No punishment for her....Why the F*ck Not?

[apsvinet]

Teenager - Oops, 1

Trying To Put Words - I never tried to put any words in your mouth. I didn't force you to believe me, or even reply to me.

There's a difference - Oh, what is it?

Proper cause - By that I mean, killing animals for sport is terrible. Did I grow up hunting? Yes. But I never laid a hand on a animal that I wanted to kill for fun.

For Animal Rights - Don't you mean, not breathing out Carbon Dioxide? I mean, there's a surplus of oxygen as long as we have plants. Hahaha.

In your post you were stating that there's a, well, let me quote it:

"There's a huge difference between killing animals that we've killed for extremely long time for food and killing domesticated animals, that have been known to show emotion and incredible personalities.

What's the difference?

Boom. 6 in a row, as you may say.

Hahahaha, trying to use my own techniques against me aint gonna work. Bolded up the parts that made me laugh the most.
The difference is that the animals we've killed for an extremely long time have been used to supply people with food. Rest assured that the drowned dog was not eaten afterwards.

Rekt.

[MUFC]

I always find animal cruelty horrible but feel a hypocrite for eating meat.

[apsvinet]

I always find animal cruelty horrible but feel a hypocrite for eating meat.

Animal cruelty isn't the same as slaughtering animals for food.

[acs267]

Teenager - Oops, 1

Trying To Put Words - I never tried to put any words in your mouth. I didn't force you to believe me, or even reply to me.

There's a difference - Oh, what is it?

Proper cause - By that I mean, killing animals for sport is terrible. Did I grow up hunting? Yes. But I never laid a hand on a animal that I wanted to kill for fun.

For Animal Rights - Don't you mean, not breathing out Carbon Dioxide? I mean, there's a surplus of oxygen as long as we have plants. Hahaha.

In your post you were stating that there's a, well, let me quote it:

"There's a huge difference between killing animals that we've killed for extremely long time for food and killing domesticated animals, that have been known to show emotion and incredible personalities.

What's the difference?

Boom. 6 in a row, as you may say.

Hahahaha, trying to use my own techniques against me aint gonna work. Bolded up the parts that made me laugh the most.
The difference is that the animals we've killed for an extremely long time have been used to supply people with food. Rest assured that the drowned dog was not eaten afterwards.

Rekt.

I don't think it's 'your' techniques. I don't actually think it belongs to anybody. I never said the dogs were eaten afterwords, or hinted towards that. So as long as animals have been used for a long time, and used to supply us with food, that's basically saying that every animal is on the same level. Hundreds of countries have eaten dogs, cats, guinea pigs, and other pets for years.

Bolded up? Erm... Not going to think about that.

[apsvinet]

Teenager - Oops, 1

Trying To Put Words - I never tried to put any words in your mouth. I didn't force you to believe me, or even reply to me.

There's a difference - Oh, what is it?

Proper cause - By that I mean, killing animals for sport is terrible. Did I grow up hunting? Yes. But I never laid a hand on a animal that I wanted to kill for fun.

For Animal Rights - Don't you mean, not breathing out Carbon Dioxide? I mean, there's a surplus of oxygen as long as we have plants. Hahaha.

In your post you were stating that there's a, well, let me quote it:

"There's a huge difference between killing animals that we've killed for extremely long time for food and killing domesticated animals, that have been known to show emotion and incredible personalities.

What's the difference?

Boom. 6 in a row, as you may say.

Hahahaha, trying to use my own techniques against me aint gonna work. Bolded up the parts that made me laugh the most.
The difference is that the animals we've killed for an extremely long time have been used to supply people with food. Rest assured that the drowned dog was not eaten afterwards.

Rekt.

I don't think it's 'your' techniques. I don't actually think it belongs to anybody. I never said the dogs were eaten afterwords, or hinted towards that. So as long as animals have been used for a long time, and used to supply us with food, that's basically saying that every animal is on the same level. Hundreds of countries have eaten dogs, cats, guinea pigs, and other pets for years.

Bolded up? Erm... Not going to think about that.

Aha, and they drown them before cooking them?
Go away, kid.

[hilariousandco]

I always find animal cruelty horrible but feel a hypocrite for eating meat.

Animal cruelty isn't the same as slaughtering animals for food.

