Bitcoin Forum
November 05, 2024, 03:23:20 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Will you move your trading over to BOST from INFchain ?
Yes - 11 (68.8%)
No - 5 (31.3%)
Total Voters: 16

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 ... 193 »
  Print  
Author Topic: █=█ BoostCoin █=█ New team, new plans  (Read 299701 times)
jackteng
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 37
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 17, 2014, 10:00:33 AM
 #261

X13?

the new script?
I hope it could go well.
I am waiting to mine.
luck888888
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 152
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 17, 2014, 12:50:58 PM
 #262

boost.suprnova.cc/   Seems not block it?
brother3
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 17, 2014, 01:12:40 PM
 #263

Update:

As we all know the difficulty value is fluctuating too much at the moment as as a result the average block rate is about 2 - 3 minutes when it should be 1 minute. At the moment we are at about block 650 when we should be at about 1600. So as a result the PoW phase will probably over run by a few days.

I've identified the fixes that need to go into the wallet. I'm aiming to get the following tasks complete before block 2000

- Coding complete
- Tested on TestNet
- New wallets compiled
- Publish the new wallets

This will cause a mandatory wallet update which everyone will need to do.

Thanks for sticking with BoostCoin Smiley

Will there be a logo on the new wallet?
niejian_2003
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 17, 2014, 01:26:14 PM
 #264

There are no new mine pool. .  boost.suprnova.cc points less than a block away
go6ooo1212
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000


quarkchain.io


View Profile
May 17, 2014, 01:32:18 PM
 #265

There are no new mine pool. .  boost.suprnova.cc points less than a block away


+1 ... What happoned with Suprnova , It seems It stucked on block 537...
brother3
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 17, 2014, 02:14:10 PM
 #266

There are no new mine pool. .  boost.suprnova.cc points less than a block away


+1 ... What happoned with Suprnova , It seems It stucked on block 537...

Awaiting fix from dev...
hero18688
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 17, 2014, 03:14:27 PM
 #267

Blocks over 600.There must be another pool or hashmonster.

brother3
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 17, 2014, 06:23:12 PM
 #268

Blocks over 600.There must be another pool or hashmonster.

I just hope people don't mine on a bad fork
MacMuffin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 18, 2014, 05:27:44 AM
 #269

Any ETA on the fix, other than the at block 2000?
mammix2 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1004



View Profile
May 18, 2014, 09:17:38 AM
 #270

Any ETA on the fix, other than the at block 2000?

Very soon, i've got the fix coded in and has been proven on testnet and on a private fork of the Main chain.
All i need to do is compile both Windows and OSX wallets and release them.

Im away today but should be able to get them done this evening when i'm back

1HfpFYxBUpQ941mKd4DEjsyA22HN4Kerzu
tricass
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 394
Merit: 250


Crypto enthusiast


View Profile
May 18, 2014, 10:02:27 AM
 #271

given the pools haven't found a single block for over 41h and diff still high who are the ones mining this coin?

MacMuffin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 18, 2014, 11:21:10 AM
 #272

given the pools haven't found a single block for over 41h and diff still high who are the ones mining this coin?

I actually minted some coins so I think the new blocks are PoS blocks.
mumus
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 291
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 18, 2014, 12:38:54 PM
 #273

Any ETA on the fix, other than the at block 2000?

Very soon, i've got the fix coded in and has been proven on testnet and on a private fork of the Main chain.
All i need to do is compile both Windows and OSX wallets and release them.

Im away today but should be able to get them done this evening when i'm back

I would suggest reconsidering releasing  only a difficulty fix to the wild without doing a proper hard fork from a specific block number. (fortunately the coin has PoS blocks). I'm not an expert but as far as I know without a proper hard fork and giving enough time for everybody to update, the chances for blockchain forks are pretty high. One coin that I know of and had similar problems and succeed to do a proper update, was Goodcoin (https://github.com/stolenjs/gcfinal)
mammix2 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1004



View Profile
May 18, 2014, 05:43:24 PM
 #274

Any ETA on the fix, other than the at block 2000?

Very soon, i've got the fix coded in and has been proven on testnet and on a private fork of the Main chain.
All i need to do is compile both Windows and OSX wallets and release them.

Im away today but should be able to get them done this evening when i'm back

I would suggest reconsidering releasing  only a difficulty fix to the wild without doing a proper hard fork from a specific block number. (fortunately the coin has PoS blocks). I'm not an expert but as far as I know without a proper hard fork and giving enough time for everybody to update, the chances for blockchain forks are pretty high. One coin that I know of and had similar problems and succeed to do a proper update, was Goodcoin (https://github.com/stolenjs/gcfinal)

Ah yes GOODcoin, i helped them with that coin too Smiley

To confirm, this release will cause a hard fork at the determined block number. This is because anyone on the old wallet will get an invalid Proof of Work for any blocks mined after. Once the wallets are released the seednodes will be updated, so its advisable to delete the peers.dat file to make sure the first time the new wallet connects is to the new updated wallets

1HfpFYxBUpQ941mKd4DEjsyA22HN4Kerzu
mammix2 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1004



View Profile
May 18, 2014, 06:42:08 PM
 #275

★ v1.1.0.0 Wallet client downloads ★
Windows:
https://mega.co.nz/#!UcoSHKrT!sF7a8UxsWAIIIUmUfGuWVMsBR1Q18-289HJ5-XctZj0

Source:
https://github.com/mammix2/BoostCoin


This fixes the difficulty problems after block 1300. As said before this will cause a hard fork at block 1300 due to the Proof Or Work setting being different thereafter. You must all update your wallets as soon as possible. The OSX wallet will be ready in the next few hours.

