Bitcoin Forum
December 09, 2016, 11:51:10 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Namecoin into i2p integration [WORKS!]  (Read 10335 times)
paraipan
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


Firstbits: 1pirata


View Profile WWW
January 28, 2012, 03:21:09 AM
 #21

Very nice! I was thinking about the same project for Tor. Unfortunately I'm too busy so I hope somebody else will do the job for me :-)).

Quote
And unlike I2P, Tor is just a proxy service, primary made for HTTP proxying.

This is incorrect, Tor is acting as a SOCKS5 proxy and is relaying any TCP traffic, not only HTTP.

if this is implemented for tor/i2p it would be the next best thing after bitcoin show'ed up

BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
1481284270
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481284270

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481284270
Reply with quote  #2

1481284270
Report to moderator
1481284270
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481284270

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481284270
Reply with quote  #2

1481284270
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481284270
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481284270

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481284270
Reply with quote  #2

1481284270
Report to moderator
1481284270
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481284270

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481284270
Reply with quote  #2

1481284270
Report to moderator
pent
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490



View Profile
January 28, 2012, 03:22:55 AM
 #22

if this is implemented for tor/i2p it would be the next best thing after bitcoin show'ed up
It will be a really new Internet Dimension.
paraipan
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


Firstbits: 1pirata


View Profile WWW
January 28, 2012, 03:31:48 AM
 #23

if this is implemented for tor/i2p it would be the next best thing after bitcoin show'ed up
It will be a really new Internet Dimension.

meh, more like an exact copy of the one a few ppl try to ruin these days

BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
pent
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490



View Profile
January 28, 2012, 04:47:16 AM
 #24

Very nice! I was thinking about the same project for Tor. Unfortunately I'm too busy so I hope somebody else will do the job for me :-)).

Quote
And unlike I2P, Tor is just a proxy service, primary made for HTTP proxying.

This is incorrect, Tor is acting as a SOCKS5 proxy and is relaying any TCP traffic, not only HTTP.

1.2
Differences to TOR
The main characteristic in which I2P differs from TOR is the focus of the project.
While TOR was designed with the intention to enable anonymous internet brows-
ing, I2P’s focus is to provide an anonymous network, isolated inside the internet,
offering various protocols and applications within. It is however possible to utilize
I2P outproxies to reach the internet and thus enable anonymous web browsing.
Due to the focus of the project, there was only one public outproxy in place at
the time of this writing (false.i2p). Another difference to the TOR network
is, that I2P tunnels can only be used unidirectional compared to TOR’s bidi-
rectional tunnels. Also, as mentioned in Section 1.1 I2P uses garlic encryption
where TOR uses onion encryption. Both implementations are based on layered
encryption, garlic encryption offering the possibility to store multiple messages
inside the innermost layer [3].

http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~semu/docs/2011_seminar_ehlert_i2p.pdf
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
January 28, 2012, 04:57:21 AM
 #25

pent, you didn't say anything in the direct oposite of my post :-).

We can discuss what is main purpose of Internet/Tor/I2P, but the fact is that Tor is TCP mixing network (not HTTP-only mixing network).

pent
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490



View Profile
January 28, 2012, 04:59:57 AM
 #26

pent, you didn't say anything in the direct oposite of my post :-).

We can discuss what is main purpose of Internet/Tor/I2P, but the fact is that Tor is TCP mixing network (not HTTP-only mixing network).
look, I know the Tor can almost all what i2p can. but the differ is in project purposes, in what they were designed for.
pent
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490



View Profile
January 28, 2012, 07:04:47 AM
 #27

How to check out?

Configure your proxy to 94.75.233.174 port 4444. Thats all.

Proxy does not support regular ICANN domains and IP. .i2p and .bit (configured for i2p) only!!! 150 Kb/sec total traffic shaper enabled.


My own site supporting this project:

http://i2psupport.bit/

Site from screenshot (not mine, just domain is my own):

http://www.pent.bit/

Other .i2p also should work... sometime   http://forum.i2p/

domain i2psupport.bit is resolved to (absolutely no any IP-address):

