitcoin, pls, help anyone who can. Buy, mine, own q2c. Dev just dissapeared, nobody knows why, but he lives in Crimea. There could be many reasons.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=411065.0

[djm34]

may-be another interesting (almost) dead coin with a not so active dev
fuguecoin: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=519138.0

[Omega6]

Interesting.

[halinyo]

Anybody knows where to store our rapidcoins?
I still have a little hope with rapidcoin if someone may rebuilt it.
Therefore, I want to find out a way to to withdraw my rapidcoins from coinmarket.io to a wallet?
Or at least the cold wallet.

Any ideas?

[Jonesd]

Hey everybody!

Thansk for the suggestions! I'll add them to the OP later.

Anybody interested in getting involved and becoming part of the foundation?

[Jonesd]

Here a conversation of this in another thread of the fund:

It's an interesting concept, however my doubts lie in the fact that it typically is not an issue with the Dev's abandoning it, an opensource project can be updated by anyone in the community, if a community is large enough because the coin attracted enough people due to it's innovations/marketing place, it will be taken over by  someone to ensure it's survival.. It's the survival of the fittest coin!

Wouldn't it be great to get a lot of people together and let the coins survive due to strength of concept and not the randomness of the coin?

I moved the main topic here, btw: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=576714.msg6294074#msg6294074

Indeed, but when you are talking about strenght of the concept, if it is really a strong concept, the community will take over on it's own and take over if it gets abandoned. Taking over a coin is hard work, being in the KittehCoin team myself, I can tell you it's hard work and the community expects a lot from you with no compensation at all, nowadays for a coin to be successful from a dev team perspective, pre-mine and IPO is a necessity, you need funds to run a project like that and unless you are a bunch of people that are rich and have all the time in the world, it's going to be extremely challenging. Just my two cents, honestly, I think it's a good gesture and all and who knows it may work out, but there's so much competition right now that it's hard to deal with something that has already had bad press.

Thanks for your input

Wouldn't it make sense to combine your team with other teams in an organization and spread the workload? For expertise knowledge you can simply get somebody from the fund instead of wasting many hours looking for somebody.

From a money point of view, we could also have a combined fund that invests in these upcoming coins and uses the profits to pay for the costs and give all the contributors compensation for their effort. Next to this, the best thing is to keep it non-profit, to avoid legal problems.

Would you guys be interested in contributing a bit to the foundation? I will add this conversation to the main topic,https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=576714.msg6319111#msg6319111 , so it would be nice if you could respond there

[shai_]

BoschiCoin - BCC
wasted 2 weeks of mining and a lot of electricity
need KGW fix
community seems dead too
it was traded in cryptorush and also cryptoaltex but was removed from cryptoaltex

[fud_etra]

Karma and LEAF should be in the list.