jackteng
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
|
May 17, 2014, 10:00:33 AM |
|
X13?
the new script? I hope it could go well. I am waiting to mine.
|
|
|
|
luck888888
|
|
May 17, 2014, 12:50:58 PM |
|
boost.suprnova.cc/ Seems not block it?
|
|
|
|
brother3
|
|
May 17, 2014, 01:12:40 PM |
|
Update:As we all know the difficulty value is fluctuating too much at the moment as as a result the average block rate is about 2 - 3 minutes when it should be 1 minute. At the moment we are at about block 650 when we should be at about 1600. So as a result the PoW phase will probably over run by a few days. I've identified the fixes that need to go into the wallet. I'm aiming to get the following tasks complete before block 2000 - Coding complete - Tested on TestNet - New wallets compiled - Publish the new wallets This will cause a mandatory wallet update which everyone will need to do. Thanks for sticking with BoostCoin Will there be a logo on the new wallet?
|
|
|
|
niejian_2003
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
May 17, 2014, 01:26:14 PM |
|
There are no new mine pool. . boost.suprnova.cc points less than a block away
|
|
|
|
go6ooo1212
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
quarkchain.io
|
|
May 17, 2014, 01:32:18 PM |
|
There are no new mine pool. . boost.suprnova.cc points less than a block away
+1 ... What happoned with Suprnova , It seems It stucked on block 537...
|
|
|
|
brother3
|
|
May 17, 2014, 02:14:10 PM |
|
There are no new mine pool. . boost.suprnova.cc points less than a block away
+1 ... What happoned with Suprnova , It seems It stucked on block 537... Awaiting fix from dev...
|
|
|
|
hero18688
|
|
May 17, 2014, 03:14:27 PM |
|
Blocks over 600.There must be another pool or hashmonster.
|
|
|
|
brother3
|
|
May 17, 2014, 06:23:12 PM |
|
Blocks over 600.There must be another pool or hashmonster.
I just hope people don't mine on a bad fork
|
|
|
|
MacMuffin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
|
May 18, 2014, 05:27:44 AM |
|
Any ETA on the fix, other than the at block 2000?
|
|
|
|
mammix2 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1004
|
|
May 18, 2014, 09:17:38 AM |
|
Any ETA on the fix, other than the at block 2000?
Very soon, i've got the fix coded in and has been proven on testnet and on a private fork of the Main chain. All i need to do is compile both Windows and OSX wallets and release them. Im away today but should be able to get them done this evening when i'm back
|
1HfpFYxBUpQ941mKd4DEjsyA22HN4Kerzu
|
|
|
tricass
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 394
Merit: 250
Crypto enthusiast
|
|
May 18, 2014, 10:02:27 AM |
|
given the pools haven't found a single block for over 41h and diff still high who are the ones mining this coin?
|
|
|
|
MacMuffin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
|
May 18, 2014, 11:21:10 AM |
|
given the pools haven't found a single block for over 41h and diff still high who are the ones mining this coin?
I actually minted some coins so I think the new blocks are PoS blocks.
|
|
|
|
mumus
|
|
May 18, 2014, 12:38:54 PM |
|
Any ETA on the fix, other than the at block 2000?
Very soon, i've got the fix coded in and has been proven on testnet and on a private fork of the Main chain. All i need to do is compile both Windows and OSX wallets and release them. Im away today but should be able to get them done this evening when i'm back I would suggest reconsidering releasing only a difficulty fix to the wild without doing a proper hard fork from a specific block number. (fortunately the coin has PoS blocks). I'm not an expert but as far as I know without a proper hard fork and giving enough time for everybody to update, the chances for blockchain forks are pretty high. One coin that I know of and had similar problems and succeed to do a proper update, was Goodcoin ( https://github.com/stolenjs/gcfinal)
|
|
|
|
mammix2 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1004
|
|
May 18, 2014, 05:43:24 PM |
|
Any ETA on the fix, other than the at block 2000?
