darlidada
|
|
June 14, 2014, 04:29:21 PM |
|
I used to be the ultimate darkcoin fanboy(read my fucking previous posts). But i gotta say, Monero is better. simply put fuckers, all that it needs is a good gui wallet and solution to the dust transactions,( bitcoin also had that problem) and it could easily be the #1 crypto on earth besides bitcoin. I'm curious as to what changed your perspective on monero. Also why would you delete your post?! Because i wanted it to be on the first page's first post perspective changed cause its just a better coin obviously. 100% anonymity..great dev team, great name, i2p coming soon.... yes but it has always been the case, what i was wondering is what made you aware of all this? it would be useful to know in order to attract more people into MRO:)
|
|
|
|
formar
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
June 14, 2014, 04:30:46 PM |
|
I used to be the ultimate darkcoin fanboy(read my previous posts). But i gotta say, Monero is better. simply put, all that it needs is a good gui wallet and solution to the dust transactions,( bitcoin also had that problem) and it could easily be the #1 crypto on earth besides bitcoin.
What's the minimum number of coins you can send?
|
|
|
|
uvt9
|
|
June 14, 2014, 04:35:01 PM |
|
I used to be the ultimate darkcoin fanboy(read my previous posts). But i gotta say, Monero is better. simply put, all that it needs is a good gui wallet and solution to the dust transactions,( bitcoin also had that problem) and it could easily be the #1 crypto on earth besides bitcoin.
There are already several open source, non official GUIs available. For the official one, fluffypony stated on reddit that we might have to wait few more months. Dev team is focusing on more important work to improve stability of network. http://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/283f49/do_anyone_know_when_we_will_get_a_moneroqt_wallet/ci7856u What's the minimum number of coins you can send?
The transaction size limit only happened with small miners who received to many dust from pools. Normal users (like me) has no problem, i can transfer thousands of coins in one transaction smoothly. Apparently the pool software need some fix, i don't know who is doing it.
|
|
|
|
tacotime
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1005
|
|
June 14, 2014, 04:47:55 PM |
|
The transaction size limit only happened with small miners who received to many dust from pools. Normal users (like me) has no problem, i can transfer thousands of coins in one transaction smoothly.
Apparently the pool software need some fix, i don't know who is doing it.
We're waiting on zone117x to do it, if anyone is skilled with node.js, they can also implement it. https://github.com/zone117x/node-cryptonote-pool/issues/12Fix should do this this: 1.) keep track of all shares on the server and distribute reward per block for contribution internally 2.) allow the user to request manual payout or set auto payout threshold 3.) allow only payments in increments of 0.1 (because of the denomination code); do not allow payments smaller than 0.1 In the meantime, all smaller miners are recommended not to mine at moneropool.com or moneropool.org, as mining there will produce lots of dust if your HR is low.
|
XMR: 44GBHzv6ZyQdJkjqZje6KLZ3xSyN1hBSFAnLP6EAqJtCRVzMzZmeXTC2AHKDS9aEDTRKmo6a6o9r9j86pYfhCWDkKjbtcns
|
|
|
rokkyroad
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1090
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 14, 2014, 05:06:35 PM |
|
I will never buy duckarse thanks to spamming in other coin threads.
|
" If you have to spam and shout to justify your existence then you are a shit coin." TaunSew
|
|
|
phzi
|
|
June 14, 2014, 05:17:13 PM |
|
SimpleWallet refresh SOOOO DAMMNNN SLLOOOOW =/
<3 Monero. This coin has endless potential, but the software definitely has a ways to go. Oh well, gives a few more months to collect XMR before the crowds start flocking when there is a pretty/integrated/fast GUI wallet.
|
|
|
|
meccoin4me
|
|
June 14, 2014, 05:18:04 PM |
|
Hello all , i am totally new to this coin and after a lot of reading i new have two wallets , the simplewallet and the crptonotewallet ( i am a noob i guess) , i buyed some coins on bittrex and try to send some little amounts , new i now it was to little because i send 0,1 ,minus de trans.fee they sent less then the 0.1 that is neccesary so new i try to sent 0.5 to my cryptonotewallet but it also did not arrive , is it possible that it takes some time before the coins came in my wallet?
please some help , tanx anyway
|
|
|
|
phzi
|
|
June 14, 2014, 05:19:11 PM |
|
Hello all , i am totally new to this coin and after a lot of reading i new have two wallets , the simplewallet and the crptonotewallet ( i am a noob i guess) , i buyed some coins on bittrex and try to send some little amounts , new i now it was to little because i send 0,1 ,minus de trans.fee they sent less then the 0.1 that is neccesary so new i try to sent 0.5 to my cryptonotewallet but it also did not arrive , is it possible that it takes some time before the coins came in my wallet?
please some help , tanx anyway
It might take a little while before the transaction is confirmed on the blockchain. How long ago did you request the withdrawals?
