[ANN] Mjollnircoin - MNR - Ultra-secure, Fast Transactions & ASIC resistant

[cayars]

I think the pool operators are also to blame in this regard.  The reason I (and I suspect a lot of others) use 1GH is because of the P2Pool style setup they have which does not require registration or workers to be setup.  If you have multiple rigs this is a big time saver.  For most coins I use a P2Pool server for the same reason (less work for me).  If someone is going to the effort to setup a pool I don't understand why they don't just make a P2Pool or use a 1GH style setup.  If they did people like me would be more likely to switch.  At the moment I just can't justify fiddling around with settings for each of my miners.

I agree but only to a degree.  With an MPOS pool you do need to signup which takes all of 5 minutes. You need to add your wallet address for payment, then you need to create at least one worker process and set a password.
For example cayars.worker as the worker and mnrpassword as the password.

Once this is done it's really no different then using 1GH or any other anonymous pool. No harder to setup 100 machines vs 1.  Just use the same worker name (ie cayars.worker) and same password (ie mnrpassword) for each machine/rig.  Nothing says you have to setup a different worker process for every rig. But the option is there is you want to be able to monitor different machines and know if just one is down or performing poorly.

But yes I do get the fact that many people are too lazy to do this.  

[1715168244]

1715168244

[Soul_eater_123]

That's actually incorrect for a lot of pools using a single worker doesn't work (I've tried it) and I don't have the time to experiment and see which pools support it and which don't. That then means that you have to setup an individual worker on each rig which is a lot of extra work.  Even if a single worker did work you would still have to setup a new account with a new password, PIN etc which takes time and management.  This may not seem like a lot of work but if you switch coins often it can be a chore.  A P2Pool solves these problems so I still don't see the need for the majority of pools (all in the case of MNR) to use the standard setup.

[reorder]

I agree but only to a degree.  With an MPOS pool you do need to signup which takes all of 5 minutes. You need to add your wallet address for payment, then you need to create at least one worker process and set a password.
For example cayars.worker as the worker and mnrpassword as the password.

Once this is done it's really no different then using 1GH or any other anonymous pool. No harder to setup 100 machines vs 1.  Just use the same worker name (ie cayars.worker) and same password (ie mnrpassword) for each machine/rig.  Nothing says you have to setup a different worker process for every rig. But the option is there is you want to be able to monitor different machines and know if just one is down or performing poorly.

But yes I do get the fact that many people are too lazy to do this.  

You also need an email to register. And to remember the frigging pincode! And your account can still be hacked and your coins stolen.

However, it would be nice if some other anonymous pool picked up the coin. Not that the 'centralization' is a real concern for anyone: XPM, PTS are essentially mined at a single pool for months and months, still they have some nice value and adoption level.

[cayars]

Soul_eater_123
From experience I can tell you it does work at Nonce as I had 6 machines setup that way.

I agree but only to a degree.  With an MPOS pool you do need to signup which takes all of 5 minutes. You need to add your wallet address for payment, then you need to create at least one worker process and set a password.
For example cayars.worker as the worker and mnrpassword as the password.

Once this is done it's really no different then using 1GH or any other anonymous pool. No harder to setup 100 machines vs 1.  Just use the same worker name (ie cayars.worker) and same password (ie mnrpassword) for each machine/rig.  Nothing says you have to setup a different worker process for every rig. But the option is there is you want to be able to monitor different machines and know if just one is down or performing poorly.

But yes I do get the fact that many people are too lazy to do this.  

You also need an email to register. And to remember the frigging pincode! And your account can still be hacked and your coins stolen.

However, it would be nice if some other anonymous pool picked up the coin. Not that the 'centralization' is a real concern for anyone: XPM, PTS are essentially mined at a single pool for months and months, still they have some nice value and adoption level.

No need to make it small there Reorder.

No one is doubting you or your pools honesty.  Certainly not me!  You're one of the most honest and generous guys I come across in Crypto land. You even go out of your way to provide us with GPU mining software on a couple of the last coins I've mined. However, the pool centralization is a concern to a couple of the Exchanges as I mentioned a page or two back. I personally think the old 51% issue is sort of rubbish when dealing with reliable/established pools such as 1GH that have proved themselves, as any type of monkey business would surely hurt the pool and cause miners to move elsewhere. But I digress.

There is nothing wrong with everyone mining at 1GH, but it does hurt our chances of getting picked up by a larger pool without going through the voting process.  It would be nice to just get picked up by MintPal and Poloniex just as HVC did when they were young.

Carlo

PS #220 at mintpal with 187 votes.

[reorder]

No need to make it small there Reorder.

No one is doubting you or your pools honesty.  Certainly not me!  You're one of the most honest and generous guys I come across in Crypto land. You even go out of your way to provide us with GPU mining software on a couple of the last coins I've mined. However, the pool centralization is a concern to a couple of the Exchanges as I mentioned a page or two back. I personally think the old 51% issue is sort of rubbish when dealing with reliable/established pools such as 1GH that have proved themselves, as any type of monkey business would surely hurt the pool and cause miners to move elsewhere. But I digress.

You may have noticed Cryptsy has a dedicated market for XPM which is mined 90% at a certain pool. When they see profit (i.e.: potential volume), they don't care: they add/keep coins subject to double-spend by design (recently attacked C2, WC, semi-abandoned coins like Elacoin). When they don't see profit, nothing would convince them (save for a bribe, be it direct or through bought votes).

Edit: actually they have removed XPM markets for non-major coins, but it was there recently

[Soul_eater_123]

I agree but only to a degree.  With an MPOS pool you do need to signup which takes all of 5 minutes. You need to add your wallet address for payment, then you need to create at least one worker process and set a password.
For example cayars.worker as the worker and mnrpassword as the password.