Very soon, i've got the fix coded in and has been proven on testnet and on a private fork of the Main chain. All i need to do is compile both Windows and OSX wallets and release them. Im away today but should be able to get them done this evening when i'm back I would suggest reconsidering releasing only a difficulty fix to the wild without doing a proper hard fork from a specific block number. (fortunately the coin has PoS blocks). I'm not an expert but as far as I know without a proper hard fork and giving enough time for everybody to update, the chances for blockchain forks are pretty high. One coin that I know of and had similar problems and succeed to do a proper update, was Goodcoin ( https://github.com/stolenjs/gcfinal) Ah yes GOODcoin, i helped them with that coin too To confirm, this release will cause a hard fork at the determined block number. This is because anyone on the old wallet will get an invalid Proof of Work for any blocks mined after. Once the wallets are released the seednodes will be updated, so its advisable to delete the peers.dat file to make sure the first time the new wallet connects is to the new updated wallets
|
1HfpFYxBUpQ941mKd4DEjsyA22HN4Kerzu
|
|
|
mammix2 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1004
|
|
May 18, 2014, 06:42:08 PM |
|
★ v1.1.0.0 Wallet client downloads ★ Windows: https://mega.co.nz/#!UcoSHKrT!sF7a8UxsWAIIIUmUfGuWVMsBR1Q18-289HJ5-XctZj0Source:https://github.com/mammix2/BoostCoinThis fixes the difficulty problems after block 1300. As said before this will cause a hard fork at block 1300 due to the Proof Or Work setting being different thereafter. You must all update your wallets as soon as possible. The OSX wallet will be ready in the next few hours. Also updated are the PoS interest rates, and someone asked for a logo in the wallet so i put that in too
|
1HfpFYxBUpQ941mKd4DEjsyA22HN4Kerzu
|
|
|
mumus
|
|
May 18, 2014, 06:54:25 PM Last edit: May 18, 2014, 07:09:01 PM by mumus |
|
Any ETA on the fix, other than the at block 2000?
Very soon, i've got the fix coded in and has been proven on testnet and on a private fork of the Main chain. All i need to do is compile both Windows and OSX wallets and release them. Im away today but should be able to get them done this evening when i'm back I would suggest reconsidering releasing only a difficulty fix to the wild without doing a proper hard fork from a specific block number. (fortunately the coin has PoS blocks). I'm not an expert but as far as I know without a proper hard fork and giving enough time for everybody to update, the chances for blockchain forks are pretty high. One coin that I know of and had similar problems and succeed to do a proper update, was Goodcoin ( https://github.com/stolenjs/gcfinal) Ah yes GOODcoin, i helped them with that coin too To confirm, this release will cause a hard fork at the determined block number. This is because anyone on the old wallet will get an invalid Proof of Work for any blocks mined after. Once the wallets are released the seednodes will be updated, so its advisable to delete the peers.dat file to make sure the first time the new wallet connects is to the new updated wallets OK. Thanks for the update and sorry if I underestimated your work. It's good the hear that behind this coin there is a professional programmer.
|
|
|
|
go6ooo1212
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
quarkchain.io
|
|
May 18, 2014, 07:07:10 PM |
|
Any ETA on the fix, other than the at block 2000?
Very soon, i've got the fix coded in and has been proven on testnet and on a private fork of the Main chain. All i need to do is compile both Windows and OSX wallets and release them. Im away today but should be able to get them done this evening when i'm back I would suggest reconsidering releasing only a difficulty fix to the wild without doing a proper hard fork from a specific block number. (fortunately the coin has PoS blocks). I'm not an expert but as far as I know without a proper hard fork and giving enough time for everybody to update, the chances for blockchain forks are pretty high. One coin that I know of and had similar problems and succeed to do a proper update, was Goodcoin ( https://github.com/stolenjs/gcfinal) Ah yes GOODcoin, i helped them with that coin too To confirm, this release will cause a hard fork at the determined block number. This is because anyone on the old wallet will get an invalid Proof of Work for any blocks mined after. Once the wallets are released the seednodes will be updated, so its advisable to delete the peers.dat file to make sure the first time the new wallet connects is to the new updated wallets OK. Thanks for the update and sorry if I underestimated your work. It's good the hear the behind this coin there is a professional programmer. +1 Thank you from me too... Is there any alive pool now , maybe Suprnova?
|
|
|
|
policymaker
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Crypto Currency Supporter
|
|
May 18, 2014, 07:24:18 PM |
|
mammix is this minable with nvidia ccminer? Or not? They havent replied in cuda miner thread(I guess not?)
|
|
|
|
mumus
|
|
May 18, 2014, 07:39:23 PM |
|
The boost.suprnova.cc pool is online with active miners who tries to solve the high diff block, but in my opinion it's waste of hash power. We should start mining after block height 1300. Block are resolved with PoS now.
|
|
|
|
policymaker
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Crypto Currency Supporter
|
|
May 18, 2014, 08:01:40 PM |
|
The boost.suprnova.cc pool is online with active miners who tries to solve the high diff block, but in my opinion it's waste of hash power. We should start mining after block height 1300. Block are resolved with PoS now.
so what is the plan? after this block the coin will be OK to mine again? I want to point my ati card to nova pool but my resources are limited and I want to w8 till its surely fixed!
|
|
|
|
|