Bitcoin Forum
June 23, 2024, 10:09:59 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 [93] 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 »
  Print  
Author Topic: GOP - Rand Paul's Presidential Highlight Reel w/ his Libertarian Twist  (Read 205770 times)
Chef Ramsay (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001



View Profile
October 13, 2015, 06:23:14 AM
 #1841

Ted Cruz’s attempt to encroach on Rand Paul’s libertarian territory falls flat

Over the weekend the Republican Liberty Caucus (RLC), a group founded in 1991 to represent libertarians active within the GOP, held its national convention in Nashua, New Hampshire.

The event featured many speakers (myself included) but most of the focus was on the two presidential candidate guests: Rand Paul and Ted Cruz. Media outlets covering the race honed in on the convention, pushing a narrative that Cruz was encroaching on what many might consider Paul’s core libertarian territory.

Read more at http://rare.us/story/ted-cruzs-attempt-to-encroach-on-rand-pauls-libertarian-territory-falls-flat/#xtAgCpyDdWJVCCfO.99
Chef Ramsay (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001



View Profile
October 13, 2015, 06:31:07 AM
 #1842

Rand Paul will visit 11 Iowa college campuses this week, including three in Northeast Iowa.

http://wcfcourier.com/elections/caucuses/update-new-details-for-rand-paul-s-campus-tour/article_7013a568-5ae8-577e-8d01-3ecb463fbaa8.html

CEDAR FALLS | Republican presidential candidate Rand Paul will visit 11 Iowa college campuses this week, including three in Northeast Iowa.

Paul is working with the Students for Rand chapters on the college campuses. He will talk about his constitutional conservative message and aims to demonstrate that he has more than 10,000 Iowa students committed to caucus for him on Feb. 1.
Chef Ramsay (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001



View Profile
October 14, 2015, 02:56:12 AM
 #1843

Paul Campaign Seeks to Steal Limelight Ahead of Debate With New Ad Aimed at Top Dems

As the Democratic presidential candidates prepare to step under the bright Las Vegas lights and duke it out in their party’s first debate, Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul seemingly threw the first punches of Tuesday afternoon.

In an effort to draw stark comparisons between Paul and other presidential contenders — both Republicans and Democrats — the Paul campaign stole some of the limelight away from the Democrats ahead of the debate by allowing voters to follow along with him via a live-stream from sunup to sundown. And as voters tune into the campaign’s live-stream, Paul will release a new ad aimed at Democrats ahead of the debate — targeting Hillary Clinton and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders specifically.

The ad, a copy of which was provided to TheBlaze Tuesday afternoon, criticizes Clinton and Sanders for “continuing the Obama legacy” and “fighting for the Washington machine” — the latter of which is the opposite of Paul’s own campaign slogan, “defeat the Washington machine, unleash the American dream.”

Unsurprisingly, Paul’s ad hit Clinton on her personal email server and her handling of the Benghazi attack — controversies that the senator said revealed a “lack of judgment.” Paul also hit Sanders’ promises of free college, health care and paid leave.

“It is a disservice to the country for Bernie Sanders to say he’s going to give you all more Social Security and money is going to grow on trees and everybody will be rich and there will be a chicken in every pot,” Paul says in a clip played in the ad.

“We’re going to destroy the country if we do that,” Paul said of Sanders’ plans.

Paul’s nearly two-minute-long ad goes after only Clinton and Sanders, the top two Democratic contenders, but Tuesday’s debate will also feature former Rhode Island Gov. Lincoln Chafee, former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley and former Virginia Sen. Jim Webb who will all try to use the debate’s exposure to gain prominence in the race.

Vincent Harris, Paul’s chief digital strategist, told TheBlaze Tuesday that Paul’s ad is a precursor to what he plans to discuss during his live-stream later Tuesday.