Once this is done it's really no different then using 1GH or any other anonymous pool. No harder to setup 100 machines vs 1.  Just use the same worker name (ie cayars.worker) and same password (ie mnrpassword) for each machine/rig.  Nothing says you have to setup a different worker process for every rig. But the option is there is you want to be able to monitor different machines and know if just one is down or performing poorly.

But yes I do get the fact that many people are too lazy to do this.  

You also need an email to register. And to remember the frigging pincode! And your account can still be hacked and your coins stolen.

However, it would be nice if some other anonymous pool picked up the coin. Not that the 'centralization' is a real concern for anyone: XPM, PTS are essentially mined at a single pool for months and months, still they have some nice value and adoption level.

Thanks for chiming in.  I forgot to mention that another reason I use 1GH and have done for many coins as one of my go to pools is because it just works and is trustworthy.  So if this is your pool, you have done a fine job - thanks for all your work.  It is appreciated by those of us who use it:)

[cayars]

It is appreciated by those of us who use it:)

Which is everyone for good reason!  

[reorder]

Thanks for chiming in.  I forgot to mention that another reason I use 1GH and have done for many coins as one of my go to pools is because it just works and is trustworthy.  So if this is your pool, you have done a fine job - thanks for all your work.  It is appreciated by those of us who use it:)

Thank you, it is most rewarding to know people like our work!

But back on a track, is anyone working on a block explorer on the moment? If not, I am going to build one myself, but no earlier than in 6-7 days.

[mjollnircoin]

Thanks for chiming in.  I forgot to mention that another reason I use 1GH and have done for many coins as one of my go to pools is because it just works and is trustworthy.  So if this is your pool, you have done a fine job - thanks for all your work.  It is appreciated by those of us who use it:)

Thank you, it is most rewarding to know people like our work!

But back on a track, is anyone working on a block explorer on the moment? If not, I am going to build one myself, but no earlier than in 6-7 days.

I am working on one, its a modified bitcoin-abe. I'll commit what I have to git once I get back home. Its not working completely yet and I'm not so versed in Python so help would be great!

[cayars]

If either of you guys get one working do me a favor and PM details.
I'll then follow up with the couple of Exchanges asking for this info.

Thanks,
Carlo

PS @218 on Mintpal with 203 votes.

[nanoprobe]

If either of you guys get one working do me a favor and PM details.
I'll then follow up with the couple of Exchanges asking for this info.

Thanks,
Carlo

PS @218 on Mintpal with 203 votes.

I used to get 5 votes per hour now I only get 1. Sux.

[auy]

Why not contact  https://bittrex.com/ and https://poloniex.com

[cayars]

Why not contact  https://bittrex.com/ and https://poloniex.com

done already

[hero18688]

 cayars is the dev of this coin?

[cayars]

cayars is the dev of this coin?

Nope, that would be mjollnircoin

I'm just a community member like everyone else. I just happen to like this coin and I'm actively involved.

[braxx]

only 28 votes until top 200 on mintpal
KEEP VOTING

[auy]

You can have a look mintpal ranked first coins he has been ranked first for a long time



The mintpal strategy is not to spend money is not let you on the transaction
 

[TheRealSteve]

Doesn't time just fly?  It's been a week since (re)launch!
Pools, hash rates and miners

pool 24h Ghash/s delta % % of network workers delta % rate/miner fee % payout      1gh 12.83 -36.79 99.3 0 128.27 1 RBPPS      noncepool 0.01 -88.92 0.1 1 -74.4 0.02 0 PPLNS      suprnova 0.13 1 0 0.61 0 PROP

All pools currently listed.
Block progression and luck

pool	7d Ghash/s	% of network	7d blocks	% of network	7d luck %	3d luck %	24h luck %
1gh	17,816.17	96.6	4,554	92.3	95.6	102.3	100.8
noncepool	303.72	1.6	91	0.0	3.7	96.0	0.0
suprnova	101.89	0.6	1	0.0	3.7	0.0	0.0
residual			288	5.8

Higher hash rates (vertical axis) typically result in more blocks found (more dots along horizontal axis).
Density of dots is indicative of luck - closer together is greater luck, further apart is lower luck.
Luck is a ratio between % of blocks found and % of network hashrate claimed and should ideally hover around 100%.
Mining and pool takes (indicative, not authoritative)
The previous day, 715 blocks with an average reward of 50 MNR were found on the network for a total of 35,800.08 MNR distributed.
At an average network hash rate of 12,915Ghash/s, a miner having 1Ghash/s would have earned approximately 2,768.05 MNR (minus pool fees),
that could be traded for BTC0.0581290954 ($26.1)

pool 24h blocks fee % MNR take BTC $USD      1gh 716 1 358.00 0.0 3.40      noncepool 0 0 0.00 0.0 0.00      suprnova 0 0 0.00 0.0 0.00

Market cap: 421,850MNR | BTC8.86 | $3,978

1gh Top hash distribution profile

1gh top (Mhash/s) Top 10 Top 100 Total 5,498.92 8,948.46 Mean 549.89 89.48 Median 386.23 55.34 % of pool 42.9 69.8 % of network 42.6 69.3

[hccwin]

HVC is good enough,we do not need a copy

[braxx]

You can have a look mintpal ranked first coins he has been ranked first for a long time



The mintpal strategy is not to spend money is not let you on the transaction
 

looks like there is already spend 0.004 btc to the donation addres https://blockchain.info/address/16b4xfDatkRHAzt5g5hvX5pT6TiAempNEq