Is the West gearing up to invade Russia once again?

[LostDutchman]

The US had all necessary justifications to send troops to Ukraine, since they signed in 1994 an agreement (as Russia) given assurances to the integrity of Ukraine. They didn't.

It's more than clear that the US doesn't want any war with Russia. It has already his hands full with the hot potatoes that Bush junior left.

Oh, you mean the ones that The Chosen One continues?

[Trading]

Yes, the ones Obama is eager to drop in anyone's lap, including the Afghans themselves... the afghan army doing the security of Afghanistan, against the war lords, the drug traders and the Taliban...

I don't believe Obama believes that we believed that he believes that this is going to happen.

[watcoin]

Read the works of Joel Skousen or watch some of his YouTube Videos to get a handle of WAT is going on.

http://www.joelskousen.com/

http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7O8RukKEsU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0lU84AlmUc

[watcoin]

Yes, the ones Obama is eager to drop in anyone's lap, including the Afghans themselves... the afghan army doing the security of Afghanistan, against the war lords, the drug traders and the Taliban...

I don't believe Obama believes that we believed that he believes that this is going to happen.

Meanwhile the CIA has 100% control of the poppy juice exports from Afghanistan.

[LostDutchman]

The USA is NOT going to invade Russia.

The Chosen One may be crazy and some other things but he can at least understand history.

[bryant.coleman]

Meanwhile the CIA has 100% control of the poppy juice exports from Afghanistan.

The CIA has encouraged poppy production in Afghanistan ever since the Taliban government was overthrown in 2001. It has achieved its objective. The two enemy nations (Iran and Russia) are struggling to contain the massive drug addiction among their youth.

[watcoin]

Those links might deserve some reading, even if I don't trust anyone that just toss out facts without quoting documents or credible sources.

Anyone, you can be shore that the CIA doesn't control 100% of the afghan opium. A huge part is controlled by the taliban (it's their major source of income) and another one by the afghan war lords (and another one, probably, by a few high officers of the afghan government and army). I could quote credible sources on these facts.

In 1998 the Taliban controlled 98% of the Afghan opium trade. After the invasion and occupation by the US and NATO forces that changed dramatically. They seized control of the commodity and became the main exporter of the crop to the world.

US Military admitted it but claim it is to keep locals happy.

http://www.naturalnews.com/034289_afghanistan_opium_trade.html

[LostDutchman]

Meanwhile the CIA has 100% control of the poppy juice exports from Afghanistan.

The CIA has encouraged poppy production in Afghanistan ever since the Taliban government was overthrown in 2001. It has achieved its objective. The two enemy nations (Iran and Russia) are struggling to contain the massive drug addiction among their youth.

Well, yeah, the CIA does indeed have a strong history of drug involvement but drugs are not really what the Afgahn thing is about.

[watcoin]

Meanwhile the CIA has 100% control of the poppy juice exports from Afghanistan.

The CIA has encouraged poppy production in Afghanistan ever since the Taliban government was overthrown in 2001. It has achieved its objective. The two enemy nations (Iran and Russia) are struggling to contain the massive drug addiction among their youth.

Well, yeah, the CIA does indeed have a strong history of drug involvement but drugs are not really what the Afgahn thing is about.

A pipeline to the Caspian Sea was also a part of this criminal enterprise called war. Most wars are over resources, especially energy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-Afghanistan_Pipeline

[bryant.coleman]

US Military admitted it but claim it is to keep locals happy.

http://www.naturalnews.com/034289_afghanistan_opium_trade.html

If given adequate compensation, then the farmers in Afghanistan will shift to some other crop. Or even bring modern irrigation schemes to Afghanistan to encourage the farmers to shift to barley or sorghum. But the NATO is preventing all this. The locals are not gaining much from the poppy trade, in terms of money. Only the NATO is gaining anything.

[LostDutchman]

Meanwhile the CIA has 100% control of the poppy juice exports from Afghanistan.

The CIA has encouraged poppy production in Afghanistan ever since the Taliban government was overthrown in 2001. It has achieved its objective. The two enemy nations (Iran and Russia) are struggling to contain the massive drug addiction among their youth.

Well, yeah, the CIA does indeed have a strong history of drug involvement but drugs are not really what the Afgahn thing is about.

A pipeline to the Caspian Sea was also a part of this criminal enterprise called war. Most wars are over resources, especially energy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-Afghanistan_Pipeline

It's the pipeline not the drugs.

[LostDutchman]

US Military admitted it but claim it is to keep locals happy.

http://www.naturalnews.com/034289_afghanistan_opium_trade.html

If given adequate compensation, then the farmers in Afghanistan will shift to some other crop. Or even bring modern irrigation schemes to Afghanistan to encourage the farmers to shift to barley or sorghum. But the NATO is preventing all this. The locals are not gaining much from the poppy trade, in terms of money. Only the NATO is gaining anything.