“Voters appreciate transparency, they don’t appreciate Hillary Clinton’s secrecy and lies,” Harris said.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=32&v=zBpF-8ksWW8

more...http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/10/13/rand-paul-campaign-seeks-to-steal-limelight-ahead-of-debate-with-new-ad-aimed-at-top-dems-voters-appreciate-transparency/
Chef Ramsay (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001



View Profile
October 14, 2015, 02:58:21 AM
 #1844

Trump-town continues

Running down the GOP race: Trump remains in the top spot with 24 percent, closely followed by Carson at 23 percent. Ted Cruz is third with 10 percent. Those are the only three who receive double-digit backing from Republican primary voters.

Next, it’s Marco Rubio (9 percent), Jeb Bush (8 percent), Carly Fiorina and Mike Huckabee (5 percent each), and Rand Paul (3 percent). The remaining candidates garner one percent or less.

,,,,,The Fox News poll is based on landline and cell phone interviews with 1,004 randomly chosen registered voters nationwide and was conducted under the joint direction of Anderson Robbins Research (D) and Shaw & Company Research (R) from October 10-12, 2015. The poll has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus three percentage points for all registered voters, and five points for both Democratic and Republican primary voters.

...http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/10/13/fox-news-poll-carson-giving-trump-run-for-his-money-in-gop-race/?intcmp=hpbt2
Chef Ramsay (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001



View Profile
October 14, 2015, 03:02:27 AM
 #1845

Rand Paul: ‘Idiots in the Republican Party’ Want War in Syria and So Does Hillary Clinton

If you’ve been watching the livestream of Sen. Rand Paul’s day on the campaign trail in Iowa, you know he drove through a lot of cornfields and listened to some Metallica. But perhaps the most noteworthy moment came when he paused the music and attacked his Republican—and Democratic opponents—for being war cheerleaders.

He said:

I think we should talk about politics for a minute. Shouldn’t we at least talk about what idiots we have in the Republican Party running for president who want to have a red line and a no-fly zone in Syria. What a recipe for disaster. But you know what the interesting thing is, Hillary Clinton agrees with all of them. All of them beating their chest to see who is the most likely to get us involved in a war that really, these people have been at war for a thousand years. You think somehow we’re going to solve their problems?

This is the side of Paul libertarians want to see more of—particularly in the debates. Voters who think it’s a good idea to get involved in the Syrian civil war have plenty of candidates on both sides of the aisle to choose from. On the other hand, voters who are skeptical that further military intervention in the Middle East could possibly be the right course of action have few options. Paul must court them.

https://reason.com/blog/2015/10/13/rand-paul-idiots-in-the-republican-party
1aguar
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 14, 2015, 06:23:04 AM
Last edit: October 14, 2015, 06:37:21 AM by 1aguar
 #1846

“It is a disservice to the country for Bernie Sanders to say he’s going to give you all more Social Security and money is going to grow on trees and everybody will be rich and there will be a chicken in every pot,” Paul says in a clip played in the ad.

“We’re going to destroy the country if we do that,” Paul said of Sanders’ plans.

Sanders offers us "bread and circuses"; his proposal is an appeasement strategy in the national economic war. He is promoting the ideology of a foreign power; he wants "more transparency" from the Fed but he does not practice what he preaches...

Ron Paul says Bernie Sanders 'sold out' on Fed amendment
"Bernie Sanders has sold out and sided with [Sen.] Chris Dodd to gut Audit the Fed in the Senate. His 'compromise' is what the administration and banking interests want," Paul wrote on Facebook.

Paul said transparency of the Fed's interest rate decisions are important.

The Federal Reserve and Obama administration had strongly opposed earlier drafts of the Senate amendment.

The central bank said the earlier version would have threatened the independence of monetary policy in the United States.
Best to propose an END to the Fed as Rand Paul does.

Some will argue that free money is an attractive proposal for the nation's economy because the private people know how to grow the economy much better than the government and that the Fed has only a few alternatives to stimulate economic growth with interest rates at zero.

In my opinion, to hand out money is indeed better than to implement more QE or institute a tax on currency (the alternatives described in Fed publications); however, every alternative listed is simply another means of foreign control.