Also updated are the PoS interest rates, and someone asked for a logo in the wallet so i put that in too Smiley

1HfpFYxBUpQ941mKd4DEjsyA22HN4Kerzu
mumus
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 291
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 18, 2014, 06:54:25 PM
Last edit: May 18, 2014, 07:09:01 PM by mumus
 #276

Any ETA on the fix, other than the at block 2000?

Very soon, i've got the fix coded in and has been proven on testnet and on a private fork of the Main chain.
All i need to do is compile both Windows and OSX wallets and release them.

Im away today but should be able to get them done this evening when i'm back

I would suggest reconsidering releasing  only a difficulty fix to the wild without doing a proper hard fork from a specific block number. (fortunately the coin has PoS blocks). I'm not an expert but as far as I know without a proper hard fork and giving enough time for everybody to update, the chances for blockchain forks are pretty high. One coin that I know of and had similar problems and succeed to do a proper update, was Goodcoin (https://github.com/stolenjs/gcfinal)

Ah yes GOODcoin, i helped them with that coin too Smiley

To confirm, this release will cause a hard fork at the determined block number. This is because anyone on the old wallet will get an invalid Proof of Work for any blocks mined after. Once the wallets are released the seednodes will be updated, so its advisable to delete the peers.dat file to make sure the first time the new wallet connects is to the new updated wallets

OK. Thanks for the update and sorry if I underestimated your work. It's good the hear that behind this coin there is a professional programmer. Smiley
go6ooo1212
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000


quarkchain.io


View Profile
May 18, 2014, 07:07:10 PM
 #277

Any ETA on the fix, other than the at block 2000?

Very soon, i've got the fix coded in and has been proven on testnet and on a private fork of the Main chain.
All i need to do is compile both Windows and OSX wallets and release them.

Im away today but should be able to get them done this evening when i'm back

I would suggest reconsidering releasing  only a difficulty fix to the wild without doing a proper hard fork from a specific block number. (fortunately the coin has PoS blocks). I'm not an expert but as far as I know without a proper hard fork and giving enough time for everybody to update, the chances for blockchain forks are pretty high. One coin that I know of and had similar problems and succeed to do a proper update, was Goodcoin (https://github.com/stolenjs/gcfinal)

Ah yes GOODcoin, i helped them with that coin too Smiley

To confirm, this release will cause a hard fork at the determined block number. This is because anyone on the old wallet will get an invalid Proof of Work for any blocks mined after. Once the wallets are released the seednodes will be updated, so its advisable to delete the peers.dat file to make sure the first time the new wallet connects is to the new updated wallets

OK. Thanks for the update and sorry if I underestimated your work. It's good the hear the behind this coin there is a professional programmer. Smiley

+1 Thank you from me too...
Is there any alive pool now , maybe Suprnova?
Smiley
policymaker
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100

Crypto Currency Supporter


View Profile
May 18, 2014, 07:24:18 PM
 #278

mammix is this minable with nvidia ccminer? Or not? They havent replied in cuda miner thread(I guess not?)

XCurrency Price Speculation Topic
Coin Control Basic guide                                                                XChat address/private/instant/absolute: XSKu1fpwvRcAekfK91qVHi51Tgz4ckoA91
XChat public key: zcfx74j4fFK9hW7rQniTvLyDyXd9SyRCrncP9vdukbVT
mumus
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 291
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 18, 2014, 07:39:23 PM
 #279

The boost.suprnova.cc pool is online with active miners who tries to solve the high diff block, but in my opinion it's waste of hash power. We should start mining after block height 1300. Block are resolved with PoS now.
policymaker
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100

Crypto Currency Supporter


View Profile
May 18, 2014, 08:01:40 PM
 #280

The boost.suprnova.cc pool is online with active miners who tries to solve the high diff block, but in my opinion it's waste of hash power. We should start mining after block height 1300. Block are resolved with PoS now.

so what is the plan? after this block the coin will be OK to mine again? I want to point my ati card to nova pool but my resources are limited and I want to w8 till its surely fixed!

XCurrency Price Speculation Topic
Coin Control Basic guide                                                                XChat address/private/instant/absolute: XSKu1fpwvRcAekfK91qVHi51Tgz4ckoA91
XChat public key: zcfx74j4fFK9hW7rQniTvLyDyXd9SyRCrncP9vdukbVT
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 ... 193 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!