Code:
[root@server ~]$ ./namecoind name_scan d/i2psupport 1
[
    {
        "name" : "d/i2psupport",
        "value" : "{\"i2p\": { \"destination\": \"SN8pNsF~NHZek2NRUootxO465FnrcpZcdcRzQXGvjmwXER7HQKw5j~S4mEZuFEFMWTDXI3MTACJfN9y87sLBPHnJA0CEXjYKf2hM4YNJ2fLUXCZi0uLDaW-rUz4vEpUJF1-rcE~D4tiFO-2MKVNJLoGKvO87808XL0ejtdNCE-apxOWsGNBmxDdOM6dPx~F6tzmA-m8EeAzXvE-ZD8Q5yQX2dIiDXTFRTgfKQG0acyuNwBOWxRb2MvyoyxiKQFhcn2V~jR0Ub4~1eHNMq-308j1d1nZNPEPxnQPcMYY22lU427GASGYMOpngFH-Z8l1cKpiBAYCvDR1kvUASctLfBIE9U3IWRsYhQHhMPi5ZPuWNkM5U5oH4DXPctDmDsiIAtB-l4vUWTTkxmwU0~65URyb4EDFEVzcfmZuD0xMCq8Me9q1OgkhfIjdoCC-35D8cKPygCMdfZh4ZOHg932NmNLT5fTaKIiri~MSl4GwQPdC27iV7DRDZJV0YrjhIYJccAAAA\" } }",
        "txid" : "9f4903a2061d78398842619e49aacfca0e2021d3e2fd2ebc8d06f9effb311b27",
        "address" : "MxR1e7obQ5KcuaofuzXbceL3Aj1wfWME7v",
        "expires_in" : 35983
    }
]
pent
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490



View Profile
January 29, 2012, 12:01:01 AM
 #28

Sources are available on github (with all instructions)

https://github.com/pentarh/NameCoin-I2P-Resolver

Launched IP4-mirror of i2psupport.bit:

http://i2psupport.org/

I2P Binaries comming soon with site update.
pent
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490



View Profile
January 29, 2012, 02:26:59 AM
 #29

Website updated http://i2psupport.org/
paraipan
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


Firstbits: 1pirata


View Profile WWW
January 29, 2012, 02:51:43 AM
 #30

Website updated http://i2psupport.org/

lool  Smiley

BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100



View Profile
January 29, 2012, 09:09:50 PM
 #31

Quote
I2P has ugly and not authoritative DNS system, but has very strong anonymous crypted network.
Tor has authoritative .onion domains, but they are looks not user-friendly.

NameCoin Has authoritative anonymous domain system, but has no anonymous network implementations.

They all made for each other.

You got it. Gonna follow this.

Herodes
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868


View Profile
January 29, 2012, 10:59:00 PM
 #32


+1 Cheesy
pent
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490



View Profile
January 30, 2012, 07:50:01 AM
 #33

Everyone that loves this should really consider donating to the Namecoin project.  Looking at their block history they have received a pitifully low amount of support from the community, lets see if we can pony up some love for these guys

http://dot-bit.org/Dot-BIT_Namecoin_Project:Site_support
I agree, NameCoin needs a community support. It is in very poor state now.


I posted an initial proposal to I2P developers: http://zzz.i2p/topics/1091 (I2P link!)

Also this is discussed here: http://forum.i2p2.de/viewtopic.php?t=5767
pent
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490



View Profile
January 30, 2012, 09:06:14 AM
 #34

I promised in this thread a reward of 100 BTC if lightweight namecoin Java client will be integrated into i2p router with ability to surf .bit eepsites.

If you want to help, this is donation page Smiley http://i2psupport.org/supportus.html
ThiagoCMC
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190


฿itcoin: Currency of Resistance!


View Profile WWW
January 30, 2012, 09:55:54 AM
 #35

I love this!! Following! +1000

Mercado Forex acessível para todos os Brasileiros que tenham Bitcoins! Cadastre-se hoje mesmo! Bastar acessar aqui: https://1broker.com/m/r.php?i=8879
pent
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490



View Profile
January 31, 2012, 07:41:57 AM
 #36

While inspecting namecoin code i found it destroys coins for name registration. This is made for figthing with squaters. But actually it is namecoin suicid.

I wrote a public appeal to khal:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=62017.0
http://dot-bit.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2548#p2548

Please vote for removal of this algo from namecoin if you care.
torusJKL
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 594


View Profile
January 31, 2012, 08:08:07 AM
 #37

This sounds very interesting.
It could make i2p much more end user friendly.
Will certainly follow the process.

If you find my post useful send some BTC: 167XM1Za8aG9CdbYuHFMpL2kvPsw6uC8da
Bitrated || bitcoin-otc || Moon Bitcoin Faucet
pent
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490



View Profile
February 01, 2012, 11:19:24 AM
 #38

Falling into namecoin internals I found it not suitable for use in a current design.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=62017.0

I'll look around what can we do with that.
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
February 01, 2012, 02:26:05 PM
 #39

Falling into namecoin internals I found it not suitable for use in a current design.

I think you're so much skeptical about namecoin. It works pretty well *now*. Namecoin is still very young project and there may be some development fixing those issues. There's only few namecoin users right now, so namecoin update can work like bitcoin updates year or two ago; satoshi simply posted new bitcoin version and everybody updated without any boring discussion like BIP16/17 :-D.

I see bigger threat in lacking namecoin development than in missing features in current implementation.

pent
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490



View Profile
February 01, 2012, 03:03:13 PM
 #40

==cut==
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!