The real problem lies with the control of the nation's credit by a foreign conglomerate and the deception by these same foreign powers which causes the poverty and stagnation in the first place. The nation's people don't realize that they have been tricked and the country has been embezzled, and the bankers will never inform the people of this fact. Fortunately, there are a few public figures who have been vocal about monetary truth; too bad the truth has such low "polling numbers".

"The raw truth is never popular".
Amos 5
Chef Ramsay (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001



View Profile
October 16, 2015, 02:21:51 AM
 #1847

In court, Ron Paul accuses FEDS of targeting Rand's campaign

DES MOINES, Iowa (October 15, 2015)—On Wednesday, retired Congressman and presidential contender Ron Paul came to a Des Moines’ federal courthouse to testify for the prosecution against two of his former top campaign staffers, Jesse Benton, who is married to Paul’s granddaughter, and Dimitri Kesari. With force, Paul told jurors that the timing of the indictments against Benton and Kesari were carefully planned in order to pose a threat against his son, United States Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who is currently running for president on the Republican ticket.

...http://truthinmedia.com/ron-paul-says-feds-targeting-rand/
Chef Ramsay (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001



View Profile
October 16, 2015, 02:24:24 AM
 #1848

'Dumbass' Or Not, Rand Paul's Live Stream May Be The Future Of Campaigning

It was probably only a matter of time before we got the live-streamed campaign.

Between Periscope, Vine, and Snapchat, candidates have seized on new apps this cycle to produce behind-the-scenes, unfiltered moments and deliver them to voters.

On Tuesday, Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul took the trend to its inevitable conclusion, and broadcast the bulk of his day on the Iowa campaign trail on the Internet.

Toward the end of the day, Paul answered hostile questions from Twitter users that campaign staffers put in front of him as a gag. He delivered the type of language you don't usually hear from a presidential candidate. "Is Rand Paul still running for president? I dunno," he answered, "I wouldn't be doing this dumbass live streaming if I weren't."

...http://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/10/15/448954423/dumbass-or-not-rand-pauls-live-stream-may-be-the-future-of-campaigning
Chef Ramsay (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001



View Profile
October 16, 2015, 02:33:35 AM
 #1849

Rand Paul on Obama Continuing War in Afghanistan in Interview on CNN w/ Wolf Blitzer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-Jj9L7zrIc

Rand, point blank, says that this stay over in A-stan by Obama is wrong and should be ended now.
Chef Ramsay (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001



View Profile
October 16, 2015, 02:38:12 AM
 #1850

Media fail: Sloppy reporting takes a bite out of Rand Paul

Reporters created a false narrative this week about 2016 presidential candidate Rand Paul, suggesting on social media that the Kentucky senator is dismissive of efforts to protect members of the LGBT community from workplace discrimination.

On Wednesday, during a campaign stop at Drake University, Paul took time to answer students' questions. One attendee asked the senator about discrimination in the workplace against members of the LGBT community.

"Do you think an employer should be able to fire an LGBT employee because that person is LGBT?" the attendee asked.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jAjcYZWYoA

Paul responded, "I think, really, the things you do in your house, we could just leave those in your house and they wouldn't have to be part of the workplace, to tell you the truth."

"These are very difficult decisions on what you decide will be employers' decisions and not. And it really isn't so much about that question as it is about — it sets up a classification, or a class of people, who can now sue. You see what I mean? So what happens is, it sets up a whole industry for people who want to sue," he added. "So if you happen to be gay and you get fired, now you have a reason you can sue them. But it's almost impossible sometimes. People don't put up a sign and say, 'I'm firing you because you're gay.' It's something that's very much disputed. And so I don't know that we need to keep adding to different classifications to say the government needs to be involved in the hiring and firing."

He explained that although there are still big questions that need to be answered regarding the rights of employers and employees, society is moving quickly towards greater acceptance of the LGBT community. So rather than rely on the government to intercede on behalf of one group, evolving cultural norms could very well answer the question of anti-LGBT discrimination, Paul seemed to suggest.

"I think society is rapidly changing. If you are gay, there are plenty of places that will hire you. I would say the vast majority of corporations already privately have manuals, or work manuals, that say that they don't discriminate in any way," he said.


