[ANN][XC] >> Mandatory Update to new Wallet - The first POS X11 anonymous wallet

[tbearhere]

cryptoalts only 88% effective

[1714799401]

1714799401

[1714799401]

1714799401

[1714799401]

1714799401

[1714799401]

1714799401

[jaayruu]

is there a more detailed post on the Xnodes?

[nanoprobe]

cryptoalts only 88% effective

Same here. 12-13% DOA is not acceptable.

[battbot]

Here are the key points I have collated from the developer over numerous posts so far:

The mixer technology will be multi-path across a cluster of xnodes which runs over the encrypted protocol, so it won't be a central server, it would be similar to a distributed cluster, and the data is encapsulated inside that encrypted tunnel to prevent off-the wire sniffing (or off-the-air* for the mobile platform)...  DRK didn't "invent" supernodes or the concept, and while some of concepts are similar and/or overlap, we are on a different path than DRK and as we refine the platform, it will be clear why our design, implementation and infrastructure is superior as we will have autonomous supernodes using PKI that can scale up and out to become a distributed anonymous application platform

This is why the multi-path paradigm network I built back in 2005 still functions to do this day and scaled up to meet the demands of 2014... think back to 2005, granted we had the internet, but not the mobile technology - and that is a key part of my background is mobility that will be leveraged in the android anonymous POS wallet

(http://eprint.iacr.org/2009/385.pdf
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1208/1208.3022.pdf)
(The principles for this concept come from a design that I originally leveraged back in 2005,[multi-path paradigm] the system still runs to do this day handling 50k to 100k users per day )

If your waiting for NSA proof anonymity - well that is the goal of our REV 2 release..

No, mixing is only part of it, XC now contains a completely new transaction protocol layer that is encrypted and will be leveraged as a platform for all sorts of concepts.... and it will leverage multi-path paradigm topology (which again is a custom developed concept based on dual-path paradigm)So mixing is just the first application to run on top of this new protocol........ Don't want this key point to get lost --- mixing is just the first application, the list is long and the potential is huge, and since the foundation has been built and deployed, it is now time to build on that foundation.... with some revolutionary concepts and idea's.....

Also the infrastructure for this will support numerous other applications, such as encrypted messaging, P2P exchange..etc granted we can only develop new features so fast, but we are putting the foundation for a multi-use, multi-purpose platform

^ xnodes

[laredo7mm]

cryptoalts only 88% effective

Same here. 12-13% DOA is not acceptable.

Read their FAQ on their website. I'm pretty sure it said to expect 10% doa since it is p2pool based

I am only seeing 1% rejects,  but I am running -g 2 and -Q 0 on all my GPU's.

[r0ach]

My vote for coin name:  Xnode Currency

After reading all the ridiculous coin name ideas, Xnode coin and Xcurrency seemed like the only two decent ones for using the XC abbreviation.  Xcurrency takes a lot of effort to pronounce is the only thing I don't like.  You could always combine the two names to Xnode Currency, then only refer to it as XC and never go through the long pronunciation.

The name "Xnode Currency" makes it sound very upscale and high tech as well to the average Joe.

[cryptohunter]

cryptoalts only 88% effective

ask hashcows to hook xc up

[Polycoin]

How about Xenographic Corosisative. (XC)

That name is easy to remember and catchy.

[BitQuark]

I am sure something must be wrong, bacause when i unlock wallet my green minting icon is lighting , net weight: 0 and then pup out
with old wallet was all ok...

by the way, i think we need more nodes... or ?

addnode=76.182.189.115

[atcsecure]

I am sure something must be wrong, bacause when i unlock wallet my green minting icon is lighting , net weight: 0 and then pup out
with old wallet was all ok...

by the way, i think we need more nodes... or ?

162.243.109.24
188.226.174.16


use these two nodes

looks miners are still submiting pow blocks,

use -connect as well to only connect to these 2 nodes

[laredo7mm]

I am sure something must be wrong, bacause when i unlock wallet my green minting icon is lighting , net weight: 0 and then pup out
with old wallet was all ok...

by the way, i think we need more nodes... or ?

Yeah, someone mentioned earlier and they may be correct. It is like pos is still competing with pow. A few posts back some posted their get info from the debug console and the difficulty was still saying 5000+.

Not sure what is going on but I am confident that the DEV is looking into it. Hold tight. Be patient.

[tbearhere]

CryptoAlts now supports and ready for XC post-POW mining

nope

[cryptohunter]

if a lot of people have not uploaded to the new wallet and still try to mine?  is that a problem?

[Alisho]

I am sure something must be wrong, bacause when i unlock wallet my green minting icon is lighting , net weight: 0 and then pup out
with old wallet was all ok...

by the way, i think we need more nodes... or ?

162.243.109.24
188.226.174.16


use these two nodes

looks miners are still submiting pow blocks,

use -connect as well to only connect to these 2 nodes

where do we have to put the -connect?

[silverkinguk]

This looks like good X logo on Cyberia intro Xatrix

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8eXK76pvHFc

[blade87]

cryptoalts only 88% effective

Same here. 12-13% DOA is not acceptable.

Use different nodes! US East is a bit overloaded with hash right now (looks like one big farm on it), so get that spread to lower DOA. US West and US Central could take a fair amount of load off US East. Same with EU1, EU2, and SG1 - try to keep them balanced. Use the link below to see individual node stats.

I was once supporting somewhere between 1-2 GH/s for BlackCoin when BCPool was down getting DDoS for entire week, and things were fine. But hash rates were pretty well spread. It is especially important for smaller miners to use lower hash rate nodes. Other than that, because my pool is P2Pool based (the only multipool out there P2Pool based I believe, and thus hopefully DDoS resistant), so once the hash rates get high (over 150 MH/s on scrypt per node or 500 MH/s X11 per node) the difficulty on each node starts getting very high. This leads to high DOA rates unless you're the one contributing all of the hash!

http://cryptoalts.com/poolinfo/ to see individual node hash rates.

I wasn't expecting this much hash so I guess I should been very clear right from the start about keeping the hash spread - sorry! Anyway, worst case, you at least know where to set your failover mining addresses if you cannot obtain a low DOA rate.

Don't forget if you are interested to give hybrid mining a shot! http://cryptoalts.com/hybrid/

[laredo7mm]

I am sure something must be wrong, bacause when i unlock wallet my green minting icon is lighting , net weight: 0 and then pup out
with old wallet was all ok...

by the way, i think we need more nodes... or ?

162.243.109.24
188.226.174.16


use these two nodes

looks miners are still submiting pow blocks,

use -connect as well to only connect to these 2 nodes

Do we addnode and connect to those or just connect?

[cryptohunter]

hashcows is a large multipool and will payout in XC if we ask them.

Need a large stable multipool .......well a few would be good really.

100% safe to transfer coins right now or not?

[atcsecure]

Could be a potential fork

to resolve


#1.  backup wallet.dat

#2.  Make sure you have backed up wallet.dat (see #1) & X11Coin.conf

#3.  clean out the roaming data in roaming\X11Coin

#4.  Copy wallet.dat and X11Coin.Conf back

#5.  Launch wallet with the correct parameters to sync to masternode
x11coin-qt.exe -addnode=162.243.109.24 -connect=162.243.109.24


This is download block chain from masternode and sync

[solid12345]

My vote is for Xenucoin