|
|
|
|
meccoin4me
|
|
June 14, 2014, 05:20:20 PM |
|
Hello all , i am totally new to this coin and after a lot of reading i new have two wallets , the simplewallet and the crptonotewallet ( i am a noob i guess) , i buyed some coins on bittrex and try to send some little amounts , new i now it was to little because i send 0,1 ,minus de trans.fee they sent less then the 0.1 that is neccesary so new i try to sent 0.5 to my cryptonotewallet but it also did not arrive , is it possible that it takes some time before the coins came in my wallet?
please some help , tanx anyway
It might take a little while before the transaction is confirmed on the blockchain. How long ago did you request the withdrawals? 5 till 10 min. ago , tanx for the fast reply
|
|
|
|
blaaaaacksuit
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Who cares?
|
|
June 14, 2014, 05:24:51 PM |
|
When it happened weeks ago, it was the amazon ec2 folks that stopped mining. this time around, the botnets are much more established. don't be naive and pretend this isn't happening. feel free to hit that ignore button
Who cares. BTC had a botnet problem. So did Litecoin. Hashrate is also going up because of yet another miner enhancement. There is also a GPU miner out there now which hashes on parity with a good CPU, allowing more to get into the XMR mining game. I doubt it's profitable for them at the moment but I'm sure quite a few of them see longer term potential in this coin and plan on holding instead of dumping. I'm sure eventually someone will figure out how to increase the GPU miner efficiency on top of that. Eventually the botnets will take their stolen power elsewhere.
|
|
|
|
|
akula999
|
|
June 14, 2014, 05:32:46 PM |
|
I seriously think the error size limit bug is on purpose. Keeps people from dumping the coins. I have 137 XMR in my wallet, i can't even send 1 XMR to the exchange... So...What to do?
|
Bitcoin: 1FzZehkiwfeeUmfmBrym8VvXX7gUj3miHe XMR: 4AqrzGPfEKeZrVXyPDNXUrNeKZZGNYiXMDoY49PvdffKNTRg6xp2Qz74SZ72gT5F9HH8Vaic99ndRg6 UBGcVijaNStQjwwf
|
|
|
beavis4ever
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
June 14, 2014, 05:40:01 PM |
|
Hello all , i am totally new to this coin and after a lot of reading i new have two wallets , the simplewallet and the crptonotewallet ( i am a noob i guess) , i buyed some coins on bittrex and try to send some little amounts , new i now it was to little because i send 0,1 ,minus de trans.fee they sent less then the 0.1 that is neccesary so new i try to sent 0.5 to my cryptonotewallet but it also did not arrive , is it possible that it takes some time before the coins came in my wallet?
please some help , tanx anyway
It might take a little while before the transaction is confirmed on the blockchain. How long ago did you request the withdrawals? 5 till 10 min. ago , tanx for the fast reply I have a transfer from Bitrex to my wallet that never arrived currently. It was for a much greater amount than yours though. I have a ticket open, but so far all I heard was they show them as sent. Yet the txid isn't found in the blockchain. txid 7c626ba76a822e0e474303b7fe7b80a79ccb90464cc1e1818a7ee0a1f2d01bbd if anyone can help. I was wondering if anyone else was having problems with Bitrex.
|
|
|
|
tacotime
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1005
|
|
June 14, 2014, 05:44:07 PM |
|
I seriously think the error size limit bug is on purpose. Keeps people from dumping the coins. I have 137 XMR in my wallet, i can't even send 1 XMR to the exchange... So...What to do?
set mixin to 0 and send smaller amounts, eg 0.5 MRO
|
XMR: 44GBHzv6ZyQdJkjqZje6KLZ3xSyN1hBSFAnLP6EAqJtCRVzMzZmeXTC2AHKDS9aEDTRKmo6a6o9r9j86pYfhCWDkKjbtcns
|
|
|
akula999
|
|
June 14, 2014, 05:49:19 PM |
|
So I set mixin to 0 and sent .5 XMR. I refreshed and tried another .5 and couldnt sent it. I tried .3 and couldnt. I cant even send .1 XMR I give up. If this isn't fixed, this coin has no future.
|
Bitcoin: 1FzZehkiwfeeUmfmBrym8VvXX7gUj3miHe XMR: 4AqrzGPfEKeZrVXyPDNXUrNeKZZGNYiXMDoY49PvdffKNTRg6xp2Qz74SZ72gT5F9HH8Vaic99ndRg6 UBGcVijaNStQjwwf
|
|
|
nioc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1008
|
|
June 14, 2014, 05:51:39 PM |
|
Can someone explain these errors in the daemon? It goes on forever in red text except for the bolded which is white. Before I was mostly getting the bolded error.