Reporters responded to Paul's remarks by tweeting out only fragments of his full answer, and focusing especially hard on his conclusion.

"Rand Paul, asked whether employers [should] be able to fire LGBT workers, says, 'If you are gay, there are plenty of places that will hire you,'" the Los Angeles Times' Seema Mehta tweeted, reducing the entirety of Paul's answer into something where he seemingly shrugged at the idea of workplace discrimination.

Her tweet appeared before any video or transcript of the Drake University event were made available. But the absence of the full context didn't stop other reporters from weighing in on what Paul supposedly said.

Fellow L.A. Times colleague Matt Pearce responded to Mehta's tweet by commenting, "Imagine replacing 'gay' with almost any other description of a person."
MSNBC's Benjy Sarlin was incredulous.

"So the Rand Paul solution to LGBT worker protections appears to be applying 'Don't Ask Don't Tell' to the entire economy," he said. "Look, straight people, just never mention your spouse at work ever and no one will have any problems. Leave your home life at home."

Time magazine's Phil Elliott did a better job than Mehta of reporting on the context of Paul's response, but he also contributed to the false narrative by focusing mostly on the "there are plenty of places that will hire you" line.

Out of all the quotes tweeted by Elliott, he led off with this: "Asked about anti-discrimination policies for LGBT workers, Rand Paul says if people kept their home life at home, it wouldn't be an issue." He immediately followed with a tweet that read, "Rand Paul on LGBT workers losing their jobs: 'If you are gay, there are plenty of places that will hire you.'"

Elliott sent out additional quotes from Paul's response, but only after he had highlighted the senator's remarks on employment and the LGBT community.

Unfortunately for the Kentucky senator, and despite that the event's footage has been made available online, it doesn't look like the storyline that he supposedly shrugged off workplace discrimination is going to go away.

The Hill followed Mehta's lead and published a story titled, "Paul: LGBT people should keep their private lives out of the workplace."

And the narrative had spread outside media circles. Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton's social media team saw an opportunity to boost her standing in the LGBT community, and they acted accordingly:



But not everyone in media felt the same about Paul's answer. The Huffington Post's Sam Stein, for example, conceded after he had watched the video that the senator's comments were not as nearly as controversial as initially claimed.

"Rand Paul's answer on LGBT protections in the workplace was much more thoughtful than what I [re-tweeted]," Stein said.

hxxp://www.washingtonexaminer.com/media-fail-sloppy-reporting-takes-a-bite-out-of-rand-paul/article/2574162
Chef Ramsay (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001



View Profile
October 16, 2015, 02:41:54 AM
 #1851

Senator Rand Paul, the Republican candidate for President from Kentucky, sits down with editor-in-chief Dan Skye to discuss his views on cannabis and the War on Drugs.

Tell us your views on marijuana law reform.

I’ve always been a believer in individual freedom and that people should be left alone. If you’re not hurting anybody, it’s really nobody’s business what you’re doing. That’s been an underlying principle of most people who consider themselves to be Libertarian. They call it the “non-aggression principle”: if you’re not committing aggression against another individual, it’s really your business what you’re doing.

How should marijuana law reform be handled?

It’s a fundamental constitutional belief that, if you are going to classify something as right or wrong, or make something criminal or not criminal, it should be done at the state level – not at the federal level.  When the Constitution was written, we had very few laws. But over time now we’ve criminalized everything. I mean it’s not just marijuana; we’ve criminalized a host of things that no one in their right mind would have believed that there would be a federal law against. The government’s getting large and so is the criminal justice system. As a consequence, we’ve got a lot of unjust sentences passed — people put in jail for 20-25 years. Very recently, a man got a life sentence you know for marijuana.

How far does decriminalization extend for you?

States should be allowed to do what they want to do and the federal government should not intervene.