I think slashing an animals throat and letting it bleed out is pretty cruel. Anything else seems like double standards. What about killing a dog then eating it?

[feina24h]

Pathetic judgement, she should have been thrown jo jail for atleast 10 years.

[acs267]

Teenager - Oops, 1

Trying To Put Words - I never tried to put any words in your mouth. I didn't force you to believe me, or even reply to me.

There's a difference - Oh, what is it?

Proper cause - By that I mean, killing animals for sport is terrible. Did I grow up hunting? Yes. But I never laid a hand on a animal that I wanted to kill for fun.

For Animal Rights - Don't you mean, not breathing out Carbon Dioxide? I mean, there's a surplus of oxygen as long as we have plants. Hahaha.

In your post you were stating that there's a, well, let me quote it:

"There's a huge difference between killing animals that we've killed for extremely long time for food and killing domesticated animals, that have been known to show emotion and incredible personalities.

What's the difference?

Boom. 6 in a row, as you may say.

Hahahaha, trying to use my own techniques against me aint gonna work. Bolded up the parts that made me laugh the most.
The difference is that the animals we've killed for an extremely long time have been used to supply people with food. Rest assured that the drowned dog was not eaten afterwards.

Rekt.

I don't think it's 'your' techniques. I don't actually think it belongs to anybody. I never said the dogs were eaten afterwords, or hinted towards that. So as long as animals have been used for a long time, and used to supply us with food, that's basically saying that every animal is on the same level. Hundreds of countries have eaten dogs, cats, guinea pigs, and other pets for years.

Bolded up? Erm... Not going to think about that.

Aha, and they drown them before cooking them?
Go away, kid.

I never said anything about drowning animals. But if you drown a animal, ehum, that's still killing it. And saying 'go away, kid'? That sounds mature, I guess.

[MUFC]

I always find animal cruelty horrible but feel a hypocrite for eating meat.

Animal cruelty isn't the same as slaughtering animals for food.

I think slashing an animals throat and letting it bleed out is pretty cruel. Anything else seems like double standards. What about killing a dog then eating it?

Yea kinda this.

[apsvinet]

I always find animal cruelty horrible but feel a hypocrite for eating meat.

Animal cruelty isn't the same as slaughtering animals for food.

I think slashing an animals throat and letting it bleed out is pretty cruel. Anything else seems like double standards. What about killing a dog then eating it?

Killing a dog and then eating it, if the killing is isn't cruel ( where do they slash cow throats? Seems like an outdated way of slaughter ) is ok, yes.

[Rampton]

I always find animal cruelty horrible but feel a hypocrite for eating meat.

Animal cruelty isn't the same as slaughtering animals for food.

I think slashing an animals throat and letting it bleed out is pretty cruel. Anything else seems like double standards. What about killing a dog then eating it?

Killing a dog and then eating it, if the killing is isn't cruel ( where do they slash cow throats? Seems like an outdated way of slaughter ) is ok, yes.

Think they just slash the jugular.

[Dogtanian]

I always find animal cruelty horrible but feel a hypocrite for eating meat.

Animal cruelty isn't the same as slaughtering animals for food.

I think slashing an animals throat and letting it bleed out is pretty cruel. Anything else seems like double standards. What about killing a dog then eating it?

Killing a dog and then eating it, if the killing is isn't cruel ( where do they slash cow throats? Seems like an outdated way of slaughter ) is ok, yes.

It is outdated but its an effective method. They kill all cows and chickens etc like this. Usually hang em upside down to bleed out.

[apsvinet]

I always find animal cruelty horrible but feel a hypocrite for eating meat.

Animal cruelty isn't the same as slaughtering animals for food.

I think slashing an animals throat and letting it bleed out is pretty cruel. Anything else seems like double standards. What about killing a dog then eating it?

Killing a dog and then eating it, if the killing is isn't cruel ( where do they slash cow throats? Seems like an outdated way of slaughter ) is ok, yes.

It is outdated but its an effective method. They kill all cows and chickens etc like this. Usually hang em upside down to bleed out.

Alright. Still tastes good to me.

[apsvinet]

Slaughter houses also Use pneumatic spikes to penetrate the brain. they also use electricity,slicing the throat and some barbaric slaughter houses use sledgehammers.

Now now, sledgehammers? That seems a bit excessive.

[hilariousandco]

I always find animal cruelty horrible but feel a hypocrite for eating meat.