2014-Jun-14 13:46:44.564557 [P2P8]ERROR c:\temp\monero\git\bitmonero-master-x64\ contrib\epee\include\net\abstract_tcp_server2.inl:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection 2014-Jun-14 13:46:44.570561 [P2P8]ERROR c:\temp\monero\git\bitmonero-master-x64\ contrib\epee\include\net\levin_protocol_handler_async.h:638 [24.8.142.47:18080 O UT]Failed to do_send() 2014-Jun-14 13:46:44.577566 [P2P8]ERROR c:\temp\monero\git\bitmonero-master-x64\ contrib\epee\include\net\abstract_tcp_server2.inl:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection 2014-Jun-14 13:46:44.588574 [P2P8]ERROR c:\temp\monero\git\bitmonero-master-x64\ contrib\epee\include\net\levin_protocol_handler_async.h:638 [81.155.65.215:18080 OUT]Failed to do_send() 2014-Jun-14 13:47:08.950807 [P2P1]ERROR c:\temp\monero\git\bitmonero-master-x64\ contrib\epee\include\net\abstract_tcp_server2.inl:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection 2014-Jun-14 13:47:10.594970 [P2P1]ERROR c:\temp\monero\git\bitmonero-master-x64\ contrib\epee\include\net\levin_protocol_handler_async.h:638 [24.8.142.47:18080 O UT]Failed to do_send() 2014-Jun-14 13:47:10.602976 [P2P1]ERROR c:\temp\monero\git\bitmonero-master-x64\ contrib\epee\include\net\abstract_tcp_server2.inl:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection 2014-Jun-14 13:47:10.609980 [P2P1]ERROR c:\temp\monero\git\bitmonero-master-x64\ contrib\epee\include\net\levin_protocol_handler_async.h:638 [81.155.65.215:18080 OUT]Failed to do_send() 2014-Jun-14 13:47:12.034988 [P2P3]ERROR c:\temp\monero\git\bitmonero-master-x64\ contrib\epee\include\net\abstract_tcp_server2.inl:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection 2014-Jun-14 13:47:12.041993 [P2P3]ERROR c:\temp\monero\git\bitmonero-master-x64\ contrib\epee\include\net\levin_protocol_handler_async.h:638 [24.8.142.47:18080 O UT]Failed to do_send() 2014-Jun-14 13:47:12.047997 [P2P3]ERROR c:\temp\monero\git\bitmonero-master-x64\ contrib\epee\include\net\abstract_tcp_server2.inl:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection 2014-Jun-14 13:47:12.056004 [P2P3]ERROR c:\temp\monero\git\bitmonero-master-x64\ contrib\epee\include\net\levin_protocol_handler_async.h:638 [81.155.65.215:18080 OUT]Failed to do_send() 2014-Jun-14 13:47:17.557895 [P2P2]ERROR c:\temp\monero\git\bitmonero-master-x64\ contrib\epee\include\net\abstract_tcp_server2.inl:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection 2014-Jun-14 13:47:42.866797 [P2P3][sock 2288] Some problems at write: An existin g connection was forcibly closed by the remote host:10054 2014-Jun-14 13:48:02.277528 [P2P2]ERROR c:\temp\monero\git\bitmonero-master-x64\ contrib\epee\include\net\levin_protocol_handler_async.h:515 [24.8.142.47:18080 O UT]Failed to do_send 2014-Jun-14 13:48:02.289536 [P2P2]ERROR c:\temp\monero\git\bitmonero-master-x64\ contrib\epee\include\net\abstract_tcp_server2.inl:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection 2014-Jun-14 13:48:02.297542 [P2P2]ERROR c:\temp\monero\git\bitmonero-master-x64\ contrib\epee\include\net\levin_protocol_handler_async.h:515 [81.155.65.215:18080 OUT]Failed to do_send
|
|
|
|
RentaMouse
|
|
June 14, 2014, 05:56:28 PM |
|
Those daemon errors are not uncommon, its all to do with it commmunicating with other peers.
The send_que_size is more than... error is because the daemon tries to shove more data at a remote peer than it is supposed to in a session
The connection closed by remote host is someone else's daemon disconnecting you for some reason
You can usually ignore them, but if you are getting loads at the same time it can end up only talking to one or two peers and getting out of sync. Even so thats not a major problem unless you are running a pool.
|
Currently donating all of our 1% pool fee to the dev fund - mine at CryptonotepoolUK and support XMR at no extra cost!
|
|
|
mr_random
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1001
|
|
June 14, 2014, 05:58:31 PM |
|
I didn't notice Monero was now votable on Mintpal.
Will they be able to implement it quickly if it tops the vote I wonder...
A major exchange having Monero will do wonders for the price.
I don't think they would have added it to the voting if they were not in the position to add it. They flat out refused to even consider it earlier on and my guess is that was due to them not being able to implement it. I think this is one reason why the price is being pumped at the moment.
|
|
|
|
windjc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1070
|
|
June 14, 2014, 06:44:43 PM |
|
I didn't notice Monero was now votable on Mintpal.
Will they be able to implement it quickly if it tops the vote I wonder...
A major exchange having Monero will do wonders for the price.
I don't think they would have added it to the voting if they were not in the position to add it. They flat out refused to even consider it earlier on and my guess is that was due to them not being able to implement it. I think this is one reason why the price is being pumped at the moment. I would be shocked if MintPal added MRO. They wouldn't add Nxt when Nxt got first place votes for a mile, once they realized they actually had to modify the api since it wasn't a bitcoin clone. Nxt offered its own developers for help, but MintPal was too lazy.
|
|
|
|
originalchilli
|
|
June 14, 2014, 06:48:09 PM |
|
can anyone confirm this with mintpal?
|
FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER - @originalchilli
|
|
|
|