...http://www.hightimes.com/read/high-times-interview-rand-paul
Chef Ramsay (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001



View Profile
October 16, 2015, 02:46:04 AM
 #1852

Paul aide Chris LaCivita curses out CNBC

...
Top aides to Senators Ted Cruz and Rand Paul also insisted that the debate feature opening and closing statements, with Paul aide Chris LaCivita saying at one point that CNBC could "go f--- themselves" if they weren't willing to agree to those terms, according to two sources on the call.

The demand for opening and closing statements reflects the candidates' interest in getting their messages out unchallenged. The demand for a two-hour debate comes in the wake of CNN's decision to extend the previous GOP debate to three hours, leaving some of the candidates visibly exhausted.

...http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/15/politics/trump-carson-cnbc-republican-debate-threaten-pullout/
Chef Ramsay (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001



View Profile
October 16, 2015, 02:48:54 AM
 #1853

Rand Paul Releases Memo Explaining why he won't drop out - 10/15

CC: Rand Paul for President Team
FROM: Doug Stafford, Chief Strategist
Chip Englander, Campaign Manager
RE: Summary of Campaign Standing
DATE: October 15, 2015

There are some in the media who are pushing a false narrative that Senator Rand Paul (SRP) is on the ropes.

Here are the facts and why SRP is here to stay.

POLITICAL ORGANIZATION

Ground game and political organization have a disproportionate impact in primaries and especially caucuses — and SRP has the best organization in America.

Three times, SRP has competed against the other contenders in presidential straw polls – and every time he has won. He won at the Conservative Political Action Conference, the same straw poll Reagan won that helped launch his 1980 candidacy. He won at the Republican Leadership Conference, the largest straw poll in America. And he won this past weekend at the largest New Hampshire straw poll. At all of these straw polls, other contenders competed, paid for supporters, and went in to win it. Each time they failed.

In New Hampshire, where SRP won over the weekend, our organization has a statewide Leadership Team of over 300 members-nearly triple the size of our closest rival. This well-respected team of veteran grassroots organizers were the catalyst of this weekend’s win and will be vital to future victories.

SRP’s strength in New Hampshire comes from his continued legwork in the state. He’s been there more than most of the candidates. He was there last weekend, he will be there next weekend, and he will be there a third time at the end of this month. Like John McCain in 2008, Senator Paul’s campaign isn’t showing up in October polling, but will be there when it counts-on Election Day.

Our campaign is similarly well-positioned in Iowa. SRP has already announced co-chairs in each of Iowa’s 99 counties and has 600 precinct captains that are actively recruiting supporters and volunteers. This team has been able to call over 100,000 voters in the past few weeks alone.

Like New Hampshire, our Iowa team provides the backbone of the ground force needed to win a trench warfare campaign. As demonstrated in both parties’ campaigns for President, to win in Iowa, a strong ground force, not money, is the true game changer. In 2012, Rick Santorum was vastly outspent by Mitt Romney, yet he won Iowa. In 2008, Mike Huckabee was vastly outspent and won Iowa. In 2004, Democrat Howard Dean had all the money and resources, but John Kerry’s in-state volunteer force propelled him to the top. That’s how Iowa campaigns are won-through the hard work of motivated, well-organized, and passionate grassroots supporters.

SRP is also making a historic effort to build a Students for Rand organization that will play heavily in Iowa and change the way Republicans treat the youth vote. Nationally, the organization established over 350 chapters since its launch. Students make the calls and walk the doors. They also give the campaign the ability to organize cheaply in later states.

And in Iowa, Students for Rand will have a huge impact.

In 2012, 121,000 Iowans participated in their Republican caucus. In 2008, 119,000 Iowans participated in their Republican caucus. Although Iowa is not one of the most populous states in the country, large schools such as the University of Iowa and Iowa State University are part of a student population of over 120,000.

Yet this sizable student population factored little in the last two Iowa caucuses because they occurred during winter break on January 3. Due to a change in RNC rules, the 2016 caucuses will occur on February 1, when school is in session. With 120,000 voters and over 120,000 students, students are set to dominate the caucuses in an unprecedented way and we are set to dominate this demographic.