Animal cruelty isn't the same as slaughtering animals for food.

I think slashing an animals throat and letting it bleed out is pretty cruel. Anything else seems like double standards. What about killing a dog then eating it?

Killing a dog and then eating it, if the killing is isn't cruel ( where do they slash cow throats? Seems like an outdated way of slaughter ) is ok, yes.

It is outdated but its an effective method. They kill all cows and chickens etc like this. Usually hang em upside down to bleed out.

Cows and Sheep usually get a bolt gun to the head first, chickens don't. There's no bolt guns in Halal meat though, just the straight throat slash.

I always find animal cruelty horrible but feel a hypocrite for eating meat.

Animal cruelty isn't the same as slaughtering animals for food.

This is spot on! ^^

Don't compare cruel torture and killing of animal for sadistic fun with killing an animal for food.

food is a neccesity and you can say veagan all you wan't but the fact is humans need meat. Why do you think you have canine teeth? it's not for tearing a carrot apart it is for tearing flesh.

I wonder how many of you animal lovers here are vegans? Yeah, killing puppies for fun isn't nice, and people get really upset about dogs, but hypocritically usually don't mind killing other animals.

Other cultures kill animals such as dogs and cats on a daily basis...do i agree with it? No We kill cows that some people find sacred.  Besides killing for food is one thing throwing a puppy into a river serves what purpose?

Your comment makes ZERO sense.

No, it makes sense. And isn't killing an animal killing an animal regardless of intent? And maybe throwing a puppy in a river is fun and entertainment to some. Many people hunt for fun and entertainment.  Sometimes to eat sometimes not. My point only makes no sense if you're close-minded and unable to see from an impartial viewpoint. What if the guy at the slaughterhouse takes pleasure in killing or torturing the animals or just enjoys his job? Is that then wrong? I guess you take pleasure in eating them, is that wrong? I'm sure vegans could argue that you're being sadistic to condone it, but my point was that there's a certain amount of hypocrisy when it comes to what animals we do and don't eat or the way they're killed and my point still stands. I can also eat you with my teeth too, but there's a morality question involved, but vegans hold this morality to animals too. Humans have superior brains and consciences as well, vegans might argue we should use them.

[apsvinet]

I always find animal cruelty horrible but feel a hypocrite for eating meat.

Animal cruelty isn't the same as slaughtering animals for food.

I think slashing an animals throat and letting it bleed out is pretty cruel. Anything else seems like double standards. What about killing a dog then eating it?

Killing a dog and then eating it, if the killing is isn't cruel ( where do they slash cow throats? Seems like an outdated way of slaughter ) is ok, yes.

It is outdated but its an effective method. They kill all cows and chickens etc like this. Usually hang em upside down to bleed out.

Cows and Sheep usually get a bolt gun to the head first, chickens don't. There's no bolt guns in Halal meat though, just the straight throat slash.

I always find animal cruelty horrible but feel a hypocrite for eating meat.

Animal cruelty isn't the same as slaughtering animals for food.

This is spot on! ^^

Don't compare cruel torture and killing of animal for sadistic fun with killing an animal for food.

food is a neccesity and you can say veagan all you wan't but the fact is humans need meat. Why do you think you have canine teeth? it's not for tearing a carrot apart it is for tearing flesh.

I wonder how many of you animal lovers here are vegans? Yeah, killing puppies for fun isn't nice, and people get really upset about dogs, but hypocritically usually don't mind killing other animals.

Other cultures kill animals such as dogs and cats on a daily basis...do i agree with it? No We kill cows that some people find sacred.  Besides killing for food is one thing throwing a puppy into a river serves what purpose?

Your comment makes ZERO sense.

No, it makes sense. And isn't killing an animal killing an animal regardless of intent? And maybe throwing a puppy in a river is fun and entertainment to some. Many people hunt for fun and entertainment.  Sometimes to eat sometimes not. My point only makes no sense if you're close-minded and unable to see from an impartial viewpoint. What if the guy at the slaughterhouse takes pleasure in killing or torturing the animals or just enjoys his job? Is that then wrong? I guess you take pleasure in eating them, is that wrong? I'm sure vegans could argue that you're being sadistic to condone it, but my point was that there's a certain amount of hypocrisy when it comes to what animals we do and don't eat or the way they're killed and my point still stands. I can also eat you with my teeth too, but there's a morality question involved, but vegans hold this morality to animals too. Humans have superior brains and consciences as well, vegans might argue we should use them.

