paraipan
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1004
Firstbits: 1pirata
|
|
January 28, 2012, 03:21:09 AM |
|
Very nice! I was thinking about the same project for Tor. Unfortunately I'm too busy so I hope somebody else will do the job for me :-)). And unlike I2P, Tor is just a proxy service, primary made for HTTP proxying.
This is incorrect, Tor is acting as a SOCKS5 proxy and is relaying any TCP traffic, not only HTTP. if this is implemented for tor/i2p it would be the next best thing after bitcoin show'ed up
|
BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin mining is now a specialized and very risky industry, just like gold mining. Amateur miners are unlikely to make much money, and may even lose money. Bitcoin is much more than just mining, though!
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
pent (OP)
|
|
January 28, 2012, 03:22:55 AM |
|
if this is implemented for tor/i2p it would be the next best thing after bitcoin show'ed up
It will be a really new Internet Dimension.
|
|
|
|
paraipan
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1004
Firstbits: 1pirata
|
|
January 28, 2012, 03:31:48 AM |
|
if this is implemented for tor/i2p it would be the next best thing after bitcoin show'ed up
It will be a really new Internet Dimension. meh, more like an exact copy of the one a few ppl try to ruin these days
|
BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
|
|
|
pent (OP)
|
|
January 28, 2012, 04:47:16 AM |
|
Very nice! I was thinking about the same project for Tor. Unfortunately I'm too busy so I hope somebody else will do the job for me :-)). And unlike I2P, Tor is just a proxy service, primary made for HTTP proxying.
This is incorrect, Tor is acting as a SOCKS5 proxy and is relaying any TCP traffic, not only HTTP. 1.2 Differences to TOR The main characteristic in which I2P differs from TOR is the focus of the project. While TOR was designed with the intention to enable anonymous internet brows- ing, I2P’s focus is to provide an anonymous network, isolated inside the internet, offering various protocols and applications within. It is however possible to utilize I2P outproxies to reach the internet and thus enable anonymous web browsing. Due to the focus of the project, there was only one public outproxy in place at the time of this writing (false.i2p). Another difference to the TOR network is, that I2P tunnels can only be used unidirectional compared to TOR’s bidi- rectional tunnels. Also, as mentioned in Section 1.1 I2P uses garlic encryption where TOR uses onion encryption. Both implementations are based on layered encryption, garlic encryption offering the possibility to store multiple messages inside the innermost layer [3]. http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~semu/docs/2011_seminar_ehlert_i2p.pdf
|
|
|
|
slush
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
January 28, 2012, 04:57:21 AM |
|
pent, you didn't say anything in the direct oposite of my post :-).
We can discuss what is main purpose of Internet/Tor/I2P, but the fact is that Tor is TCP mixing network (not HTTP-only mixing network).
|
|
|
|
pent (OP)
|
|
January 28, 2012, 04:59:57 AM |
|
pent, you didn't say anything in the direct oposite of my post :-).
We can discuss what is main purpose of Internet/Tor/I2P, but the fact is that Tor is TCP mixing network (not HTTP-only mixing network).
look, I know the Tor can almost all what i2p can. but the differ is in project purposes, in what they were designed for.
|
|
|
|
pent (OP)
|
|
January 28, 2012, 07:04:47 AM |
|
How to check out? Configure your proxy to 94.75.233.174 port 4444. Thats all.
Proxy does not support regular ICANN domains and IP. .i2p and .bit (configured for i2p) only!!! 150 Kb/sec total traffic shaper enabled.
My own site supporting this project: http://i2psupport.bit/Site from screenshot (not mine, just domain is my own): http://www.pent.bit/Other .i2p also should work... sometime http://forum.i2p/domain i2psupport.bit is resolved to ( absolutely no any IP-address): [root@server ~]$ ./namecoind name_scan d/i2psupport 1 [ { "name" : "d/i2psupport", "value" : "{\"i2p\": { \"destination\": \"SN8pNsF~NHZek2NRUootxO465FnrcpZcdcRzQXGvjmwXER7HQKw5j~S4mEZuFEFMWTDXI3MTACJfN9y87sLBPHnJA0CEXjYKf2hM4YNJ2fLUXCZi0uLDaW-rUz4vEpUJF1-rcE~D4tiFO-2MKVNJLoGKvO87808XL0ejtdNCE-apxOWsGNBmxDdOM6dPx~F6tzmA-m8EeAzXvE-ZD8Q5yQX2dIiDXTFRTgfKQG0acyuNwBOWxRb2MvyoyxiKQFhcn2V~jR0Ub4~1eHNMq-308j1d1nZNPEPxnQPcMYY22lU427GASGYMOpngFH-Z8l1cKpiBAYCvDR1kvUASctLfBIE9U3IWRsYhQHhMPi5ZPuWNkM5U5oH4DXPctDmDsiIAtB-l4vUWTTkxmwU0~65URyb4EDFEVzcfmZuD0xMCq8Me9q1OgkhfIjdoCC-35D8cKPygCMdfZh4ZOHg932NmNLT5fTaKIiri~MSl4GwQPdC27iV7DRDZJV0YrjhIYJccAAAA\" } }", "txid" : "9f4903a2061d78398842619e49aacfca0e2021d3e2fd2ebc8d06f9effb311b27", "address" : "MxR1e7obQ5KcuaofuzXbceL3Aj1wfWME7v", "expires_in" : 35983 } ]
|
|
|
|
|
pent (OP)
|
|
January 29, 2012, 02:26:59 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
paraipan
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1004
Firstbits: 1pirata
|
|
January 29, 2012, 02:51:43 AM |
|
lool
|
BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2348
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
|
January 29, 2012, 09:09:50 PM |
|
I2P has ugly and not authoritative DNS system, but has very strong anonymous crypted network. Tor has authoritative .onion domains, but they are looks not user-friendly.
NameCoin Has authoritative anonymous domain system, but has no anonymous network implementations.
They all made for each other. You got it. Gonna follow this.
|
|
|
|
Herodes
|
|
January 29, 2012, 10:59:00 PM |
|
lool +1
|
|
|
|
|
|
ThiagoCMC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1000
฿itcoin: Currency of Resistance!
|
|
January 30, 2012, 09:55:54 AM |
|
I love this!! Following! +1000
|
|
|
|
|
torusJKL
|
|
January 31, 2012, 08:08:07 AM |
|
This sounds very interesting. It could make i2p much more end user friendly. Will certainly follow the process.
|
|
|
|
|
slush
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
February 01, 2012, 02:26:05 PM |
|
Falling into namecoin internals I found it not suitable for use in a current design.
I think you're so much skeptical about namecoin. It works pretty well *now*. Namecoin is still very young project and there may be some development fixing those issues. There's only few namecoin users right now, so namecoin update can work like bitcoin updates year or two ago; satoshi simply posted new bitcoin version and everybody updated without any boring discussion like BIP16/17 :-D. I see bigger threat in lacking namecoin development than in missing features in current implementation.
|
|
|
|
pent (OP)
|
|
February 01, 2012, 03:03:13 PM Last edit: February 03, 2012, 04:44:11 PM by pent |
|
==cut==
|
|
|
|
|