While the media fixates on ad buys and fundraising, we are the only campaign organizing on campuses. For example, when the University of Iowa kicked off back-to-school week, we were the only campaign tabling and signing people up. There are twenty Students for Rand chapters across Iowa. Every campus event sees hundreds, if not thousands, of excited students ready to stand with Rand. Just this week, SRP crisscrossed Iowa as part of an 11-campus barnstorm, hitting schools in every corner of the state, signing up hundreds of caucus attendees and volunteers at every stop.

You will not see this student advantage show-up in polls, but you will see it show-up in elections-just like the straw polls we keep winning.

DEBATES, POLLS AND FUNDRAISING

The media can be forgiven for not grasping the significance of the ground organization we are building because it is not highly visible except on the few occasions we mobilize (and win). Some reporters have covered the fact that SRP always comes in first when people are actually voting, although most have ignored it altogether.

What makes less sense, though, is that the media plays up any drop in the polls SRP experiences, while ignoring his momentum and the precipitous decline of other candidates.

Since the last debate, SRP has moved up three spots in the polls. The two most recent polls determining who makes the next debate-conducted by CBS and Fox-had SRP outpolling Christie and Kasich. SRP is well within the criteria for the next debate-no question, he will be on the stage. Moreover, earlier this month Reuters-which independent analysts called the most accurate pollster of the last presidential election-had SRP in fifth place ahead of Rubio, Cruz, and others.

Although the criteria to make the cut for the next debate requires a 2.5% average in the polls, you never read anything about Christie, who currently sits at 1.9% in the RCP average of polls. The media is fixated on insisting that SRP should get out of the race even though he continues to win every time votes are counted and the polls show him on the rise.

The timing of the next two debates gives SRP an advantage because viewers will be able to decide the narrative for themselves. While each of the first three debates experienced 5-6 week breaks between them, the next two debates are separated by only 13 days – a significant opportunity for SRP to have some repetition before voters for the first time.

This gives SRP the opportunity to further build on his recent momentum following the Reagan Library debate. Two of the three straw polls SRP has won have come since the debate, and SRP raised nearly a million dollars in the final twelve days after the last debate.

SRP currently has over $2 million cash-on-hand and is running a lean campaign heavy on organization and light on expensive advertising. SRP has the financial resources to continue indefinitely and will keep racking up wins once the voting begins.

If you were SRP – with $2 million, little overhead, the best organization in America, always on the debate stage, and you were winning 100% of the time votes were counted – would you bet you were closer to dropping out or that you were nearing a breakthrough? We bet on breakthrough-and the continued passion and dedication of our team to fight for Senator Paul’s vision of liberty, opportunity and justice for all Americans is what will bring us success when it actually counts – on Election Day .

...http://dailycaller.com/2015/10/15/rand-paul-campaign-releases-memo-explaining-why-he-wont-drop-out-of-race/
Chef Ramsay (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001



View Profile
October 16, 2015, 02:55:03 AM
 #1854

Rand Paul Is Right: Say No to a Syrian No-Fly Zone

...


That decision — let’s be perfectly clear — would move a great-power conflict from “possible” to “probable.” I don’t say this often on foreign-policy matters, but Rand Paul is fundamentally right. A no-fly zone is an unacceptable risk. Putin clearly views Assad’s survival as vital to Russia’s national interests. Even now, a Syrian, Hezbollah, Iranian, and Russian coalition is massing for a significant ground offensive. Would Putin let that offensive flounder simply because Americans told him not to support his troops and his allies?

Or would he instead put American will to the test, resulting in direct aerial combat, lost lives, and a geopolitical incident that would not be easy to confine or control? And for what strategic purpose? There is simply no allied force on the ground that can defeat Assad and ISIS and al-Qaeda. Our best allies, the Kurds, are geographically confined to the north, and there is no prospect that they could or would spearhead an offensive south to Damascus. The Kurds don’t want to run Syria. They want to protect their homeland.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/425579/syria-no-fly-zone-russia-united-states-rand-paul
Chef Ramsay (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001



View Profile
October 17, 2015, 05:33:22 AM
 #1855

PHOTOS: Rand Paul's "The Iowa 10,000 College Tour!"