Doesnt matter if the guy at the slaughter hose has fun or not...the purpose of killing there is for food. Again throwing puppies into a river serves no purpose and the comparison doesn't stand.  You say killing is killing it's not 1 is survival while the other is to satisfy an insane person.

Couldn't have said it better myself, this guy gets it. It's hard fending off these activists, phahaha.

[hilariousandco]

I always find animal cruelty horrible but feel a hypocrite for eating meat.

Animal cruelty isn't the same as slaughtering animals for food.

I think slashing an animals throat and letting it bleed out is pretty cruel. Anything else seems like double standards. What about killing a dog then eating it?

Killing a dog and then eating it, if the killing is isn't cruel ( where do they slash cow throats? Seems like an outdated way of slaughter ) is ok, yes.

It is outdated but its an effective method. They kill all cows and chickens etc like this. Usually hang em upside down to bleed out.

Cows and Sheep usually get a bolt gun to the head first, chickens don't. There's no bolt guns in Halal meat though, just the straight throat slash.

I always find animal cruelty horrible but feel a hypocrite for eating meat.

Animal cruelty isn't the same as slaughtering animals for food.

This is spot on! ^^

Don't compare cruel torture and killing of animal for sadistic fun with killing an animal for food.

food is a neccesity and you can say veagan all you wan't but the fact is humans need meat. Why do you think you have canine teeth? it's not for tearing a carrot apart it is for tearing flesh.

I wonder how many of you animal lovers here are vegans? Yeah, killing puppies for fun isn't nice, and people get really upset about dogs, but hypocritically usually don't mind killing other animals.

Other cultures kill animals such as dogs and cats on a daily basis...do i agree with it? No We kill cows that some people find sacred.  Besides killing for food is one thing throwing a puppy into a river serves what purpose?

Your comment makes ZERO sense.

No, it makes sense. And isn't killing an animal killing an animal regardless of intent? And maybe throwing a puppy in a river is fun and entertainment to some. Many people hunt for fun and entertainment.  Sometimes to eat sometimes not. My point only makes no sense if you're close-minded and unable to see from an impartial viewpoint. What if the guy at the slaughterhouse takes pleasure in killing or torturing the animals or just enjoys his job? Is that then wrong? I guess you take pleasure in eating them, is that wrong? I'm sure vegans could argue that you're being sadistic to condone it, but my point was that there's a certain amount of hypocrisy when it comes to what animals we do and don't eat or the way they're killed and my point still stands. I can also eat you with my teeth too, but there's a morality question involved, but vegans hold this morality to animals too. Humans have superior brains and consciences as well, vegans might argue we should use them.

Doesnt matter if the guy at the slaughter hose has fun or not...the purpose of killing there is for food. Again throwing puppies into a river serves no purpose and the comparison doesn't stand.  You say killing is killing it's not 1 is survival while the other is to satisfy an insane person.

That's your own biased opinion. Throwing puppies into a river might be entertaining just as hunting is or swatting flies. We don't need to eat meat for survival either. We're not in the wild any more. In fact, eating most meat is pretty bad for you, and there are far healthier diets available that don't involve meat.

Couldn't have said it better myself, this guy gets it. It's hard fending off these activists, phahaha.

I'm not an activist, I'm just playing Devil's Advocate, but it's only hard for morons who can't see past their own bias or see from an alternative viewpoint or make a argument, but I wouldn't expect you to make a constructive post or point anyway.

[apsvinet]

I always find animal cruelty horrible but feel a hypocrite for eating meat.

Animal cruelty isn't the same as slaughtering animals for food.

I think slashing an animals throat and letting it bleed out is pretty cruel. Anything else seems like double standards. What about killing a dog then eating it?

Killing a dog and then eating it, if the killing is isn't cruel ( where do they slash cow throats? Seems like an outdated way of slaughter ) is ok, yes.

It is outdated but its an effective method. They kill all cows and chickens etc like this. Usually hang em upside down to bleed out.

Cows and Sheep usually get a bolt gun to the head first, chickens don't. There's no bolt guns in Halal meat though, just the straight throat slash.

I always find animal cruelty horrible but feel a hypocrite for eating meat.