Well, if sorghum or barley can match the money produced by opium, I'm sure the farmers will switch in a hurry.

oh wait

[watcoin]

Meanwhile the CIA has 100% control of the poppy juice exports from Afghanistan.

The CIA has encouraged poppy production in Afghanistan ever since the Taliban government was overthrown in 2001. It has achieved its objective. The two enemy nations (Iran and Russia) are struggling to contain the massive drug addiction among their youth.

Well, yeah, the CIA does indeed have a strong history of drug involvement but drugs are not really what the Afgahn thing is about.

A pipeline to the Caspian Sea was also a part of this criminal enterprise called war. Most wars are over resources, especially energy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-Afghanistan_Pipeline

It's the pipeline not the drugs.

The drugs fund black ops. It is their paycheck for being the Globalists' lap dogs.

[watcoin]

The US had all necessary justifications to send troops to Ukraine, since they signed in 1994 an agreement (as Russia) given assurances to the integrity of Ukraine. They didn't.

It's more than clear that the US doesn't want any war with Russia. It has already his hands full with the hot potatoes that Bush junior left.

Hate to burst your bubble but the USA and the Eurozone funded a coup d'etat of an elected government and replaced them with Neo Nazis after the leader said no to joining the Eurozone. The Eurozone is a Global Fascist's wet dream. Countries yield their sovereignty and lose all ability to control their currency, while the resource vampires suck the life out the country.

No wonder Putin is pissed. The USA and Europe started playing in his yard and he does not like it.

99% of the problem is that the western media is now nothing but a bought and paid for propaganda marketing arm of the Military Industrial Complex. People believe the bullshit spewed at them.

Russians are no better but this one is not one them. Not by a long shot. It is nothing but Kabuki Theater.

Sorry dude but here is the cold hard reality of what is going on.

http://www.pslweb.org/liberationnews/news/why-us-aided-ukraine-coup-russia.html

[watcoin]

Here is how the Globalist wet dream propagates. We allow it to happen. This cartoon is short and sweet but a great educational tool for the kids.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-dsiufhMu0

[Trading]

The source quoted on the opium contradicts the assertion that the Taliban controlled the opium before 1998. As stated in almost all sources, the Taliban repressed the opium trade, because of religious reasons.

After the US intervention, the opium production boomed, but because of the lords of war. And, then, the taliban had to take their share too, to finance their war.

I wouldn't be surprised if, besides afghan officials, also certain Americans would be involved, but not as a policy. Anyone arguing for CIA conspiracies (the last one with drugs the Iran-Contra exploded in their face) show evidence, not references about turning a blind eye to avoid desertions to the Taliban side.

[Trading]

It's possible that there are some responsibilities of the westerns in the revolt against the previous Ukranian Government.

But that has nothing to do with my point: the US don't want a war with Russia.

[bryant.coleman]

But that has nothing to do with my point: the US don't want a war with Russia.

Correction. the US don't want a war with Russia as long as it is a strong country, which is ruled by a strong president. That is why the CIA and the NATO is trying to destroy it through the death by thousand cuts methodology. The idea of funding the Chechen and Daghestani Islamists proved to be disastrous. Now the idea is to destroy the Russian youth, by flooding Russia with Afghan heroin.

[deisik]

I'm sorry but Wikipedia says otherwise:

I don't trust Wikipedia, because I have first hand experience with it. I was an active member of Wikipedia until 2011, and was forced to quit because I opposed to paid editing in certain sections. So rather than posting the Wikipedia articles, give me some reliable source for the IRG involvement.

Ok, you don't trust Wikipedia, no problem there. But lo, I went through your recent posts (actually just the first pages on your profile), and saw you quoting what? You guess, it was Wikipedia, lol!

So what exactly is AWS and how will this work exactly?

AWS stands for the Amazon Web Services.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazon_Web_Services

The only threats of violence seem to be directed at Muslims - with EDL supporters calling to "Burn all the rag heads" - God bless the EDL. Or Allah bless the EDL, that would probably irritate them more.

Yes... definitely. The London beheading was a prime example.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Lee_Rigby

Do you want me to continue?

[bryant.coleman]

Ok, you don't trust Wikipedia, no problem there. But lo, I went through your recent posts (actually just the first pages on your profile), and saw you quoting what? You guess, it was Wikipedia, lol!

For topics outside the politically charged ones, Wikipedia is a valuable reference tool. All I am saying is that Wikipedia can't be trusted to get information on various current affairs topics.