"I spent the last week travelling all across Iowa, helping to cover Rand Paul's "The Iowa 10,000 College Tour!" I attended events at the University of Iowa, St. Ambrose University, Loras College, Upper Iowa University, Wartburg College, University of Northern Iowa, Morningside College, Buena Vista University and Drake University. Unfortunately 2 of the planned stops had to be cancelled on the first day because Rand missed his flight in Chicago due to cancellations and delays."







University of Iowa:  https://www.flickr.com/photos/gageskidmore/albums/72157657569816363

St. Ambrose University:  https://www.flickr.com/photos/gageskidmore/albums/72157659485064278
Chef Ramsay (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001



View Profile
October 17, 2015, 05:41:11 AM
 #1856

Photos continued on the recent swing thru Iowa colleges by Rand:

Loras College:  https://www.flickr.com/photos/gageskidmore/albums/72157659484079860

Upper Iowa University:  https://www.flickr.com/photos/gageskidmore/albums/72157657563617274

Wartburg College:   https://www.flickr.com/photos/gageskidmore/albums/72157659833865376

University of Northern Iowa:  https://www.flickr.com/photos/gageskidmore/albums/72157659489913390

Morningside College:  https://www.flickr.com/photos/gageskidmore/albums/72157659877224702

Buena Vista University:  https://www.flickr.com/photos/gageskidmore/albums/72157659487219419

Drake University:  https://www.flickr.com/photos/gageskidmore/albums/72157659881939452

And just to recap, Rand and team have been building up a passel of college teams/students in the early states and these won't likely be polled by the media as most folks under forty don't have landlines and thus don't show up in polls, thus underscoring his numbers and not to even mention, his organizational strengths in the early states. Rand has a long game and will blow the simpletons that view the mainstream/corporate media away when the votes are counted. Get with it or deal with it later.
Chef Ramsay (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001



View Profile
October 17, 2015, 05:45:59 AM
 #1857

Rand tells the TRUTH about Trump on NewsMax Tv which is viewed by many down to earth conservatives as an alternative to the corporate media and/or Fox.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=54&v=FBA2f5nX00E

Calls Trump the worst thing that conservatives could fall for. Check it out, it's new.
Chef Ramsay (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001



View Profile
October 17, 2015, 05:51:52 AM
 #1858

Video: Judge Napolitano and Rand Paul Spread Liberty and Freedom Together | Fox Business

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=33&v=zxco6Q8hHBE

Rand sounds like his old man alot on this issue via the privacy issue and the Patriot Act plus The Judge is right there with Rand against the statist/surveillance statist British interviewer.
Chef Ramsay (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001



View Profile
October 17, 2015, 05:53:47 AM
 #1859

Sen. Rand Paul Announces Cut, Cap, and Balance Act of 2015

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Rand Paul today announced plans to introduce the Cut, Cap, and Balance Act of 2015 once the U.S. Senate is back in session next week. Building off of the Cut-Cap-Balance effort in 2011, this legislation would cut the 2016 deficit in half, cap spending going forward on a path to balance by 2021, and require Congress to pass a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution before raising the nation’s debt limit.

"Bold action is needed to address our nation’s debt crisis – our national debt currently stands at $18.4 trillion. We cannot keep piling debt on top of debt forever," Sen. Paul said.

Sen. Paul also plans next week to introduce the Default Prevention Act, which prevents a default whenever the United States has reached the national debt limit and prioritizes spending as revenue comes in.

Background information and top-line points can be found below.

,,,http://www.paul.senate.gov/news/press/sen-rand-paul-announces-cut-cap-and-balance-act-of-2015
Chef Ramsay (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001



View Profile
October 17, 2015, 06:06:34 AM
 #1860

Rand with Martha MacCallum on Fox News: blasts 'false narrative' that campaign is over

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=27&v=2kdSiUtkcAs

View it and see what the narrative against Rand has and will be as time goes on. This is the MSM in your face but Rand cleans up quite nicely.
Pages: « 1 ... 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 [93] 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!