Animal cruelty isn't the same as slaughtering animals for food.

This is spot on! ^^

Don't compare cruel torture and killing of animal for sadistic fun with killing an animal for food.

food is a neccesity and you can say veagan all you wan't but the fact is humans need meat. Why do you think you have canine teeth? it's not for tearing a carrot apart it is for tearing flesh.

I wonder how many of you animal lovers here are vegans? Yeah, killing puppies for fun isn't nice, and people get really upset about dogs, but hypocritically usually don't mind killing other animals.

Other cultures kill animals such as dogs and cats on a daily basis...do i agree with it? No We kill cows that some people find sacred.  Besides killing for food is one thing throwing a puppy into a river serves what purpose?

Your comment makes ZERO sense.

No, it makes sense. And isn't killing an animal killing an animal regardless of intent? And maybe throwing a puppy in a river is fun and entertainment to some. Many people hunt for fun and entertainment.  Sometimes to eat sometimes not. My point only makes no sense if you're close-minded and unable to see from an impartial viewpoint. What if the guy at the slaughterhouse takes pleasure in killing or torturing the animals or just enjoys his job? Is that then wrong? I guess you take pleasure in eating them, is that wrong? I'm sure vegans could argue that you're being sadistic to condone it, but my point was that there's a certain amount of hypocrisy when it comes to what animals we do and don't eat or the way they're killed and my point still stands. I can also eat you with my teeth too, but there's a morality question involved, but vegans hold this morality to animals too. Humans have superior brains and consciences as well, vegans might argue we should use them.

Doesnt matter if the guy at the slaughter hose has fun or not...the purpose of killing there is for food. Again throwing puppies into a river serves no purpose and the comparison doesn't stand.  You say killing is killing it's not 1 is survival while the other is to satisfy an insane person.

That's your own biased opinion. Throwing puppies into a river might be entertaining just as hunting is or swatting flies. We don't need to eat meat for survival either. We're not in the wild any more. In fact, eating most meat is pretty bad for you, and there are far healthier diets available that don't involve meat.

Couldn't have said it better myself, this guy gets it. It's hard fending off these activists, phahaha.

I'm not an activist, I'm just playing Devil's Advocate, but it's only hard for morons who can't see past their own bias or see from an alternative viewpoint or make a argument, but I wouldn't expect you to make a constructive post or point anyway.

Like the ones above loaded with arguments nobody has been prepared to respond to / react to? :PpPppp

[hilariousandco]

I'm not an activist, I'm just playing Devil's Advocate, but it's only hard for morons who can't see past their own bias or see from an alternative viewpoint or make a argument, but I wouldn't expect you to make a constructive post or point anyway.

Like the ones above loaded with arguments nobody has been prepared to respond to / react to? :PpPppp
[/quote]

Which ones are those?

this will be my last reply to this particular part of the discussion.  You are once again comparing throwing helpless puppies into a river with hunting now......Hunting while can be seen as sport many many hunt for necessity.  You need red meat in your diet just like you need vegetables.

No you don't need it, and again, hunting is not a necessity for you or me. You obviously don't know much about diet. Red meat is actually the worst type of meat for you, but you just can't get past your own bias or make a valid point. You obviously have an affinity for puppies, but this doesn't extend to helpless bears or other hunted animals that are killed for sport.

[apsvinet]

I'm not an activist, I'm just playing Devil's Advocate, but it's only hard for morons who can't see past their own bias or see from an alternative viewpoint or make a argument, but I wouldn't expect you to make a constructive post or point anyway.

Like the ones above loaded with arguments nobody has been prepared to respond to / react to? :PpPppp

Which ones are those?

this will be my last reply to this particular part of the discussion.  You are once again comparing throwing helpless puppies into a river with hunting now......Hunting while can be seen as sport many many hunt for necessity.  You need red meat in your diet just like you need vegetables.

No you don't need it, and again, hunting is not a necessity for you or me. You obviously don't know much about diet. Red meat is actually the worst type of meat for you, but you just can't get past your own bias or make a valid point. You obviously have an affinity for puppies, but this doesn't extend to helpless bears or other hunted animals that are killed for sport.
[/quote]

Aha, based on what science? It's all the same, in 5 years the mainstream science will tell you that you're wrong, and 5 years from that it'll once again change.